Indications, complications, and results of shoulder arthroplasty

Objective: To provide estimates of patient outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty using Neer-II type humeral prosthesis and to examine variation in outcomes due to patient and prosthesis characteristics. Methods: North American and Western European published articles were identified through a comp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Scandinavian journal of rheumatology 2006-01, Vol.35 (6), p.426-434
Hauptverfasser: Sande, MAJ van de, Brand, R., Rozing, PM
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 434
container_issue 6
container_start_page 426
container_title Scandinavian journal of rheumatology
container_volume 35
creator Sande, MAJ van de
Brand, R.
Rozing, PM
description Objective: To provide estimates of patient outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty using Neer-II type humeral prosthesis and to examine variation in outcomes due to patient and prosthesis characteristics. Methods: North American and Western European published articles were identified through a computerized literature search and bibliography review. Studies were included if they enrolled 15 or more patients, discriminated between hemi-arthroplasty (HEMI) and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and measured pain relief, gain in range of motion (ROM), radiographic follow-up (>2 years), short- and long-term complications, and revision surgery. Results: A total of 40 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. The total number of patients enrolled was 3584. The mean follow-up was 59 months. The mean patient age was 62 years, 65% of patients were women and 73% underwent TSA. All reports showed relevant pain relief, increase in ROM, and high satisfaction rates for HEMI and TSA in both osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The overall rate of revision was 8%. Significant differences between HEMI and TSA for both diagnoses were found for all outcome parameters. Conclusion: Shoulder arthroplasty is a safe and effective procedure for OA and RA patients. The diagnosis, shoulder pathology, and prosthesis specifics were significant predictors of outcomes. We therefore emphasize that conclusions on the outcome of shoulder arthroplasty can only be made if differentiated between these patient and prosthesis specifics. Limitations in the reporting style of these articles severely constrain the ability to explore variation in outcomes due to study, patient, or prosthesis characteristics and restrict their generalisability.
doi_str_mv 10.1080/03009740600759720
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_18416189</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>68321173</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-ed798fcf20a0b67691c8b9fc64336632d601c0c11b54c6f717478a8674be9bd53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMo7rr6AbxIL3qyOmnSpEEPyuKfhQUvei5pmtAuabMmLbLf3i5bWUTwNAzze495D6FzDDcYMrgFAiA4BQbAU8ETOEBTnEISc06SQzTd3uMBSCboJIQVAFDBxTGaYE4oSaiYoodFW9ZKdrVrw3WkXLO2-1W2ZeR16G0XImeiULneltpH0neVd2srQ7c5RUdG2qDPxjlDH89P7_PXePn2spg_LmNFCe1iXXKRGWUSkFAwzgRWWSGMYpQQxkhSMsAKFMZFShUzHHPKM5kxTgstijIlM3S1811799nr0OVNHZS2Vrba9SFnGUnwkGsA8Q5U3oXgtcnXvm6k3-QY8m1t-Z_aBs3FaN4XjS73irGnAbgcARmUtMbLVtVhz2UUM5xtufsdV7fG-UZ-OW_LvJMb6_yPiPz3x90veaWl7Solvc5XrvftUPA_Kb4B2XCZXw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>68321173</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Indications, complications, and results of shoulder arthroplasty</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Taylor &amp; Francis Medical Library - CRKN</source><source>Access via Taylor &amp; Francis</source><creator>Sande, MAJ van de ; Brand, R. ; Rozing, PM</creator><creatorcontrib>Sande, MAJ van de ; Brand, R. ; Rozing, PM</creatorcontrib><description>Objective: To provide estimates of patient outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty using Neer-II type humeral prosthesis and to examine variation in outcomes due to patient and prosthesis characteristics. Methods: North American and Western European published articles were identified through a computerized literature search and bibliography review. Studies were included if they enrolled 15 or more patients, discriminated between hemi-arthroplasty (HEMI) and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and measured pain relief, gain in range of motion (ROM), radiographic follow-up (&gt;2 years), short- and long-term complications, and revision surgery. Results: A total of 40 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. The total number of patients enrolled was 3584. The mean follow-up was 59 months. The mean patient age was 62 years, 65% of patients were women and 73% underwent TSA. All reports showed relevant pain relief, increase in ROM, and high satisfaction rates for HEMI and TSA in both osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The overall rate of revision was 8%. Significant differences between HEMI and TSA for both diagnoses were found for all outcome parameters. Conclusion: Shoulder arthroplasty is a safe and effective procedure for OA and RA patients. The diagnosis, shoulder pathology, and prosthesis specifics were significant predictors of outcomes. We therefore emphasize that conclusions on the outcome of shoulder arthroplasty can only be made if differentiated between these patient and prosthesis specifics. Limitations in the reporting style of these articles severely constrain the ability to explore variation in outcomes due to study, patient, or prosthesis characteristics and restrict their generalisability.