Economic comparison of MHD equilibrium options for advanced steady state tokamak power plants
Progress in theory and in tokamak experiments leads to questions of the optimal development path for commercial tokamak power plants. The economic prospects of future designs are compared for several tokamak operating modes: (high poloidal beta) first stability, second stability and reverse shear. U...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Nuclear fusion 1998-01, Vol.38 (1), p.13-29 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 29 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 1 |
| container_start_page | 13 |
| container_title | Nuclear fusion |
| container_volume | 38 |
| creator | Ehst, D.A Kessel, C.E Krakowski, R.A Bathke, C.G Jardin, S.C Mau, T.K Najmabadi, F |
| description | Progress in theory and in tokamak experiments leads to questions of the optimal development path for commercial tokamak power plants. The economic prospects of future designs are compared for several tokamak operating modes: (high poloidal beta) first stability, second stability and reverse shear. Using a simplified economic model and selecting uniform engineering performance parameters, this comparison emphasizes the different physics characteristics - stability and noninductive current drive - of the various equilibria. The reverse shear mode of operation is shown to offer the lowest cost of electricity for future power plants. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1088/0029-5515/38/1/302 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_2196435</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>746310161</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-441dcf2bcbe69443b43651077870f05e4ecbfb918cb3dec80a48114e1fdbc4c93</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkD1PwzAURS0EEqXwB5g8ICGGUL_45WtEpVCkIhYYkeU4tmSaxKmdgPrvSdWKpQvTXc69eu8Qcg3sHliezxiLiyhJIJnxfAYzzuITMoEMIUIep6dk8geck4sQvhgDBM4n5HOhXOsaq6hyTSe9Da6lztDX5SPVm8HWtvR2aKjreuvaQI3zVFbfslW6oqHXstqOIXtNe7eWjVzTzv1oT7tatn24JGdG1kFfHXJKPp4W7_NltHp7fpk_rCKFiH2ECJUycalKnRaIvESeJsCyLM-YYYlGrUpTFpCrklda5UxiDoAaTFUqVAWfktv9bufdZtChF40NStfjEdoNQWSYcmCQwkjGe1J5F4LXRnTeNtJvBTCxUyl2psTOlOC5ADGqHEs3h3kZlKyNH9-34a8ZQ5EiT0Ys2mPWdf-bvTvmjznRVYb_AiVpjuM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>746310161</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Economic comparison of MHD equilibrium options for advanced steady state tokamak power plants</title><source>IOP Publishing Journals</source><source>Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link</source><creator>Ehst, D.A ; Kessel, C.E ; Krakowski, R.A ; Bathke, C.G ; Jardin, S.C ; Mau, T.K ; Najmabadi, F</creator><creatorcontrib>Ehst, D.A ; Kessel, C.E ; Krakowski, R.A ; Bathke, C.G ; Jardin, S.C ; Mau, T.K ; Najmabadi, F</creatorcontrib><description>Progress in theory and in tokamak experiments leads to questions of the optimal development path for commercial tokamak power plants. The economic prospects of future designs are compared for several tokamak operating modes: (high poloidal beta) first stability, second stability and reverse shear. Using a simplified economic model and selecting uniform engineering performance parameters, this comparison emphasizes the different physics characteristics - stability and noninductive current drive - of the various equilibria. The reverse shear mode of operation is shown to offer the lowest cost of electricity for future power plants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0029-5515</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1741-4326</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/0029-5515/38/1/302</identifier><identifier>CODEN: NUFUAU</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Energy ; Energy. Thermal use of fuels ; Exact sciences and technology ; Fission nuclear power plants ; Industrial economics ; Installations for energy generation and conversion: thermal and electrical energy ; Magnetic confinement and equilibrium ; Magnetohydrodynamic power plants ; Magnetohydrodynamics (including electron magnetohydrodynamics) ; Mathematical models ; Nuclear physics ; Physics ; Physics of gases, plasmas and electric discharges ; Physics of plasmas and electric discharges ; Plasma dynamics and flow ; Plasma flow; magnetohydrodynamics ; Power and production reactors ; Tokamak devices ; Tokamaks</subject><ispartof>Nuclear fusion, 1998-01, Vol.38 (1), p.13-29</ispartof><rights>1998 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-441dcf2bcbe69443b43651077870f05e4ecbfb918cb3dec80a48114e1fdbc4c93</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-441dcf2bcbe69443b43651077870f05e4ecbfb918cb3dec80a48114e1fdbc4c93</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0029-5515/38/1/302/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,4024,27923,27924,27925,53830,53910</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=2196435$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ehst, D.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessel, C.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krakowski, R.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bathke, C.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardin, S.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mau, T.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Najmabadi, F</creatorcontrib><title>Economic comparison of MHD equilibrium options for advanced steady state tokamak power plants</title><title>Nuclear fusion</title><description>Progress in theory and in tokamak experiments leads to questions of the optimal development path for commercial tokamak power plants. The economic prospects of future designs are compared for several tokamak operating modes: (high poloidal beta) first stability, second stability and reverse shear. Using a simplified economic model and selecting uniform engineering performance parameters, this comparison emphasizes the different physics characteristics - stability and noninductive current drive - of the various equilibria. The reverse shear mode of operation is shown to offer the lowest cost of electricity for future power plants.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Energy</subject><subject>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Fission nuclear power plants</subject><subject>Industrial economics</subject><subject>Installations for energy generation and conversion: thermal and electrical energy</subject><subject>Magnetic confinement and equilibrium</subject><subject>Magnetohydrodynamic power plants</subject><subject>Magnetohydrodynamics (including electron magnetohydrodynamics)</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Nuclear physics</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>Physics of gases, plasmas and electric discharges</subject><subject>Physics of plasmas and electric discharges</subject><subject>Plasma dynamics and flow</subject><subject>Plasma flow; magnetohydrodynamics</subject><subject>Power and production reactors</subject><subject>Tokamak devices</subject><subject>Tokamaks</subject><issn>0029-5515</issn><issn>1741-4326</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1998</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqNkD1PwzAURS0EEqXwB5g8ICGGUL_45WtEpVCkIhYYkeU4tmSaxKmdgPrvSdWKpQvTXc69eu8Qcg3sHliezxiLiyhJIJnxfAYzzuITMoEMIUIep6dk8geck4sQvhgDBM4n5HOhXOsaq6hyTSe9Da6lztDX5SPVm8HWtvR2aKjreuvaQI3zVFbfslW6oqHXstqOIXtNe7eWjVzTzv1oT7tatn24JGdG1kFfHXJKPp4W7_NltHp7fpk_rCKFiH2ECJUycalKnRaIvESeJsCyLM-YYYlGrUpTFpCrklda5UxiDoAaTFUqVAWfktv9bufdZtChF40NStfjEdoNQWSYcmCQwkjGe1J5F4LXRnTeNtJvBTCxUyl2psTOlOC5ADGqHEs3h3kZlKyNH9-34a8ZQ5EiT0Ys2mPWdf-bvTvmjznRVYb_AiVpjuM</recordid><startdate>19980101</startdate><enddate>19980101</enddate><creator>Ehst, D.A</creator><creator>Kessel, C.E</creator><creator>Krakowski, R.A</creator><creator>Bathke, C.G</creator><creator>Jardin, S.C</creator><creator>Mau, T.K</creator><creator>Najmabadi, F</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><general>Institute of Physics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TC</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19980101</creationdate><title>Economic comparison of MHD equilibrium options for advanced steady state tokamak power plants</title><author>Ehst, D.A ; Kessel, C.E ; Krakowski, R.A ; Bathke, C.G ; Jardin, S.C ; Mau, T.K ; Najmabadi, F</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c444t-441dcf2bcbe69443b43651077870f05e4ecbfb918cb3dec80a48114e1fdbc4c93</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1998</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Energy</topic><topic>Energy. Thermal use of fuels</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Fission nuclear power plants</topic><topic>Industrial economics</topic><topic>Installations for energy generation and conversion: thermal and electrical energy</topic><topic>Magnetic confinement and equilibrium</topic><topic>Magnetohydrodynamic power plants</topic><topic>Magnetohydrodynamics (including electron magnetohydrodynamics)</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Nuclear physics</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>Physics of gases, plasmas and electric discharges</topic><topic>Physics of plasmas and electric discharges</topic><topic>Plasma dynamics and flow</topic><topic>Plasma flow; magnetohydrodynamics</topic><topic>Power and production reactors</topic><topic>Tokamak devices</topic><topic>Tokamaks</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ehst, D.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kessel, C.E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Krakowski, R.A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bathke, C.G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jardin, S.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mau, T.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Najmabadi, F</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Mechanical Engineering Abstracts</collection><jtitle>Nuclear fusion</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ehst, D.A</au><au>Kessel, C.E</au><au>Krakowski, R.A</au><au>Bathke, C.G</au><au>Jardin, S.C</au><au>Mau, T.K</au><au>Najmabadi, F</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Economic comparison of MHD equilibrium options for advanced steady state tokamak power plants</atitle><jtitle>Nuclear fusion</jtitle><date>1998-01-01</date><risdate>1998</risdate><volume>38</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>13</spage><epage>29</epage><pages>13-29</pages><issn>0029-5515</issn><eissn>1741-4326</eissn><coden>NUFUAU</coden><abstract>Progress in theory and in tokamak experiments leads to questions of the optimal development path for commercial tokamak power plants. The economic prospects of future designs are compared for several tokamak operating modes: (high poloidal beta) first stability, second stability and reverse shear. Using a simplified economic model and selecting uniform engineering performance parameters, this comparison emphasizes the different physics characteristics - stability and noninductive current drive - of the various equilibria. The reverse shear mode of operation is shown to offer the lowest cost of electricity for future power plants.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/0029-5515/38/1/302</doi><tpages>17</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0029-5515 |
| ispartof | Nuclear fusion, 1998-01, Vol.38 (1), p.13-29 |
| issn | 0029-5515 1741-4326 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_2196435 |
| source | IOP Publishing Journals; Institute of Physics (IOP) Journals - HEAL-Link |
| subjects | Applied sciences Energy Energy. Thermal use of fuels Exact sciences and technology Fission nuclear power plants Industrial economics Installations for energy generation and conversion: thermal and electrical energy Magnetic confinement and equilibrium Magnetohydrodynamic power plants Magnetohydrodynamics (including electron magnetohydrodynamics) Mathematical models Nuclear physics Physics Physics of gases, plasmas and electric discharges Physics of plasmas and electric discharges Plasma dynamics and flow Plasma flow magnetohydrodynamics Power and production reactors Tokamak devices Tokamaks |
| title | Economic comparison of MHD equilibrium options for advanced steady state tokamak power plants |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T18%3A07%3A37IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Economic%20comparison%20of%20MHD%20equilibrium%20options%20for%20advanced%20steady%20state%20tokamak%20power%20plants&rft.jtitle=Nuclear%20fusion&rft.au=Ehst,%20D.A&rft.date=1998-01-01&rft.volume=38&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=13&rft.epage=29&rft.pages=13-29&rft.issn=0029-5515&rft.eissn=1741-4326&rft.coden=NUFUAU&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/0029-5515/38/1/302&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E746310161%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=746310161&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |