Application of genetic diversity–ecosystem function research to ecological restoration

1. Three common goals for restoration are (i) rapid plant establishment, (ii) long-term plant persistence and (iii) restoration of functioning ecosystems. Restoration practitioners often use cultivars optimized for rapid plant establishment under highly disturbed conditions to achieve the first goal...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:The Journal of applied ecology 2014-04, Vol.51 (2), p.339-348
Hauptverfasser: Kettenring, Karin M., Mercer, Kristin L., Adams, Carrie Reinhardt, Hines, Jes
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 348
container_issue 2
container_start_page 339
container_title The Journal of applied ecology
container_volume 51
creator Kettenring, Karin M.
Mercer, Kristin L.
Adams, Carrie Reinhardt
Hines, Jes
description 1. Three common goals for restoration are (i) rapid plant establishment, (ii) long-term plant persistence and (iii) restoration of functioning ecosystems. Restoration practitioners often use cultivars optimized for rapid plant establishment under highly disturbed conditions to achieve the first goal; locally adapted genotypes are championed for the second because they can be well suited for local environmental conditions. Restoring functioning ecosystems is considered a loftier goal that practitioners struggle to achieve because we lack proven techniques. 2. Similar to the demonstrated benefits of species, functional and phylogenetic diversity for ecosystem functions (EFs), recent genetic diversity (GD)–ecosystem function (EF) experiments have shown that increases in plant GD can positively influence many different EFs. Would the introduction of diverse plant genotypes of a given species into a restoration enhance ecosystem functioning and the evolutionary potential of restored populations? 3. In this review, we first examine three propagule-sourcing approaches: cultivar, local adaptation and GD. Next, we raise questions that if addressed, could help practitioners implement a GD approach in restoration: (i) How might the selection, relatedness and arrangement of genotypes be optimized to restore functioning ecosystems, (ii) How do traits that affect an EF relate to neutral or adaptive diversity, more common measures of GD and (iii) at which spatial and temporal scales does GD influence EFs in restorations? 4. Synthesis and applications. Although each propagule-sourcing approach may be best suited for a particular restoration goal, each approach may simultaneously benefit other goals. Yet cultivars and locally adapted populations that have experienced artificial and/or natural selection may not possess the levels of diversity that will confer expected benefits to different ecosystem functions. Future research should determine the relative value of each approach (or a combination of approaches) for simultaneously achieving multiple restoration goals. Restoration experiments, where plant genetic diversity (GD) is manipulated and monitored over scales relevant to restoration, could reveal the true promise of a GD approach to restoration.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/1365-2664.12202
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_28337220</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>24032365</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>24032365</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j207t-47b3f68430c02be6dd7f4884c7f8e39e2ef500b87dd79dcbf7f7bdcec87866173</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkM1KxDAUhYMoWEfXroRuXHa8SdokXQ6DfzDgRsHd0KY3Y0qnLUkUuvMdfEOfxMyM6N1cON_hcDiEXFKY03g3lIsiY0Lkc8oYsCOS_CnHJAFgNFMl0FNy5n0LAGXBeUJeF-PYWV0FO_TpYNIN9hisThv7gc7bMH1_fqEe_OQDblPz3uu906HHyum3NAxpxN2wiRndTg6D24edkxNTdR4vfv-MvNzdPi8fstXT_eNyscpaBjJkuay5ESrnoIHVKJpGmlypXEujkJfI0BQAtZIRlI2ujTSybjRqJZUQVPIZuT7kjpWPFYyrem39enR2W7lpzRTnMu4RfVcHX7ur-M9z4CzuxH8AVLNhOw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Application of genetic diversity–ecosystem function research to ecological restoration</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><creator>Kettenring, Karin M. ; Mercer, Kristin L. ; Adams, Carrie Reinhardt ; Hines, Jes</creator><creatorcontrib>Kettenring, Karin M. ; Mercer, Kristin L. ; Adams, Carrie Reinhardt ; Hines, Jes</creatorcontrib><description>1. Three common goals for restoration are (i) rapid plant establishment, (ii) long-term plant persistence and (iii) restoration of functioning ecosystems. Restoration practitioners often use cultivars optimized for rapid plant establishment under highly disturbed conditions to achieve the first goal; locally adapted genotypes are championed for the second because they can be well suited for local environmental conditions. Restoring functioning ecosystems is considered a loftier goal that practitioners struggle to achieve because we lack proven techniques. 2. Similar to the demonstrated benefits of species, functional and phylogenetic diversity for ecosystem functions (EFs), recent genetic diversity (GD)–ecosystem function (EF) experiments have shown that increases in plant GD can positively influence many different EFs. Would the introduction of diverse plant genotypes of a given species into a restoration enhance ecosystem functioning and the evolutionary potential of restored populations? 3. In this review, we first examine three propagule-sourcing approaches: cultivar, local adaptation and GD. Next, we raise questions that if addressed, could help practitioners implement a GD approach in restoration: (i) How might the selection, relatedness and arrangement of genotypes be optimized to restore functioning ecosystems, (ii) How do traits that affect an EF relate to neutral or adaptive diversity, more common measures of GD and (iii) at which spatial and temporal scales does GD influence EFs in restorations? 4. Synthesis and applications. Although each propagule-sourcing approach may be best suited for a particular restoration goal, each approach may simultaneously benefit other goals. Yet cultivars and locally adapted populations that have experienced artificial and/or natural selection may not possess the levels of diversity that will confer expected benefits to different ecosystem functions. Future research should determine the relative value of each approach (or a combination of approaches) for simultaneously achieving multiple restoration goals. Restoration experiments, where plant genetic diversity (GD) is manipulated and monitored over scales relevant to restoration, could reveal the true promise of a GD approach to restoration.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-8901</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1365-2664</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/1365-2664.12202</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JAPEAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford: John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</publisher><subject>Animal and plant ecology ; Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied ecology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife ; Ecological genetics ; Ecosystems ; Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects ; Genetic diversity ; Genotypes ; Phenotypic traits ; Plants ; Population genetics ; Restoration ecology ; REVIEW ; Species diversity ; Synecology</subject><ispartof>The Journal of applied ecology, 2014-04, Vol.51 (2), p.339-348</ispartof><rights>2014 British Ecological Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/24032365$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/24032365$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,804,27929,27930,58022,58255</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=28337220$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kettenring, Karin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercer, Kristin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Carrie Reinhardt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hines, Jes</creatorcontrib><title>Application of genetic diversity–ecosystem function research to ecological restoration</title><title>The Journal of applied ecology</title><description>1. Three common goals for restoration are (i) rapid plant establishment, (ii) long-term plant persistence and (iii) restoration of functioning ecosystems. Restoration practitioners often use cultivars optimized for rapid plant establishment under highly disturbed conditions to achieve the first goal; locally adapted genotypes are championed for the second because they can be well suited for local environmental conditions. Restoring functioning ecosystems is considered a loftier goal that practitioners struggle to achieve because we lack proven techniques. 2. Similar to the demonstrated benefits of species, functional and phylogenetic diversity for ecosystem functions (EFs), recent genetic diversity (GD)–ecosystem function (EF) experiments have shown that increases in plant GD can positively influence many different EFs. Would the introduction of diverse plant genotypes of a given species into a restoration enhance ecosystem functioning and the evolutionary potential of restored populations? 3. In this review, we first examine three propagule-sourcing approaches: cultivar, local adaptation and GD. Next, we raise questions that if addressed, could help practitioners implement a GD approach in restoration: (i) How might the selection, relatedness and arrangement of genotypes be optimized to restore functioning ecosystems, (ii) How do traits that affect an EF relate to neutral or adaptive diversity, more common measures of GD and (iii) at which spatial and temporal scales does GD influence EFs in restorations? 4. Synthesis and applications. Although each propagule-sourcing approach may be best suited for a particular restoration goal, each approach may simultaneously benefit other goals. Yet cultivars and locally adapted populations that have experienced artificial and/or natural selection may not possess the levels of diversity that will confer expected benefits to different ecosystem functions. Future research should determine the relative value of each approach (or a combination of approaches) for simultaneously achieving multiple restoration goals. Restoration experiments, where plant genetic diversity (GD) is manipulated and monitored over scales relevant to restoration, could reveal the true promise of a GD approach to restoration.</description><subject>Animal and plant ecology</subject><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied ecology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</subject><subject>Ecological genetics</subject><subject>Ecosystems</subject><subject>Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Genetic diversity</subject><subject>Genotypes</subject><subject>Phenotypic traits</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Population genetics</subject><subject>Restoration ecology</subject><subject>REVIEW</subject><subject>Species diversity</subject><subject>Synecology</subject><issn>0021-8901</issn><issn>1365-2664</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkM1KxDAUhYMoWEfXroRuXHa8SdokXQ6DfzDgRsHd0KY3Y0qnLUkUuvMdfEOfxMyM6N1cON_hcDiEXFKY03g3lIsiY0Lkc8oYsCOS_CnHJAFgNFMl0FNy5n0LAGXBeUJeF-PYWV0FO_TpYNIN9hisThv7gc7bMH1_fqEe_OQDblPz3uu906HHyum3NAxpxN2wiRndTg6D24edkxNTdR4vfv-MvNzdPi8fstXT_eNyscpaBjJkuay5ESrnoIHVKJpGmlypXEujkJfI0BQAtZIRlI2ujTSybjRqJZUQVPIZuT7kjpWPFYyrem39enR2W7lpzRTnMu4RfVcHX7ur-M9z4CzuxH8AVLNhOw</recordid><startdate>20140401</startdate><enddate>20140401</enddate><creator>Kettenring, Karin M.</creator><creator>Mercer, Kristin L.</creator><creator>Adams, Carrie Reinhardt</creator><creator>Hines, Jes</creator><general>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20140401</creationdate><title>Application of genetic diversity–ecosystem function research to ecological restoration</title><author>Kettenring, Karin M. ; Mercer, Kristin L. ; Adams, Carrie Reinhardt ; Hines, Jes</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j207t-47b3f68430c02be6dd7f4884c7f8e39e2ef500b87dd79dcbf7f7bdcec87866173</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>Animal and plant ecology</topic><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied ecology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife</topic><topic>Ecological genetics</topic><topic>Ecosystems</topic><topic>Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Genetic diversity</topic><topic>Genotypes</topic><topic>Phenotypic traits</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Population genetics</topic><topic>Restoration ecology</topic><topic>REVIEW</topic><topic>Species diversity</topic><topic>Synecology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kettenring, Karin M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mercer, Kristin L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Adams, Carrie Reinhardt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hines, Jes</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kettenring, Karin M.</au><au>Mercer, Kristin L.</au><au>Adams, Carrie Reinhardt</au><au>Hines, Jes</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Application of genetic diversity–ecosystem function research to ecological restoration</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of applied ecology</jtitle><date>2014-04-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>51</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>339</spage><epage>348</epage><pages>339-348</pages><issn>0021-8901</issn><eissn>1365-2664</eissn><coden>JAPEAI</coden><abstract>1. Three common goals for restoration are (i) rapid plant establishment, (ii) long-term plant persistence and (iii) restoration of functioning ecosystems. Restoration practitioners often use cultivars optimized for rapid plant establishment under highly disturbed conditions to achieve the first goal; locally adapted genotypes are championed for the second because they can be well suited for local environmental conditions. Restoring functioning ecosystems is considered a loftier goal that practitioners struggle to achieve because we lack proven techniques. 2. Similar to the demonstrated benefits of species, functional and phylogenetic diversity for ecosystem functions (EFs), recent genetic diversity (GD)–ecosystem function (EF) experiments have shown that increases in plant GD can positively influence many different EFs. Would the introduction of diverse plant genotypes of a given species into a restoration enhance ecosystem functioning and the evolutionary potential of restored populations? 3. In this review, we first examine three propagule-sourcing approaches: cultivar, local adaptation and GD. Next, we raise questions that if addressed, could help practitioners implement a GD approach in restoration: (i) How might the selection, relatedness and arrangement of genotypes be optimized to restore functioning ecosystems, (ii) How do traits that affect an EF relate to neutral or adaptive diversity, more common measures of GD and (iii) at which spatial and temporal scales does GD influence EFs in restorations? 4. Synthesis and applications. Although each propagule-sourcing approach may be best suited for a particular restoration goal, each approach may simultaneously benefit other goals. Yet cultivars and locally adapted populations that have experienced artificial and/or natural selection may not possess the levels of diversity that will confer expected benefits to different ecosystem functions. Future research should determine the relative value of each approach (or a combination of approaches) for simultaneously achieving multiple restoration goals. Restoration experiments, where plant genetic diversity (GD) is manipulated and monitored over scales relevant to restoration, could reveal the true promise of a GD approach to restoration.</abstract><cop>Oxford</cop><pub>John Wiley &amp; Sons Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/1365-2664.12202</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-8901
ispartof The Journal of applied ecology, 2014-04, Vol.51 (2), p.339-348
issn 0021-8901
1365-2664
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_28337220
source Access via Wiley Online Library; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)
subjects Animal and plant ecology
Animal, plant and microbial ecology
Applied ecology
Biological and medical sciences
Conservation, protection and management of environment and wildlife
Ecological genetics
Ecosystems
Environmental degradation: ecosystems survey and restoration
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
General aspects
Genetic diversity
Genotypes
Phenotypic traits
Plants
Population genetics
Restoration ecology
REVIEW
Species diversity
Synecology
title Application of genetic diversity–ecosystem function research to ecological restoration
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T05%3A24%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Application%20of%20genetic%20diversity%E2%80%93ecosystem%20function%20research%20to%20ecological%20restoration&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20applied%20ecology&rft.au=Kettenring,%20Karin%20M.&rft.date=2014-04-01&rft.volume=51&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=339&rft.epage=348&rft.pages=339-348&rft.issn=0021-8901&rft.eissn=1365-2664&rft.coden=JAPEAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/1365-2664.12202&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pasca%3E24032365%3C/jstor_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=24032365&rfr_iscdi=true