Fall and Early Preplant Application Timing Effects on Persistence and Efficacy of Acetamide Herbicides

The persistence and efficacy of acetamide herbicides at application timings from fall to preemergence (PRE) were studied in 1998 and 1999 on mollisols (1.1 to 2.8% organic carbon). Metolachlor, s-metolachlor, acetochlor (as an emulsifiable concentrate [EC] formulation and two encapsulated formulatio...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weed technology 2005, Vol.19 (1), p.6-13
Hauptverfasser: Parker, D.C, Simmons, F.W, Wax, L.M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 13
container_issue 1
container_start_page 6
container_title Weed technology
container_volume 19
creator Parker, D.C
Simmons, F.W
Wax, L.M
description The persistence and efficacy of acetamide herbicides at application timings from fall to preemergence (PRE) were studied in 1998 and 1999 on mollisols (1.1 to 2.8% organic carbon). Metolachlor, s-metolachlor, acetochlor (as an emulsifiable concentrate [EC] formulation and two encapsulated formulations, capsule suspension [CS] and microencapsulated [ME]), and the combination of flufenacet 1 metribuzin were evaluated at five application times including late fall, 60 and 30 d early preplant (EPP), preplant incorporated, and PRE. Soil bioassays 180 d after application indicated flufenacet + metribuzin, metolachlor, s-metolachlor, and the acetochlor CS had 62 to 74% giant foxtail control, whereas acetochlor EC and ME had 43 to 46% control. Applications at 60 EPP of metolachlor, s-metolachlor, and acetochlor CS provided 70 to 75% giant foxtail control in greenhouse bioassays, whereas flufenacet + metribuzin, acetochlor ME, and acetochlor EC provided 38 to 57% control. At the 30 EPP timing, metolachlor and acetochlor CS had 80 to 82% control, whereas acetochlor EC provided 46% control, and acetochlor ME, flufenacet + metribuzin, and s-metolachlor had 65 to 74% control. Quantitative soil analysis (0 to 6 cm) 10 d after planting (DAP) indicated metolachlor, s-metolachlor, and acetochlor CS concentrations ranged from 12 to 16% and 32 to 47% of applied herbicide for the fall and PRE application timings, respectively, whereas acetochlor (ME and EC) were from 1 to 3% and 16 to 21% of applied for the fall and PRE application timings, respectively. Bioassay reduction was correlated (R2 5 0.68) with soil-herbicide concentrations at 10 DAP.
doi_str_mv 10.1614/WT-03-020R1
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_16660299</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3989105</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3989105</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-f230t-66d5f74a7fb1d5bd18ed0438523aa64d0de65ad1fe053af26911ea65da7dada3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9jM9LwzAUgIMoOKsnr4K5eKy-JE3aHsfYnDBwaEVv4y0_RkbXliSX_fcWKp7e433f-wi5Z_DMFCtevpscRA4cPtgFmTEpIedlAZdkBlUNIyt_rslNjEcApjiHGXErbFuKnaFLDO2ZboMdWuwSnQ9D6zUm33e08SffHejSOatTpONla0P0MdlO2-nZuVHWZ9o7Otc24ckbS9c27L0et3hLrhy20d79zYw0q2WzWOeb99e3xXyTOy4g5UoZ6coCS7dnRu4Nq6yBQlSSC0RVGDBWSTTMWZACHVc1YxaVNFgaNCgy8jRlB4waWxew0z7uhuBPGM47ppQCXtej9zB5x5j68M9FXdVsLGfkccIO-x0ewpj4-uTABEApZSEL8Qsr52us</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Fall and Early Preplant Application Timing Effects on Persistence and Efficacy of Acetamide Herbicides</title><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><source>BioOne Complete</source><creator>Parker, D.C ; Simmons, F.W ; Wax, L.M</creator><creatorcontrib>Parker, D.C ; Simmons, F.W ; Wax, L.M</creatorcontrib><description>The persistence and efficacy of acetamide herbicides at application timings from fall to preemergence (PRE) were studied in 1998 and 1999 on mollisols (1.1 to 2.8% organic carbon). Metolachlor, s-metolachlor, acetochlor (as an emulsifiable concentrate [EC] formulation and two encapsulated formulations, capsule suspension [CS] and microencapsulated [ME]), and the combination of flufenacet 1 metribuzin were evaluated at five application times including late fall, 60 and 30 d early preplant (EPP), preplant incorporated, and PRE. Soil bioassays 180 d after application indicated flufenacet + metribuzin, metolachlor, s-metolachlor, and the acetochlor CS had 62 to 74% giant foxtail control, whereas acetochlor EC and ME had 43 to 46% control. Applications at 60 EPP of metolachlor, s-metolachlor, and acetochlor CS provided 70 to 75% giant foxtail control in greenhouse bioassays, whereas flufenacet + metribuzin, acetochlor ME, and acetochlor EC provided 38 to 57% control. At the 30 EPP timing, metolachlor and acetochlor CS had 80 to 82% control, whereas acetochlor EC provided 46% control, and acetochlor ME, flufenacet + metribuzin, and s-metolachlor had 65 to 74% control. Quantitative soil analysis (0 to 6 cm) 10 d after planting (DAP) indicated metolachlor, s-metolachlor, and acetochlor CS concentrations ranged from 12 to 16% and 32 to 47% of applied herbicide for the fall and PRE application timings, respectively, whereas acetochlor (ME and EC) were from 1 to 3% and 16 to 21% of applied for the fall and PRE application timings, respectively. Bioassay reduction was correlated (R2 5 0.68) with soil-herbicide concentrations at 10 DAP.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/WT-03-020R1</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WETEE9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>acetochlor ; Agricultural soils ; application timing ; Bioassay ; bioassays ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical control ; Clay loam soils ; Fertilizer application timing ; flufenacet ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Herbicides ; metolachlor ; metribuzin ; Mollisols ; Parasitic plants. Weeds ; pesticide formulations ; pesticide persistence ; Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection ; Planting ; preemergent weed control ; preplanting treatment ; Rain ; residual effects ; s-metolachlor ; seasonal variation ; Setaria faberi ; Silt loam soils ; soil biochemistry ; Soil samples ; Soil treatment ; temporal variation ; weed control ; Weeds</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2005, Vol.19 (1), p.6-13</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2005 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>2005 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3989105$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3989105$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,4010,27900,27901,27902,57992,58225</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=16660299$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Parker, D.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmons, F.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wax, L.M</creatorcontrib><title>Fall and Early Preplant Application Timing Effects on Persistence and Efficacy of Acetamide Herbicides</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>The persistence and efficacy of acetamide herbicides at application timings from fall to preemergence (PRE) were studied in 1998 and 1999 on mollisols (1.1 to 2.8% organic carbon). Metolachlor, s-metolachlor, acetochlor (as an emulsifiable concentrate [EC] formulation and two encapsulated formulations, capsule suspension [CS] and microencapsulated [ME]), and the combination of flufenacet 1 metribuzin were evaluated at five application times including late fall, 60 and 30 d early preplant (EPP), preplant incorporated, and PRE. Soil bioassays 180 d after application indicated flufenacet + metribuzin, metolachlor, s-metolachlor, and the acetochlor CS had 62 to 74% giant foxtail control, whereas acetochlor EC and ME had 43 to 46% control. Applications at 60 EPP of metolachlor, s-metolachlor, and acetochlor CS provided 70 to 75% giant foxtail control in greenhouse bioassays, whereas flufenacet + metribuzin, acetochlor ME, and acetochlor EC provided 38 to 57% control. At the 30 EPP timing, metolachlor and acetochlor CS had 80 to 82% control, whereas acetochlor EC provided 46% control, and acetochlor ME, flufenacet + metribuzin, and s-metolachlor had 65 to 74% control. Quantitative soil analysis (0 to 6 cm) 10 d after planting (DAP) indicated metolachlor, s-metolachlor, and acetochlor CS concentrations ranged from 12 to 16% and 32 to 47% of applied herbicide for the fall and PRE application timings, respectively, whereas acetochlor (ME and EC) were from 1 to 3% and 16 to 21% of applied for the fall and PRE application timings, respectively. Bioassay reduction was correlated (R2 5 0.68) with soil-herbicide concentrations at 10 DAP.</description><subject>acetochlor</subject><subject>Agricultural soils</subject><subject>application timing</subject><subject>Bioassay</subject><subject>bioassays</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical control</subject><subject>Clay loam soils</subject><subject>Fertilizer application timing</subject><subject>flufenacet</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>metolachlor</subject><subject>metribuzin</subject><subject>Mollisols</subject><subject>Parasitic plants. Weeds</subject><subject>pesticide formulations</subject><subject>pesticide persistence</subject><subject>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>preemergent weed control</subject><subject>preplanting treatment</subject><subject>Rain</subject><subject>residual effects</subject><subject>s-metolachlor</subject><subject>seasonal variation</subject><subject>Setaria faberi</subject><subject>Silt loam soils</subject><subject>soil biochemistry</subject><subject>Soil samples</subject><subject>Soil treatment</subject><subject>temporal variation</subject><subject>weed control</subject><subject>Weeds</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2005</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNo9jM9LwzAUgIMoOKsnr4K5eKy-JE3aHsfYnDBwaEVv4y0_RkbXliSX_fcWKp7e433f-wi5Z_DMFCtevpscRA4cPtgFmTEpIedlAZdkBlUNIyt_rslNjEcApjiHGXErbFuKnaFLDO2ZboMdWuwSnQ9D6zUm33e08SffHejSOatTpONla0P0MdlO2-nZuVHWZ9o7Otc24ckbS9c27L0et3hLrhy20d79zYw0q2WzWOeb99e3xXyTOy4g5UoZ6coCS7dnRu4Nq6yBQlSSC0RVGDBWSTTMWZACHVc1YxaVNFgaNCgy8jRlB4waWxew0z7uhuBPGM47ppQCXtej9zB5x5j68M9FXdVsLGfkccIO-x0ewpj4-uTABEApZSEL8Qsr52us</recordid><startdate>2005</startdate><enddate>2005</enddate><creator>Parker, D.C</creator><creator>Simmons, F.W</creator><creator>Wax, L.M</creator><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2005</creationdate><title>Fall and Early Preplant Application Timing Effects on Persistence and Efficacy of Acetamide Herbicides</title><author>Parker, D.C ; Simmons, F.W ; Wax, L.M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-f230t-66d5f74a7fb1d5bd18ed0438523aa64d0de65ad1fe053af26911ea65da7dada3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2005</creationdate><topic>acetochlor</topic><topic>Agricultural soils</topic><topic>application timing</topic><topic>Bioassay</topic><topic>bioassays</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical control</topic><topic>Clay loam soils</topic><topic>Fertilizer application timing</topic><topic>flufenacet</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>metolachlor</topic><topic>metribuzin</topic><topic>Mollisols</topic><topic>Parasitic plants. Weeds</topic><topic>pesticide formulations</topic><topic>pesticide persistence</topic><topic>Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>preemergent weed control</topic><topic>preplanting treatment</topic><topic>Rain</topic><topic>residual effects</topic><topic>s-metolachlor</topic><topic>seasonal variation</topic><topic>Setaria faberi</topic><topic>Silt loam soils</topic><topic>soil biochemistry</topic><topic>Soil samples</topic><topic>Soil treatment</topic><topic>temporal variation</topic><topic>weed control</topic><topic>Weeds</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Parker, D.C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Simmons, F.W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wax, L.M</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Parker, D.C</au><au>Simmons, F.W</au><au>Wax, L.M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Fall and Early Preplant Application Timing Effects on Persistence and Efficacy of Acetamide Herbicides</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>2005</date><risdate>2005</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>6</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>6-13</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><coden>WETEE9</coden><abstract>The persistence and efficacy of acetamide herbicides at application timings from fall to preemergence (PRE) were studied in 1998 and 1999 on mollisols (1.1 to 2.8% organic carbon). Metolachlor, s-metolachlor, acetochlor (as an emulsifiable concentrate [EC] formulation and two encapsulated formulations, capsule suspension [CS] and microencapsulated [ME]), and the combination of flufenacet 1 metribuzin were evaluated at five application times including late fall, 60 and 30 d early preplant (EPP), preplant incorporated, and PRE. Soil bioassays 180 d after application indicated flufenacet + metribuzin, metolachlor, s-metolachlor, and the acetochlor CS had 62 to 74% giant foxtail control, whereas acetochlor EC and ME had 43 to 46% control. Applications at 60 EPP of metolachlor, s-metolachlor, and acetochlor CS provided 70 to 75% giant foxtail control in greenhouse bioassays, whereas flufenacet + metribuzin, acetochlor ME, and acetochlor EC provided 38 to 57% control. At the 30 EPP timing, metolachlor and acetochlor CS had 80 to 82% control, whereas acetochlor EC provided 46% control, and acetochlor ME, flufenacet + metribuzin, and s-metolachlor had 65 to 74% control. Quantitative soil analysis (0 to 6 cm) 10 d after planting (DAP) indicated metolachlor, s-metolachlor, and acetochlor CS concentrations ranged from 12 to 16% and 32 to 47% of applied herbicide for the fall and PRE application timings, respectively, whereas acetochlor (ME and EC) were from 1 to 3% and 16 to 21% of applied for the fall and PRE application timings, respectively. Bioassay reduction was correlated (R2 5 0.68) with soil-herbicide concentrations at 10 DAP.</abstract><cop>Lawrence, KS</cop><pub>Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1614/WT-03-020R1</doi><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-037X
ispartof Weed technology, 2005, Vol.19 (1), p.6-13
issn 0890-037X
1550-2740
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_16660299
source Jstor Complete Legacy; BioOne Complete
subjects acetochlor
Agricultural soils
application timing
Bioassay
bioassays
Biological and medical sciences
Chemical control
Clay loam soils
Fertilizer application timing
flufenacet
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Herbicides
metolachlor
metribuzin
Mollisols
Parasitic plants. Weeds
pesticide formulations
pesticide persistence
Phytopathology. Animal pests. Plant and forest protection
Planting
preemergent weed control
preplanting treatment
Rain
residual effects
s-metolachlor
seasonal variation
Setaria faberi
Silt loam soils
soil biochemistry
Soil samples
Soil treatment
temporal variation
weed control
Weeds
title Fall and Early Preplant Application Timing Effects on Persistence and Efficacy of Acetamide Herbicides
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T01%3A00%3A08IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Fall%20and%20Early%20Preplant%20Application%20Timing%20Effects%20on%20Persistence%20and%20Efficacy%20of%20Acetamide%20Herbicides&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Parker,%20D.C&rft.date=2005&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=6&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=6-13&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft.coden=WETEE9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/WT-03-020R1&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pasca%3E3989105%3C/jstor_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3989105&rfr_iscdi=true