Performance of hard decision detection for impulse radio

Impulse radio (IR) is an ultra-wide bandwidth, time-hopping, code division multiple access (CDMA) technology that possesses unique characteristics that make it a promising candidate for future tactical military radio networks. In this paper, we present an analysis of the bit error performance of IR...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Hauptverfasser: Weeks, G.D., Townsend, J.K., Freebersyser, J.A.
Format: Tagungsbericht
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1206 vol.2
container_issue
container_start_page 1201
container_title
container_volume 2
creator Weeks, G.D.
Townsend, J.K.
Freebersyser, J.A.
description Impulse radio (IR) is an ultra-wide bandwidth, time-hopping, code division multiple access (CDMA) technology that possesses unique characteristics that make it a promising candidate for future tactical military radio networks. In this paper, we present an analysis of the bit error performance of IR using hard decision detection and soft decision detection techniques in an environment with dense multiple access interference and large near-far ratios, including severe interference from several local transmitters and a large number of distant interferers and thermal noise. The results show that hard decision detection performs better than soft decision detection in the presence of several large interferers. We discuss the tradeoffs between hard decision detection and soft decision detection, and we also compare the performance of hard decision detection and soft decision detection with blanking. In the soft decision detection with blanking scheme, the input signal is blanked during any interval when an interfering pulse overlaps the desired pulse. This blanking scheme requires knowledge of the time-hopping pattern of the interfering users and a corresponding increase in the complexity needed to achieve synchronization. Our analysis shows that the performance of the hard decision detection receiver is nearly equivalent to the performance of the soft decision detection receiver with blanking without an increase in complexity.
doi_str_mv 10.1109/MILCOM.1999.821394
format Conference Proceeding
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>pascalfrancis_6IE</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_1536588</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><ieee_id>821394</ieee_id><sourcerecordid>1536588</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-g898-2e5c36f71a21fc11e0966b5a63272ce5e64043c39349a72e93de254c0132cb333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE9rwzAMxQ1jsNHlC_SUw67JLMt27OMI-1NI6Q69F9dRNo-mCXZ32LefR8bEAz2hHw8hxtbAawBuH7abrt1ta7DW1kYAWnnFCtsYnoVKoVE3rEjpk-eSCkCoW2beKA5THN3ZUzkN5YeLfdmTDylM52wu5C-_LjNlGOevU6Iyuj5Md-x6cHkq_vqK7Z-f9u1r1e1eNu1jV70baypByqMeGnACBg9A3Gp9VE6jaIQnRVpyiR4tSusaQRZ7Ekp6Dij8ERFX7H6JnV3y7jTEfGhIhzmG0cXvAyjUypiMrRcsENH_dnkC_gAVXlDg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Performance of hard decision detection for impulse radio</title><source>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</source><creator>Weeks, G.D. ; Townsend, J.K. ; Freebersyser, J.A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Weeks, G.D. ; Townsend, J.K. ; Freebersyser, J.A.</creatorcontrib><description>Impulse radio (IR) is an ultra-wide bandwidth, time-hopping, code division multiple access (CDMA) technology that possesses unique characteristics that make it a promising candidate for future tactical military radio networks. In this paper, we present an analysis of the bit error performance of IR using hard decision detection and soft decision detection techniques in an environment with dense multiple access interference and large near-far ratios, including severe interference from several local transmitters and a large number of distant interferers and thermal noise. The results show that hard decision detection performs better than soft decision detection in the presence of several large interferers. We discuss the tradeoffs between hard decision detection and soft decision detection, and we also compare the performance of hard decision detection and soft decision detection with blanking. In the soft decision detection with blanking scheme, the input signal is blanked during any interval when an interfering pulse overlaps the desired pulse. This blanking scheme requires knowledge of the time-hopping pattern of the interfering users and a corresponding increase in the complexity needed to achieve synchronization. Our analysis shows that the performance of the hard decision detection receiver is nearly equivalent to the performance of the soft decision detection receiver with blanking without an increase in complexity.</description><identifier>ISBN: 9780780355385</identifier><identifier>ISBN: 0780355385</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1109/MILCOM.1999.821394</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Piscataway NJ: IEEE</publisher><subject>Applied sciences ; Bandwidth ; Blanking ; Exact sciences and technology ; Information, signal and communications theory ; Infrared detectors ; Multiaccess communication ; Multiple access interference ; Performance analysis ; Radio network ; Radio transmitters ; Radiocommunications ; Signal to noise ratio ; Systems, networks and services of telecommunications ; Telecommunications ; Telecommunications and information theory ; Telecommunications: signal transmission and processing; communication satellites ; Working environment noise</subject><ispartof>MILCOM 1999. IEEE Military Communications. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36341), 1999, Vol.2, p.1201-1206 vol.2</ispartof><rights>2000 INIST-CNRS</rights><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/821394$$EHTML$$P50$$Gieee$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,780,784,789,790,2056,4047,4048,27923,54918</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/821394$$EView_record_in_IEEE$$FView_record_in_$$GIEEE</linktorsrc><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=1536588$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Weeks, G.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Townsend, J.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freebersyser, J.A.</creatorcontrib><title>Performance of hard decision detection for impulse radio</title><title>MILCOM 1999. IEEE Military Communications. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36341)</title><addtitle>MILCOM</addtitle><description>Impulse radio (IR) is an ultra-wide bandwidth, time-hopping, code division multiple access (CDMA) technology that possesses unique characteristics that make it a promising candidate for future tactical military radio networks. In this paper, we present an analysis of the bit error performance of IR using hard decision detection and soft decision detection techniques in an environment with dense multiple access interference and large near-far ratios, including severe interference from several local transmitters and a large number of distant interferers and thermal noise. The results show that hard decision detection performs better than soft decision detection in the presence of several large interferers. We discuss the tradeoffs between hard decision detection and soft decision detection, and we also compare the performance of hard decision detection and soft decision detection with blanking. In the soft decision detection with blanking scheme, the input signal is blanked during any interval when an interfering pulse overlaps the desired pulse. This blanking scheme requires knowledge of the time-hopping pattern of the interfering users and a corresponding increase in the complexity needed to achieve synchronization. Our analysis shows that the performance of the hard decision detection receiver is nearly equivalent to the performance of the soft decision detection receiver with blanking without an increase in complexity.</description><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Bandwidth</subject><subject>Blanking</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>Information, signal and communications theory</subject><subject>Infrared detectors</subject><subject>Multiaccess communication</subject><subject>Multiple access interference</subject><subject>Performance analysis</subject><subject>Radio network</subject><subject>Radio transmitters</subject><subject>Radiocommunications</subject><subject>Signal to noise ratio</subject><subject>Systems, networks and services of telecommunications</subject><subject>Telecommunications</subject><subject>Telecommunications and information theory</subject><subject>Telecommunications: signal transmission and processing; communication satellites</subject><subject>Working environment noise</subject><isbn>9780780355385</isbn><isbn>0780355385</isbn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>1999</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><sourceid>6IE</sourceid><sourceid>RIE</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kE9rwzAMxQ1jsNHlC_SUw67JLMt27OMI-1NI6Q69F9dRNo-mCXZ32LefR8bEAz2hHw8hxtbAawBuH7abrt1ta7DW1kYAWnnFCtsYnoVKoVE3rEjpk-eSCkCoW2beKA5THN3ZUzkN5YeLfdmTDylM52wu5C-_LjNlGOevU6Iyuj5Md-x6cHkq_vqK7Z-f9u1r1e1eNu1jV70baypByqMeGnACBg9A3Gp9VE6jaIQnRVpyiR4tSusaQRZ7Ekp6Dij8ERFX7H6JnV3y7jTEfGhIhzmG0cXvAyjUypiMrRcsENH_dnkC_gAVXlDg</recordid><startdate>1999</startdate><enddate>1999</enddate><creator>Weeks, G.D.</creator><creator>Townsend, J.K.</creator><creator>Freebersyser, J.A.</creator><general>IEEE</general><scope>6IE</scope><scope>6IH</scope><scope>CBEJK</scope><scope>RIE</scope><scope>RIO</scope><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1999</creationdate><title>Performance of hard decision detection for impulse radio</title><author>Weeks, G.D. ; Townsend, J.K. ; Freebersyser, J.A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-g898-2e5c36f71a21fc11e0966b5a63272ce5e64043c39349a72e93de254c0132cb333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1999</creationdate><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Bandwidth</topic><topic>Blanking</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>Information, signal and communications theory</topic><topic>Infrared detectors</topic><topic>Multiaccess communication</topic><topic>Multiple access interference</topic><topic>Performance analysis</topic><topic>Radio network</topic><topic>Radio transmitters</topic><topic>Radiocommunications</topic><topic>Signal to noise ratio</topic><topic>Systems, networks and services of telecommunications</topic><topic>Telecommunications</topic><topic>Telecommunications and information theory</topic><topic>Telecommunications: signal transmission and processing; communication satellites</topic><topic>Working environment noise</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Weeks, G.D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Townsend, J.K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Freebersyser, J.A.</creatorcontrib><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plan (POP) 1998-present by volume</collection><collection>IEEE Xplore All Conference Proceedings</collection><collection>IEEE Electronic Library (IEL)</collection><collection>IEEE Proceedings Order Plans (POP) 1998-present</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Weeks, G.D.</au><au>Townsend, J.K.</au><au>Freebersyser, J.A.</au><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Performance of hard decision detection for impulse radio</atitle><btitle>MILCOM 1999. IEEE Military Communications. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36341)</btitle><stitle>MILCOM</stitle><date>1999</date><risdate>1999</risdate><volume>2</volume><spage>1201</spage><epage>1206 vol.2</epage><pages>1201-1206 vol.2</pages><isbn>9780780355385</isbn><isbn>0780355385</isbn><abstract>Impulse radio (IR) is an ultra-wide bandwidth, time-hopping, code division multiple access (CDMA) technology that possesses unique characteristics that make it a promising candidate for future tactical military radio networks. In this paper, we present an analysis of the bit error performance of IR using hard decision detection and soft decision detection techniques in an environment with dense multiple access interference and large near-far ratios, including severe interference from several local transmitters and a large number of distant interferers and thermal noise. The results show that hard decision detection performs better than soft decision detection in the presence of several large interferers. We discuss the tradeoffs between hard decision detection and soft decision detection, and we also compare the performance of hard decision detection and soft decision detection with blanking. In the soft decision detection with blanking scheme, the input signal is blanked during any interval when an interfering pulse overlaps the desired pulse. This blanking scheme requires knowledge of the time-hopping pattern of the interfering users and a corresponding increase in the complexity needed to achieve synchronization. Our analysis shows that the performance of the hard decision detection receiver is nearly equivalent to the performance of the soft decision detection receiver with blanking without an increase in complexity.</abstract><cop>Piscataway NJ</cop><pub>IEEE</pub><doi>10.1109/MILCOM.1999.821394</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISBN: 9780780355385
ispartof MILCOM 1999. IEEE Military Communications. Conference Proceedings (Cat. No.99CH36341), 1999, Vol.2, p.1201-1206 vol.2
issn
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_1536588
source IEEE Electronic Library (IEL) Conference Proceedings
subjects Applied sciences
Bandwidth
Blanking
Exact sciences and technology
Information, signal and communications theory
Infrared detectors
Multiaccess communication
Multiple access interference
Performance analysis
Radio network
Radio transmitters
Radiocommunications
Signal to noise ratio
Systems, networks and services of telecommunications
Telecommunications
Telecommunications and information theory
Telecommunications: signal transmission and processing
communication satellites
Working environment noise
title Performance of hard decision detection for impulse radio
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T07%3A43%3A45IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pascalfrancis_6IE&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Performance%20of%20hard%20decision%20detection%20for%20impulse%20radio&rft.btitle=MILCOM%201999.%20IEEE%20Military%20Communications.%20Conference%20Proceedings%20(Cat.%20No.99CH36341)&rft.au=Weeks,%20G.D.&rft.date=1999&rft.volume=2&rft.spage=1201&rft.epage=1206%20vol.2&rft.pages=1201-1206%20vol.2&rft.isbn=9780780355385&rft.isbn_list=0780355385&rft_id=info:doi/10.1109/MILCOM.1999.821394&rft_dat=%3Cpascalfrancis_6IE%3E1536588%3C/pascalfrancis_6IE%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_ieee_id=821394&rfr_iscdi=true