Model checking synchronized products of infinite transition systems

Formal verification using the model-checking paradigm has to deal with two aspects. The systems models are structured, often as products of components, and the specification logic has to be expressive enough to allow the formalization of reachability properties. The present paper is a study on what...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Wohrle, S., Thomas, W.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 11
container_issue
container_start_page 2
container_title
container_volume
creator Wohrle, S.
Thomas, W.
description Formal verification using the model-checking paradigm has to deal with two aspects. The systems models are structured, often as products of components, and the specification logic has to be expressive enough to allow the formalization of reachability properties. The present paper is a study on what can be achieved for infinite transition systems under these premises. As models, we consider products of infinite transition systems with different synchronization constraints. We introduce finitely synchronized transition systems, i.e. product systems which contain only finitely many synchronized transitions, and show that the decidability of FO(R), first-order logic extended by reachability predicates, of the product system can be reduced to the decidability of FO(R) of the components in a Feferman-Vaught like style. This result is optimal in the following sense. (1) If we allow semifinite synchronization, i.e. just in one component infinitely many transitions are synchronized, the FO(R)-theory of the product system is in general undecidable. (2) We cannot extend the expressive power of the logic under consideration. Already a weak extension of first-order logic with transitive closure, where we restrict the transitive closure operators to arity one and nesting depth two, is undecidable for an asynchronous (and hence finitely synchronized) product, namely for the infinite grid.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/LICS.2004.1319595
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pascalfrancis_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_17344638</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>1319595</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>17344638</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c166t-fae2c4dcf5926d5596a97d714e2639124c7a1b0d35a7b9b42c056ff19c22cd553</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpF0EtLAzEUBeDgA6y1P0DczMbl1Nyb12Qpg49CxYW6LulNYqNtpkzGhf56Byq4uovzcThcxi6BzwG4vVku2pc5ci7nIMAqq47YBJVRtVLYHLOZNQ032ioEi-KETYBLUevGwBk7L-WDc45a8glrnzofthVtAn2m_F6V70ybvsvpJ_hq33f-i4ZSdbFKOaachlANvcslDanLIy5D2JULdhrdtoTZ352yt_u71_axXj4_LNrbZU2g9VBHF5Ckp6gsaq-U1c4ab0AG1MICSjIO1twL5czariUSVzpGsIRIoxdTdn3o3btCbhvHIZTKat-nneu_V2CElFo0o7s6uBRC-I8PfxK_52RaPQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Model checking synchronized products of infinite transition systems</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Wohrle, S. ; Thomas, W.</creator><creatorcontrib>Wohrle, S. ; Thomas, W.</creatorcontrib><description>Formal verification using the model-checking paradigm has to deal with two aspects. The systems models are structured, often as products of components, and the specification logic has to be expressive enough to allow the formalization of reachability properties. The present paper is a study on what can be achieved for infinite transition systems under these premises. As models, we consider products of infinite transition systems with different synchronization constraints. We introduce finitely synchronized transition systems, i.e. product systems which contain only finitely many synchronized transitions, and show that the decidability of FO(R), first-order logic extended by reachability predicates, of the product system can be reduced to the decidability of FO(R) of the components in a Feferman-Vaught like style. This result is optimal in the following sense. (1) If we allow semifinite synchronization, i.e. just in one component infinitely many transitions are synchronized, the FO(R)-theory of the product system is in general undecidable. (2) We cannot extend the expressive power of the logic under consideration. Already a weak extension of first-order logic with transitive closure, where we restrict the transitive closure operators to arity one and nesting depth two, is undecidable for an asynchronous (and hence finitely synchronized) product, namely for the infinite grid.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1043-6871</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9780769521923</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0769521924</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2575-5528</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/LICS.2004.1319595</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Los Alamitos, Calif: IEEE</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Computational modeling ; Computer science ; Computer science; control theory; systems ; Exact sciences and technology ; Filters ; Logic ; Logical, boolean and switching functions ; Theoretical computing</subject><ispartof>Proceedings of the 19th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 2004, 2004, p.2-11</ispartof><rights>2006 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c166t-fae2c4dcf5926d5596a97d714e2639124c7a1b0d35a7b9b42c056ff19c22cd553</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1319595$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2058,4050,4051,27925,54920</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/1319595$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17344638$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Wohrle, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, W.</creatorcontrib><title>Model checking synchronized products of infinite transition systems</title><title>Proceedings of the 19th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 2004</title><addtitle>LICS</addtitle><description>Formal verification using the model-checking paradigm has to deal with two aspects. The systems models are structured, often as products of components, and the specification logic has to be expressive enough to allow the formalization of reachability properties. The present paper is a study on what can be achieved for infinite transition systems under these premises. As models, we consider products of infinite transition systems with different synchronization constraints. We introduce finitely synchronized transition systems, i.e. product systems which contain only finitely many synchronized transitions, and show that the decidability of FO(R), first-order logic extended by reachability predicates, of the product system can be reduced to the decidability of FO(R) of the components in a Feferman-Vaught like style. This result is optimal in the following sense. (1) If we allow semifinite synchronization, i.e. just in one component infinitely many transitions are synchronized, the FO(R)-theory of the product system is in general undecidable. (2) We cannot extend the expressive power of the logic under consideration. Already a weak extension of first-order logic with transitive closure, where we restrict the transitive closure operators to arity one and nesting depth two, is undecidable for an asynchronous (and hence finitely synchronized) product, namely for the infinite grid.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Computational modeling</subject><subject>Computer science</subject><subject>Computer science; control theory; systems</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Filters</subject><subject>Logic</subject><subject>Logical, boolean and switching functions</subject><subject>Theoretical computing</subject><issn>1043-6871</issn><issn>2575-5528</issn><isbn>9780769521923</isbn><isbn>0769521924</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNpF0EtLAzEUBeDgA6y1P0DczMbl1Nyb12Qpg49CxYW6LulNYqNtpkzGhf56Byq4uovzcThcxi6BzwG4vVku2pc5ci7nIMAqq47YBJVRtVLYHLOZNQ032ioEi-KETYBLUevGwBk7L-WDc45a8glrnzofthVtAn2m_F6V70ybvsvpJ_hq33f-i4ZSdbFKOaachlANvcslDanLIy5D2JULdhrdtoTZ352yt_u71_axXj4_LNrbZU2g9VBHF5Ckp6gsaq-U1c4ab0AG1MICSjIO1twL5czariUSVzpGsIRIoxdTdn3o3btCbhvHIZTKat-nneu_V2CElFo0o7s6uBRC-I8PfxK_52RaPQ</recordid><startdate>2004</startdate><enddate>2004</enddate><creator>Wohrle, S.</creator><creator>Thomas, W.</creator><general>IEEE</general><general>IEEE Computer Society</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2004</creationdate><title>Model checking synchronized products of infinite transition systems</title><author>Wohrle, S. ; Thomas, W.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c166t-fae2c4dcf5926d5596a97d714e2639124c7a1b0d35a7b9b42c056ff19c22cd553</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Computational modeling</topic><topic>Computer science</topic><topic>Computer science; control theory; systems</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Filters</topic><topic>Logic</topic><topic>Logical, boolean and switching functions</topic><topic>Theoretical computing</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Wohrle, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomas, W.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Wohrle, S.</au><au>Thomas, W.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Model checking synchronized products of infinite transition systems</atitle><btitle>Proceedings of the 19th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 2004</btitle><stitle>LICS</stitle><date>2004</date><risdate>2004</risdate><spage>2</spage><epage>11</epage><pages>2-11</pages><issn>1043-6871</issn><eissn>2575-5528</eissn><isbn>9780769521923</isbn><isbn>0769521924</isbn><abstract>Formal verification using the model-checking paradigm has to deal with two aspects. The systems models are structured, often as products of components, and the specification logic has to be expressive enough to allow the formalization of reachability properties. The present paper is a study on what can be achieved for infinite transition systems under these premises. As models, we consider products of infinite transition systems with different synchronization constraints. We introduce finitely synchronized transition systems, i.e. product systems which contain only finitely many synchronized transitions, and show that the decidability of FO(R), first-order logic extended by reachability predicates, of the product system can be reduced to the decidability of FO(R) of the components in a Feferman-Vaught like style. This result is optimal in the following sense. (1) If we allow semifinite synchronization, i.e. just in one component infinitely many transitions are synchronized, the FO(R)-theory of the product system is in general undecidable. (2) We cannot extend the expressive power of the logic under consideration. Already a weak extension of first-order logic with transitive closure, where we restrict the transitive closure operators to arity one and nesting depth two, is undecidable for an asynchronous (and hence finitely synchronized) product, namely for the infinite grid.</abstract><cop>Los Alamitos, Calif</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/LICS.2004.1319595</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1043-6871
ispartof Proceedings of the 19th Annual IEEE Symposium on Logic in Computer Science, 2004, 2004, p.2-11
issn 1043-6871
2575-5528
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_17344638
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Applied sciences
Computational modeling
Computer science
Computer science
control theory
systems
Exact sciences and technology
Filters
Logic
Logical, boolean and switching functions
Theoretical computing
title Model checking synchronized products of infinite transition systems
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-08T05%3A12%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pascalfrancis_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Model%20checking%20synchronized%20products%20of%20infinite%20transition%20systems&rft.btitle=Proceedings%20of%20the%2019th%20Annual%20IEEE%20Symposium%20on%20Logic%20in%20Computer%20Science,%202004&rft.au=Wohrle,%20S.&rft.date=2004&rft.spage=2&rft.epage=11&rft.pages=2-11&rft.issn=1043-6871&rft.eissn=2575-5528&rft.isbn=9780769521923&rft.isbn_list=0769521924&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/LICS.2004.1319595&rft_dat=%3Cpascalfrancis_6IE%3E17344638%3C/pascalfrancis_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=1319595&rfr_iscdi=true