Training Algorithm Performance for Image Classification by Neural Networks
Adaptive training is critical for image classification by artificial neural networks (ANNs). While the machine learning community has been enthusiastic in developing various training algorithms, little research has been conducted to evaluate the performance of these algorithms in image classificatio...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing 2010-08, Vol.76 (8), p.945-951 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 951 |
---|---|
container_issue | 8 |
container_start_page | 945 |
container_title | Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing |
container_volume | 76 |
creator | Zhou, Libin Yang, Xiaojun |
description | Adaptive training is critical for image classification by artificial neural networks (ANNs). While the machine learning community has been enthusiastic in developing various training algorithms, little research has been conducted to evaluate the performance of these algorithms in
image classification by neural networks. We introduce and evaluate nine commonly-used training algorithms in terms of their performance in land-cover classification from remotely sensed data by the multi-layer-perceptron (MLP) neural networks. MLP has been considered as the most popular neural
network architecture. The training algorithms we consider are Steepest Gradient Descent, Gradient Descent with Momentum, Resilient Propagation, Fletcher-Reeves, Polak-Ribiere, Powell-Beale, Scaled Conjugate Gradient, BFGS (Broyden, Fletcher, Goldfarb, and Shanno), and Levenberg- Marquardt.
We use each algorithm to train the MLP networks multiple times using identical training samples, and then apply each of the resultant network models to derive landcover information from a Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) image. The training algorithms are further evaluated according
to their training efficiency, capability of convergence, classification accuracy, and stability of the classification accuracy. It is found that the performance of these algorithms varies substantially and selecting an appropriate algorithm can lead to a fast and efficient training and an
increase in land-cover classification accuracy by artificial neural networks. |
doi_str_mv | 10.14358/PERS.76.8.945 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubtec_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_23067170</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ingid>asprs/pers/2010/00000076/00000008/art00005</ingid><sourcerecordid>asprs/pers/2010/00000076/00000008/art00005</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-1171ebd20e89e815df48020eb0bf3ac4d90fbe81c7feec23d2613c5ec0f6a4003</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1UMFO3DAQtRCVWChXzrn0uGHsOLFzhBW0IASopefRxLEXQzZZ2dlWy9fjkIpbffC8kf3evHmMnXHIuSxKff549fNXrqpc57UsD9hCFEouNaj6kC0A6nrJORdH7DjGF4CCl1wt2O1TIN_7fp1ddOsh-PF5kz3a4Iawod7YLIHsZkNrm606itE7b2j0Q581--ze7gJ1qYx_h_Aav7IvjrpoT__VE_b7-upp9WN59_D9ZnVxtzRSwphMKG6bVoDVtdW8bJ3UkLoGGleQkW0NrkkPRjlrjShaUfHClNaAq0gm4ycsn3VNGGIM1uE2-A2FPXLAjyRwSgJVhRpTEonwbSZsKRrqXEib-fjJEgVUiqtJ-GH-l-Kw_Uj4MuxCn1ZBb5DiNkScYpxSxD-q6jUKEBy0SGOFrLG1jnbdiCMFXL9hnCZf_kdxltvadAlIvuHjJMszAI0UxgmUxTvP6Y8U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Training Algorithm Performance for Image Classification by Neural Networks</title><source>IngentaConnect</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals</source><creator>Zhou, Libin ; Yang, Xiaojun</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Libin ; Yang, Xiaojun</creatorcontrib><description>Adaptive training is critical for image classification by artificial neural networks (ANNs). While the machine learning community has been enthusiastic in developing various training algorithms, little research has been conducted to evaluate the performance of these algorithms in
image classification by neural networks. We introduce and evaluate nine commonly-used training algorithms in terms of their performance in land-cover classification from remotely sensed data by the multi-layer-perceptron (MLP) neural networks. MLP has been considered as the most popular neural
network architecture. The training algorithms we consider are Steepest Gradient Descent, Gradient Descent with Momentum, Resilient Propagation, Fletcher-Reeves, Polak-Ribiere, Powell-Beale, Scaled Conjugate Gradient, BFGS (Broyden, Fletcher, Goldfarb, and Shanno), and Levenberg- Marquardt.
We use each algorithm to train the MLP networks multiple times using identical training samples, and then apply each of the resultant network models to derive landcover information from a Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) image. The training algorithms are further evaluated according
to their training efficiency, capability of convergence, classification accuracy, and stability of the classification accuracy. It is found that the performance of these algorithms varies substantially and selecting an appropriate algorithm can lead to a fast and efficient training and an
increase in land-cover classification accuracy by artificial neural networks.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0099-1112</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2374-8079</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.14358/PERS.76.8.945</identifier><identifier>CODEN: PERSDV</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bethesda, MD: American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing</publisher><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology ; Applied geophysics ; Biological and medical sciences ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; General aspects. Techniques ; Internal geophysics ; Teledetection and vegetation maps</subject><ispartof>Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing, 2010-08, Vol.76 (8), p.945-951</ispartof><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-1171ebd20e89e815df48020eb0bf3ac4d90fbe81c7feec23d2613c5ec0f6a4003</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-1171ebd20e89e815df48020eb0bf3ac4d90fbe81c7feec23d2613c5ec0f6a4003</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>289,314,776,780,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=23067170$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Libin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Xiaojun</creatorcontrib><title>Training Algorithm Performance for Image Classification by Neural Networks</title><title>Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing</title><description>Adaptive training is critical for image classification by artificial neural networks (ANNs). While the machine learning community has been enthusiastic in developing various training algorithms, little research has been conducted to evaluate the performance of these algorithms in
image classification by neural networks. We introduce and evaluate nine commonly-used training algorithms in terms of their performance in land-cover classification from remotely sensed data by the multi-layer-perceptron (MLP) neural networks. MLP has been considered as the most popular neural
network architecture. The training algorithms we consider are Steepest Gradient Descent, Gradient Descent with Momentum, Resilient Propagation, Fletcher-Reeves, Polak-Ribiere, Powell-Beale, Scaled Conjugate Gradient, BFGS (Broyden, Fletcher, Goldfarb, and Shanno), and Levenberg- Marquardt.
We use each algorithm to train the MLP networks multiple times using identical training samples, and then apply each of the resultant network models to derive landcover information from a Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) image. The training algorithms are further evaluated according
to their training efficiency, capability of convergence, classification accuracy, and stability of the classification accuracy. It is found that the performance of these algorithms varies substantially and selecting an appropriate algorithm can lead to a fast and efficient training and an
increase in land-cover classification accuracy by artificial neural networks.</description><subject>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</subject><subject>Applied geophysics</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>General aspects. Techniques</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>Teledetection and vegetation maps</subject><issn>0099-1112</issn><issn>2374-8079</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1UMFO3DAQtRCVWChXzrn0uGHsOLFzhBW0IASopefRxLEXQzZZ2dlWy9fjkIpbffC8kf3evHmMnXHIuSxKff549fNXrqpc57UsD9hCFEouNaj6kC0A6nrJORdH7DjGF4CCl1wt2O1TIN_7fp1ddOsh-PF5kz3a4Iawod7YLIHsZkNrm606itE7b2j0Q581--ze7gJ1qYx_h_Aav7IvjrpoT__VE_b7-upp9WN59_D9ZnVxtzRSwphMKG6bVoDVtdW8bJ3UkLoGGleQkW0NrkkPRjlrjShaUfHClNaAq0gm4ycsn3VNGGIM1uE2-A2FPXLAjyRwSgJVhRpTEonwbSZsKRrqXEib-fjJEgVUiqtJ-GH-l-Kw_Uj4MuxCn1ZBb5DiNkScYpxSxD-q6jUKEBy0SGOFrLG1jnbdiCMFXL9hnCZf_kdxltvadAlIvuHjJMszAI0UxgmUxTvP6Y8U</recordid><startdate>20100801</startdate><enddate>20100801</enddate><creator>Zhou, Libin</creator><creator>Yang, Xiaojun</creator><general>American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100801</creationdate><title>Training Algorithm Performance for Image Classification by Neural Networks</title><author>Zhou, Libin ; Yang, Xiaojun</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c440t-1171ebd20e89e815df48020eb0bf3ac4d90fbe81c7feec23d2613c5ec0f6a4003</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>Animal, plant and microbial ecology</topic><topic>Applied geophysics</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>General aspects. Techniques</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>Teledetection and vegetation maps</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhou, Libin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yang, Xiaojun</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><jtitle>Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhou, Libin</au><au>Yang, Xiaojun</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Training Algorithm Performance for Image Classification by Neural Networks</atitle><jtitle>Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing</jtitle><date>2010-08-01</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>76</volume><issue>8</issue><spage>945</spage><epage>951</epage><pages>945-951</pages><issn>0099-1112</issn><eissn>2374-8079</eissn><coden>PERSDV</coden><abstract>Adaptive training is critical for image classification by artificial neural networks (ANNs). While the machine learning community has been enthusiastic in developing various training algorithms, little research has been conducted to evaluate the performance of these algorithms in
image classification by neural networks. We introduce and evaluate nine commonly-used training algorithms in terms of their performance in land-cover classification from remotely sensed data by the multi-layer-perceptron (MLP) neural networks. MLP has been considered as the most popular neural
network architecture. The training algorithms we consider are Steepest Gradient Descent, Gradient Descent with Momentum, Resilient Propagation, Fletcher-Reeves, Polak-Ribiere, Powell-Beale, Scaled Conjugate Gradient, BFGS (Broyden, Fletcher, Goldfarb, and Shanno), and Levenberg- Marquardt.
We use each algorithm to train the MLP networks multiple times using identical training samples, and then apply each of the resultant network models to derive landcover information from a Landsat Enhanced Thematic Mapper Plus (ETM+) image. The training algorithms are further evaluated according
to their training efficiency, capability of convergence, classification accuracy, and stability of the classification accuracy. It is found that the performance of these algorithms varies substantially and selecting an appropriate algorithm can lead to a fast and efficient training and an
increase in land-cover classification accuracy by artificial neural networks.</abstract><cop>Bethesda, MD</cop><pub>American Society for Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing</pub><doi>10.14358/PERS.76.8.945</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0099-1112 |
ispartof | Photogrammetric engineering and remote sensing, 2010-08, Vol.76 (8), p.945-951 |
issn | 0099-1112 2374-8079 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_23067170 |
source | IngentaConnect; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek - Frei zugängliche E-Journals |
subjects | Animal, plant and microbial ecology Applied geophysics Biological and medical sciences Earth sciences Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology General aspects. Techniques Internal geophysics Teledetection and vegetation maps |
title | Training Algorithm Performance for Image Classification by Neural Networks |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-30T14%3A16%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubtec_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Training%20Algorithm%20Performance%20for%20Image%20Classification%20by%20Neural%20Networks&rft.jtitle=Photogrammetric%20engineering%20and%20remote%20sensing&rft.au=Zhou,%20Libin&rft.date=2010-08-01&rft.volume=76&rft.issue=8&rft.spage=945&rft.epage=951&rft.pages=945-951&rft.issn=0099-1112&rft.eissn=2374-8079&rft.coden=PERSDV&rft_id=info:doi/10.14358/PERS.76.8.945&rft_dat=%3Cpubtec_pasca%3Easprs/pers/2010/00000076/00000008/art00005%3C/pubtec_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ingid=asprs/pers/2010/00000076/00000008/art00005&rfr_iscdi=true |