A Comparative Performance Analysis of JPEG 2000 vs. WSQ for Fingerprint Image Compression
The FBI Wavelet Scalar Quantization (WSQ) compression standard was developed by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The main advantage of WSQ-based fingerprint image compression has been its superiority in preserving the fingerprint minutiae features even at very high compression rates whi...
Gespeichert in:
| Hauptverfasser: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Buchkapitel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 392 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | |
| container_start_page | 385 |
| container_title | |
| container_volume | 2688 |
| creator | Figueroa-Villanueva, Miguel A. Ratha, Nalini K. Bolle, Ruud M. |
| description | The FBI Wavelet Scalar Quantization (WSQ) compression standard was developed by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The main advantage of WSQ-based fingerprint image compression has been its superiority in preserving the fingerprint minutiae features even at very high compression rates which standard JPEG compression techniques were unable to preserve. With the advent of JPEG 2000 image compression technique based on Wavelet transforms moving away from DCT-based methods, we have been motivated to investigate if the same advantage still persists. In this paper, we describe a set of experiments we carried out to compare the performance of WSQ with JPEG 2000. The performance analysis is based on three public databases of fingerprint images acquired using different imaging sensors. Our analysis shows that JPEG 2000 provides better compression with less impact on the overall system accuracy performance. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1007/3-540-44887-X_46 |
| format | Book Chapter |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_15692493</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>EBC3073222_52_403</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-p268t-675953fed859d29a7fb97b0d6f9970679e7abfc21e35c74beb1c14d18c853c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkEtPwzAQhM1ThMedoy8cU2yvHcfHqmoLqBIgkICT5TgOBJoHdqjEv8cp3ctKuzOj0YfQJSUTSoi8hlRwknKe5zJ91TzbQ6cQL9vD6z5KaEZpCsDVwe5BgDB5iJJxp0pyOEaJErlglGXkBF2E8EniAKM8pwl6m-JZ1_TGm6HeOPzgfNX5xrTW4Wlr1r-hDrir8N3DfIlZ9OFNmOCXp0ccZXhRt-_O975uB3zbmHe3zfIuhLprz9FRZdbBXez2GXpezJ9nN-nqfnk7m67SnmX5kGZSKAGVK3OhSqaMrAolC1JmlVKSZFI5aYrKMupAWMkLV1BLeUlzmwuwEs7Q1X9sb4I168rH7nXQsVRj_K-mIlOMK4i6yb8ujH1jbV103VfQlOgRtAYd6ektVz2CjgbYBfvu-8eFQbvRYV07eLO2H6YfnA8aiATGmBZMR_bwBxzFei0</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><pqid>EBC3073222_52_403</pqid></control><display><type>book_chapter</type><title>A Comparative Performance Analysis of JPEG 2000 vs. WSQ for Fingerprint Image Compression</title><source>Springer Books</source><creator>Figueroa-Villanueva, Miguel A. ; Ratha, Nalini K. ; Bolle, Ruud M.</creator><contributor>Nixon, Mark S ; Kittler, Josef ; Kittler, Josef ; Nixon, Mark S.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Figueroa-Villanueva, Miguel A. ; Ratha, Nalini K. ; Bolle, Ruud M. ; Nixon, Mark S ; Kittler, Josef ; Kittler, Josef ; Nixon, Mark S.</creatorcontrib><description>The FBI Wavelet Scalar Quantization (WSQ) compression standard was developed by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The main advantage of WSQ-based fingerprint image compression has been its superiority in preserving the fingerprint minutiae features even at very high compression rates which standard JPEG compression techniques were unable to preserve. With the advent of JPEG 2000 image compression technique based on Wavelet transforms moving away from DCT-based methods, we have been motivated to investigate if the same advantage still persists. In this paper, we describe a set of experiments we carried out to compare the performance of WSQ with JPEG 2000. The performance analysis is based on three public databases of fingerprint images acquired using different imaging sensors. Our analysis shows that JPEG 2000 provides better compression with less impact on the overall system accuracy performance.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0302-9743</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 3540403027</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 9783540403029</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1611-3349</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 354044887X</identifier><identifier>EISBN: 9783540448877</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/3-540-44887-X_46</identifier><identifier>OCLC: 958521260</identifier><identifier>LCCallNum: Q337.5</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Germany: Springer Berlin / Heidelberg</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Computer science; control theory; systems ; Exact sciences and technology ; False Reject Rate ; Fingerprint Image ; Image Compression ; Memory and file management (including protection and security) ; Memory organisation. Data processing ; Root Mean Square Error ; Software ; Wavelet Packet</subject><ispartof>Audio- and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication, 2003, Vol.2688, p.385-392</ispartof><rights>Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2003</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><relation>Lecture Notes in Computer Science</relation></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Uhttps://ebookcentral.proquest.com/covers/3073222-l.jpg</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/content/pdf/10.1007/3-540-44887-X_46$$EPDF$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://link.springer.com/10.1007/3-540-44887-X_46$$EHTML$$P50$$Gspringer$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,776,777,781,786,787,790,4036,4037,27906,38236,41423,42492</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15692493$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><contributor>Nixon, Mark S</contributor><contributor>Kittler, Josef</contributor><contributor>Kittler, Josef</contributor><contributor>Nixon, Mark S.</contributor><creatorcontrib>Figueroa-Villanueva, Miguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratha, Nalini K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolle, Ruud M.</creatorcontrib><title>A Comparative Performance Analysis of JPEG 2000 vs. WSQ for Fingerprint Image Compression</title><title>Audio- and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication</title><description>The FBI Wavelet Scalar Quantization (WSQ) compression standard was developed by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The main advantage of WSQ-based fingerprint image compression has been its superiority in preserving the fingerprint minutiae features even at very high compression rates which standard JPEG compression techniques were unable to preserve. With the advent of JPEG 2000 image compression technique based on Wavelet transforms moving away from DCT-based methods, we have been motivated to investigate if the same advantage still persists. In this paper, we describe a set of experiments we carried out to compare the performance of WSQ with JPEG 2000. The performance analysis is based on three public databases of fingerprint images acquired using different imaging sensors. Our analysis shows that JPEG 2000 provides better compression with less impact on the overall system accuracy performance.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Computer science; control theory; systems</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>False Reject Rate</subject><subject>Fingerprint Image</subject><subject>Image Compression</subject><subject>Memory and file management (including protection and security)</subject><subject>Memory organisation. Data processing</subject><subject>Root Mean Square Error</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>Wavelet Packet</subject><issn>0302-9743</issn><issn>1611-3349</issn><isbn>3540403027</isbn><isbn>9783540403029</isbn><isbn>354044887X</isbn><isbn>9783540448877</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>book_chapter</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>book_chapter</recordtype><recordid>eNotkEtPwzAQhM1ThMedoy8cU2yvHcfHqmoLqBIgkICT5TgOBJoHdqjEv8cp3ctKuzOj0YfQJSUTSoi8hlRwknKe5zJ91TzbQ6cQL9vD6z5KaEZpCsDVwe5BgDB5iJJxp0pyOEaJErlglGXkBF2E8EniAKM8pwl6m-JZ1_TGm6HeOPzgfNX5xrTW4Wlr1r-hDrir8N3DfIlZ9OFNmOCXp0ccZXhRt-_O975uB3zbmHe3zfIuhLprz9FRZdbBXez2GXpezJ9nN-nqfnk7m67SnmX5kGZSKAGVK3OhSqaMrAolC1JmlVKSZFI5aYrKMupAWMkLV1BLeUlzmwuwEs7Q1X9sb4I168rH7nXQsVRj_K-mIlOMK4i6yb8ujH1jbV103VfQlOgRtAYd6ektVz2CjgbYBfvu-8eFQbvRYV07eLO2H6YfnA8aiATGmBZMR_bwBxzFei0</recordid><startdate>2003</startdate><enddate>2003</enddate><creator>Figueroa-Villanueva, Miguel A.</creator><creator>Ratha, Nalini K.</creator><creator>Bolle, Ruud M.</creator><general>Springer Berlin / Heidelberg</general><general>Springer Berlin Heidelberg</general><general>Springer</general><scope>FFUUA</scope><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2003</creationdate><title>A Comparative Performance Analysis of JPEG 2000 vs. WSQ for Fingerprint Image Compression</title><author>Figueroa-Villanueva, Miguel A. ; Ratha, Nalini K. ; Bolle, Ruud M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-p268t-675953fed859d29a7fb97b0d6f9970679e7abfc21e35c74beb1c14d18c853c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>book_chapters</rsrctype><prefilter>book_chapters</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Computer science; control theory; systems</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>False Reject Rate</topic><topic>Fingerprint Image</topic><topic>Image Compression</topic><topic>Memory and file management (including protection and security)</topic><topic>Memory organisation. Data processing</topic><topic>Root Mean Square Error</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>Wavelet Packet</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Figueroa-Villanueva, Miguel A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ratha, Nalini K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bolle, Ruud M.</creatorcontrib><collection>ProQuest Ebook Central - Book Chapters - Demo use only</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Figueroa-Villanueva, Miguel A.</au><au>Ratha, Nalini K.</au><au>Bolle, Ruud M.</au><au>Nixon, Mark S</au><au>Kittler, Josef</au><au>Kittler, Josef</au><au>Nixon, Mark S.</au><format>book</format><genre>bookitem</genre><ristype>CHAP</ristype><atitle>A Comparative Performance Analysis of JPEG 2000 vs. WSQ for Fingerprint Image Compression</atitle><btitle>Audio- and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication</btitle><seriestitle>Lecture Notes in Computer Science</seriestitle><date>2003</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>2688</volume><spage>385</spage><epage>392</epage><pages>385-392</pages><issn>0302-9743</issn><eissn>1611-3349</eissn><isbn>3540403027</isbn><isbn>9783540403029</isbn><eisbn>354044887X</eisbn><eisbn>9783540448877</eisbn><abstract>The FBI Wavelet Scalar Quantization (WSQ) compression standard was developed by the US Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The main advantage of WSQ-based fingerprint image compression has been its superiority in preserving the fingerprint minutiae features even at very high compression rates which standard JPEG compression techniques were unable to preserve. With the advent of JPEG 2000 image compression technique based on Wavelet transforms moving away from DCT-based methods, we have been motivated to investigate if the same advantage still persists. In this paper, we describe a set of experiments we carried out to compare the performance of WSQ with JPEG 2000. The performance analysis is based on three public databases of fingerprint images acquired using different imaging sensors. Our analysis shows that JPEG 2000 provides better compression with less impact on the overall system accuracy performance.</abstract><cop>Germany</cop><pub>Springer Berlin / Heidelberg</pub><doi>10.1007/3-540-44887-X_46</doi><oclcid>958521260</oclcid><tpages>8</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0302-9743 |
| ispartof | Audio- and Video-Based Biometric Person Authentication, 2003, Vol.2688, p.385-392 |
| issn | 0302-9743 1611-3349 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_15692493 |
| source | Springer Books |
| subjects | Applied sciences Computer science control theory systems Exact sciences and technology False Reject Rate Fingerprint Image Image Compression Memory and file management (including protection and security) Memory organisation. Data processing Root Mean Square Error Software Wavelet Packet |
| title | A Comparative Performance Analysis of JPEG 2000 vs. WSQ for Fingerprint Image Compression |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-19T19%3A15%3A16IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=bookitem&rft.atitle=A%20Comparative%20Performance%20Analysis%20of%20JPEG%202000%20vs.%20WSQ%20for%20Fingerprint%20Image%20Compression&rft.btitle=Audio-%20and%20Video-Based%20Biometric%20Person%20Authentication&rft.au=Figueroa-Villanueva,%20Miguel%20A.&rft.date=2003&rft.volume=2688&rft.spage=385&rft.epage=392&rft.pages=385-392&rft.issn=0302-9743&rft.eissn=1611-3349&rft.isbn=3540403027&rft.isbn_list=9783540403029&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/3-540-44887-X_46&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3EEBC3073222_52_403%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&rft.eisbn=354044887X&rft.eisbn_list=9783540448877&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=EBC3073222_52_403&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |