Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Pressure Swing Adsorption
Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) processes have been used extensively for gas separation, especially in the separation of hydrogen from CO2, and in air purification. The objective of this paper is to examine the economic feasibility of pressure swing adsorption (PSA) for recovering CO2 from postcombu...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Industrial & engineering chemistry research 2008-07, Vol.47 (14), p.4883-4890 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 4890 |
---|---|
container_issue | 14 |
container_start_page | 4883 |
container_title | Industrial & engineering chemistry research |
container_volume | 47 |
creator | Ho, Minh T Allinson, Guy W Wiley, Dianne E |
description | Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) processes have been used extensively for gas separation, especially in the separation of hydrogen from CO2, and in air purification. The objective of this paper is to examine the economic feasibility of pressure swing adsorption (PSA) for recovering CO2 from postcombustion power plant flue gas. The analysis considers both high-pressure feed and vacuum desorption using commercial adsorbent 13X, which has a working capacity of 2.2 mol/kg and CO2/N2 selectivity of 54. The results show that using vacuum desorption reduces the capture cost from US$57 to US$51 per ton of CO2 avoided and is comparable in cost to CO2 capture using conventional MEA absorption of US$49 per ton of CO2 avoided. In this paper, a sensitivity analysis is also presented showing the effect on the capture cost with changes in process cycle; feed pressure and evacuation pressure; improvements the adsorbent characteristics; and selectivity and working capacity. The results show that a hypothetical adsorbent with a working capacity of 4.3 mol/kg and a CO2/N2 selectivity of 150 can reduce the capture cost to US$30 per ton of CO2 avoided. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1021/ie070831e |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>acs_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_20498544</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>a665624439</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a253t-94675f679f2464bcbe9aef9aac14354270015cd095807a001674b9c2fd92ee8e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkEFLwzAcxYMoOKcHv0EuHqv_pEmTHEfRKUw23KbHkKWJdm5tSVrUb2_LZJ4ej_fjwXsIXRO4JUDJXelAgEyJO0EjwikkHBg_RSOQUiZcSn6OLmLcAgDnjI3Q4sUVnS2rd9x-OJzXscW1x_mc4tw0bRcc9qHe44dd5_DURBfxOg70IrgYh3j5NdhJEevQtGVdXaIzb3bRXf3pGK0f7lf5YzKbT5_yySwxlKdtolgmuM-E8pRlbGM3ThnnlTGWsJQzKgAItwUoLkGY3mSCbZSlvlDUOenSMbo59DYmWrPzwVS2jLoJ5d6EH02BKdkv7LnkwJWxdd_H3IRPnYlUcL1aLPXqlcnn5RvX0_9eY6Pe1l2o-hWagB7u1cd70184Wmp3</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Pressure Swing Adsorption</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Ho, Minh T ; Allinson, Guy W ; Wiley, Dianne E</creator><creatorcontrib>Ho, Minh T ; Allinson, Guy W ; Wiley, Dianne E</creatorcontrib><description>Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) processes have been used extensively for gas separation, especially in the separation of hydrogen from CO2, and in air purification. The objective of this paper is to examine the economic feasibility of pressure swing adsorption (PSA) for recovering CO2 from postcombustion power plant flue gas. The analysis considers both high-pressure feed and vacuum desorption using commercial adsorbent 13X, which has a working capacity of 2.2 mol/kg and CO2/N2 selectivity of 54. The results show that using vacuum desorption reduces the capture cost from US$57 to US$51 per ton of CO2 avoided and is comparable in cost to CO2 capture using conventional MEA absorption of US$49 per ton of CO2 avoided. In this paper, a sensitivity analysis is also presented showing the effect on the capture cost with changes in process cycle; feed pressure and evacuation pressure; improvements the adsorbent characteristics; and selectivity and working capacity. The results show that a hypothetical adsorbent with a working capacity of 4.3 mol/kg and a CO2/N2 selectivity of 150 can reduce the capture cost to US$30 per ton of CO2 avoided.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-5885</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5045</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/ie070831e</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IECRED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Adsorption ; Applied sciences ; Chemical engineering ; Exact sciences and technology ; Separations</subject><ispartof>Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 2008-07, Vol.47 (14), p.4883-4890</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 Published 2008 by the American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ie070831e$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ie070831e$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27076,27924,27925,56738,56788</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20498544$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ho, Minh T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allinson, Guy W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiley, Dianne E</creatorcontrib><title>Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Pressure Swing Adsorption</title><title>Industrial & engineering chemistry research</title><addtitle>Ind. Eng. Chem. Res</addtitle><description>Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) processes have been used extensively for gas separation, especially in the separation of hydrogen from CO2, and in air purification. The objective of this paper is to examine the economic feasibility of pressure swing adsorption (PSA) for recovering CO2 from postcombustion power plant flue gas. The analysis considers both high-pressure feed and vacuum desorption using commercial adsorbent 13X, which has a working capacity of 2.2 mol/kg and CO2/N2 selectivity of 54. The results show that using vacuum desorption reduces the capture cost from US$57 to US$51 per ton of CO2 avoided and is comparable in cost to CO2 capture using conventional MEA absorption of US$49 per ton of CO2 avoided. In this paper, a sensitivity analysis is also presented showing the effect on the capture cost with changes in process cycle; feed pressure and evacuation pressure; improvements the adsorbent characteristics; and selectivity and working capacity. The results show that a hypothetical adsorbent with a working capacity of 4.3 mol/kg and a CO2/N2 selectivity of 150 can reduce the capture cost to US$30 per ton of CO2 avoided.</description><subject>Adsorption</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Chemical engineering</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Separations</subject><issn>0888-5885</issn><issn>1520-5045</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkEFLwzAcxYMoOKcHv0EuHqv_pEmTHEfRKUw23KbHkKWJdm5tSVrUb2_LZJ4ej_fjwXsIXRO4JUDJXelAgEyJO0EjwikkHBg_RSOQUiZcSn6OLmLcAgDnjI3Q4sUVnS2rd9x-OJzXscW1x_mc4tw0bRcc9qHe44dd5_DURBfxOg70IrgYh3j5NdhJEevQtGVdXaIzb3bRXf3pGK0f7lf5YzKbT5_yySwxlKdtolgmuM-E8pRlbGM3ThnnlTGWsJQzKgAItwUoLkGY3mSCbZSlvlDUOenSMbo59DYmWrPzwVS2jLoJ5d6EH02BKdkv7LnkwJWxdd_H3IRPnYlUcL1aLPXqlcnn5RvX0_9eY6Pe1l2o-hWagB7u1cd70184Wmp3</recordid><startdate>20080716</startdate><enddate>20080716</enddate><creator>Ho, Minh T</creator><creator>Allinson, Guy W</creator><creator>Wiley, Dianne E</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080716</creationdate><title>Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Pressure Swing Adsorption</title><author>Ho, Minh T ; Allinson, Guy W ; Wiley, Dianne E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a253t-94675f679f2464bcbe9aef9aac14354270015cd095807a001674b9c2fd92ee8e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Adsorption</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Chemical engineering</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Separations</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ho, Minh T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allinson, Guy W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiley, Dianne E</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><jtitle>Industrial & engineering chemistry research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ho, Minh T</au><au>Allinson, Guy W</au><au>Wiley, Dianne E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Pressure Swing Adsorption</atitle><jtitle>Industrial & engineering chemistry research</jtitle><addtitle>Ind. Eng. Chem. Res</addtitle><date>2008-07-16</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>14</issue><spage>4883</spage><epage>4890</epage><pages>4883-4890</pages><issn>0888-5885</issn><eissn>1520-5045</eissn><coden>IECRED</coden><abstract>Pressure swing adsorption (PSA) processes have been used extensively for gas separation, especially in the separation of hydrogen from CO2, and in air purification. The objective of this paper is to examine the economic feasibility of pressure swing adsorption (PSA) for recovering CO2 from postcombustion power plant flue gas. The analysis considers both high-pressure feed and vacuum desorption using commercial adsorbent 13X, which has a working capacity of 2.2 mol/kg and CO2/N2 selectivity of 54. The results show that using vacuum desorption reduces the capture cost from US$57 to US$51 per ton of CO2 avoided and is comparable in cost to CO2 capture using conventional MEA absorption of US$49 per ton of CO2 avoided. In this paper, a sensitivity analysis is also presented showing the effect on the capture cost with changes in process cycle; feed pressure and evacuation pressure; improvements the adsorbent characteristics; and selectivity and working capacity. The results show that a hypothetical adsorbent with a working capacity of 4.3 mol/kg and a CO2/N2 selectivity of 150 can reduce the capture cost to US$30 per ton of CO2 avoided.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/ie070831e</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0888-5885 |
ispartof | Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 2008-07, Vol.47 (14), p.4883-4890 |
issn | 0888-5885 1520-5045 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_20498544 |
source | ACS Publications |
subjects | Adsorption Applied sciences Chemical engineering Exact sciences and technology Separations |
title | Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Pressure Swing Adsorption |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-04T15%3A17%3A44IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-acs_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reducing%20the%20Cost%20of%20CO2%20Capture%20from%20Flue%20Gases%20Using%20Pressure%20Swing%20Adsorption&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20&%20engineering%20chemistry%20research&rft.au=Ho,%20Minh%20T&rft.date=2008-07-16&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=14&rft.spage=4883&rft.epage=4890&rft.pages=4883-4890&rft.issn=0888-5885&rft.eissn=1520-5045&rft.coden=IECRED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/ie070831e&rft_dat=%3Cacs_pasca%3Ea665624439%3C/acs_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |