Atomic Components

The operational definition of observational congruence in CCS and ACP can be split into two parts: one, the definition of an observational semantics (ie abstraction); and two, the definition of a strong congruence. In both cases this “separation of concerns” has been applied with abstraction that is...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Reeves, Steve, Streader, David
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 139
container_issue
container_start_page 128
container_title
container_volume
creator Reeves, Steve
Streader, David
description The operational definition of observational congruence in CCS and ACP can be split into two parts: one, the definition of an observational semantics (ie abstraction); and two, the definition of a strong congruence. In both cases this “separation of concerns” has been applied with abstraction that is implicitly “fair”. We define a novel (if obvious) observational semantics with no implicit “fairness”. When combining this observational semantics with failure equality the resulting observational semantics is shown to be equal, other than for minor details, to NDFD semantics. We also combine our observational semantics with singleton failure semantics and we establish congruence results for this new observational equality.
doi_str_mv 10.1007/978-3-540-31862-0_11
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pascalfrancis_sprin</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_17028473</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>17028473</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p228t-a5c8e67506a98d0c8ecae4873c9cdb6e69d4554b91438d17db15e360800797d13</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkDtPAzEQhM1L4hJS0FPQUBp2vX6W0Sk8pEg0UFs-n4MOkrvTOQ3_HiehWu3MaKT5GLtDeEQA8-SM5cSVBE5oteDgEc_YoshUxKMG56xCjciJpLtgs4MhFIHES1YBgeDOSLpms5y_AUAYJyp2u9wPuy7e18NuHPrU7_MNu9qEbU6L_ztnn8-rj_qVr99f3urlmo9C2D0PKtqkjQIdnG2hPDEkaQ1FF9tGJ-1aqZRsHEqyLZq2QZVIgy1rnGmR5uzh1DuGHMN2M4U-dtmPU7cL069HA8JKQyUnTrlcrP4rTb4Zhp_ssSAoXb4g8OTLVn-k4A9k6A_Zuk7v</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Atomic Components</title><source>Springer Books</source><creator>Reeves, Steve ; Streader, David</creator><contributor>Araki, Keijiro ; Liu, Zhiming</contributor><creatorcontrib>Reeves, Steve ; Streader, David ; Araki, Keijiro ; Liu, Zhiming</creatorcontrib><description>The operational definition of observational congruence in CCS and ACP can be split into two parts: one, the definition of an observational semantics (ie abstraction); and two, the definition of a strong congruence. In both cases this “separation of concerns” has been applied with abstraction that is implicitly “fair”. We define a novel (if obvious) observational semantics with no implicit “fairness”. When combining this observational semantics with failure equality the resulting observational semantics is shown to be equal, other than for minor details, to NDFD semantics. We also combine our observational semantics with singleton failure semantics and we establish congruence results for this new observational equality.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-9743</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 3540253041</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9783540253044</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1611-3349</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9783540318620</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 3540318623</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-31862-0_11</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Computer science; control theory; systems ; Discrete Event System ; Exact sciences and technology ; Label Transition System ; Operational Semantic ; Sequential Composition ; Start State</subject><ispartof>Lecture notes in computer science, 2005, p.128-139</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2005</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-540-31862-0_11$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-540-31862-0_11$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,775,776,780,785,786,789,4036,4037,27902,38232,41418,42487</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=17028473$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Araki, Keijiro</contributor><contributor>Liu, Zhiming</contributor><creatorcontrib>Reeves, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streader, David</creatorcontrib><title>Atomic Components</title><title>Lecture notes in computer science</title><description>The operational definition of observational congruence in CCS and ACP can be split into two parts: one, the definition of an observational semantics (ie abstraction); and two, the definition of a strong congruence. In both cases this “separation of concerns” has been applied with abstraction that is implicitly “fair”. We define a novel (if obvious) observational semantics with no implicit “fairness”. When combining this observational semantics with failure equality the resulting observational semantics is shown to be equal, other than for minor details, to NDFD semantics. We also combine our observational semantics with singleton failure semantics and we establish congruence results for this new observational equality.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Computer science; control theory; systems</subject><subject>Discrete Event System</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Label Transition System</subject><subject>Operational Semantic</subject><subject>Sequential Composition</subject><subject>Start State</subject><issn>0302-9743</issn><issn>1611-3349</issn><isbn>3540253041</isbn><isbn>9783540253044</isbn><isbn>9783540318620</isbn><isbn>3540318623</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNotkDtPAzEQhM1L4hJS0FPQUBp2vX6W0Sk8pEg0UFs-n4MOkrvTOQ3_HiehWu3MaKT5GLtDeEQA8-SM5cSVBE5oteDgEc_YoshUxKMG56xCjciJpLtgs4MhFIHES1YBgeDOSLpms5y_AUAYJyp2u9wPuy7e18NuHPrU7_MNu9qEbU6L_ztnn8-rj_qVr99f3urlmo9C2D0PKtqkjQIdnG2hPDEkaQ1FF9tGJ-1aqZRsHEqyLZq2QZVIgy1rnGmR5uzh1DuGHMN2M4U-dtmPU7cL069HA8JKQyUnTrlcrP4rTb4Zhp_ssSAoXb4g8OTLVn-k4A9k6A_Zuk7v</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Reeves, Steve</creator><creator>Streader, David</creator><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Atomic Components</title><author>Reeves, Steve ; Streader, David</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p228t-a5c8e67506a98d0c8ecae4873c9cdb6e69d4554b91438d17db15e360800797d13</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Computer science; control theory; systems</topic><topic>Discrete Event System</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Label Transition System</topic><topic>Operational Semantic</topic><topic>Sequential Composition</topic><topic>Start State</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reeves, Steve</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Streader, David</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reeves, Steve</au><au>Streader, David</au><au>Araki, Keijiro</au><au>Liu, Zhiming</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Atomic Components</atitle><btitle>Lecture notes in computer science</btitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><spage>128</spage><epage>139</epage><pages>128-139</pages><issn>0302-9743</issn><eissn>1611-3349</eissn><isbn>3540253041</isbn><isbn>9783540253044</isbn><eisbn>9783540318620</eisbn><eisbn>3540318623</eisbn><abstract>The operational definition of observational congruence in CCS and ACP can be split into two parts: one, the definition of an observational semantics (ie abstraction); and two, the definition of a strong congruence. In both cases this “separation of concerns” has been applied with abstraction that is implicitly “fair”. We define a novel (if obvious) observational semantics with no implicit “fairness”. When combining this observational semantics with failure equality the resulting observational semantics is shown to be equal, other than for minor details, to NDFD semantics. We also combine our observational semantics with singleton failure semantics and we establish congruence results for this new observational equality.</abstract><cop>Berlin, Heidelberg</cop><pub>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/978-3-540-31862-0_11</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0302-9743
ispartof Lecture notes in computer science, 2005, p.128-139
issn 0302-9743
1611-3349
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_17028473
source Springer Books
subjects Applied sciences
Computer science
control theory
systems
Discrete Event System
Exact sciences and technology
Label Transition System
Operational Semantic
Sequential Composition
Start State
title Atomic Components
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T12%3A24%3A22IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pascalfrancis_sprin&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Atomic%20Components&rft.btitle=Lecture%20notes%20in%20computer%20science&rft.au=Reeves,%20Steve&rft.date=2005&rft.spage=128&rft.epage=139&rft.pages=128-139&rft.issn=0302-9743&rft.eissn=1611-3349&rft.isbn=3540253041&rft.isbn_list=9783540253044&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/978-3-540-31862-0_11&rft_dat=%3Cpascalfrancis_sprin%3E17028473%3C/pascalfrancis_sprin%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9783540318620&rft.eisbn_list=3540318623&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true