A comparison of methods for gravitational wave burst searches from LIGO and Virgo
The search procedure for burst gravitational waves has been studied using 24 hours of simulated data in a network of three interferometers (Hanford 4-km, Livingston 4-km and Virgo 3-km are the example interferometers). Several methods to detect burst events developed in the LIGO Scientific Collabora...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Classical and quantum gravity 2008-02, Vol.25 (4), p.045002 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 045002 |
container_title | Classical and quantum gravity |
container_volume | 25 |
creator | Beauville, F Bizouard, M-A Blackburn, L Bosi, L Brocco, L Brown, D A Buskulic, D Cavalier, F Chatterji, S Christensen, N Clapson, A-C Fairhurst, S Grosjean, D Guidi, G Hello, P Heng, S Hewitson, M Katsavounidis, E Klimenko, S Knight, M Lazzarini, A Leroy, N Marion, F Markowitz, J Melachrinos, C Mours, B Ricci, F Viceré, A Yakushin, I Zanolin, M |
description | The search procedure for burst gravitational waves has been studied using 24 hours of simulated data in a network of three interferometers (Hanford 4-km, Livingston 4-km and Virgo 3-km are the example interferometers). Several methods to detect burst events developed in the LIGO Scientific Collaboration (LSC) and Virgo collaboration have been studied and compared. We have performed coincidence analysis of the triggers obtained in the different interferometers with and without simulated signals added to the data. The benefits of having multiple interferometers of similar sensitivity are demonstrated by comparing the detection performance of the joint coincidence analysis with LSC and Virgo only burst searches. Adding Virgo to the LIGO detector network can increase by 50% the detection efficiency for this search. Another advantage of a joint LIGO-Virgo network is the ability to reconstruct the source sky position. The reconstruction accuracy depends on the timing measurement accuracy of the events in each interferometer, and is displayed in this paper with a fixed source position example. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1088/0264-9381/25/4/045002 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>hal_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_20110487</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>oai_HAL_in2p3_00122656v1</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-48af349afff2a3286c06afb0f16baa98ebfc6ddd660ec247d56a1e54562d7c573</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKuPIOTiSdcm2SRNj6VoKywUQb2G2WzSRtrNkqwV395dVnpRPM1hvv9n5kPompJ7SpSaECZ5NssVnTAx4RPCBSHsBI1oLmkmc8VO0ejInKOLlN4JoVRRNkLPc2zCvoHoU6hxcHhv222oEnYh4k2Eg2-h9aGGHf6Eg8XlR0wtThai2dqOimGPi6flGkNd4TcfN-ESnTnYJXv1M8fo9fHhZbHKivXyaTEvMsNl3mZcgcv5DJxzDHKmpCESXEkclSXATNnSGVlVlZTEGsanlZBAreBCsmpqxDQfo9uhdws73US_h_ilA3i9mhfa16zJdfclY1LIA-1oMdAmhpSidccIJbq3qHtDujekmdBcDxa73M2QayAZ2LkItfHpGGadR8JVf83dwPnQHLd_Vuqmch1OfuP_X_IN7jCNLw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparison of methods for gravitational wave burst searches from LIGO and Virgo</title><source>Institute of Physics Journals</source><creator>Beauville, F ; Bizouard, M-A ; Blackburn, L ; Bosi, L ; Brocco, L ; Brown, D A ; Buskulic, D ; Cavalier, F ; Chatterji, S ; Christensen, N ; Clapson, A-C ; Fairhurst, S ; Grosjean, D ; Guidi, G ; Hello, P ; Heng, S ; Hewitson, M ; Katsavounidis, E ; Klimenko, S ; Knight, M ; Lazzarini, A ; Leroy, N ; Marion, F ; Markowitz, J ; Melachrinos, C ; Mours, B ; Ricci, F ; Viceré, A ; Yakushin, I ; Zanolin, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Beauville, F ; Bizouard, M-A ; Blackburn, L ; Bosi, L ; Brocco, L ; Brown, D A ; Buskulic, D ; Cavalier, F ; Chatterji, S ; Christensen, N ; Clapson, A-C ; Fairhurst, S ; Grosjean, D ; Guidi, G ; Hello, P ; Heng, S ; Hewitson, M ; Katsavounidis, E ; Klimenko, S ; Knight, M ; Lazzarini, A ; Leroy, N ; Marion, F ; Markowitz, J ; Melachrinos, C ; Mours, B ; Ricci, F ; Viceré, A ; Yakushin, I ; Zanolin, M ; The joint LSC/Virgo working group</creatorcontrib><description>The search procedure for burst gravitational waves has been studied using 24 hours of simulated data in a network of three interferometers (Hanford 4-km, Livingston 4-km and Virgo 3-km are the example interferometers). Several methods to detect burst events developed in the LIGO Scientific Collaboration (LSC) and Virgo collaboration have been studied and compared. We have performed coincidence analysis of the triggers obtained in the different interferometers with and without simulated signals added to the data. The benefits of having multiple interferometers of similar sensitivity are demonstrated by comparing the detection performance of the joint coincidence analysis with LSC and Virgo only burst searches. Adding Virgo to the LIGO detector network can increase by 50% the detection efficiency for this search. Another advantage of a joint LIGO-Virgo network is the ability to reconstruct the source sky position. The reconstruction accuracy depends on the timing measurement accuracy of the events in each interferometer, and is displayed in this paper with a fixed source position example.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0264-9381</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1361-6382</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1088/0264-9381/25/4/045002</identifier><identifier>CODEN: CQGRDG</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Bristol: IOP Publishing</publisher><subject>Exact sciences and technology ; General relativity and gravitation ; General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology ; Physics</subject><ispartof>Classical and quantum gravity, 2008-02, Vol.25 (4), p.045002</ispartof><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Distributed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-48af349afff2a3286c06afb0f16baa98ebfc6ddd660ec247d56a1e54562d7c573</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-48af349afff2a3286c06afb0f16baa98ebfc6ddd660ec247d56a1e54562d7c573</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-3658-7240 ; 0000-0002-4618-1674 ; 0000-0002-2321-1017</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/0264-9381/25/4/045002/pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Giop$$H</linktopdf><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904,53808,53888</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20110487$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://in2p3.hal.science/in2p3-00122656$$DView record in HAL$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Beauville, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bizouard, M-A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackburn, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosi, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brocco, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, D A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buskulic, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalier, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatterji, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clapson, A-C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairhurst, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grosjean, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guidi, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hello, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heng, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hewitson, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsavounidis, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klimenko, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazzarini, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leroy, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marion, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markowitz, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melachrinos, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mours, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricci, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viceré, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yakushin, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanolin, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The joint LSC/Virgo working group</creatorcontrib><title>A comparison of methods for gravitational wave burst searches from LIGO and Virgo</title><title>Classical and quantum gravity</title><description>The search procedure for burst gravitational waves has been studied using 24 hours of simulated data in a network of three interferometers (Hanford 4-km, Livingston 4-km and Virgo 3-km are the example interferometers). Several methods to detect burst events developed in the LIGO Scientific Collaboration (LSC) and Virgo collaboration have been studied and compared. We have performed coincidence analysis of the triggers obtained in the different interferometers with and without simulated signals added to the data. The benefits of having multiple interferometers of similar sensitivity are demonstrated by comparing the detection performance of the joint coincidence analysis with LSC and Virgo only burst searches. Adding Virgo to the LIGO detector network can increase by 50% the detection efficiency for this search. Another advantage of a joint LIGO-Virgo network is the ability to reconstruct the source sky position. The reconstruction accuracy depends on the timing measurement accuracy of the events in each interferometer, and is displayed in this paper with a fixed source position example.</description><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>General relativity and gravitation</subject><subject>General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology</subject><subject>Physics</subject><issn>0264-9381</issn><issn>1361-6382</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kMFKAzEQhoMoWKuPIOTiSdcm2SRNj6VoKywUQb2G2WzSRtrNkqwV395dVnpRPM1hvv9n5kPompJ7SpSaECZ5NssVnTAx4RPCBSHsBI1oLmkmc8VO0ejInKOLlN4JoVRRNkLPc2zCvoHoU6hxcHhv222oEnYh4k2Eg2-h9aGGHf6Eg8XlR0wtThai2dqOimGPi6flGkNd4TcfN-ESnTnYJXv1M8fo9fHhZbHKivXyaTEvMsNl3mZcgcv5DJxzDHKmpCESXEkclSXATNnSGVlVlZTEGsanlZBAreBCsmpqxDQfo9uhdws73US_h_ilA3i9mhfa16zJdfclY1LIA-1oMdAmhpSidccIJbq3qHtDujekmdBcDxa73M2QayAZ2LkItfHpGGadR8JVf83dwPnQHLd_Vuqmch1OfuP_X_IN7jCNLw</recordid><startdate>20080221</startdate><enddate>20080221</enddate><creator>Beauville, F</creator><creator>Bizouard, M-A</creator><creator>Blackburn, L</creator><creator>Bosi, L</creator><creator>Brocco, L</creator><creator>Brown, D A</creator><creator>Buskulic, D</creator><creator>Cavalier, F</creator><creator>Chatterji, S</creator><creator>Christensen, N</creator><creator>Clapson, A-C</creator><creator>Fairhurst, S</creator><creator>Grosjean, D</creator><creator>Guidi, G</creator><creator>Hello, P</creator><creator>Heng, S</creator><creator>Hewitson, M</creator><creator>Katsavounidis, E</creator><creator>Klimenko, S</creator><creator>Knight, M</creator><creator>Lazzarini, A</creator><creator>Leroy, N</creator><creator>Marion, F</creator><creator>Markowitz, J</creator><creator>Melachrinos, C</creator><creator>Mours, B</creator><creator>Ricci, F</creator><creator>Viceré, A</creator><creator>Yakushin, I</creator><creator>Zanolin, M</creator><general>IOP Publishing</general><general>Institute of Physics</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>1XC</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3658-7240</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4618-1674</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2321-1017</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20080221</creationdate><title>A comparison of methods for gravitational wave burst searches from LIGO and Virgo</title><author>Beauville, F ; Bizouard, M-A ; Blackburn, L ; Bosi, L ; Brocco, L ; Brown, D A ; Buskulic, D ; Cavalier, F ; Chatterji, S ; Christensen, N ; Clapson, A-C ; Fairhurst, S ; Grosjean, D ; Guidi, G ; Hello, P ; Heng, S ; Hewitson, M ; Katsavounidis, E ; Klimenko, S ; Knight, M ; Lazzarini, A ; Leroy, N ; Marion, F ; Markowitz, J ; Melachrinos, C ; Mours, B ; Ricci, F ; Viceré, A ; Yakushin, I ; Zanolin, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c463t-48af349afff2a3286c06afb0f16baa98ebfc6ddd660ec247d56a1e54562d7c573</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>General relativity and gravitation</topic><topic>General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology</topic><topic>Physics</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Beauville, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bizouard, M-A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Blackburn, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bosi, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brocco, L</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, D A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Buskulic, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cavalier, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chatterji, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Christensen, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Clapson, A-C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fairhurst, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Grosjean, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guidi, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hello, P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Heng, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hewitson, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Katsavounidis, E</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Klimenko, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Knight, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lazzarini, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leroy, N</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Marion, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markowitz, J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Melachrinos, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mours, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ricci, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viceré, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Yakushin, I</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Zanolin, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>The joint LSC/Virgo working group</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Hyper Article en Ligne (HAL)</collection><jtitle>Classical and quantum gravity</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Beauville, F</au><au>Bizouard, M-A</au><au>Blackburn, L</au><au>Bosi, L</au><au>Brocco, L</au><au>Brown, D A</au><au>Buskulic, D</au><au>Cavalier, F</au><au>Chatterji, S</au><au>Christensen, N</au><au>Clapson, A-C</au><au>Fairhurst, S</au><au>Grosjean, D</au><au>Guidi, G</au><au>Hello, P</au><au>Heng, S</au><au>Hewitson, M</au><au>Katsavounidis, E</au><au>Klimenko, S</au><au>Knight, M</au><au>Lazzarini, A</au><au>Leroy, N</au><au>Marion, F</au><au>Markowitz, J</au><au>Melachrinos, C</au><au>Mours, B</au><au>Ricci, F</au><au>Viceré, A</au><au>Yakushin, I</au><au>Zanolin, M</au><aucorp>The joint LSC/Virgo working group</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparison of methods for gravitational wave burst searches from LIGO and Virgo</atitle><jtitle>Classical and quantum gravity</jtitle><date>2008-02-21</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>25</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>045002</spage><pages>045002-</pages><issn>0264-9381</issn><eissn>1361-6382</eissn><coden>CQGRDG</coden><abstract>The search procedure for burst gravitational waves has been studied using 24 hours of simulated data in a network of three interferometers (Hanford 4-km, Livingston 4-km and Virgo 3-km are the example interferometers). Several methods to detect burst events developed in the LIGO Scientific Collaboration (LSC) and Virgo collaboration have been studied and compared. We have performed coincidence analysis of the triggers obtained in the different interferometers with and without simulated signals added to the data. The benefits of having multiple interferometers of similar sensitivity are demonstrated by comparing the detection performance of the joint coincidence analysis with LSC and Virgo only burst searches. Adding Virgo to the LIGO detector network can increase by 50% the detection efficiency for this search. Another advantage of a joint LIGO-Virgo network is the ability to reconstruct the source sky position. The reconstruction accuracy depends on the timing measurement accuracy of the events in each interferometer, and is displayed in this paper with a fixed source position example.</abstract><cop>Bristol</cop><pub>IOP Publishing</pub><doi>10.1088/0264-9381/25/4/045002</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3658-7240</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4618-1674</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2321-1017</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0264-9381 |
ispartof | Classical and quantum gravity, 2008-02, Vol.25 (4), p.045002 |
issn | 0264-9381 1361-6382 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_20110487 |
source | Institute of Physics Journals |
subjects | Exact sciences and technology General relativity and gravitation General Relativity and Quantum Cosmology Physics |
title | A comparison of methods for gravitational wave burst searches from LIGO and Virgo |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-24T18%3A32%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-hal_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparison%20of%20methods%20for%20gravitational%20wave%20burst%20searches%20from%20LIGO%20and%20Virgo&rft.jtitle=Classical%20and%20quantum%20gravity&rft.au=Beauville,%20F&rft.aucorp=The%20joint%20LSC/Virgo%20working%20group&rft.date=2008-02-21&rft.volume=25&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=045002&rft.pages=045002-&rft.issn=0264-9381&rft.eissn=1361-6382&rft.coden=CQGRDG&rft_id=info:doi/10.1088/0264-9381/25/4/045002&rft_dat=%3Chal_pasca%3Eoai_HAL_in2p3_00122656v1%3C/hal_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |