Comparison of Energy Minimization Algorithms for Highly Connected Graphs
Algorithms for discrete energy minimization play a fundamental role for low-level vision. Known techniques include graph cuts, belief propagation (BP) and recently introduced tree-reweighted message passing (TRW). So far, the standard benchmark for their comparison has been a 4-connected grid-graph...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Buchkapitel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 15 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 1 |
container_title | |
container_volume | |
creator | Kolmogorov, Vladimir Rother, Carsten |
description | Algorithms for discrete energy minimization play a fundamental role for low-level vision. Known techniques include graph cuts, belief propagation (BP) and recently introduced tree-reweighted message passing (TRW). So far, the standard benchmark for their comparison has been a 4-connected grid-graph arising in pixel-labelling stereo. This minimization problem, however, has been largely solved: recent work shows that for many scenes TRW finds the global optimum. Furthermore, it is known that a 4-connected grid-graph is a poor stereo model since it does not take occlusions into account.
We propose the problem of stereo with occlusions as a new test bed for minimization algorithms. This is a more challenging graph since it has much larger connectivity, and it also serves as a better stereo model. An attractive feature of this problem is that increased connectivity does not result in increased complexity of message passing algorithms. Indeed, one contribution of this paper is to show that sophisticated implementations of BP and TRW have the same time and memory complexity as that of 4-connected grid-graph stereo.
The main conclusion of our experimental study is that for our problem graph cut outperforms both TRW and BP considerably. TRW achieves consistently a lower energy than BP. However, as connectivity increases the speed of convergence of TRW becomes slower. Unlike 4-connected grids, the difference between the energy of the best optimization method and the lower bound of TRW appears significant. This shows the hardness of the problem and motivates future research. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/11744047_1 |
format | Book Chapter |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pascalfrancis_sprin</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_20046147</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>20046147</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j320t-2b8c24ea2fc89170fccb6b1fb295b0e8ee96423e5939ee971d134570921b64f73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpVUD1rwzAUVL-gIc3SX-Cl0MXte5JsWWMwaVJI6dLORnYkR6ktGclL-uvrkELpW-5xdxzcEXKP8IQA4hlRcA5cVHhBFlIULOPA2AT0kswwR0wZ4_Lqn8azazIDBjSVgrNbsojxANMxzCUWM7IpfT-oYKN3iTfJyunQHpM362xvv9VoJ3rZtT7Ycd_HxPiQbGy7745J6Z3Tzah3yTqoYR_vyI1RXdSLX5yTz5fVR7lJt-_r13K5TQ-MwpjSumgo14qappAowDRNnddoaiqzGnShtcw5ZTqTTE6_wB1OHQRIinXOjWBz8nDOHVRsVGeCco2N1RBsr8KxogA8R37yPZ59cZJcq0NVe_8VK4TqNGb1Nyb7AU8_YD4</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype></control><display><type>book_chapter</type><title>Comparison of Energy Minimization Algorithms for Highly Connected Graphs</title><source>Springer Books</source><creator>Kolmogorov, Vladimir ; Rother, Carsten</creator><contributor>Bischof, Horst ; Pinz, Axel ; Leonardis, Aleš</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kolmogorov, Vladimir ; Rother, Carsten ; Bischof, Horst ; Pinz, Axel ; Leonardis, Aleš</creatorcontrib><description>Algorithms for discrete energy minimization play a fundamental role for low-level vision. Known techniques include graph cuts, belief propagation (BP) and recently introduced tree-reweighted message passing (TRW). So far, the standard benchmark for their comparison has been a 4-connected grid-graph arising in pixel-labelling stereo. This minimization problem, however, has been largely solved: recent work shows that for many scenes TRW finds the global optimum. Furthermore, it is known that a 4-connected grid-graph is a poor stereo model since it does not take occlusions into account.
We propose the problem of stereo with occlusions as a new test bed for minimization algorithms. This is a more challenging graph since it has much larger connectivity, and it also serves as a better stereo model. An attractive feature of this problem is that increased connectivity does not result in increased complexity of message passing algorithms. Indeed, one contribution of this paper is to show that sophisticated implementations of BP and TRW have the same time and memory complexity as that of 4-connected grid-graph stereo.
The main conclusion of our experimental study is that for our problem graph cut outperforms both TRW and BP considerably. TRW achieves consistently a lower energy than BP. However, as connectivity increases the speed of convergence of TRW becomes slower. Unlike 4-connected grids, the difference between the energy of the best optimization method and the lower bound of TRW appears significant. This shows the hardness of the problem and motivates future research.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-9743</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9783540338345</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 3540338349</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9783540338321</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 3540338322</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1611-3349</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9783540338352</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 3540338357</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/11744047_1</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Artificial intelligence ; Belief Propagation ; Computer science; control theory; systems ; Computer systems and distributed systems. User interface ; Exact sciences and technology ; Ground Truth ; Message Passing ; Pattern recognition. Digital image processing. Computational geometry ; Sequential Schedule ; Software ; Stereo Match</subject><ispartof>Computer Vision – ECCV 2006, 2006, p.1-15</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006</rights><rights>2008 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><relation>Lecture Notes in Computer Science</relation></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/11744047_1$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/11744047_1$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,775,776,780,785,786,789,4035,4036,27904,38234,41421,42490</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=20046147$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Bischof, Horst</contributor><contributor>Pinz, Axel</contributor><contributor>Leonardis, Aleš</contributor><creatorcontrib>Kolmogorov, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rother, Carsten</creatorcontrib><title>Comparison of Energy Minimization Algorithms for Highly Connected Graphs</title><title>Computer Vision – ECCV 2006</title><description>Algorithms for discrete energy minimization play a fundamental role for low-level vision. Known techniques include graph cuts, belief propagation (BP) and recently introduced tree-reweighted message passing (TRW). So far, the standard benchmark for their comparison has been a 4-connected grid-graph arising in pixel-labelling stereo. This minimization problem, however, has been largely solved: recent work shows that for many scenes TRW finds the global optimum. Furthermore, it is known that a 4-connected grid-graph is a poor stereo model since it does not take occlusions into account.
We propose the problem of stereo with occlusions as a new test bed for minimization algorithms. This is a more challenging graph since it has much larger connectivity, and it also serves as a better stereo model. An attractive feature of this problem is that increased connectivity does not result in increased complexity of message passing algorithms. Indeed, one contribution of this paper is to show that sophisticated implementations of BP and TRW have the same time and memory complexity as that of 4-connected grid-graph stereo.
The main conclusion of our experimental study is that for our problem graph cut outperforms both TRW and BP considerably. TRW achieves consistently a lower energy than BP. However, as connectivity increases the speed of convergence of TRW becomes slower. Unlike 4-connected grids, the difference between the energy of the best optimization method and the lower bound of TRW appears significant. This shows the hardness of the problem and motivates future research.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Artificial intelligence</subject><subject>Belief Propagation</subject><subject>Computer science; control theory; systems</subject><subject>Computer systems and distributed systems. User interface</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Ground Truth</subject><subject>Message Passing</subject><subject>Pattern recognition. Digital image processing. Computational geometry</subject><subject>Sequential Schedule</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Stereo Match</subject><issn>0302-9743</issn><issn>1611-3349</issn><isbn>9783540338345</isbn><isbn>3540338349</isbn><isbn>9783540338321</isbn><isbn>3540338322</isbn><isbn>9783540338352</isbn><isbn>3540338357</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book_chapter</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><recordid>eNpVUD1rwzAUVL-gIc3SX-Cl0MXte5JsWWMwaVJI6dLORnYkR6ktGclL-uvrkELpW-5xdxzcEXKP8IQA4hlRcA5cVHhBFlIULOPA2AT0kswwR0wZ4_Lqn8azazIDBjSVgrNbsojxANMxzCUWM7IpfT-oYKN3iTfJyunQHpM362xvv9VoJ3rZtT7Ycd_HxPiQbGy7745J6Z3Tzah3yTqoYR_vyI1RXdSLX5yTz5fVR7lJt-_r13K5TQ-MwpjSumgo14qappAowDRNnddoaiqzGnShtcw5ZTqTTE6_wB1OHQRIinXOjWBz8nDOHVRsVGeCco2N1RBsr8KxogA8R37yPZ59cZJcq0NVe_8VK4TqNGb1Nyb7AU8_YD4</recordid><startdate>2006</startdate><enddate>2006</enddate><creator>Kolmogorov, Vladimir</creator><creator>Rother, Carsten</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2006</creationdate><title>Comparison of Energy Minimization Algorithms for Highly Connected Graphs</title><author>Kolmogorov, Vladimir ; Rother, Carsten</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j320t-2b8c24ea2fc89170fccb6b1fb295b0e8ee96423e5939ee971d134570921b64f73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>book_chapters</rsrctype><prefilter>book_chapters</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Artificial intelligence</topic><topic>Belief Propagation</topic><topic>Computer science; control theory; systems</topic><topic>Computer systems and distributed systems. User interface</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Ground Truth</topic><topic>Message Passing</topic><topic>Pattern recognition. Digital image processing. Computational geometry</topic><topic>Sequential Schedule</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Stereo Match</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kolmogorov, Vladimir</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rother, Carsten</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kolmogorov, Vladimir</au><au>Rother, Carsten</au><au>Bischof, Horst</au><au>Pinz, Axel</au><au>Leonardis, Aleš</au><format>book</format><genre>bookitem</genre><ristype>CHAP</ristype><atitle>Comparison of Energy Minimization Algorithms for Highly Connected Graphs</atitle><btitle>Computer Vision – ECCV 2006</btitle><seriestitle>Lecture Notes in Computer Science</seriestitle><date>2006</date><risdate>2006</risdate><spage>1</spage><epage>15</epage><pages>1-15</pages><issn>0302-9743</issn><eissn>1611-3349</eissn><isbn>9783540338345</isbn><isbn>3540338349</isbn><isbn>9783540338321</isbn><isbn>3540338322</isbn><eisbn>9783540338352</eisbn><eisbn>3540338357</eisbn><abstract>Algorithms for discrete energy minimization play a fundamental role for low-level vision. Known techniques include graph cuts, belief propagation (BP) and recently introduced tree-reweighted message passing (TRW). So far, the standard benchmark for their comparison has been a 4-connected grid-graph arising in pixel-labelling stereo. This minimization problem, however, has been largely solved: recent work shows that for many scenes TRW finds the global optimum. Furthermore, it is known that a 4-connected grid-graph is a poor stereo model since it does not take occlusions into account.
We propose the problem of stereo with occlusions as a new test bed for minimization algorithms. This is a more challenging graph since it has much larger connectivity, and it also serves as a better stereo model. An attractive feature of this problem is that increased connectivity does not result in increased complexity of message passing algorithms. Indeed, one contribution of this paper is to show that sophisticated implementations of BP and TRW have the same time and memory complexity as that of 4-connected grid-graph stereo.
The main conclusion of our experimental study is that for our problem graph cut outperforms both TRW and BP considerably. TRW achieves consistently a lower energy than BP. However, as connectivity increases the speed of convergence of TRW becomes slower. Unlike 4-connected grids, the difference between the energy of the best optimization method and the lower bound of TRW appears significant. This shows the hardness of the problem and motivates future research.</abstract><cop>Berlin, Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/11744047_1</doi><tpages>15</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0302-9743 |
ispartof | Computer Vision – ECCV 2006, 2006, p.1-15 |
issn | 0302-9743 1611-3349 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_20046147 |
source | Springer Books |
subjects | Applied sciences Artificial intelligence Belief Propagation Computer science control theory systems Computer systems and distributed systems. User interface Exact sciences and technology Ground Truth Message Passing Pattern recognition. Digital image processing. Computational geometry Sequential Schedule Software Stereo Match |
title | Comparison of Energy Minimization Algorithms for Highly Connected Graphs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-25T14%3A15%3A35IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pascalfrancis_sprin&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=bookitem&rft.atitle=Comparison%20of%20Energy%20Minimization%20Algorithms%20for%20Highly%20Connected%20Graphs&rft.btitle=Computer%20Vision%20%E2%80%93%20ECCV%202006&rft.au=Kolmogorov,%20Vladimir&rft.date=2006&rft.spage=1&rft.epage=15&rft.pages=1-15&rft.issn=0302-9743&rft.eissn=1611-3349&rft.isbn=9783540338345&rft.isbn_list=3540338349&rft.isbn_list=9783540338321&rft.isbn_list=3540338322&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/11744047_1&rft_dat=%3Cpascalfrancis_sprin%3E20046147%3C/pascalfrancis_sprin%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9783540338352&rft.eisbn_list=3540338357&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |