Self-Adaptability of Agile Software Processes: A Case Study on Post-iteration Workshops
None of the agile methods are claimed to fit all development situations. A team should attempt to adapt the methods and practices to fit their specific needs. For that reason agile principles call for self-reflection on a regular basis in order to identify where and how to make improvements. While s...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Buchkapitel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 193 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 184 |
container_title | |
container_volume | 3092 |
creator | Salo, Outi Kolehmainen, Kari Kyllönen, Pekka Löthman, Jani Salmijärvi, Sanna Abrahamsson, Pekka |
description | None of the agile methods are claimed to fit all development situations. A team should attempt to adapt the methods and practices to fit their specific needs. For that reason agile principles call for self-reflection on a regular basis in order to identify where and how to make improvements. While some systematic approaches on how to execute this self-reflection process effectively have already been proposed, little empirical evidence currently exists. This paper reports empirical results based on a study where a project team conducted a self-reflection process called “post-iteration workshop” in order to improve and optimize the adopted practices in an XP project. Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected from four 1-2 hour workshops. The results show that with less than 4% effort it is possible to hold post-iteration workshops that significantly help to improve and optimize practices and enhance the learning and satisfaction of the project team. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/978-3-540-24853-8_21 |
format | Book Chapter |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_15876134</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>EBC3087735_27_198</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p272t-ee9a1c356dbc5453193a8fc68a87fe8ad8f97455623ad508727391319b62e20f3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFkE1LAzEQhuMnltp_4GEvHqNJZrPJeivFLxAsVOkxpLuJrq7NmkTEf--0FpxLmPd9Z5g8hJxxdsEZU5e10hSoLBkVpZZAtRF8j0xQBhS3mt4nI15xTgHK-uDfExwUPyQjBkzQWpVwTEY1RjRjQp-QSUpvDItLISsxIsuF6z2dtnbIdtX1Xf4pgi-mL13vikXw-dtGV8xjaFxKLl0V02JmE1r5q8XkupiHlGmXXbS5w3YZ4nt6DUM6JUfe9slNdu-YPN9cP83u6MPj7f1s-kAHoUSmztWWNyCrdtXIUgKvwWrfVNpq5Z22rfb4B4mngm0l00ooqDnGVpVwgnkYk_O_vYNNje19tOumS2aI3YeNP4ZLrSoOJebEXy6htX5x0axCeE-GM7MhbhCfAYMAzZau2RDHIdgtj-Hzy6Vs3Gaqcescbd-8IjQXkwG8S4E0Qhlea_gF93J9bQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><pqid>EBC3087735_27_198</pqid></control><display><type>book_chapter</type><title>Self-Adaptability of Agile Software Processes: A Case Study on Post-iteration Workshops</title><source>Springer Books</source><creator>Salo, Outi ; Kolehmainen, Kari ; Kyllönen, Pekka ; Löthman, Jani ; Salmijärvi, Sanna ; Abrahamsson, Pekka</creator><contributor>Eckstein, Jutta ; Baumeister, Hubert ; Eckstein, Jutta ; Baumeister, Hubert</contributor><creatorcontrib>Salo, Outi ; Kolehmainen, Kari ; Kyllönen, Pekka ; Löthman, Jani ; Salmijärvi, Sanna ; Abrahamsson, Pekka ; Eckstein, Jutta ; Baumeister, Hubert ; Eckstein, Jutta ; Baumeister, Hubert</creatorcontrib><description>None of the agile methods are claimed to fit all development situations. A team should attempt to adapt the methods and practices to fit their specific needs. For that reason agile principles call for self-reflection on a regular basis in order to identify where and how to make improvements. While some systematic approaches on how to execute this self-reflection process effectively have already been proposed, little empirical evidence currently exists. This paper reports empirical results based on a study where a project team conducted a self-reflection process called “post-iteration workshop” in order to improve and optimize the adopted practices in an XP project. Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected from four 1-2 hour workshops. The results show that with less than 4% effort it is possible to hold post-iteration workshops that significantly help to improve and optimize practices and enhance the learning and satisfaction of the project team.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-9743</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9783540221371</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 3540221379</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1611-3349</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9783540248538</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 3540248536</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-24853-8_21</identifier><identifier>OCLC: 934980028</identifier><identifier>LCCallNum: QA76.758</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Berlin / Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Agile Method ; Applied sciences ; Computer science; control theory; systems ; Exact sciences and technology ; Negative Finding ; Project Team ; Software ; Software Development Project ; Software engineering ; Time Tracking</subject><ispartof>Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering, 2004, Vol.3092, p.184-193</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2004</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><relation>Lecture Notes in Computer Science</relation></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://ebookcentral.proquest.com/covers/3087735-l.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/978-3-540-24853-8_21$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/978-3-540-24853-8_21$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,775,776,780,785,786,789,4036,4037,27904,38234,41421,42490</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15876134$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Eckstein, Jutta</contributor><contributor>Baumeister, Hubert</contributor><contributor>Eckstein, Jutta</contributor><contributor>Baumeister, Hubert</contributor><creatorcontrib>Salo, Outi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolehmainen, Kari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyllönen, Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Löthman, Jani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmijärvi, Sanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrahamsson, Pekka</creatorcontrib><title>Self-Adaptability of Agile Software Processes: A Case Study on Post-iteration Workshops</title><title>Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering</title><description>None of the agile methods are claimed to fit all development situations. A team should attempt to adapt the methods and practices to fit their specific needs. For that reason agile principles call for self-reflection on a regular basis in order to identify where and how to make improvements. While some systematic approaches on how to execute this self-reflection process effectively have already been proposed, little empirical evidence currently exists. This paper reports empirical results based on a study where a project team conducted a self-reflection process called “post-iteration workshop” in order to improve and optimize the adopted practices in an XP project. Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected from four 1-2 hour workshops. The results show that with less than 4% effort it is possible to hold post-iteration workshops that significantly help to improve and optimize practices and enhance the learning and satisfaction of the project team.</description><subject>Agile Method</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Computer science; control theory; systems</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Negative Finding</subject><subject>Project Team</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Software Development Project</subject><subject>Software engineering</subject><subject>Time Tracking</subject><issn>0302-9743</issn><issn>1611-3349</issn><isbn>9783540221371</isbn><isbn>3540221379</isbn><isbn>9783540248538</isbn><isbn>3540248536</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book_chapter</rsrctype><creationdate>2004</creationdate><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><recordid>eNpFkE1LAzEQhuMnltp_4GEvHqNJZrPJeivFLxAsVOkxpLuJrq7NmkTEf--0FpxLmPd9Z5g8hJxxdsEZU5e10hSoLBkVpZZAtRF8j0xQBhS3mt4nI15xTgHK-uDfExwUPyQjBkzQWpVwTEY1RjRjQp-QSUpvDItLISsxIsuF6z2dtnbIdtX1Xf4pgi-mL13vikXw-dtGV8xjaFxKLl0V02JmE1r5q8XkupiHlGmXXbS5w3YZ4nt6DUM6JUfe9slNdu-YPN9cP83u6MPj7f1s-kAHoUSmztWWNyCrdtXIUgKvwWrfVNpq5Z22rfb4B4mngm0l00ooqDnGVpVwgnkYk_O_vYNNje19tOumS2aI3YeNP4ZLrSoOJebEXy6htX5x0axCeE-GM7MhbhCfAYMAzZau2RDHIdgtj-Hzy6Vs3Gaqcescbd-8IjQXkwG8S4E0Qhlea_gF93J9bQ</recordid><startdate>2004</startdate><enddate>2004</enddate><creator>Salo, Outi</creator><creator>Kolehmainen, Kari</creator><creator>Kyllönen, Pekka</creator><creator>Löthman, Jani</creator><creator>Salmijärvi, Sanna</creator><creator>Abrahamsson, Pekka</creator><general>Springer Berlin / Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><scope>FFUUA</scope><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2004</creationdate><title>Self-Adaptability of Agile Software Processes: A Case Study on Post-iteration Workshops</title><author>Salo, Outi ; Kolehmainen, Kari ; Kyllönen, Pekka ; Löthman, Jani ; Salmijärvi, Sanna ; Abrahamsson, Pekka</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p272t-ee9a1c356dbc5453193a8fc68a87fe8ad8f97455623ad508727391319b62e20f3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>book_chapters</rsrctype><prefilter>book_chapters</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2004</creationdate><topic>Agile Method</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Computer science; control theory; systems</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Negative Finding</topic><topic>Project Team</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Software Development Project</topic><topic>Software engineering</topic><topic>Time Tracking</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Salo, Outi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolehmainen, Kari</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kyllönen, Pekka</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Löthman, Jani</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Salmijärvi, Sanna</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Abrahamsson, Pekka</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Ebook Central - Book Chapters - Demo use only</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Salo, Outi</au><au>Kolehmainen, Kari</au><au>Kyllönen, Pekka</au><au>Löthman, Jani</au><au>Salmijärvi, Sanna</au><au>Abrahamsson, Pekka</au><au>Eckstein, Jutta</au><au>Baumeister, Hubert</au><au>Eckstein, Jutta</au><au>Baumeister, Hubert</au><format>book</format><genre>bookitem</genre><ristype>CHAP</ristype><atitle>Self-Adaptability of Agile Software Processes: A Case Study on Post-iteration Workshops</atitle><btitle>Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering</btitle><seriestitle>Lecture Notes in Computer Science</seriestitle><date>2004</date><risdate>2004</risdate><volume>3092</volume><spage>184</spage><epage>193</epage><pages>184-193</pages><issn>0302-9743</issn><eissn>1611-3349</eissn><isbn>9783540221371</isbn><isbn>3540221379</isbn><eisbn>9783540248538</eisbn><eisbn>3540248536</eisbn><abstract>None of the agile methods are claimed to fit all development situations. A team should attempt to adapt the methods and practices to fit their specific needs. For that reason agile principles call for self-reflection on a regular basis in order to identify where and how to make improvements. While some systematic approaches on how to execute this self-reflection process effectively have already been proposed, little empirical evidence currently exists. This paper reports empirical results based on a study where a project team conducted a self-reflection process called “post-iteration workshop” in order to improve and optimize the adopted practices in an XP project. Both qualitative and quantitative data were collected from four 1-2 hour workshops. The results show that with less than 4% effort it is possible to hold post-iteration workshops that significantly help to improve and optimize practices and enhance the learning and satisfaction of the project team.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Berlin / Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/978-3-540-24853-8_21</doi><oclcid>934980028</oclcid><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0302-9743 |
ispartof | Extreme Programming and Agile Processes in Software Engineering, 2004, Vol.3092, p.184-193 |
issn | 0302-9743 1611-3349 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_15876134 |
source | Springer Books |
subjects | Agile Method Applied sciences Computer science control theory systems Exact sciences and technology Negative Finding Project Team Software Software Development Project Software engineering Time Tracking |
title | Self-Adaptability of Agile Software Processes: A Case Study on Post-iteration Workshops |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T04%3A37%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=bookitem&rft.atitle=Self-Adaptability%20of%20Agile%20Software%20Processes:%20A%20Case%20Study%20on%20Post-iteration%20Workshops&rft.btitle=Extreme%20Programming%20and%20Agile%20Processes%20in%20Software%20Engineering&rft.au=Salo,%20Outi&rft.date=2004&rft.volume=3092&rft.spage=184&rft.epage=193&rft.pages=184-193&rft.issn=0302-9743&rft.eissn=1611-3349&rft.isbn=9783540221371&rft.isbn_list=3540221379&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/978-3-540-24853-8_21&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3EEBC3087735_27_198%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=9783540248538&rft.eisbn_list=3540248536&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=EBC3087735_27_198&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |