A randomized phase 2 study of etaracizumab, a monoclonal antibody against integrin αvβ3, ± dacarbazine in patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma

BACKGROUND: The alpha v beta 3 (αvβ3) integrin is involved in intracellular signaling regulating cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation and is important for tumor‐induced angiogenesis. METHODS: This phase 2, randomized, open‐label, 2‐arm study was designed to capture safety data and eval...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Cancer 2010-03, Vol.116 (6), p.1526-1534
Hauptverfasser: Hersey, Peter, Sosman, Jeffrey, O'Day, Steven, Richards, Jon, Bedikian, Agop, Gonzalez, Rene, Sharfman, William, Weber, Robert, Logan, Theodore, Buzoianu, Manuela, Hammershaimb, Luz, Kirkwood, John M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1534
container_issue 6
container_start_page 1526
container_title Cancer
container_volume 116
creator Hersey, Peter
Sosman, Jeffrey
O'Day, Steven
Richards, Jon
Bedikian, Agop
Gonzalez, Rene
Sharfman, William
Weber, Robert
Logan, Theodore
Buzoianu, Manuela
Hammershaimb, Luz
Kirkwood, John M.
description BACKGROUND: The alpha v beta 3 (αvβ3) integrin is involved in intracellular signaling regulating cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation and is important for tumor‐induced angiogenesis. METHODS: This phase 2, randomized, open‐label, 2‐arm study was designed to capture safety data and evaluate the antitumor efficacy of etaracizumab (Abegrin), an IgG1 humanized monoclonal antibody against the αvβ3 integrin, in patients with previously untreated metastatic melanoma. The objective was to evaluate whether etaracizumab ± dacarbazine had sufficient clinical activity to warrant further study in a phase 3 clinical trial. RESULTS: One hundred twelve patients were randomized to receive etaracizumab alone (N = 57) or etaracizumab + dacarbazine (N = 55). Safety of etaracizumab ± dacarbazine was acceptable with infusion‐related, gastrointestinal, and metabolic reactions being the most common adverse events (AEs). The majority of AEs were grade 1 or 2 in severity in both study arms; most events were not considered serious, except for cardiovascular (myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation) and thromboembolic events, which occurred in 3 and 5 patients, respectively. None of the patients in the etaracizumab‐alone study arm and 12.7% of patients in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm achieved an objective response. The median duration of objective response in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm was 4.2 months. Stable disease rate, time to progression (TTP), and progression‐free survival (PFS) appeared to be similar between the 2 treatment arms. Stable disease occurred in 45.6% of patients in the etaracizumab‐alone study arm and 40.0% of patients in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm. Median TTP and median PFS were both 1.8 months in the etaracizumab‐alone study arm and 2.5 and 2.6 months in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm, respectively. Median overall survival was 12.6 months in the etaracizumab‐alone study arm and 9.4 months in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm. CONCLUSIONS: The survival results in both treatment arms of this study were considered unlikely to result in clinically meaningful improvement over dacarbazine alone. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society. Preclinical studies suggested that antibodies against the αvβ3 adhesion molecule on melanoma cells could inhibit the growth of melanoma xenografts and induce tumor cell death. The present study evaluated safety characteristics and therapeutic effects of anti‐αvβ
doi_str_mv 10.1002/cncr.24821
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_22484491</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>CNCR24821</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p1781-bdd8552cb0d08dea5ffafe6b4a82c237ec7a0119ea428739f4a7a8873c1854c53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE1OwzAUhC0EEqWw4QRvw64B23GIu0QVf1IFEgLELnqxndYocaLYpWovwjngCBygZ8IUxOrNaEZvpI-QY0ZPGaX8TDnVn3IhOdshA0bHeUKZ4LtkQCmVSSbSl31y4P1rtDnP0gF5v4AenW4buzYaujl6Axx8WOgVtBWYgD0qu140WI4AoWldq-rWYQ3ogi3bWMMZWucDWBfMrLcONh9vm890BF8foFFhX-LaOhNz6DBY44KHpQ3zuIIzA7fP0MSZaIJVUdbo2gYPyV6FtTdHf3dInq4uHyc3yfT--nZyMU06lkuWlFrLLOOqpJpKbTCrKqzMeSlQcsXT3KgcKWNjg4LLPB1XAnOUUSkmM6GydEhOfv926BXWVYShrC-63jbYrwoeWQoxZrHHfntLW5vVf85o8cO9-OFebLkXk7vJw1al3xH3fVQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A randomized phase 2 study of etaracizumab, a monoclonal antibody against integrin αvβ3, ± dacarbazine in patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma</title><source>Wiley Blackwell Single Titles</source><source>Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek</source><source>Wiley Online Library Free Content</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hersey, Peter ; Sosman, Jeffrey ; O'Day, Steven ; Richards, Jon ; Bedikian, Agop ; Gonzalez, Rene ; Sharfman, William ; Weber, Robert ; Logan, Theodore ; Buzoianu, Manuela ; Hammershaimb, Luz ; Kirkwood, John M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Hersey, Peter ; Sosman, Jeffrey ; O'Day, Steven ; Richards, Jon ; Bedikian, Agop ; Gonzalez, Rene ; Sharfman, William ; Weber, Robert ; Logan, Theodore ; Buzoianu, Manuela ; Hammershaimb, Luz ; Kirkwood, John M.</creatorcontrib><description>BACKGROUND: The alpha v beta 3 (αvβ3) integrin is involved in intracellular signaling regulating cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation and is important for tumor‐induced angiogenesis. METHODS: This phase 2, randomized, open‐label, 2‐arm study was designed to capture safety data and evaluate the antitumor efficacy of etaracizumab (Abegrin), an IgG1 humanized monoclonal antibody against the αvβ3 integrin, in patients with previously untreated metastatic melanoma. The objective was to evaluate whether etaracizumab ± dacarbazine had sufficient clinical activity to warrant further study in a phase 3 clinical trial. RESULTS: One hundred twelve patients were randomized to receive etaracizumab alone (N = 57) or etaracizumab + dacarbazine (N = 55). Safety of etaracizumab ± dacarbazine was acceptable with infusion‐related, gastrointestinal, and metabolic reactions being the most common adverse events (AEs). The majority of AEs were grade 1 or 2 in severity in both study arms; most events were not considered serious, except for cardiovascular (myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation) and thromboembolic events, which occurred in 3 and 5 patients, respectively. None of the patients in the etaracizumab‐alone study arm and 12.7% of patients in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm achieved an objective response. The median duration of objective response in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm was 4.2 months. Stable disease rate, time to progression (TTP), and progression‐free survival (PFS) appeared to be similar between the 2 treatment arms. Stable disease occurred in 45.6% of patients in the etaracizumab‐alone study arm and 40.0% of patients in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm. Median TTP and median PFS were both 1.8 months in the etaracizumab‐alone study arm and 2.5 and 2.6 months in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm, respectively. Median overall survival was 12.6 months in the etaracizumab‐alone study arm and 9.4 months in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm. CONCLUSIONS: The survival results in both treatment arms of this study were considered unlikely to result in clinically meaningful improvement over dacarbazine alone. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society. Preclinical studies suggested that antibodies against the αvβ3 adhesion molecule on melanoma cells could inhibit the growth of melanoma xenografts and induce tumor cell death. The present study evaluated safety characteristics and therapeutic effects of anti‐αvβ3 antibody given alone or with standard dacarbazine chemotherapy in patients with metastatic melanoma. The results did not show major effects on progression‐free survival or overall survival with or without chemotherapy and did not warrant further evaluation in phase 3 trials.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0008-543X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0142</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/cncr.24821</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CANCAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Hoboken: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>alpha v beta 3 ; Biological and medical sciences ; clinical trials ; Dermatology ; etaracizumab (Abegrin) ; Medical sciences ; melanoma ; Tumors ; Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><ispartof>Cancer, 2010-03, Vol.116 (6), p.1526-1534</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2010 American Cancer Society</rights><rights>2015 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fcncr.24821$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fcncr.24821$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,1411,1427,27901,27902,45550,45551,46384,46808</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=22484491$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hersey, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sosman, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Day, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedikian, Agop</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Rene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharfman, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logan, Theodore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buzoianu, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammershaimb, Luz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkwood, John M.</creatorcontrib><title>A randomized phase 2 study of etaracizumab, a monoclonal antibody against integrin αvβ3, ± dacarbazine in patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma</title><title>Cancer</title><description>BACKGROUND: The alpha v beta 3 (αvβ3) integrin is involved in intracellular signaling regulating cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation and is important for tumor‐induced angiogenesis. METHODS: This phase 2, randomized, open‐label, 2‐arm study was designed to capture safety data and evaluate the antitumor efficacy of etaracizumab (Abegrin), an IgG1 humanized monoclonal antibody against the αvβ3 integrin, in patients with previously untreated metastatic melanoma. The objective was to evaluate whether etaracizumab ± dacarbazine had sufficient clinical activity to warrant further study in a phase 3 clinical trial. RESULTS: One hundred twelve patients were randomized to receive etaracizumab alone (N = 57) or etaracizumab + dacarbazine (N = 55). Safety of etaracizumab ± dacarbazine was acceptable with infusion‐related, gastrointestinal, and metabolic reactions being the most common adverse events (AEs). The majority of AEs were grade 1 or 2 in severity in both study arms; most events were not considered serious, except for cardiovascular (myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation) and thromboembolic events, which occurred in 3 and 5 patients, respectively. None of the patients in the etaracizumab‐alone study arm and 12.7% of patients in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm achieved an objective response. The median duration of objective response in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm was 4.2 months. Stable disease rate, time to progression (TTP), and progression‐free survival (PFS) appeared to be similar between the 2 treatment arms. Stable disease occurred in 45.6% of patients in the etaracizumab‐alone study arm and 40.0% of patients in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm. Median TTP and median PFS were both 1.8 months in the etaracizumab‐alone study arm and 2.5 and 2.6 months in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm, respectively. Median overall survival was 12.6 months in the etaracizumab‐alone study arm and 9.4 months in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm. CONCLUSIONS: The survival results in both treatment arms of this study were considered unlikely to result in clinically meaningful improvement over dacarbazine alone. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society. Preclinical studies suggested that antibodies against the αvβ3 adhesion molecule on melanoma cells could inhibit the growth of melanoma xenografts and induce tumor cell death. The present study evaluated safety characteristics and therapeutic effects of anti‐αvβ3 antibody given alone or with standard dacarbazine chemotherapy in patients with metastatic melanoma. The results did not show major effects on progression‐free survival or overall survival with or without chemotherapy and did not warrant further evaluation in phase 3 trials.</description><subject>alpha v beta 3</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>clinical trials</subject><subject>Dermatology</subject><subject>etaracizumab (Abegrin)</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>melanoma</subject><subject>Tumors</subject><subject>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</subject><issn>0008-543X</issn><issn>1097-0142</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9kE1OwzAUhC0EEqWw4QRvw64B23GIu0QVf1IFEgLELnqxndYocaLYpWovwjngCBygZ8IUxOrNaEZvpI-QY0ZPGaX8TDnVn3IhOdshA0bHeUKZ4LtkQCmVSSbSl31y4P1rtDnP0gF5v4AenW4buzYaujl6Axx8WOgVtBWYgD0qu140WI4AoWldq-rWYQ3ogi3bWMMZWucDWBfMrLcONh9vm890BF8foFFhX-LaOhNz6DBY44KHpQ3zuIIzA7fP0MSZaIJVUdbo2gYPyV6FtTdHf3dInq4uHyc3yfT--nZyMU06lkuWlFrLLOOqpJpKbTCrKqzMeSlQcsXT3KgcKWNjg4LLPB1XAnOUUSkmM6GydEhOfv926BXWVYShrC-63jbYrwoeWQoxZrHHfntLW5vVf85o8cO9-OFebLkXk7vJw1al3xH3fVQ</recordid><startdate>20100315</startdate><enddate>20100315</enddate><creator>Hersey, Peter</creator><creator>Sosman, Jeffrey</creator><creator>O'Day, Steven</creator><creator>Richards, Jon</creator><creator>Bedikian, Agop</creator><creator>Gonzalez, Rene</creator><creator>Sharfman, William</creator><creator>Weber, Robert</creator><creator>Logan, Theodore</creator><creator>Buzoianu, Manuela</creator><creator>Hammershaimb, Luz</creator><creator>Kirkwood, John M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20100315</creationdate><title>A randomized phase 2 study of etaracizumab, a monoclonal antibody against integrin αvβ3, ± dacarbazine in patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma</title><author>Hersey, Peter ; Sosman, Jeffrey ; O'Day, Steven ; Richards, Jon ; Bedikian, Agop ; Gonzalez, Rene ; Sharfman, William ; Weber, Robert ; Logan, Theodore ; Buzoianu, Manuela ; Hammershaimb, Luz ; Kirkwood, John M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p1781-bdd8552cb0d08dea5ffafe6b4a82c237ec7a0119ea428739f4a7a8873c1854c53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>alpha v beta 3</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>clinical trials</topic><topic>Dermatology</topic><topic>etaracizumab (Abegrin)</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>melanoma</topic><topic>Tumors</topic><topic>Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hersey, Peter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sosman, Jeffrey</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>O'Day, Steven</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Richards, Jon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bedikian, Agop</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gonzalez, Rene</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharfman, William</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Weber, Robert</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Logan, Theodore</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buzoianu, Manuela</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hammershaimb, Luz</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kirkwood, John M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hersey, Peter</au><au>Sosman, Jeffrey</au><au>O'Day, Steven</au><au>Richards, Jon</au><au>Bedikian, Agop</au><au>Gonzalez, Rene</au><au>Sharfman, William</au><au>Weber, Robert</au><au>Logan, Theodore</au><au>Buzoianu, Manuela</au><au>Hammershaimb, Luz</au><au>Kirkwood, John M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A randomized phase 2 study of etaracizumab, a monoclonal antibody against integrin αvβ3, ± dacarbazine in patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma</atitle><jtitle>Cancer</jtitle><date>2010-03-15</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>116</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>1526</spage><epage>1534</epage><pages>1526-1534</pages><issn>0008-543X</issn><eissn>1097-0142</eissn><coden>CANCAR</coden><abstract>BACKGROUND: The alpha v beta 3 (αvβ3) integrin is involved in intracellular signaling regulating cell proliferation, migration, and differentiation and is important for tumor‐induced angiogenesis. METHODS: This phase 2, randomized, open‐label, 2‐arm study was designed to capture safety data and evaluate the antitumor efficacy of etaracizumab (Abegrin), an IgG1 humanized monoclonal antibody against the αvβ3 integrin, in patients with previously untreated metastatic melanoma. The objective was to evaluate whether etaracizumab ± dacarbazine had sufficient clinical activity to warrant further study in a phase 3 clinical trial. RESULTS: One hundred twelve patients were randomized to receive etaracizumab alone (N = 57) or etaracizumab + dacarbazine (N = 55). Safety of etaracizumab ± dacarbazine was acceptable with infusion‐related, gastrointestinal, and metabolic reactions being the most common adverse events (AEs). The majority of AEs were grade 1 or 2 in severity in both study arms; most events were not considered serious, except for cardiovascular (myocardial infarction, atrial fibrillation) and thromboembolic events, which occurred in 3 and 5 patients, respectively. None of the patients in the etaracizumab‐alone study arm and 12.7% of patients in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm achieved an objective response. The median duration of objective response in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm was 4.2 months. Stable disease rate, time to progression (TTP), and progression‐free survival (PFS) appeared to be similar between the 2 treatment arms. Stable disease occurred in 45.6% of patients in the etaracizumab‐alone study arm and 40.0% of patients in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm. Median TTP and median PFS were both 1.8 months in the etaracizumab‐alone study arm and 2.5 and 2.6 months in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm, respectively. Median overall survival was 12.6 months in the etaracizumab‐alone study arm and 9.4 months in the etaracizumab + dacarbazine study arm. CONCLUSIONS: The survival results in both treatment arms of this study were considered unlikely to result in clinically meaningful improvement over dacarbazine alone. Cancer 2010. © 2010 American Cancer Society. Preclinical studies suggested that antibodies against the αvβ3 adhesion molecule on melanoma cells could inhibit the growth of melanoma xenografts and induce tumor cell death. The present study evaluated safety characteristics and therapeutic effects of anti‐αvβ3 antibody given alone or with standard dacarbazine chemotherapy in patients with metastatic melanoma. The results did not show major effects on progression‐free survival or overall survival with or without chemotherapy and did not warrant further evaluation in phase 3 trials.</abstract><cop>Hoboken</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><doi>10.1002/cncr.24821</doi><tpages>9</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0008-543X
ispartof Cancer, 2010-03, Vol.116 (6), p.1526-1534
issn 0008-543X
1097-0142
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_22484491
source Wiley Blackwell Single Titles; Elektronische Zeitschriftenbibliothek; Wiley Online Library Free Content; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects alpha v beta 3
Biological and medical sciences
clinical trials
Dermatology
etaracizumab (Abegrin)
Medical sciences
melanoma
Tumors
Tumors of the skin and soft tissue. Premalignant lesions
title A randomized phase 2 study of etaracizumab, a monoclonal antibody against integrin αvβ3, ± dacarbazine in patients with stage IV metastatic melanoma
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-11T19%3A10%3A11IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20randomized%20phase%202%20study%20of%20etaracizumab,%20a%20monoclonal%20antibody%20against%20integrin%20%CE%B1v%CE%B23,%20%C2%B1%20dacarbazine%20in%20patients%20with%20stage%20IV%20metastatic%20melanoma&rft.jtitle=Cancer&rft.au=Hersey,%20Peter&rft.date=2010-03-15&rft.volume=116&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=1526&rft.epage=1534&rft.pages=1526-1534&rft.issn=0008-543X&rft.eissn=1097-0142&rft.coden=CANCAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/cncr.24821&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_pasca%3ECNCR24821%3C/wiley_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true