Pasture and sheep responses to lime application in a grazing experiment in a high-rainfall area, south-eastern Australia. II. Liveweight gain and wool production

‘Managing Acid Soils Through Efficient Rotations (MASTER)’ is a long-term pasture–crop rotation experiment commenced in 1992. One of the objectives was to demonstrate the extent of crop, pasture, and animal responses to lime application on a typical acidic soil in the 500–800 mm rainfall zone of sou...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Australian journal of agricultural research 2006-01, Vol.57 (10), p.1057-1066
Hauptverfasser: Li, G.D, Helyar, K.R, Conyers, M.K, Castleman, L.J.C, Fisher, R.P, Poile, G.J, Lisle, C.J, Cullis, B.R, Cregan, P.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1066
container_issue 10
container_start_page 1057
container_title Australian journal of agricultural research
container_volume 57
creator Li, G.D
Helyar, K.R
Conyers, M.K
Castleman, L.J.C
Fisher, R.P
Poile, G.J
Lisle, C.J
Cullis, B.R
Cregan, P.D
description ‘Managing Acid Soils Through Efficient Rotations (MASTER)’ is a long-term pasture–crop rotation experiment commenced in 1992. One of the objectives was to demonstrate the extent of crop, pasture, and animal responses to lime application on a typical acidic soil in the 500–800 mm rainfall zone of south-eastern Australia. Two types of pastures (perennial v. annual pastures) with or without lime application were established in 1992. Fifteen- to eighteen-month-old Merino hoggets were used as test animals and were changed annually. This paper reports the results of sheep responses to liming from the 4 continuous pasture treatments over 6 years from 1992 to 1997. The stocking rate was the same on all plots within a treatment during each rotation period, but was varied between treatments based on the pasture availability and sheep body condition. The most important findings from this study are that the limed treatments carried 29% and 27% more stock (up to 4 DSE/ha) than the unlimed treatments for perennial and annual pastures, respectively. As a result, the limed perennial pastures produced 27% more liveweight gain (62 kg/ha.year) and 28% more greasy wool (13 kg/ha.year) than unlimed perennial pastures, whereas the limed annual pastures produced 34% more liveweight gain (77 kg/ha.year) and 24% more greasy wool (11 kg/ha.year) than unlimed annual pastures. The significant responses to lime in liveweight and wool production were detected from the second growing season after the pastures were established. The increased sheep productivity on the limed treatment was due to a combination of increased pasture production and improved pasture quality. Perennial pastures showed a slight advantage in wool production, but not in liveweight gain. However, the seasonal variation of liveweight was greater on annual pastures than on perennial pastures. The larger variation in liveweight change could lead to more adverse effects on wool quality especially at high grazing pressures. Grazing management can be used to manipulate pasture and animal productivity to increase profits from lime use.
doi_str_mv 10.1071/AR05299
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_18198097</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>19522295</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-bd7745e6470c27bd4cd291fd7eacd1908333df8e2ce82fd7cf9203fe8b2d9ac63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkdtuEzEQhlcIJEKLeAR8A9x0gw978mVUQYkUiarQ69XEnt01cuzF9lLK2_CmOCSCq5FmPn__yFMUrxhdM9qy95s7WnMpnxQr1ommrFtZPy1WlNKqlBWVz4sXMX6jtKlq1qyK37cQ0xKQgNMkTogzCRhn7yJGkjyx5pBn82yNgmS8I8YRIGOAX8aNBH_OGDLh0qk_mXEqAxg3gLUEAsIViX5JU4k5BoMjmyWmANbAmmy3a7IzP_AB86tERjgq8hYP3lsyB68XdUy8LJ5lW8SX53pR3H_88PX6U7n7fLO93uxKJUSdyr1u26rGpmqp4u1eV0pzyQbdIijNJO2EEHrokCvseG6rQXIqBuz2XEtQjbgo3p68Ofr7gjH1BxMVWgsO_RJ7JmvOuawz-O4EquBjDDj0c_4DCI89o_3xBP35BJl8c1ZCVGCHAE6Z-B_vmOyobDP3-sQN4HsYQ2buv3DKBGWMcdocTeScGU3w_wwQ_gb1UzqIP5zInWc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19522295</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Pasture and sheep responses to lime application in a grazing experiment in a high-rainfall area, south-eastern Australia. II. Liveweight gain and wool production</title><source>CSIRO Publishing Journals</source><creator>Li, G.D ; Helyar, K.R ; Conyers, M.K ; Castleman, L.J.C ; Fisher, R.P ; Poile, G.J ; Lisle, C.J ; Cullis, B.R ; Cregan, P.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, G.D ; Helyar, K.R ; Conyers, M.K ; Castleman, L.J.C ; Fisher, R.P ; Poile, G.J ; Lisle, C.J ; Cullis, B.R ; Cregan, P.D</creatorcontrib><description>‘Managing Acid Soils Through Efficient Rotations (MASTER)’ is a long-term pasture–crop rotation experiment commenced in 1992. One of the objectives was to demonstrate the extent of crop, pasture, and animal responses to lime application on a typical acidic soil in the 500–800 mm rainfall zone of south-eastern Australia. Two types of pastures (perennial v. annual pastures) with or without lime application were established in 1992. Fifteen- to eighteen-month-old Merino hoggets were used as test animals and were changed annually. This paper reports the results of sheep responses to liming from the 4 continuous pasture treatments over 6 years from 1992 to 1997. The stocking rate was the same on all plots within a treatment during each rotation period, but was varied between treatments based on the pasture availability and sheep body condition. The most important findings from this study are that the limed treatments carried 29% and 27% more stock (up to 4 DSE/ha) than the unlimed treatments for perennial and annual pastures, respectively. As a result, the limed perennial pastures produced 27% more liveweight gain (62 kg/ha.year) and 28% more greasy wool (13 kg/ha.year) than unlimed perennial pastures, whereas the limed annual pastures produced 34% more liveweight gain (77 kg/ha.year) and 24% more greasy wool (11 kg/ha.year) than unlimed annual pastures. The significant responses to lime in liveweight and wool production were detected from the second growing season after the pastures were established. The increased sheep productivity on the limed treatment was due to a combination of increased pasture production and improved pasture quality. Perennial pastures showed a slight advantage in wool production, but not in liveweight gain. However, the seasonal variation of liveweight was greater on annual pastures than on perennial pastures. The larger variation in liveweight change could lead to more adverse effects on wool quality especially at high grazing pressures. Grazing management can be used to manipulate pasture and animal productivity to increase profits from lime use.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0004-9409</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1836-5795</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1071/AR05299</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJAEA9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Collingwood: Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization</publisher><subject>acid soils ; acidification ; Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions ; Animal productions ; annual pasture ; annual pastures ; Biological and medical sciences ; calcium carbonate ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; geasy wool ; General agronomy. Plant production ; grazing management ; lime response ; liming ; liveweight gain ; Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries ; pastures ; perennial pasture ; perennial pastures ; seasonal variation ; sheep ; sheep production ; soil acidification ; Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments ; stocking rate ; Terrestrial animal productions ; Vertebrates ; wool production</subject><ispartof>Australian journal of agricultural research, 2006-01, Vol.57 (10), p.1057-1066</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-bd7745e6470c27bd4cd291fd7eacd1908333df8e2ce82fd7cf9203fe8b2d9ac63</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-bd7745e6470c27bd4cd291fd7eacd1908333df8e2ce82fd7cf9203fe8b2d9ac63</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,3350,3351,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=18198097$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, G.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helyar, K.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conyers, M.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castleman, L.J.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, R.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poile, G.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisle, C.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullis, B.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cregan, P.D</creatorcontrib><title>Pasture and sheep responses to lime application in a grazing experiment in a high-rainfall area, south-eastern Australia. II. Liveweight gain and wool production</title><title>Australian journal of agricultural research</title><description>‘Managing Acid Soils Through Efficient Rotations (MASTER)’ is a long-term pasture–crop rotation experiment commenced in 1992. One of the objectives was to demonstrate the extent of crop, pasture, and animal responses to lime application on a typical acidic soil in the 500–800 mm rainfall zone of south-eastern Australia. Two types of pastures (perennial v. annual pastures) with or without lime application were established in 1992. Fifteen- to eighteen-month-old Merino hoggets were used as test animals and were changed annually. This paper reports the results of sheep responses to liming from the 4 continuous pasture treatments over 6 years from 1992 to 1997. The stocking rate was the same on all plots within a treatment during each rotation period, but was varied between treatments based on the pasture availability and sheep body condition. The most important findings from this study are that the limed treatments carried 29% and 27% more stock (up to 4 DSE/ha) than the unlimed treatments for perennial and annual pastures, respectively. As a result, the limed perennial pastures produced 27% more liveweight gain (62 kg/ha.year) and 28% more greasy wool (13 kg/ha.year) than unlimed perennial pastures, whereas the limed annual pastures produced 34% more liveweight gain (77 kg/ha.year) and 24% more greasy wool (11 kg/ha.year) than unlimed annual pastures. The significant responses to lime in liveweight and wool production were detected from the second growing season after the pastures were established. The increased sheep productivity on the limed treatment was due to a combination of increased pasture production and improved pasture quality. Perennial pastures showed a slight advantage in wool production, but not in liveweight gain. However, the seasonal variation of liveweight was greater on annual pastures than on perennial pastures. The larger variation in liveweight change could lead to more adverse effects on wool quality especially at high grazing pressures. Grazing management can be used to manipulate pasture and animal productivity to increase profits from lime use.</description><subject>acid soils</subject><subject>acidification</subject><subject>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</subject><subject>Animal productions</subject><subject>annual pasture</subject><subject>annual pastures</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>calcium carbonate</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>geasy wool</subject><subject>General agronomy. Plant production</subject><subject>grazing management</subject><subject>lime response</subject><subject>liming</subject><subject>liveweight gain</subject><subject>Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries</subject><subject>pastures</subject><subject>perennial pasture</subject><subject>perennial pastures</subject><subject>seasonal variation</subject><subject>sheep</subject><subject>sheep production</subject><subject>soil acidification</subject><subject>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</subject><subject>stocking rate</subject><subject>Terrestrial animal productions</subject><subject>Vertebrates</subject><subject>wool production</subject><issn>0004-9409</issn><issn>1836-5795</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2006</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkdtuEzEQhlcIJEKLeAR8A9x0gw978mVUQYkUiarQ69XEnt01cuzF9lLK2_CmOCSCq5FmPn__yFMUrxhdM9qy95s7WnMpnxQr1ommrFtZPy1WlNKqlBWVz4sXMX6jtKlq1qyK37cQ0xKQgNMkTogzCRhn7yJGkjyx5pBn82yNgmS8I8YRIGOAX8aNBH_OGDLh0qk_mXEqAxg3gLUEAsIViX5JU4k5BoMjmyWmANbAmmy3a7IzP_AB86tERjgq8hYP3lsyB68XdUy8LJ5lW8SX53pR3H_88PX6U7n7fLO93uxKJUSdyr1u26rGpmqp4u1eV0pzyQbdIijNJO2EEHrokCvseG6rQXIqBuz2XEtQjbgo3p68Ofr7gjH1BxMVWgsO_RJ7JmvOuawz-O4EquBjDDj0c_4DCI89o_3xBP35BJl8c1ZCVGCHAE6Z-B_vmOyobDP3-sQN4HsYQ2buv3DKBGWMcdocTeScGU3w_wwQ_gb1UzqIP5zInWc</recordid><startdate>20060101</startdate><enddate>20060101</enddate><creator>Li, G.D</creator><creator>Helyar, K.R</creator><creator>Conyers, M.K</creator><creator>Castleman, L.J.C</creator><creator>Fisher, R.P</creator><creator>Poile, G.J</creator><creator>Lisle, C.J</creator><creator>Cullis, B.R</creator><creator>Cregan, P.D</creator><general>Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7ST</scope><scope>7U6</scope><scope>C1K</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20060101</creationdate><title>Pasture and sheep responses to lime application in a grazing experiment in a high-rainfall area, south-eastern Australia. II. Liveweight gain and wool production</title><author>Li, G.D ; Helyar, K.R ; Conyers, M.K ; Castleman, L.J.C ; Fisher, R.P ; Poile, G.J ; Lisle, C.J ; Cullis, B.R ; Cregan, P.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c335t-bd7745e6470c27bd4cd291fd7eacd1908333df8e2ce82fd7cf9203fe8b2d9ac63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2006</creationdate><topic>acid soils</topic><topic>acidification</topic><topic>Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions</topic><topic>Animal productions</topic><topic>annual pasture</topic><topic>annual pastures</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>calcium carbonate</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>geasy wool</topic><topic>General agronomy. Plant production</topic><topic>grazing management</topic><topic>lime response</topic><topic>liming</topic><topic>liveweight gain</topic><topic>Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries</topic><topic>pastures</topic><topic>perennial pasture</topic><topic>perennial pastures</topic><topic>seasonal variation</topic><topic>sheep</topic><topic>sheep production</topic><topic>soil acidification</topic><topic>Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments</topic><topic>stocking rate</topic><topic>Terrestrial animal productions</topic><topic>Vertebrates</topic><topic>wool production</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, G.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Helyar, K.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Conyers, M.K</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Castleman, L.J.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fisher, R.P</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Poile, G.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lisle, C.J</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cullis, B.R</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cregan, P.D</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Environment Abstracts</collection><collection>Sustainability Science Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><jtitle>Australian journal of agricultural research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, G.D</au><au>Helyar, K.R</au><au>Conyers, M.K</au><au>Castleman, L.J.C</au><au>Fisher, R.P</au><au>Poile, G.J</au><au>Lisle, C.J</au><au>Cullis, B.R</au><au>Cregan, P.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Pasture and sheep responses to lime application in a grazing experiment in a high-rainfall area, south-eastern Australia. II. Liveweight gain and wool production</atitle><jtitle>Australian journal of agricultural research</jtitle><date>2006-01-01</date><risdate>2006</risdate><volume>57</volume><issue>10</issue><spage>1057</spage><epage>1066</epage><pages>1057-1066</pages><issn>0004-9409</issn><eissn>1836-5795</eissn><coden>AJAEA9</coden><abstract>‘Managing Acid Soils Through Efficient Rotations (MASTER)’ is a long-term pasture–crop rotation experiment commenced in 1992. One of the objectives was to demonstrate the extent of crop, pasture, and animal responses to lime application on a typical acidic soil in the 500–800 mm rainfall zone of south-eastern Australia. Two types of pastures (perennial v. annual pastures) with or without lime application were established in 1992. Fifteen- to eighteen-month-old Merino hoggets were used as test animals and were changed annually. This paper reports the results of sheep responses to liming from the 4 continuous pasture treatments over 6 years from 1992 to 1997. The stocking rate was the same on all plots within a treatment during each rotation period, but was varied between treatments based on the pasture availability and sheep body condition. The most important findings from this study are that the limed treatments carried 29% and 27% more stock (up to 4 DSE/ha) than the unlimed treatments for perennial and annual pastures, respectively. As a result, the limed perennial pastures produced 27% more liveweight gain (62 kg/ha.year) and 28% more greasy wool (13 kg/ha.year) than unlimed perennial pastures, whereas the limed annual pastures produced 34% more liveweight gain (77 kg/ha.year) and 24% more greasy wool (11 kg/ha.year) than unlimed annual pastures. The significant responses to lime in liveweight and wool production were detected from the second growing season after the pastures were established. The increased sheep productivity on the limed treatment was due to a combination of increased pasture production and improved pasture quality. Perennial pastures showed a slight advantage in wool production, but not in liveweight gain. However, the seasonal variation of liveweight was greater on annual pastures than on perennial pastures. The larger variation in liveweight change could lead to more adverse effects on wool quality especially at high grazing pressures. Grazing management can be used to manipulate pasture and animal productivity to increase profits from lime use.</abstract><cop>Collingwood</cop><pub>Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization</pub><doi>10.1071/AR05299</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0004-9409
ispartof Australian journal of agricultural research, 2006-01, Vol.57 (10), p.1057-1066
issn 0004-9409
1836-5795
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_18198097
source CSIRO Publishing Journals
subjects acid soils
acidification
Agronomy. Soil science and plant productions
Animal productions
annual pasture
annual pastures
Biological and medical sciences
calcium carbonate
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
geasy wool
General agronomy. Plant production
grazing management
lime response
liming
liveweight gain
Other nutrients. Amendments. Solid and liquid wastes. Sludges and slurries
pastures
perennial pasture
perennial pastures
seasonal variation
sheep
sheep production
soil acidification
Soil-plant relationships. Soil fertility. Fertilization. Amendments
stocking rate
Terrestrial animal productions
Vertebrates
wool production
title Pasture and sheep responses to lime application in a grazing experiment in a high-rainfall area, south-eastern Australia. II. Liveweight gain and wool production
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T04%3A42%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Pasture%20and%20sheep%20responses%20to%20lime%20application%20in%20a%20grazing%20experiment%20in%20a%20high-rainfall%20area,%20south-eastern%20Australia.%20II.%20Liveweight%20gain%20and%20wool%20production&rft.jtitle=Australian%20journal%20of%20agricultural%20research&rft.au=Li,%20G.D&rft.date=2006-01-01&rft.volume=57&rft.issue=10&rft.spage=1057&rft.epage=1066&rft.pages=1057-1066&rft.issn=0004-9409&rft.eissn=1836-5795&rft.coden=AJAEA9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1071/AR05299&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E19522295%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19522295&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true