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0300-9742</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1502-7732</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/03009740600759720</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17343249</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SJRHAT</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Colchester: Informa UK Ltd</publisher><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - surgery ; Arthroplasty, Replacement - adverse effects ; Biological and medical sciences ; Diseases of the osteoarticular system ; Humans ; Inflammatory joint diseases ; Joint Instability - etiology ; Joint Prosthesis ; Medical sciences ; Miscellaneous. Osteoarticular involvement in other diseases ; Osteoarthritis ; Osteoarthritis - surgery ; Pain, Intractable - etiology ; Patient Satisfaction ; Radiography ; Range of Motion, Articular ; Reoperation ; Shoulder - diagnostic imaging ; Shoulder - surgery</subject><ispartof>Scandinavian journal of rheumatology, 2006-01, Vol.35 (6), p.426-434</ispartof><rights>2006 Informa UK Ltd All rights reserved: reproduction in whole or part not permitted 2006</rights><rights>2007 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-ed798fcf20a0b67691c8b9fc64336632d601c0c11b54c6f717478a8674be9bd53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-ed798fcf20a0b67691c8b9fc64336632d601c0c11b54c6f717478a8674be9bd53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03009740600759720$$EPDF$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03009740600759720$$EHTML$$P50$$Ginformaworld$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>315,781,785,27929,27930,59652,59758,60441,60547,61226,61261,61407,61442</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18416189$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17343249$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sande, MAJ van de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brand, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozing, PM</creatorcontrib><title>Indications, complications, and results of shoulder arthroplasty</title><title>Scandinavian journal of rheumatology</title><addtitle>Scand J Rheumatol</addtitle><description>Objective: To provide estimates of patient outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty using Neer-II type humeral prosthesis and to examine variation in outcomes due to patient and prosthesis characteristics. Methods: North American and Western European published articles were identified through a computerized literature search and bibliography review. Studies were included if they enrolled 15 or more patients, discriminated between hemi-arthroplasty (HEMI) and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and measured pain relief, gain in range of motion (ROM), radiographic follow-up (&gt;2 years), short- and long-term complications, and revision surgery. Results: A total of 40 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. The total number of patients enrolled was 3584. The mean follow-up was 59 months. The mean patient age was 62 years, 65% of patients were women and 73% underwent TSA. All reports showed relevant pain relief, increase in ROM, and high satisfaction rates for HEMI and TSA in both osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The overall rate of revision was 8%. Significant differences between HEMI and TSA for both diagnoses were found for all outcome parameters. Conclusion: Shoulder arthroplasty is a safe and effective procedure for OA and RA patients. The diagnosis, shoulder pathology, and prosthesis specifics were significant predictors of outcomes. We therefore emphasize that conclusions on the outcome of shoulder arthroplasty can only be made if differentiated between these patient and prosthesis specifics. Limitations in the reporting style of these articles severely constrain the ability to explore variation in outcomes due to study, patient, or prosthesis characteristics and restrict their generalisability.</description><subject>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - surgery</subject><subject>Arthroplasty, Replacement - adverse effects</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Inflammatory joint diseases</subject><subject>Joint Instability - etiology</subject><subject>Joint Prosthesis</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Miscellaneous. Osteoarticular involvement in other diseases</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis</subject><subject>Osteoarthritis - surgery</subject><subject>Pain, Intractable - etiology</subject><subject>Patient Satisfaction</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Range of Motion, Articular</subject><subject>Reoperation</subject><subject>Shoulder - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Shoulder - surgery</subject><issn>0300-9742</issn><issn>1502-7732</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kE9LxDAQxYMo7rr6AbxIL3qyOmnSpEEPyuKfhQUvei5pmtAuabMmLbLf3i5bWUTwNAzze495D6FzDDcYMrgFAiA4BQbAU8ETOEBTnEISc06SQzTd3uMBSCboJIQVAFDBxTGaYE4oSaiYoodFW9ZKdrVrw3WkXLO2-1W2ZeR16G0XImeiULneltpH0neVd2srQ7c5RUdG2qDPxjlDH89P7_PXePn2spg_LmNFCe1iXXKRGWUSkFAwzgRWWSGMYpQQxkhSMsAKFMZFShUzHHPKM5kxTgstijIlM3S1811799nr0OVNHZS2Vrba9SFnGUnwkGsA8Q5U3oXgtcnXvm6k3-QY8m1t-Z_aBs3FaN4XjS73irGnAbgcARmUtMbLVtVhz2UUM5xtufsdV7fG-UZ-OW_LvJMb6_yPiPz3x90veaWl7Solvc5XrvftUPA_Kb4B2XCZXw</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Sande, MAJ van de</creator><creator>Brand, R.</creator><creator>Rozing, PM</creator><general>Informa UK Ltd</general><general>Taylor &amp; Francis</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>Indications, complications, and results of shoulder arthroplasty</title><author>Sande, MAJ van de ; Brand, R. ; Rozing, PM</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-ed798fcf20a0b67691c8b9fc64336632d601c0c11b54c6f717478a8674be9bd53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>Arthritis, Rheumatoid - surgery</topic><topic>Arthroplasty, Replacement - adverse effects</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Diseases of the osteoarticular system</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Inflammatory joint diseases</topic><topic>Joint Instability - etiology</topic><topic>Joint Prosthesis</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Miscellaneous. Osteoarticular involvement in other diseases</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis</topic><topic>Osteoarthritis - surgery</topic><topic>Pain, Intractable - etiology</topic><topic>Patient Satisfaction</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Range of Motion, Articular</topic><topic>Reoperation</topic><topic>Shoulder - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Shoulder - surgery</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sande, MAJ van de</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Brand, R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rozing, PM</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of rheumatology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sande, MAJ van de</au><au>Brand, R.</au><au>Rozing, PM</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Indications, complications, and results of shoulder arthroplasty</atitle><jtitle>Scandinavian journal of rheumatology</jtitle><addtitle>Scand J Rheumatol</addtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>35</volume><issue>6</issue><spage>426</spage><epage>434</epage><pages>426-434</pages><issn>0300-9742</issn><eissn>1502-7732</eissn><coden>SJRHAT</coden><abstract>Objective: To provide estimates of patient outcomes following shoulder arthroplasty using Neer-II type humeral prosthesis and to examine variation in outcomes due to patient and prosthesis characteristics. Methods: North American and Western European published articles were identified through a computerized literature search and bibliography review. Studies were included if they enrolled 15 or more patients, discriminated between hemi-arthroplasty (HEMI) and total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and measured pain relief, gain in range of motion (ROM), radiographic follow-up (&gt;2 years), short- and long-term complications, and revision surgery. Results: A total of 40 studies satisfied the inclusion criteria. The total number of patients enrolled was 3584. The mean follow-up was 59 months. The mean patient age was 62 years, 65% of patients were women and 73% underwent TSA. All reports showed relevant pain relief, increase in ROM, and high satisfaction rates for HEMI and TSA in both osteoarthritis (OA) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA). The overall rate of revision was 8%. Significant differences between HEMI and TSA for both diagnoses were found for all outcome parameters. Conclusion: Shoulder arthroplasty is a safe and effective procedure for OA and RA patients. The diagnosis, shoulder pathology, and prosthesis specifics were significant predictors of outcomes. We therefore emphasize that conclusions on the outcome of shoulder arthroplasty can only be made if differentiated between these patient and prosthesis specifics. Limitations in the reporting style of these articles severely constrain the ability to explore variation in outcomes due to study, patient, or prosthesis characteristics and restrict their generalisability.</abstract><cop>Colchester</cop><pub>Informa UK Ltd</pub><pmid>17343249</pmid><doi>10.1080/03009740600759720</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0300-9742
ispartof Scandinavian journal of rheumatology, 2006-01, Vol.35 (6), p.426-434
issn 0300-9742
1502-7732
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_18416189
source MEDLINE; Taylor & Francis Medical Library - CRKN; Access via Taylor & Francis
subjects Arthritis, Rheumatoid - surgery
Arthroplasty, Replacement - adverse effects
Biological and medical sciences
Diseases of the osteoarticular system
Humans
Inflammatory joint diseases
Joint Instability - etiology
Joint Prosthesis
Medical sciences
Miscellaneous. Osteoarticular involvement in other diseases
Osteoarthritis
Osteoarthritis - surgery
Pain, Intractable - etiology
Patient Satisfaction
Radiography
Range of Motion, Articular
Reoperation
Shoulder - diagnostic imaging
Shoulder - surgery
title Indications, complications, and results of shoulder arthroplasty
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-12T14%3A18%3A53IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Indications,%20complications,%20and%20results%20of%20shoulder%20arthroplasty&rft.jtitle=Scandinavian%20journal%20of%20rheumatology&rft.au=Sande,%20MAJ%20van%20de&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=35&rft.issue=6&rft.spage=426&rft.epage=434&rft.pages=426-434&rft.issn=0300-9742&rft.eissn=1502-7732&rft.coden=SJRHAT&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/03009740600759720&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E68321173%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=68321173&rft_id=info:pmid/17343249&rfr_iscdi=true