Comparison of DC Pollution Flashover Performances of Various Types of Porcelain, Glass, and Composite Insulators

Based on the artificial pollution tests, the flashover performance of various types of DC porcelain and glass suspension insulators as well as composite long-rod insulators were analyzed and compared. The test results show that there is a nearly linear relation between the pollution flashover voltag...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on power delivery 2008-04, Vol.23 (2), p.1183-1190
Hauptverfasser: Xingliang Jiang, Xingliang Jiang, Jihe Yuan, Jihe Yuan, Lichun Shu, Lichun Shu, Zhijin Zhang, Zhijin Zhang, Jianlin Hu, Jianlin Hu, Feng Mao, Feng Mao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1190
container_issue 2
container_start_page 1183
container_title IEEE transactions on power delivery
container_volume 23
creator Xingliang Jiang, Xingliang Jiang
Jihe Yuan, Jihe Yuan
Lichun Shu, Lichun Shu
Zhijin Zhang, Zhijin Zhang
Jianlin Hu, Jianlin Hu
Feng Mao, Feng Mao
description Based on the artificial pollution tests, the flashover performance of various types of DC porcelain and glass suspension insulators as well as composite long-rod insulators were analyzed and compared. The test results show that there is a nearly linear relation between the pollution flashover voltage and the disc-type insulator string length. The flashover voltage gradients of the insulators are affected by their materials and shed shapes. The antipollution performances of glass insulators are superior to those of porcelain insulators with the same profile. The flashover voltage gradients of composite insulators are higher than those of porcelain or glass ones. The exponent characterizing the influence of salt deposit density on the pollution flashover voltage is dependent on the profile and the material of insulators, and the values of the composite insulators' exponents are smaller than those of porcelain or glass insulators, namely, the influence of the pollution on the composite insulators is relatively less. The effectiveness of leakage distances of porcelain or glass insulators is less than 0.9 while that of composite insulators is higher than 0.9.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TPWRD.2007.908779
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_20384959</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4378282</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2327085131</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-cf47e436895372ecd7f889eff568fd094736b17ac2be96d9168e7d478df001583</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkUFr3DAQhUVpodu0PyD0Igqll3g7smRrdCybJg0EupRNchSKPaIOXsuV7ED-feU65NDToNH3Ho95jJ0K2AoB5uthf_frfFsC6K0B1Nq8YhthpC5UCfiabQCxKtBo_Za9S-kBABQY2LBxF46ji10KAw-en-_4PvT9PHX5fdG79Ds8UuR7ij7EoxsaSgt2mxVhTvzwNK6LfYgN9a4bzvhlVqUz7oaWL94hdRPxqyHNvZtCTO_ZG-_6RB-e5wm7ufh-2P0orn9eXu2-XReNrNRUNF5pUrJGU0ldUtNqj2jI-6pG34JRWtb3QrumvCdTt0bUSLpVGlsPICqUJ-zL6jvG8GemNNljl3LG3g2Uo1vUFahKliKTn_4jH8IchxzOYi2zWy0XO7FCTQwpRfJ2jN3RxScrwC4N2H8N2KUBuzaQNZ-fjV1qXO9jvl-XXoQlSFSmWriPK9cR0cu3khpLLOVfdQWPWw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>863001638</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Comparison of DC Pollution Flashover Performances of Various Types of Porcelain, Glass, and Composite Insulators</title><source>IEEE/IET Electronic Library</source><creator>Xingliang Jiang, Xingliang Jiang ; Jihe Yuan, Jihe Yuan ; Lichun Shu, Lichun Shu ; Zhijin Zhang, Zhijin Zhang ; Jianlin Hu, Jianlin Hu ; Feng Mao, Feng Mao</creator><creatorcontrib>Xingliang Jiang, Xingliang Jiang ; Jihe Yuan, Jihe Yuan ; Lichun Shu, Lichun Shu ; Zhijin Zhang, Zhijin Zhang ; Jianlin Hu, Jianlin Hu ; Feng Mao, Feng Mao</creatorcontrib><description>Based on the artificial pollution tests, the flashover performance of various types of DC porcelain and glass suspension insulators as well as composite long-rod insulators were analyzed and compared. The test results show that there is a nearly linear relation between the pollution flashover voltage and the disc-type insulator string length. The flashover voltage gradients of the insulators are affected by their materials and shed shapes. The antipollution performances of glass insulators are superior to those of porcelain insulators with the same profile. The flashover voltage gradients of composite insulators are higher than those of porcelain or glass ones. The exponent characterizing the influence of salt deposit density on the pollution flashover voltage is dependent on the profile and the material of insulators, and the values of the composite insulators' exponents are smaller than those of porcelain or glass insulators, namely, the influence of the pollution on the composite insulators is relatively less. The effectiveness of leakage distances of porcelain or glass insulators is less than 0.9 while that of composite insulators is higher than 0.9.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0885-8977</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1937-4208</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TPWRD.2007.908779</identifier><identifier>CODEN: ITPDE5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: IEEE</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; DC insulator ; Density ; effectiveness of leakage distance ; Electric potential ; Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering ; Exact sciences and technology ; Flashover ; Glass ; Insulation ; Insulator testing ; Insulators ; material ; Materials ; Performance analysis ; Performance evaluation ; Pollution ; Pollution abatement ; pollution flashover performance ; Porcelain ; Shape ; Studies ; type ; Various equipment and components ; Voltage</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on power delivery, 2008-04, Vol.23 (2), p.1183-1190</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2008</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-cf47e436895372ecd7f889eff568fd094736b17ac2be96d9168e7d478df001583</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-cf47e436895372ecd7f889eff568fd094736b17ac2be96d9168e7d478df001583</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4378282$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,796,27924,27925,54758</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4378282$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20384959$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Xingliang Jiang, Xingliang Jiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jihe Yuan, Jihe Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichun Shu, Lichun Shu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhijin Zhang, Zhijin Zhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jianlin Hu, Jianlin Hu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng Mao, Feng Mao</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of DC Pollution Flashover Performances of Various Types of Porcelain, Glass, and Composite Insulators</title><title>IEEE transactions on power delivery</title><addtitle>TPWRD</addtitle><description>Based on the artificial pollution tests, the flashover performance of various types of DC porcelain and glass suspension insulators as well as composite long-rod insulators were analyzed and compared. The test results show that there is a nearly linear relation between the pollution flashover voltage and the disc-type insulator string length. The flashover voltage gradients of the insulators are affected by their materials and shed shapes. The antipollution performances of glass insulators are superior to those of porcelain insulators with the same profile. The flashover voltage gradients of composite insulators are higher than those of porcelain or glass ones. The exponent characterizing the influence of salt deposit density on the pollution flashover voltage is dependent on the profile and the material of insulators, and the values of the composite insulators' exponents are smaller than those of porcelain or glass insulators, namely, the influence of the pollution on the composite insulators is relatively less. The effectiveness of leakage distances of porcelain or glass insulators is less than 0.9 while that of composite insulators is higher than 0.9.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>DC insulator</subject><subject>Density</subject><subject>effectiveness of leakage distance</subject><subject>Electric potential</subject><subject>Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Flashover</subject><subject>Glass</subject><subject>Insulation</subject><subject>Insulator testing</subject><subject>Insulators</subject><subject>material</subject><subject>Materials</subject><subject>Performance analysis</subject><subject>Performance evaluation</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Pollution abatement</subject><subject>pollution flashover performance</subject><subject>Porcelain</subject><subject>Shape</subject><subject>Studies</subject><subject>type</subject><subject>Various equipment and components</subject><subject>Voltage</subject><issn>0885-8977</issn><issn>1937-4208</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkUFr3DAQhUVpodu0PyD0Igqll3g7smRrdCybJg0EupRNchSKPaIOXsuV7ED-feU65NDToNH3Ho95jJ0K2AoB5uthf_frfFsC6K0B1Nq8YhthpC5UCfiabQCxKtBo_Za9S-kBABQY2LBxF46ji10KAw-en-_4PvT9PHX5fdG79Ds8UuR7ij7EoxsaSgt2mxVhTvzwNK6LfYgN9a4bzvhlVqUz7oaWL94hdRPxqyHNvZtCTO_ZG-_6RB-e5wm7ufh-2P0orn9eXu2-XReNrNRUNF5pUrJGU0ldUtNqj2jI-6pG34JRWtb3QrumvCdTt0bUSLpVGlsPICqUJ-zL6jvG8GemNNljl3LG3g2Uo1vUFahKliKTn_4jH8IchxzOYi2zWy0XO7FCTQwpRfJ2jN3RxScrwC4N2H8N2KUBuzaQNZ-fjV1qXO9jvl-XXoQlSFSmWriPK9cR0cu3khpLLOVfdQWPWw</recordid><startdate>20080401</startdate><enddate>20080401</enddate><creator>Xingliang Jiang, Xingliang Jiang</creator><creator>Jihe Yuan, Jihe Yuan</creator><creator>Lichun Shu, Lichun Shu</creator><creator>Zhijin Zhang, Zhijin Zhang</creator><creator>Jianlin Hu, Jianlin Hu</creator><creator>Feng Mao, Feng Mao</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7TB</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7QQ</scope><scope>F28</scope><scope>JG9</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080401</creationdate><title>Comparison of DC Pollution Flashover Performances of Various Types of Porcelain, Glass, and Composite Insulators</title><author>Xingliang Jiang, Xingliang Jiang ; Jihe Yuan, Jihe Yuan ; Lichun Shu, Lichun Shu ; Zhijin Zhang, Zhijin Zhang ; Jianlin Hu, Jianlin Hu ; Feng Mao, Feng Mao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c354t-cf47e436895372ecd7f889eff568fd094736b17ac2be96d9168e7d478df001583</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>DC insulator</topic><topic>Density</topic><topic>effectiveness of leakage distance</topic><topic>Electric potential</topic><topic>Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Flashover</topic><topic>Glass</topic><topic>Insulation</topic><topic>Insulator testing</topic><topic>Insulators</topic><topic>material</topic><topic>Materials</topic><topic>Performance analysis</topic><topic>Performance evaluation</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Pollution abatement</topic><topic>pollution flashover performance</topic><topic>Porcelain</topic><topic>Shape</topic><topic>Studies</topic><topic>type</topic><topic>Various equipment and components</topic><topic>Voltage</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Xingliang Jiang, Xingliang Jiang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jihe Yuan, Jihe Yuan</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lichun Shu, Lichun Shu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zhijin Zhang, Zhijin Zhang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jianlin Hu, Jianlin Hu</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Feng Mao, Feng Mao</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998–Present</collection><collection>IEEE/IET Electronic Library</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Mechanical &amp; Transportation Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Ceramic Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><collection>Materials Research Database</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power delivery</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Xingliang Jiang, Xingliang Jiang</au><au>Jihe Yuan, Jihe Yuan</au><au>Lichun Shu, Lichun Shu</au><au>Zhijin Zhang, Zhijin Zhang</au><au>Jianlin Hu, Jianlin Hu</au><au>Feng Mao, Feng Mao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Comparison of DC Pollution Flashover Performances of Various Types of Porcelain, Glass, and Composite Insulators</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on power delivery</jtitle><stitle>TPWRD</stitle><date>2008-04-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>23</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>1183</spage><epage>1190</epage><pages>1183-1190</pages><issn>0885-8977</issn><eissn>1937-4208</eissn><coden>ITPDE5</coden><abstract>Based on the artificial pollution tests, the flashover performance of various types of DC porcelain and glass suspension insulators as well as composite long-rod insulators were analyzed and compared. The test results show that there is a nearly linear relation between the pollution flashover voltage and the disc-type insulator string length. The flashover voltage gradients of the insulators are affected by their materials and shed shapes. The antipollution performances of glass insulators are superior to those of porcelain insulators with the same profile. The flashover voltage gradients of composite insulators are higher than those of porcelain or glass ones. The exponent characterizing the influence of salt deposit density on the pollution flashover voltage is dependent on the profile and the material of insulators, and the values of the composite insulators' exponents are smaller than those of porcelain or glass insulators, namely, the influence of the pollution on the composite insulators is relatively less. The effectiveness of leakage distances of porcelain or glass insulators is less than 0.9 while that of composite insulators is higher than 0.9.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TPWRD.2007.908779</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0885-8977
ispartof IEEE transactions on power delivery, 2008-04, Vol.23 (2), p.1183-1190
issn 0885-8977
1937-4208
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_20384959
source IEEE/IET Electronic Library
subjects Applied sciences
DC insulator
Density
effectiveness of leakage distance
Electric potential
Electrical engineering. Electrical power engineering
Exact sciences and technology
Flashover
Glass
Insulation
Insulator testing
Insulators
material
Materials
Performance analysis
Performance evaluation
Pollution
Pollution abatement
pollution flashover performance
Porcelain
Shape
Studies
type
Various equipment and components
Voltage
title Comparison of DC Pollution Flashover Performances of Various Types of Porcelain, Glass, and Composite Insulators
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T07%3A01%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20DC%20Pollution%20Flashover%20Performances%20of%20Various%20Types%20of%20Porcelain,%20Glass,%20and%20Composite%20Insulators&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20power%20delivery&rft.au=Xingliang%20Jiang,%20Xingliang%20Jiang&rft.date=2008-04-01&rft.volume=23&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=1183&rft.epage=1190&rft.pages=1183-1190&rft.issn=0885-8977&rft.eissn=1937-4208&rft.coden=ITPDE5&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TPWRD.2007.908779&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2327085131%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=863001638&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4378282&rfr_iscdi=true