Herbicides Tolerated by Cuphea (Cuphea viscosissima × lanceolata)
Partial seed retention line #23('PSR23') cuphea is a hybrid of Cuphea viscosissima × C. lanceolata. It is a new, spring-planted, annual, potential oilseed crop that is highly susceptible to interference by weeds because of its slow growth during spring and early summer. Grass weeds are con...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Weed technology 2005-10, Vol.19 (4), p.861-865 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 865 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 861 |
| container_title | Weed technology |
| container_volume | 19 |
| creator | Forcella, Frank Gary B. Amundson Russell W. Gesch Sharon K. Papiernik Vince M. Davis Winthrop B. Phippen |
| description | Partial seed retention line #23('PSR23') cuphea is a hybrid of Cuphea viscosissima × C. lanceolata. It is a new, spring-planted, annual, potential oilseed crop that is highly susceptible to interference by weeds because of its slow growth during spring and early summer. Grass weeds are controlled easily in this broadleaf crop, but broadleaf weeds are an appreciable problem. Consequently, several broadleaf herbicides were screened for tolerance by 'PSR23' cuphea. Broadleaf herbicides to which cuphea showed tolerance in a spray cabinet and a greenhouse were tested in a field setting for 2 yr. Field tolerance was considered as absence of negative impact (P > 0.05) both years to any of four measured traits: overall vigor, dry weight, stand density, and time to anthesis. Cuphea showed tolerance in the field to three soil-applied herbicides (ethalfluralin, isoxaflutole, and trifluralin) and one postemergence herbicide (mesotrione). A few combinations of soil-applied and postemergence herbicides did not damage cuphea. These combinations were ethalfluralin followed by (fb) mesotrione, isoxaflutole fb imazethapyr, and isoxaflutole fb mesotrione. Availability of these herbicides for use in cuphea production may facilitate the domestication and acceptance of this new crop. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1614/WT-04-296R.1 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_17350970</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3989260</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3989260</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j206t-3cb8fba4d2233937529a6bef01f4b73d28823abc91ba4662d2c6edf24873119b3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jsFKxDAURYMoWEd3Ll10I-gi48tLmjRLLeoIA4JUdDckaYop1Q5JHZgv8YP8MQszuDqLe7gcQs4ZzJlk4uatpiAoavkyZwckY0UBFJWAQ5JBqYECV-_H5CSlDoBJRMjI3cJHG1xofMrroffRjL7J7Tavvtcf3uRXe25CckMKKYVPk__-5L35cn7ozWiuT8lRa_rkz_ackdeH-7pa0OXz41N1u6Qdghwpd7ZsrRENIueaqwK1kda3wFphFW-wLJEb6zSbJCmxQSd906IoFWdMWz4jl7vftUnO9G2cEkJareOUFLcrpngBWsHkXey8Lo1D_N-5LjVK4H97IVXC</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Herbicides Tolerated by Cuphea (Cuphea viscosissima × lanceolata)</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><creator>Forcella, Frank ; Gary B. Amundson ; Russell W. Gesch ; Sharon K. Papiernik ; Vince M. Davis ; Winthrop B. Phippen</creator><creatorcontrib>Forcella, Frank ; Gary B. Amundson ; Russell W. Gesch ; Sharon K. Papiernik ; Vince M. Davis ; Winthrop B. Phippen</creatorcontrib><description>Partial seed retention line #23('PSR23') cuphea is a hybrid of Cuphea viscosissima × C. lanceolata. It is a new, spring-planted, annual, potential oilseed crop that is highly susceptible to interference by weeds because of its slow growth during spring and early summer. Grass weeds are controlled easily in this broadleaf crop, but broadleaf weeds are an appreciable problem. Consequently, several broadleaf herbicides were screened for tolerance by 'PSR23' cuphea. Broadleaf herbicides to which cuphea showed tolerance in a spray cabinet and a greenhouse were tested in a field setting for 2 yr. Field tolerance was considered as absence of negative impact (P > 0.05) both years to any of four measured traits: overall vigor, dry weight, stand density, and time to anthesis. Cuphea showed tolerance in the field to three soil-applied herbicides (ethalfluralin, isoxaflutole, and trifluralin) and one postemergence herbicide (mesotrione). A few combinations of soil-applied and postemergence herbicides did not damage cuphea. These combinations were ethalfluralin followed by (fb) mesotrione, isoxaflutole fb imazethapyr, and isoxaflutole fb mesotrione. Availability of these herbicides for use in cuphea production may facilitate the domestication and acceptance of this new crop.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/WT-04-296R.1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WETEE9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical control ; Crop science ; Fatty acids ; Flowering ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Herbicide resistance ; Herbicides ; Orthostatic tolerance ; Parasitic plants. Weeds ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Plants ; Sowing ; Stand density ; Weed control ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2005-10, Vol.19 (4), p.861-865</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3989260$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3989260$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,777,781,800,27905,27906,57998,58231</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=17350970$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Forcella, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gary B. Amundson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell W. Gesch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharon K. Papiernik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vince M. Davis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winthrop B. Phippen</creatorcontrib><title>Herbicides Tolerated by Cuphea (Cuphea viscosissima × lanceolata)</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>Partial seed retention line #23('PSR23') cuphea is a hybrid of Cuphea viscosissima × C. lanceolata. It is a new, spring-planted, annual, potential oilseed crop that is highly susceptible to interference by weeds because of its slow growth during spring and early summer. Grass weeds are controlled easily in this broadleaf crop, but broadleaf weeds are an appreciable problem. Consequently, several broadleaf herbicides were screened for tolerance by 'PSR23' cuphea. Broadleaf herbicides to which cuphea showed tolerance in a spray cabinet and a greenhouse were tested in a field setting for 2 yr. Field tolerance was considered as absence of negative impact (P > 0.05) both years to any of four measured traits: overall vigor, dry weight, stand density, and time to anthesis. Cuphea showed tolerance in the field to three soil-applied herbicides (ethalfluralin, isoxaflutole, and trifluralin) and one postemergence herbicide (mesotrione). A few combinations of soil-applied and postemergence herbicides did not damage cuphea. These combinations were ethalfluralin followed by (fb) mesotrione, isoxaflutole fb imazethapyr, and isoxaflutole fb mesotrione. Availability of these herbicides for use in cuphea production may facilitate the domestication and acceptance of this new crop.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical control</subject><subject>Crop science</subject><subject>Fatty acids</subject><subject>Flowering</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Herbicide resistance</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Orthostatic tolerance</subject><subject>Parasitic plants. Weeds</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Plants</subject><subject>Sowing</subject><subject>Stand density</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9jsFKxDAURYMoWEd3Ll10I-gi48tLmjRLLeoIA4JUdDckaYop1Q5JHZgv8YP8MQszuDqLe7gcQs4ZzJlk4uatpiAoavkyZwckY0UBFJWAQ5JBqYECV-_H5CSlDoBJRMjI3cJHG1xofMrroffRjL7J7Tavvtcf3uRXe25CckMKKYVPk__-5L35cn7ozWiuT8lRa_rkz_ackdeH-7pa0OXz41N1u6Qdghwpd7ZsrRENIueaqwK1kda3wFphFW-wLJEb6zSbJCmxQSd906IoFWdMWz4jl7vftUnO9G2cEkJareOUFLcrpngBWsHkXey8Lo1D_N-5LjVK4H97IVXC</recordid><startdate>20051001</startdate><enddate>20051001</enddate><creator>Forcella, Frank</creator><creator>Gary B. Amundson</creator><creator>Russell W. Gesch</creator><creator>Sharon K. Papiernik</creator><creator>Vince M. Davis</creator><creator>Winthrop B. Phippen</creator><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20051001</creationdate><title>Herbicides Tolerated by Cuphea (Cuphea viscosissima × lanceolata)</title><author>Forcella, Frank ; Gary B. Amundson ; Russell W. Gesch ; Sharon K. Papiernik ; Vince M. Davis ; Winthrop B. Phippen</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j206t-3cb8fba4d2233937529a6bef01f4b73d28823abc91ba4662d2c6edf24873119b3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical control</topic><topic>Crop science</topic><topic>Fatty acids</topic><topic>Flowering</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Herbicide resistance</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Orthostatic tolerance</topic><topic>Parasitic plants. Weeds</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Plants</topic><topic>Sowing</topic><topic>Stand density</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Forcella, Frank</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gary B. Amundson</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Russell W. Gesch</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sharon K. Papiernik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Vince M. Davis</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Winthrop B. Phippen</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Forcella, Frank</au><au>Gary B. Amundson</au><au>Russell W. Gesch</au><au>Sharon K. Papiernik</au><au>Vince M. Davis</au><au>Winthrop B. Phippen</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Herbicides Tolerated by Cuphea (Cuphea viscosissima × lanceolata)</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>2005-10-01</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>861</spage><epage>865</epage><pages>861-865</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><coden>WETEE9</coden><abstract>Partial seed retention line #23('PSR23') cuphea is a hybrid of Cuphea viscosissima × C. lanceolata. It is a new, spring-planted, annual, potential oilseed crop that is highly susceptible to interference by weeds because of its slow growth during spring and early summer. Grass weeds are controlled easily in this broadleaf crop, but broadleaf weeds are an appreciable problem. Consequently, several broadleaf herbicides were screened for tolerance by 'PSR23' cuphea. Broadleaf herbicides to which cuphea showed tolerance in a spray cabinet and a greenhouse were tested in a field setting for 2 yr. Field tolerance was considered as absence of negative impact (P > 0.05) both years to any of four measured traits: overall vigor, dry weight, stand density, and time to anthesis. Cuphea showed tolerance in the field to three soil-applied herbicides (ethalfluralin, isoxaflutole, and trifluralin) and one postemergence herbicide (mesotrione). A few combinations of soil-applied and postemergence herbicides did not damage cuphea. These combinations were ethalfluralin followed by (fb) mesotrione, isoxaflutole fb imazethapyr, and isoxaflutole fb mesotrione. Availability of these herbicides for use in cuphea production may facilitate the domestication and acceptance of this new crop.</abstract><cop>Lawrence, KS</cop><pub>Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1614/WT-04-296R.1</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0890-037X |
| ispartof | Weed technology, 2005-10, Vol.19 (4), p.861-865 |
| issn | 0890-037X 1550-2740 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_17350970 |
| source | Jstor Complete Legacy; BioOne Complete |
| subjects | Biological and medical sciences Chemical control Crop science Fatty acids Flowering Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology Herbicide resistance Herbicides Orthostatic tolerance Parasitic plants. Weeds Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection Plants Sowing Stand density Weed control Weeds |
| title | Herbicides Tolerated by Cuphea (Cuphea viscosissima × lanceolata) |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-17T17%3A17%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Herbicides%20Tolerated%20by%20Cuphea%20(Cuphea%20viscosissima%20%C3%97%20lanceolata)&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Forcella,%20Frank&rft.date=2005-10-01&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=861&rft.epage=865&rft.pages=861-865&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft.coden=WETEE9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/WT-04-296R.1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pasca%3E3989260%3C/jstor_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3989260&rfr_iscdi=true |