Initial Results of the Geostationary Synthetic Thinned Array Radiometer (GeoSTAR) Demonstrator Instrument

The design, error budget, and preliminary test results of a 50-56-GHz synthetic aperture radiometer demonstration system are presented. The instrument consists of a fixed 24-element array of correlation interferometers and is capable of producing calibrated images with 1deg spatial resolution within...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing 2007-07, Vol.45 (7), p.1947-1957
Hauptverfasser: Tanner, A.B., Wilson, W.J., Lambrigsten, B.H., Dinardo, S.J., Brown, S.T., Kangaslahti, P.P., Gaier, T.C., Ruf, C.S., Gross, S.M., Lim, B.H., Musko, S.B., Rogacki, S.., Piepmeier, J.R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1957
container_issue 7
container_start_page 1947
container_title IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing
container_volume 45
creator Tanner, A.B.
Wilson, W.J.
Lambrigsten, B.H.
Dinardo, S.J.
Brown, S.T.
Kangaslahti, P.P.
Gaier, T.C.
Ruf, C.S.
Gross, S.M.
Lim, B.H.
Musko, S.B.
Rogacki, S..
Piepmeier, J.R.
description The design, error budget, and preliminary test results of a 50-56-GHz synthetic aperture radiometer demonstration system are presented. The instrument consists of a fixed 24-element array of correlation interferometers and is capable of producing calibrated images with 1deg spatial resolution within a 17deg wide field of view. This system has been built to demonstrate a performance and a design which can be scaled to a much larger geostationary Earth imager. As a baseline, such a system would consist of about 300 elements and would be capable of providing contiguous full hemispheric images of the Earth with 1 K of radiometric precision and 50-km spatial resolution. An error budget is developed around this goal and then tested with the demonstrator system. Errors are categorized as either scaling (i.e., complex gain) or additive (noise and bias) errors. Sensitivity to gain and/or phase error is generally proportional to the magnitude of the expected visibility, which is high only in the shortest baselines of the array, based on model simulations of the Earth as viewed from geostationary Earth orbit. Requirements range from approximately 0.5% and 0.3deg of amplitude and phase uncertainty, respectively, for the closest spacings at the center of the array, to about 4% and 2.5deg for the majority of the array. The latter requirements are demonstrated with our instrument using relatively simple references and antenna models, and by relying on the intrinsic stability and efficiency of the system. The 0.5% requirement (for the short baselines) is met by measuring the detailed spatial response (e.g., on the antenna range) and by using an internal noise diode reference to stabilize the response. This result suggests a hybrid image synthesis algorithm in which long baselines are processed by a fast Fourier transform and the short baselines are processed by a more precise (G-matrix) algorithm which can handle small anomalies among antenna and receiver responses. Visibility biases and other additive errors must be below about 1.5 mK on average, regardless of baseline. The bias requirement is largely met with a phase-shifting scheme applied to the local oscillator distribution of our demonstration system. Low mutual coupling among the horn antennas of our design is also critical to minimize the biases caused by crosstalk of receiver noise. Performance is validated by a three-way comparison between interference fringes measured on the antenna range, solar transit observa
doi_str_mv 10.1109/TGRS.2007.894060
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_RIE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_18943658</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>4261082</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>2333831911</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-7833e47718ceb7dc0bd270d8c1e52309d6bd1f5cd20845e0efb71e8393c5df6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpdkNGLEzEQhxdRsJ6-C74EQdSHrZNsks0-llNr4UBo63NIk1kux25yJtmH_vem9FDwaYaZ7zcMX9O8pbCmFIYvx-3-sGYA_VoNHCQ8a1ZUCNWC5Px5swI6yJapgb1sXuX8AEC5oP2q8bvgizcT2WNeppJJHEm5R7LFmIspPgaTzuRwDnVYvCXHex8COrJJyZzJ3jgfZyyYyKeaOBw3-8_kK84x5JJMiYnsLt0yYyivmxejmTK-eao3za_v3463P9q7n9vd7eautVyK0vaq65D3PVUWT72zcHKsB6csRcE6GJw8OToK6xgoLhBwPPUUVTd0VrhRYnfTfLzefUzx94K56Nlni9NkAsYla6VAip5LWcn3_5EPcUmhPqeV5BQYG3iF4ArZFHNOOOrH5OcqRVPQF_P6Yl5fzOur-Rr58HTXZGumMZlgff6Xq1gnharcuyvnEfHvmjNJQbHuD5oJjPE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>864102294</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Initial Results of the Geostationary Synthetic Thinned Array Radiometer (GeoSTAR) Demonstrator Instrument</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</source><creator>Tanner, A.B. ; Wilson, W.J. ; Lambrigsten, B.H. ; Dinardo, S.J. ; Brown, S.T. ; Kangaslahti, P.P. ; Gaier, T.C. ; Ruf, C.S. ; Gross, S.M. ; Lim, B.H. ; Musko, S.B. ; Rogacki, S.. ; Piepmeier, J.R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Tanner, A.B. ; Wilson, W.J. ; Lambrigsten, B.H. ; Dinardo, S.J. ; Brown, S.T. ; Kangaslahti, P.P. ; Gaier, T.C. ; Ruf, C.S. ; Gross, S.M. ; Lim, B.H. ; Musko, S.B. ; Rogacki, S.. ; Piepmeier, J.R.</creatorcontrib><description>The design, error budget, and preliminary test results of a 50-56-GHz synthetic aperture radiometer demonstration system are presented. The instrument consists of a fixed 24-element array of correlation interferometers and is capable of producing calibrated images with 1deg spatial resolution within a 17deg wide field of view. This system has been built to demonstrate a performance and a design which can be scaled to a much larger geostationary Earth imager. As a baseline, such a system would consist of about 300 elements and would be capable of providing contiguous full hemispheric images of the Earth with 1 K of radiometric precision and 50-km spatial resolution. An error budget is developed around this goal and then tested with the demonstrator system. Errors are categorized as either scaling (i.e., complex gain) or additive (noise and bias) errors. Sensitivity to gain and/or phase error is generally proportional to the magnitude of the expected visibility, which is high only in the shortest baselines of the array, based on model simulations of the Earth as viewed from geostationary Earth orbit. Requirements range from approximately 0.5% and 0.3deg of amplitude and phase uncertainty, respectively, for the closest spacings at the center of the array, to about 4% and 2.5deg for the majority of the array. The latter requirements are demonstrated with our instrument using relatively simple references and antenna models, and by relying on the intrinsic stability and efficiency of the system. The 0.5% requirement (for the short baselines) is met by measuring the detailed spatial response (e.g., on the antenna range) and by using an internal noise diode reference to stabilize the response. This result suggests a hybrid image synthesis algorithm in which long baselines are processed by a fast Fourier transform and the short baselines are processed by a more precise (G-matrix) algorithm which can handle small anomalies among antenna and receiver responses. Visibility biases and other additive errors must be below about 1.5 mK on average, regardless of baseline. The bias requirement is largely met with a phase-shifting scheme applied to the local oscillator distribution of our demonstration system. Low mutual coupling among the horn antennas of our design is also critical to minimize the biases caused by crosstalk of receiver noise. Performance is validated by a three-way comparison between interference fringes measured on the antenna range, solar transit observations, and the system model.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0196-2892</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1558-0644</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/TGRS.2007.894060</identifier><identifier>CODEN: IGRSD2</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York, NY: IEEE</publisher><subject>Antenna measurements ; Antennas ; Applied geophysics ; Arrays ; Bias ; Crosstalk ; Design engineering ; Earth ; Earth sciences ; Earth, ocean, space ; Errors ; Exact sciences and technology ; Extraterrestrial measurements ; Fourier transforms ; Instruments ; Interferometry ; Internal geophysics ; microwave imaging ; microwave radiometry ; Noise ; Phased arrays ; Radiometry ; Receiving antennas ; remote sensing ; Spatial resolution ; System testing</subject><ispartof>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 2007-07, Vol.45 (7), p.1947-1957</ispartof><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE) 2007</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-7833e47718ceb7dc0bd270d8c1e52309d6bd1f5cd20845e0efb71e8393c5df6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-7833e47718ceb7dc0bd270d8c1e52309d6bd1f5cd20845e0efb71e8393c5df6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4261082$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,776,780,785,786,792,23911,23912,25120,27903,27904,54736</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/4261082$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18943658$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Tanner, A.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, W.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambrigsten, B.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinardo, S.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, S.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kangaslahti, P.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaier, T.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruf, C.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, S.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, B.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musko, S.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogacki, S..</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piepmeier, J.R.</creatorcontrib><title>Initial Results of the Geostationary Synthetic Thinned Array Radiometer (GeoSTAR) Demonstrator Instrument</title><title>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</title><addtitle>TGRS</addtitle><description>The design, error budget, and preliminary test results of a 50-56-GHz synthetic aperture radiometer demonstration system are presented. The instrument consists of a fixed 24-element array of correlation interferometers and is capable of producing calibrated images with 1deg spatial resolution within a 17deg wide field of view. This system has been built to demonstrate a performance and a design which can be scaled to a much larger geostationary Earth imager. As a baseline, such a system would consist of about 300 elements and would be capable of providing contiguous full hemispheric images of the Earth with 1 K of radiometric precision and 50-km spatial resolution. An error budget is developed around this goal and then tested with the demonstrator system. Errors are categorized as either scaling (i.e., complex gain) or additive (noise and bias) errors. Sensitivity to gain and/or phase error is generally proportional to the magnitude of the expected visibility, which is high only in the shortest baselines of the array, based on model simulations of the Earth as viewed from geostationary Earth orbit. Requirements range from approximately 0.5% and 0.3deg of amplitude and phase uncertainty, respectively, for the closest spacings at the center of the array, to about 4% and 2.5deg for the majority of the array. The latter requirements are demonstrated with our instrument using relatively simple references and antenna models, and by relying on the intrinsic stability and efficiency of the system. The 0.5% requirement (for the short baselines) is met by measuring the detailed spatial response (e.g., on the antenna range) and by using an internal noise diode reference to stabilize the response. This result suggests a hybrid image synthesis algorithm in which long baselines are processed by a fast Fourier transform and the short baselines are processed by a more precise (G-matrix) algorithm which can handle small anomalies among antenna and receiver responses. Visibility biases and other additive errors must be below about 1.5 mK on average, regardless of baseline. The bias requirement is largely met with a phase-shifting scheme applied to the local oscillator distribution of our demonstration system. Low mutual coupling among the horn antennas of our design is also critical to minimize the biases caused by crosstalk of receiver noise. Performance is validated by a three-way comparison between interference fringes measured on the antenna range, solar transit observations, and the system model.</description><subject>Antenna measurements</subject><subject>Antennas</subject><subject>Applied geophysics</subject><subject>Arrays</subject><subject>Bias</subject><subject>Crosstalk</subject><subject>Design engineering</subject><subject>Earth</subject><subject>Earth sciences</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Errors</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Extraterrestrial measurements</subject><subject>Fourier transforms</subject><subject>Instruments</subject><subject>Interferometry</subject><subject>Internal geophysics</subject><subject>microwave imaging</subject><subject>microwave radiometry</subject><subject>Noise</subject><subject>Phased arrays</subject><subject>Radiometry</subject><subject>Receiving antennas</subject><subject>remote sensing</subject><subject>Spatial resolution</subject><subject>System testing</subject><issn>0196-2892</issn><issn>1558-0644</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2007</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpdkNGLEzEQhxdRsJ6-C74EQdSHrZNsks0-llNr4UBo63NIk1kux25yJtmH_vem9FDwaYaZ7zcMX9O8pbCmFIYvx-3-sGYA_VoNHCQ8a1ZUCNWC5Px5swI6yJapgb1sXuX8AEC5oP2q8bvgizcT2WNeppJJHEm5R7LFmIspPgaTzuRwDnVYvCXHex8COrJJyZzJ3jgfZyyYyKeaOBw3-8_kK84x5JJMiYnsLt0yYyivmxejmTK-eao3za_v3463P9q7n9vd7eautVyK0vaq65D3PVUWT72zcHKsB6csRcE6GJw8OToK6xgoLhBwPPUUVTd0VrhRYnfTfLzefUzx94K56Nlni9NkAsYla6VAip5LWcn3_5EPcUmhPqeV5BQYG3iF4ArZFHNOOOrH5OcqRVPQF_P6Yl5fzOur-Rr58HTXZGumMZlgff6Xq1gnharcuyvnEfHvmjNJQbHuD5oJjPE</recordid><startdate>20070701</startdate><enddate>20070701</enddate><creator>Tanner, A.B.</creator><creator>Wilson, W.J.</creator><creator>Lambrigsten, B.H.</creator><creator>Dinardo, S.J.</creator><creator>Brown, S.T.</creator><creator>Kangaslahti, P.P.</creator><creator>Gaier, T.C.</creator><creator>Ruf, C.S.</creator><creator>Gross, S.M.</creator><creator>Lim, B.H.</creator><creator>Musko, S.B.</creator><creator>Rogacki, S..</creator><creator>Piepmeier, J.R.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers</general><general>The Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, Inc. (IEEE)</general><scope>97E</scope><scope>RIA</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7UA</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>F1W</scope><scope>FR3</scope><scope>H8D</scope><scope>H96</scope><scope>KR7</scope><scope>L.G</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>F28</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20070701</creationdate><title>Initial Results of the Geostationary Synthetic Thinned Array Radiometer (GeoSTAR) Demonstrator Instrument</title><author>Tanner, A.B. ; Wilson, W.J. ; Lambrigsten, B.H. ; Dinardo, S.J. ; Brown, S.T. ; Kangaslahti, P.P. ; Gaier, T.C. ; Ruf, C.S. ; Gross, S.M. ; Lim, B.H. ; Musko, S.B. ; Rogacki, S.. ; Piepmeier, J.R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c465t-7833e47718ceb7dc0bd270d8c1e52309d6bd1f5cd20845e0efb71e8393c5df6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2007</creationdate><topic>Antenna measurements</topic><topic>Antennas</topic><topic>Applied geophysics</topic><topic>Arrays</topic><topic>Bias</topic><topic>Crosstalk</topic><topic>Design engineering</topic><topic>Earth</topic><topic>Earth sciences</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Errors</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Extraterrestrial measurements</topic><topic>Fourier transforms</topic><topic>Instruments</topic><topic>Interferometry</topic><topic>Internal geophysics</topic><topic>microwave imaging</topic><topic>microwave radiometry</topic><topic>Noise</topic><topic>Phased arrays</topic><topic>Radiometry</topic><topic>Receiving antennas</topic><topic>remote sensing</topic><topic>Spatial resolution</topic><topic>System testing</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Tanner, A.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wilson, W.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lambrigsten, B.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dinardo, S.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brown, S.T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kangaslahti, P.P.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gaier, T.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruf, C.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gross, S.M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lim, B.H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Musko, S.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rogacki, S..</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Piepmeier, J.R.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 2005-present</collection><collection>IEEE All-Society Periodicals Package (ASPP) 1998-Present</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Water Resources Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>ASFA: Aquatic Sciences and Fisheries Abstracts</collection><collection>Engineering Research Database</collection><collection>Aerospace Database</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) 2: Ocean Technology, Policy &amp; Non-Living Resources</collection><collection>Civil Engineering Abstracts</collection><collection>Aquatic Science &amp; Fisheries Abstracts (ASFA) Professional</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>ANTE: Abstracts in New Technology &amp; Engineering</collection><jtitle>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Tanner, A.B.</au><au>Wilson, W.J.</au><au>Lambrigsten, B.H.</au><au>Dinardo, S.J.</au><au>Brown, S.T.</au><au>Kangaslahti, P.P.</au><au>Gaier, T.C.</au><au>Ruf, C.S.</au><au>Gross, S.M.</au><au>Lim, B.H.</au><au>Musko, S.B.</au><au>Rogacki, S..</au><au>Piepmeier, J.R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Initial Results of the Geostationary Synthetic Thinned Array Radiometer (GeoSTAR) Demonstrator Instrument</atitle><jtitle>IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing</jtitle><stitle>TGRS</stitle><date>2007-07-01</date><risdate>2007</risdate><volume>45</volume><issue>7</issue><spage>1947</spage><epage>1957</epage><pages>1947-1957</pages><issn>0196-2892</issn><eissn>1558-0644</eissn><coden>IGRSD2</coden><abstract>The design, error budget, and preliminary test results of a 50-56-GHz synthetic aperture radiometer demonstration system are presented. The instrument consists of a fixed 24-element array of correlation interferometers and is capable of producing calibrated images with 1deg spatial resolution within a 17deg wide field of view. This system has been built to demonstrate a performance and a design which can be scaled to a much larger geostationary Earth imager. As a baseline, such a system would consist of about 300 elements and would be capable of providing contiguous full hemispheric images of the Earth with 1 K of radiometric precision and 50-km spatial resolution. An error budget is developed around this goal and then tested with the demonstrator system. Errors are categorized as either scaling (i.e., complex gain) or additive (noise and bias) errors. Sensitivity to gain and/or phase error is generally proportional to the magnitude of the expected visibility, which is high only in the shortest baselines of the array, based on model simulations of the Earth as viewed from geostationary Earth orbit. Requirements range from approximately 0.5% and 0.3deg of amplitude and phase uncertainty, respectively, for the closest spacings at the center of the array, to about 4% and 2.5deg for the majority of the array. The latter requirements are demonstrated with our instrument using relatively simple references and antenna models, and by relying on the intrinsic stability and efficiency of the system. The 0.5% requirement (for the short baselines) is met by measuring the detailed spatial response (e.g., on the antenna range) and by using an internal noise diode reference to stabilize the response. This result suggests a hybrid image synthesis algorithm in which long baselines are processed by a fast Fourier transform and the short baselines are processed by a more precise (G-matrix) algorithm which can handle small anomalies among antenna and receiver responses. Visibility biases and other additive errors must be below about 1.5 mK on average, regardless of baseline. The bias requirement is largely met with a phase-shifting scheme applied to the local oscillator distribution of our demonstration system. Low mutual coupling among the horn antennas of our design is also critical to minimize the biases caused by crosstalk of receiver noise. Performance is validated by a three-way comparison between interference fringes measured on the antenna range, solar transit observations, and the system model.</abstract><cop>New York, NY</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/TGRS.2007.894060</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 0196-2892
ispartof IEEE transactions on geoscience and remote sensing, 2007-07, Vol.45 (7), p.1947-1957
issn 0196-2892
1558-0644
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_18943658
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)
subjects Antenna measurements
Antennas
Applied geophysics
Arrays
Bias
Crosstalk
Design engineering
Earth
Earth sciences
Earth, ocean, space
Errors
Exact sciences and technology
Extraterrestrial measurements
Fourier transforms
Instruments
Interferometry
Internal geophysics
microwave imaging
microwave radiometry
Noise
Phased arrays
Radiometry
Receiving antennas
remote sensing
Spatial resolution
System testing
title Initial Results of the Geostationary Synthetic Thinned Array Radiometer (GeoSTAR) Demonstrator Instrument
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-27T16%3A15%3A39IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_RIE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Initial%20Results%20of%20the%20Geostationary%20Synthetic%20Thinned%20Array%20Radiometer%20(GeoSTAR)%20Demonstrator%20Instrument&rft.jtitle=IEEE%20transactions%20on%20geoscience%20and%20remote%20sensing&rft.au=Tanner,%20A.B.&rft.date=2007-07-01&rft.volume=45&rft.issue=7&rft.spage=1947&rft.epage=1957&rft.pages=1947-1957&rft.issn=0196-2892&rft.eissn=1558-0644&rft.coden=IGRSD2&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/TGRS.2007.894060&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_RIE%3E2333831911%3C/proquest_RIE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=864102294&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=4261082&rfr_iscdi=true