Design and Introduction of an Electronic Patient Record: How to Involve Users?
Objectives: Two forms of participatory design (PD) – management-dominated and end-users focused – are described in the design and introduction of an electronic patient record (EPR) for a mental health care centre. Methods: Qualitative research methods were used to achieve a ‘fine-grained’ insight in...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Methods of information in medicine 2003-01, Vol.42 (4), p.371-375 |
---|---|
1. Verfasser: | |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 375 |
---|---|
container_issue | 4 |
container_start_page | 371 |
container_title | Methods of information in medicine |
container_volume | 42 |
creator | Faber, M. G. |
description | Objectives: Two forms of participatory design (PD) – management-dominated and end-users focused – are described in the design and introduction of an electronic patient record (EPR) for a mental health care centre. Methods: Qualitative research methods were used to achieve a ‘fine-grained’ insight into the EPR development process and its impacts. These methods included interviews, document study and observation of project group meetings. Results: Management-dominated PD is highly structured, led by managers and centred around rationalisation of work. End-user focused PD is more bottom-up oriented. Central in this approach are users’ working patterns and user needs. In the case described, both forms actually lead to a poorly functioning EPR. It is explained why these results could be expected. Conclusion: Our findings suggest not to reject PD, but to find a more appropriate balance between the two forms of PD. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1055/s-0038-1634232 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_15225415</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>75750261</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-b1f9d49bc75523e037bc3ce14270c20f8d3472933c1360a7fb6347e7732c8ac83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxSMEokvhyhHlArcU_4mTLBeESqGVKkCIStxGjjNpXCX21uNsxH4WPixe7YpyQbJk6fk3b2aes-wlZ2ecKfWWCsZkU_BKlkKKR9lKKM6Lmqmfj7MVY6IquKjZSfaM6I4x1jSsfJqd8FLJspLVKvvyEcneuly7Lr9yMfhuNtF6l_s-afnFiCaJzpr8m44WXcy_o_Ghe5df-iWPPhVt_bjF_IYw0Pvn2ZNej4QvjvdpdvPp4sf5ZXH99fPV-YfrwijWxKLl_bor162plRISmaxbIw3yMs1qBOubTpa1WEtpuKyYrvs27VdjXUthGm0aeZq9Ofhugr-fkSJMlgyOo3boZ4Ja1SotzxN4dgBN8EQBe9gEO-nwCziDfYJAsE8QjgmmgldH57mdsHvAj5El4PUR0GT02AftjKUHTgmhSq4SVxy4OFicEO78HFzK5P-Nfx94MoOOUc8Y_poOMW5gWRb4563D_Zn0rd5ZhzBjmz7AmiHCDm1MYLB9RAcadjBhHHxHYLxLUiTQwQx2i5uAk50nsEQzQrWukp-byQS7iSCZABr8krpPo_wDgavEDA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>75750261</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Design and Introduction of an Electronic Patient Record: How to Involve Users?</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Thieme Connect Journals</source><creator>Faber, M. G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Faber, M. G.</creatorcontrib><description>Objectives: Two forms of participatory design (PD) – management-dominated and end-users focused – are described in the design and introduction of an electronic patient record (EPR) for a mental health care centre. Methods: Qualitative research methods were used to achieve a ‘fine-grained’ insight into the EPR development process and its impacts. These methods included interviews, document study and observation of project group meetings. Results: Management-dominated PD is highly structured, led by managers and centred around rationalisation of work. End-user focused PD is more bottom-up oriented. Central in this approach are users’ working patterns and user needs. In the case described, both forms actually lead to a poorly functioning EPR. It is explained why these results could be expected. Conclusion: Our findings suggest not to reject PD, but to find a more appropriate balance between the two forms of PD.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0026-1270</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2511-705X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634232</identifier><identifier>PMID: 14534636</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MIMCAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Stuttgart: Schattauer Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften</publisher><subject>Biological and medical sciences ; Community Mental Health Centers ; Cooperative Behavior ; Delivery of Health Care, Integrated - organization & administration ; electronic patient record (EPR) ; health care ; Hospitals, Psychiatric ; Humans ; implementation ; Medical Records Systems, Computerized - organization & administration ; Medical sciences ; Mental Health Services - organization & administration ; Netherlands ; Organizational Innovation ; Original article ; participatory design (PD) ; Program Development ; Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) ; Software Design ; Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation ; Urban Health Services ; User-involvement</subject><ispartof>Methods of information in medicine, 2003-01, Vol.42 (4), p.371-375</ispartof><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-b1f9d49bc75523e037bc3ce14270c20f8d3472933c1360a7fb6347e7732c8ac83</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/pdf/10.1055/s-0038-1634232.pdf$$EPDF$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.thieme-connect.de/products/ejournals/html/10.1055/s-0038-1634232$$EHTML$$P50$$Gthieme$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>309,310,314,780,784,789,790,3017,3018,23930,23931,25140,27924,27925,54559,54560</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=15225415$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14534636$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Faber, M. G.</creatorcontrib><title>Design and Introduction of an Electronic Patient Record: How to Involve Users?</title><title>Methods of information in medicine</title><addtitle>Methods Inf Med</addtitle><description>Objectives: Two forms of participatory design (PD) – management-dominated and end-users focused – are described in the design and introduction of an electronic patient record (EPR) for a mental health care centre. Methods: Qualitative research methods were used to achieve a ‘fine-grained’ insight into the EPR development process and its impacts. These methods included interviews, document study and observation of project group meetings. Results: Management-dominated PD is highly structured, led by managers and centred around rationalisation of work. End-user focused PD is more bottom-up oriented. Central in this approach are users’ working patterns and user needs. In the case described, both forms actually lead to a poorly functioning EPR. It is explained why these results could be expected. Conclusion: Our findings suggest not to reject PD, but to find a more appropriate balance between the two forms of PD.</description><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Community Mental Health Centers</subject><subject>Cooperative Behavior</subject><subject>Delivery of Health Care, Integrated - organization & administration</subject><subject>electronic patient record (EPR)</subject><subject>health care</subject><subject>Hospitals, Psychiatric</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>implementation</subject><subject>Medical Records Systems, Computerized - organization & administration</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Mental Health Services - organization & administration</subject><subject>Netherlands</subject><subject>Organizational Innovation</subject><subject>Original article</subject><subject>participatory design (PD)</subject><subject>Program Development</subject><subject>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</subject><subject>Software Design</subject><subject>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation</subject><subject>Urban Health Services</subject><subject>User-involvement</subject><issn>0026-1270</issn><issn>2511-705X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kU9v1DAQxSMEokvhyhHlArcU_4mTLBeESqGVKkCIStxGjjNpXCX21uNsxH4WPixe7YpyQbJk6fk3b2aes-wlZ2ecKfWWCsZkU_BKlkKKR9lKKM6Lmqmfj7MVY6IquKjZSfaM6I4x1jSsfJqd8FLJspLVKvvyEcneuly7Lr9yMfhuNtF6l_s-afnFiCaJzpr8m44WXcy_o_Ghe5df-iWPPhVt_bjF_IYw0Pvn2ZNej4QvjvdpdvPp4sf5ZXH99fPV-YfrwijWxKLl_bor162plRISmaxbIw3yMs1qBOubTpa1WEtpuKyYrvs27VdjXUthGm0aeZq9Ofhugr-fkSJMlgyOo3boZ4Ja1SotzxN4dgBN8EQBe9gEO-nwCziDfYJAsE8QjgmmgldH57mdsHvAj5El4PUR0GT02AftjKUHTgmhSq4SVxy4OFicEO78HFzK5P-Nfx94MoOOUc8Y_poOMW5gWRb4563D_Zn0rd5ZhzBjmz7AmiHCDm1MYLB9RAcadjBhHHxHYLxLUiTQwQx2i5uAk50nsEQzQrWukp-byQS7iSCZABr8krpPo_wDgavEDA</recordid><startdate>20030101</startdate><enddate>20030101</enddate><creator>Faber, M. G.</creator><general>Schattauer Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften</general><general>Schattauer GmbH</general><general>Schattauer</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030101</creationdate><title>Design and Introduction of an Electronic Patient Record: How to Involve Users?</title><author>Faber, M. G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c508t-b1f9d49bc75523e037bc3ce14270c20f8d3472933c1360a7fb6347e7732c8ac83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Community Mental Health Centers</topic><topic>Cooperative Behavior</topic><topic>Delivery of Health Care, Integrated - organization & administration</topic><topic>electronic patient record (EPR)</topic><topic>health care</topic><topic>Hospitals, Psychiatric</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>implementation</topic><topic>Medical Records Systems, Computerized - organization & administration</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Mental Health Services - organization & administration</topic><topic>Netherlands</topic><topic>Organizational Innovation</topic><topic>Original article</topic><topic>participatory design (PD)</topic><topic>Program Development</topic><topic>Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects)</topic><topic>Software Design</topic><topic>Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation</topic><topic>Urban Health Services</topic><topic>User-involvement</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Faber, M. G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Methods of information in medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Faber, M. G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Design and Introduction of an Electronic Patient Record: How to Involve Users?</atitle><jtitle>Methods of information in medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Methods Inf Med</addtitle><date>2003-01-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>371</spage><epage>375</epage><pages>371-375</pages><issn>0026-1270</issn><eissn>2511-705X</eissn><coden>MIMCAI</coden><abstract>Objectives: Two forms of participatory design (PD) – management-dominated and end-users focused – are described in the design and introduction of an electronic patient record (EPR) for a mental health care centre. Methods: Qualitative research methods were used to achieve a ‘fine-grained’ insight into the EPR development process and its impacts. These methods included interviews, document study and observation of project group meetings. Results: Management-dominated PD is highly structured, led by managers and centred around rationalisation of work. End-user focused PD is more bottom-up oriented. Central in this approach are users’ working patterns and user needs. In the case described, both forms actually lead to a poorly functioning EPR. It is explained why these results could be expected. Conclusion: Our findings suggest not to reject PD, but to find a more appropriate balance between the two forms of PD.</abstract><cop>Stuttgart</cop><pub>Schattauer Verlag für Medizin und Naturwissenschaften</pub><pmid>14534636</pmid><doi>10.1055/s-0038-1634232</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0026-1270 |
ispartof | Methods of information in medicine, 2003-01, Vol.42 (4), p.371-375 |
issn | 0026-1270 2511-705X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_15225415 |
source | MEDLINE; Thieme Connect Journals |
subjects | Biological and medical sciences Community Mental Health Centers Cooperative Behavior Delivery of Health Care, Integrated - organization & administration electronic patient record (EPR) health care Hospitals, Psychiatric Humans implementation Medical Records Systems, Computerized - organization & administration Medical sciences Mental Health Services - organization & administration Netherlands Organizational Innovation Original article participatory design (PD) Program Development Radiotherapy. Instrumental treatment. Physiotherapy. Reeducation. Rehabilitation, orthophony, crenotherapy. Diet therapy and various other treatments (general aspects) Software Design Technology. Biomaterials. Equipments. Material. Instrumentation Urban Health Services User-involvement |
title | Design and Introduction of an Electronic Patient Record: How to Involve Users? |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T14%3A37%3A40IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Design%20and%20Introduction%20of%20an%20Electronic%20Patient%20Record:%20How%20to%20Involve%20Users?&rft.jtitle=Methods%20of%20information%20in%20medicine&rft.au=Faber,%20M.%20G.&rft.date=2003-01-01&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=371&rft.epage=375&rft.pages=371-375&rft.issn=0026-1270&rft.eissn=2511-705X&rft.coden=MIMCAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1055/s-0038-1634232&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E75750261%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=75750261&rft_id=info:pmid/14534636&rfr_iscdi=true |