Indications, complications, and results of shoulder arthroplasty
Objective: To provide estimates of patient outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty using Neer-II type humeral prosthesis and to examine variation in outcomes due to patient and prosthesis characteristics. Methods: North American and Western European published articles were identified through a comp...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Scandinavian journal of rheumatology 2006-01, Vol.35 (6), p.426-434 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 434 |
---|---|
container_issue | 6 |
container_start_page | 426 |
container_title | Scandinavian journal of rheumatology |
container_volume | 35 |
creator | Sande, MAJ van de Brand, R. Rozing, PM |
description | Objective: To provide estimates of patient outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty using Neer-II type humeral prosthesis and to examine variation in outcomes due to patient and prosthesis characteristics.
Methods: North American and Western European published articles were identified through a computerized literature search and bibliography review. Studies were included if they enrolled 15 or more patients, discriminated between hemi-arthroplasty (HEMI) and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and measured pain relief, gain in range of motion (ROM), radiographic follow-up (>2 years), short- and long-term complications, and revision surgery.
Results: A total of 40 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. The total number of patients enrolled was 3584. The mean follow-up was 59 months. The mean patient age was 62 years, 65% of patients were women and 73% underwent TSA. All reports showed relevant pain relief, increase in ROM, and high satisfaction rates for HEMI and TSA in both osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The overall rate of revision was 8%. Significant differences between HEMI and TSA for both diagnoses were found for all outcome parameters.
Conclusion: Shoulder arthroplasty is a safe and effective procedure for OA and RA patients. The diagnosis, shoulder pathology, and prosthesis specifics were significant predictors of outcomes. We therefore emphasize that conclusions on the outcome of shoulder arthroplasty can only be made if differentiated between these patient and prosthesis specifics. Limitations in the reporting style of these articles severely constrain the ability to explore variation in outcomes due to study, patient, or prosthesis characteristics and restrict their generalisability. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1080/03009740600759720 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_18416189</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68321173</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-ed798fcf20a0b67691c8b9fc64336632d601c0c11b54c6f717478a8674be9bd53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMo7rr6AbxIL3qyOmnSpEEPyuKfhQUvei5pmtAuabMmLbLf3i5bWUTwNAzze495D6FzDDcYMrgFAiA4BQbAU8ETOEBTnEISc06SQzTd3uMBSCboJIQVAFDBxTGaYE4oSaiYoodFW9ZKdrVrw3WkXLO2-1W2ZeR16G0XImeiULneltpH0neVd2srQ7c5RUdG2qDPxjlDH89P7_PXePn2spg_LmNFCe1iXXKRGWUSkFAwzgRWWSGMYpQQxkhSMsAKFMZFShUzHHPKM5kxTgstijIlM3S1811799nr0OVNHZS2Vrba9SFnGUnwkGsA8Q5U3oXgtcnXvm6k3-QY8m1t-Z_aBs3FaN4XjS73irGnAbgcARmUtMbLVtVhz2UUM5xtufsdV7fG-UZ-OW_LvJMb6_yPiPz3x90veaWl7Solvc5XrvftUPA_Kb4B2XCZXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68321173</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Indications, complications, and results of shoulder arthroplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN</source><source>Access via Taylor & Francis</source><creator>Sande, MAJ van de ; Brand, R. ; Rozing, PM</creator><creatorcontrib>Sande, MAJ van de ; Brand, R. ; Rozing, PM</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To provide estimates of patient outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty using Neer-II type humeral prosthesis and to examine variation in outcomes due to patient and prosthesis characteristics.
Methods: North American and Western European published articles were identified through a computerized literature search and bibliography review. Studies were included if they enrolled 15 or more patients, discriminated between hemi-arthroplasty (HEMI) and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and measured pain relief, gain in range of motion (ROM), radiographic follow-up (>2 years), short- and long-term complications, and revision surgery.
Results: A total of 40 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. The total number of patients enrolled was 3584. The mean follow-up was 59 months. The mean patient age was 62 years, 65% of patients were women and 73% underwent TSA. All reports showed relevant pain relief, increase in ROM, and high satisfaction rates for HEMI and TSA in both osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The overall rate of revision was 8%. Significant differences between HEMI and TSA for both diagnoses were found for all outcome parameters.
Conclusion: Shoulder arthroplasty is a safe and effective procedure for OA and RA patients. The diagnosis, shoulder pathology, and prosthesis specifics were significant predictors of outcomes. We therefore emphasize that conclusions on the outcome of shoulder arthroplasty can only be made if differentiated between these patient and prosthesis specifics. Limitations in the reporting style of these articles severely constrain the ability to explore variation in outcomes due to study, patient, or prosthesis characteristics and restrict their generalisability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-9742</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1502-7732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03009740600759720</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17343249</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SJRHAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Colchester: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - surgery ; Arthroplasty, Replacement - adverse effects ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Humans ; Inflammatory joint diseases ; Joint Instability - etiology ; Joint Prosthesis ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous. Osteoarticular involvement in other diseases ; Osteoarthritis ; Osteoarthritis - surgery ; Pain, Intractable - etiology ; Patient Satisfaction ; Radiography ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Reoperation ; Shoulder - diagnostic imaging ; Shoulder - surgery</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of rheumatology, 2006-01, Vol.35 (6), p.426-434</ispartof><rights>2006 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2006</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-ed798fcf20a0b67691c8b9fc64336632d601c0c11b54c6f717478a8674be9bd53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-ed798fcf20a0b67691c8b9fc64336632d601c0c11b54c6f717478a8674be9bd53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03009740600759720$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03009740600759720$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,59652,59758,60441,60547,61226,61261,61407,61442</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=18416189$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17343249$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sande, MAJ van de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brand, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozing, PM</creatorcontrib><title>Indications, complications, and results of shoulder arthroplasty</title><title>Scandinavian journal of rheumatology</title><addtitle>Scand J Rheumatol</addtitle><description>Objective: To provide estimates of patient outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty using Neer-II type humeral prosthesis and to examine variation in outcomes due to patient and prosthesis characteristics.
Methods: North American and Western European published articles were identified through a computerized literature search and bibliography review. Studies were included if they enrolled 15 or more patients, discriminated between hemi-arthroplasty (HEMI) and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and measured pain relief, gain in range of motion (ROM), radiographic follow-up (>2 years), short- and long-term complications, and revision surgery.
Results: A total of 40 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. The total number of patients enrolled was 3584. The mean follow-up was 59 months. The mean patient age was 62 years, 65% of patients were women and 73% underwent TSA. All reports showed relevant pain relief, increase in ROM, and high satisfaction rates for HEMI and TSA in both osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The overall rate of revision was 8%. Significant differences between HEMI and TSA for both diagnoses were found for all outcome parameters.
Conclusion: Shoulder arthroplasty is a safe and effective procedure for OA and RA patients. The diagnosis, shoulder pathology, and prosthesis specifics were significant predictors of outcomes. We therefore emphasize that conclusions on the outcome of shoulder arthroplasty can only be made if differentiated between these patient and prosthesis specifics. Limitations in the reporting style of these articles severely constrain the ability to explore variation in outcomes due to study, patient, or prosthesis characteristics and restrict their generalisability.</description><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - surgery</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement - adverse effects</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inflammatory joint diseases</subject><subject>Joint Instability - etiology</subject><subject>Joint Prosthesis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous. Osteoarticular involvement in other diseases</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis - surgery</subject><subject>Pain, Intractable - etiology</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Shoulder - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Shoulder - surgery</subject><issn>0300-9742</issn><issn>1502-7732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMo7rr6AbxIL3qyOmnSpEEPyuKfhQUvei5pmtAuabMmLbLf3i5bWUTwNAzze495D6FzDDcYMrgFAiA4BQbAU8ETOEBTnEISc06SQzTd3uMBSCboJIQVAFDBxTGaYE4oSaiYoodFW9ZKdrVrw3WkXLO2-1W2ZeR16G0XImeiULneltpH0neVd2srQ7c5RUdG2qDPxjlDH89P7_PXePn2spg_LmNFCe1iXXKRGWUSkFAwzgRWWSGMYpQQxkhSMsAKFMZFShUzHHPKM5kxTgstijIlM3S1811799nr0OVNHZS2Vrba9SFnGUnwkGsA8Q5U3oXgtcnXvm6k3-QY8m1t-Z_aBs3FaN4XjS73irGnAbgcARmUtMbLVtVhz2UUM5xtufsdV7fG-UZ-OW_LvJMb6_yPiPz3x90veaWl7Solvc5XrvftUPA_Kb4B2XCZXw</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Sande, MAJ van de</creator><creator>Brand, R.</creator><creator>Rozing, PM</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor & Francis</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>Indications, complications, and results of shoulder arthroplasty</title><author>Sande, MAJ van de ; Brand, R. ; Rozing, PM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-ed798fcf20a0b67691c8b9fc64336632d601c0c11b54c6f717478a8674be9bd53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - surgery</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement - adverse effects</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inflammatory joint diseases</topic><topic>Joint Instability - etiology</topic><topic>Joint Prosthesis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous. Osteoarticular involvement in other diseases</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis - surgery</topic><topic>Pain, Intractable - etiology</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Shoulder - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Shoulder - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sande, MAJ van de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brand, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozing, PM</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of rheumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sande, MAJ van de</au><au>Brand, R.</au><au>Rozing, PM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Indications, complications, and results of shoulder arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of rheumatology</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Rheumatol</addtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>426</spage><epage>434</epage><pages>426-434</pages><issn>0300-9742</issn><eissn>1502-7732</eissn><coden>SJRHAT</coden><abstract>Objective: To provide estimates of patient outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty using Neer-II type humeral prosthesis and to examine variation in outcomes due to patient and prosthesis characteristics.
Methods: North American and Western European published articles were identified through a computerized literature search and bibliography review. Studies were included if they enrolled 15 or more patients, discriminated between hemi-arthroplasty (HEMI) and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and measured pain relief, gain in range of motion (ROM), radiographic follow-up (>2 years), short- and long-term complications, and revision surgery.
Results: A total of 40 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. The total number of patients enrolled was 3584. The mean follow-up was 59 months. The mean patient age was 62 years, 65% of patients were women and 73% underwent TSA. All reports showed relevant pain relief, increase in ROM, and high satisfaction rates for HEMI and TSA in both osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The overall rate of revision was 8%. Significant differences between HEMI and TSA for both diagnoses were found for all outcome parameters.
Conclusion: Shoulder arthroplasty is a safe and effective procedure for OA and RA patients. The diagnosis, shoulder pathology, and prosthesis specifics were significant predictors of outcomes. We therefore emphasize that conclusions on the outcome of shoulder arthroplasty can only be made if differentiated between these patient and prosthesis specifics. Limitations in the reporting style of these articles severely constrain the ability to explore variation in outcomes due to study, patient, or prosthesis characteristics and restrict their generalisability.</abstract><cop>Colchester</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>17343249</pmid><doi>10.1080/03009740600759720</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0300-9742 |
ispartof | Scandinavian journal of rheumatology, 2006-01, Vol.35 (6), p.426-434 |
issn | 0300-9742 1502-7732 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_18416189 |
source | MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN; Access via Taylor & Francis |
subjects | Arthritis, Rheumatoid - surgery Arthroplasty, Replacement - adverse effects Biological and medical sciences Diseases of the osteoarticular system Humans Inflammatory joint diseases Joint Instability - etiology Joint Prosthesis Medical sciences Miscellaneous. Osteoarticular involvement in other diseases Osteoarthritis Osteoarthritis - surgery Pain, Intractable - etiology Patient Satisfaction Radiography Range of Motion, Articular Reoperation Shoulder - diagnostic imaging Shoulder - surgery |
title | Indications, complications, and results of shoulder arthroplasty |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T14%3A18%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Indications,%20complications,%20and%20results%20of%20shoulder%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20rheumatology&rft.au=Sande,%20MAJ%20van%20de&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=426&rft.epage=434&rft.pages=426-434&rft.issn=0300-9742&rft.eissn=1502-7732&rft.coden=SJRHAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03009740600759720&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E68321173%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68321173&rft_id=info:pmid/17343249&rfr_iscdi=true |