Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Membrane Technology

Studies of CO2 capture using membrane technology from coal-fired power-plant flue gas typically assume compression of the feed to achieve a driving force across the membrane. The high CO2 capture cost of these systems reflects the need to compress the low-pressure feed gas (1 bar) and the low CO2 pu...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Industrial & engineering chemistry research 2008-03, Vol.47 (5), p.1562-1568
Hauptverfasser: Ho, Minh T, Allinson, Guy W, Wiley, Dianne E
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1568
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1562
container_title Industrial & engineering chemistry research
container_volume 47
creator Ho, Minh T
Allinson, Guy W
Wiley, Dianne E
description Studies of CO2 capture using membrane technology from coal-fired power-plant flue gas typically assume compression of the feed to achieve a driving force across the membrane. The high CO2 capture cost of these systems reflects the need to compress the low-pressure feed gas (1 bar) and the low CO2 purity of the product stream. This article investigates how costs for CO2 capture using membranes can be reduced by operating under vacuum conditions. The flue gas is pressurized to 1.5 bar, whereas the permeate stream is at 0.08 bar. Under these operating conditions, the capture cost is U.S. $54/tonne CO2 avoided compared to U.S. $82/tonne CO2 avoided using membrane processes with a pressurized feed. This is a reduction of 35%. The article also investigates the effect on the capture cost of improvements in CO2 permeability and selectivity. The results show that the capture cost can be reduced to less than U.S. $25/tonne CO2 avoided when the CO2 permeability is 300 barrer, CO2/N2 selectivity is 250, and the membrane cost is U.S. $10/m2.
doi_str_mv 10.1021/ie070541y
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>acs_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_20181119</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>c164244093</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-a290t-b56e090825367f383601296c90d1a419b4cc51fe389bedd8ad2225f7a3ef18543</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1PwkAYhDdGExE9-A_24rH67sfbbo-mEdFAIFricbPd7kKxUNJtE_n3QjB4msM8mcwMIfcMHhlw9lQ5SAAl21-QAUMOEYLESzIApVSESuE1uQlhDQCIUg7I-4cre1ttl7RbOZo1oaONp9mM08zsur511LfNho7q3tFXE1ygi3Ckp25TtGbraO7satvUzXJ_S668qYO7-9MhWYxe8mwcTWavb9nzJDI8hS4qMHaQguIo4sQLJWJgPI1tCiUzkqWFtBaZd0KlhStLZUrOOfrECOeZQimG5OGUuzPBmtofatgq6F1bbUy71xyYYoylBy46cVXo3M_ZN-23jhORoM7nn3qO4y-UU9D5f66xQa-bvt0eVmgG-nisPh8rfgH7SWfG</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Membrane Technology</title><source>ACS Publications</source><creator>Ho, Minh T ; Allinson, Guy W ; Wiley, Dianne E</creator><creatorcontrib>Ho, Minh T ; Allinson, Guy W ; Wiley, Dianne E</creatorcontrib><description>Studies of CO2 capture using membrane technology from coal-fired power-plant flue gas typically assume compression of the feed to achieve a driving force across the membrane. The high CO2 capture cost of these systems reflects the need to compress the low-pressure feed gas (1 bar) and the low CO2 purity of the product stream. This article investigates how costs for CO2 capture using membranes can be reduced by operating under vacuum conditions. The flue gas is pressurized to 1.5 bar, whereas the permeate stream is at 0.08 bar. Under these operating conditions, the capture cost is U.S. $54/tonne CO2 avoided compared to U.S. $82/tonne CO2 avoided using membrane processes with a pressurized feed. This is a reduction of 35%. The article also investigates the effect on the capture cost of improvements in CO2 permeability and selectivity. The results show that the capture cost can be reduced to less than U.S. $25/tonne CO2 avoided when the CO2 permeability is 300 barrer, CO2/N2 selectivity is 250, and the membrane cost is U.S. $10/m2.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0888-5885</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1520-5045</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1021/ie070541y</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IECRED</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: American Chemical Society</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Chemical engineering ; Exact sciences and technology</subject><ispartof>Industrial &amp; engineering chemistry research, 2008-03, Vol.47 (5), p.1562-1568</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 2008 American Chemical Society</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/pdf/10.1021/ie070541y$$EPDF$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://pubs.acs.org/doi/10.1021/ie070541y$$EHTML$$P50$$Gacs$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,27057,27905,27906,56719,56769</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=20181119$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ho, Minh T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allinson, Guy W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiley, Dianne E</creatorcontrib><title>Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Membrane Technology</title><title>Industrial &amp; engineering chemistry research</title><addtitle>Ind. Eng. Chem. Res</addtitle><description>Studies of CO2 capture using membrane technology from coal-fired power-plant flue gas typically assume compression of the feed to achieve a driving force across the membrane. The high CO2 capture cost of these systems reflects the need to compress the low-pressure feed gas (1 bar) and the low CO2 purity of the product stream. This article investigates how costs for CO2 capture using membranes can be reduced by operating under vacuum conditions. The flue gas is pressurized to 1.5 bar, whereas the permeate stream is at 0.08 bar. Under these operating conditions, the capture cost is U.S. $54/tonne CO2 avoided compared to U.S. $82/tonne CO2 avoided using membrane processes with a pressurized feed. This is a reduction of 35%. The article also investigates the effect on the capture cost of improvements in CO2 permeability and selectivity. The results show that the capture cost can be reduced to less than U.S. $25/tonne CO2 avoided when the CO2 permeability is 300 barrer, CO2/N2 selectivity is 250, and the membrane cost is U.S. $10/m2.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Chemical engineering</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><issn>0888-5885</issn><issn>1520-5045</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1PwkAYhDdGExE9-A_24rH67sfbbo-mEdFAIFricbPd7kKxUNJtE_n3QjB4msM8mcwMIfcMHhlw9lQ5SAAl21-QAUMOEYLESzIApVSESuE1uQlhDQCIUg7I-4cre1ttl7RbOZo1oaONp9mM08zsur511LfNho7q3tFXE1ygi3Ckp25TtGbraO7satvUzXJ_S668qYO7-9MhWYxe8mwcTWavb9nzJDI8hS4qMHaQguIo4sQLJWJgPI1tCiUzkqWFtBaZd0KlhStLZUrOOfrECOeZQimG5OGUuzPBmtofatgq6F1bbUy71xyYYoylBy46cVXo3M_ZN-23jhORoM7nn3qO4y-UU9D5f66xQa-bvt0eVmgG-nisPh8rfgH7SWfG</recordid><startdate>20080305</startdate><enddate>20080305</enddate><creator>Ho, Minh T</creator><creator>Allinson, Guy W</creator><creator>Wiley, Dianne E</creator><general>American Chemical Society</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080305</creationdate><title>Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Membrane Technology</title><author>Ho, Minh T ; Allinson, Guy W ; Wiley, Dianne E</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-a290t-b56e090825367f383601296c90d1a419b4cc51fe389bedd8ad2225f7a3ef18543</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Chemical engineering</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ho, Minh T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allinson, Guy W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wiley, Dianne E</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><jtitle>Industrial &amp; engineering chemistry research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ho, Minh T</au><au>Allinson, Guy W</au><au>Wiley, Dianne E</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Membrane Technology</atitle><jtitle>Industrial &amp; engineering chemistry research</jtitle><addtitle>Ind. Eng. Chem. Res</addtitle><date>2008-03-05</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>47</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1562</spage><epage>1568</epage><pages>1562-1568</pages><issn>0888-5885</issn><eissn>1520-5045</eissn><coden>IECRED</coden><abstract>Studies of CO2 capture using membrane technology from coal-fired power-plant flue gas typically assume compression of the feed to achieve a driving force across the membrane. The high CO2 capture cost of these systems reflects the need to compress the low-pressure feed gas (1 bar) and the low CO2 purity of the product stream. This article investigates how costs for CO2 capture using membranes can be reduced by operating under vacuum conditions. The flue gas is pressurized to 1.5 bar, whereas the permeate stream is at 0.08 bar. Under these operating conditions, the capture cost is U.S. $54/tonne CO2 avoided compared to U.S. $82/tonne CO2 avoided using membrane processes with a pressurized feed. This is a reduction of 35%. The article also investigates the effect on the capture cost of improvements in CO2 permeability and selectivity. The results show that the capture cost can be reduced to less than U.S. $25/tonne CO2 avoided when the CO2 permeability is 300 barrer, CO2/N2 selectivity is 250, and the membrane cost is U.S. $10/m2.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>American Chemical Society</pub><doi>10.1021/ie070541y</doi><tpages>7</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0888-5885
ispartof Industrial & engineering chemistry research, 2008-03, Vol.47 (5), p.1562-1568
issn 0888-5885
1520-5045
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_20181119
source ACS Publications
subjects Applied sciences
Chemical engineering
Exact sciences and technology
title Reducing the Cost of CO2 Capture from Flue Gases Using Membrane Technology
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-20T02%3A10%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-acs_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Reducing%20the%20Cost%20of%20CO2%20Capture%20from%20Flue%20Gases%20Using%20Membrane%20Technology&rft.jtitle=Industrial%20&%20engineering%20chemistry%20research&rft.au=Ho,%20Minh%20T&rft.date=2008-03-05&rft.volume=47&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1562&rft.epage=1568&rft.pages=1562-1568&rft.issn=0888-5885&rft.eissn=1520-5045&rft.coden=IECRED&rft_id=info:doi/10.1021/ie070541y&rft_dat=%3Cacs_pasca%3Ec164244093%3C/acs_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true