Integrating Economic Dualism and Labor Market Segmentation: The Effects of Race, Gender, and Structural Location on Earnings, 1974-2000

Although the U.S. economy of the early twenty-first century is vastly different from the U.S. economy prior to the 1970s, the nature of these economic changes and their impact on U.S. workers is unclear. This article claims that despite contemporary economic shifts, differential labor and employer p...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Sociological quarterly 2003-07, Vol.44 (3), p.405-432
Hauptverfasser: Reid, Lesley Williams, Rubin, Beth A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 432
container_issue 3
container_start_page 405
container_title Sociological quarterly
container_volume 44
creator Reid, Lesley Williams
Rubin, Beth A.
description Although the U.S. economy of the early twenty-first century is vastly different from the U.S. economy prior to the 1970s, the nature of these economic changes and their impact on U.S. workers is unclear. This article claims that despite contemporary economic shifts, differential labor and employer power continues to segment the economy, and workers' position in the labor market continues to predict their rewards, beyond the effects of gender, race, and human capital. Drawing on segmented labor market and dual economy research, we propose a four-category model of the structural factors that influence variance in work-related rewards. We examine the distribution of jobs in each of four categories between 1974 and 2000 and observe that losses and gains across categories are unevenly distributed by race and gender. While white men have experienced the greatest declines in employment and earnings, they have maintained their absolute advantage over women and nonwhites. In multivariate analyses, we find that the structural position of employment continues to be a significant determinant of wages. Although women and racial minorities have experienced sizable increases in employment in primary labor market jobs in the core of the economy, both groups remain overrepresented in low-paying jobs. Moreover women, but not nonwhite men, consistently receive significantly fewer rewards for their labor in both low-paying and high-paying jobs. Our findings suggest that structural factors continue to influence earnings inequality, especially across race and gender lines.
doi_str_mv 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2003.tb00539.x
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_15207052</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>4120713</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>4120713</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-f24524171c9c303573143e799a4e53698909b5fd0d17d561361361587f1a54923</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNkcFu3CAURa2qlTpN-gddoErtauyAAQPZVYmbRJoqUpOuEYNh6qkNKWA1-YL-dvHMJF0m6Ekszr3vPbhF8RHBCuVzsq0QxbjktKZVDSGu0hpCikV1_6pYPKHXxSIzXsKa4rfFuxi3EEJECVkUf69cMpugUu82oNXe-bHX4HxSQx9HoFwHVmrtA_imwi-TwI3ZjMalLPfuFNz-NKC11ugUgbfgu9JmCS6M60xY7rw3KUw6TUENYOX1zgVytSq4PC8uARKMlHlxeFy8sWqI5v3hPip-fG1vzy7L1fXF1dmXVakxr1Npa0JrghjSQmOIKcOIYMOEUMRQ3AguoFhT28EOsY42CO-KcmaRokTU-Kj4vO97F_zvycQkxz5qMwzKGT9F2UDC8l-hZ4WUc9YgwZ8VYk5JIxjNwtO9UAcfYzBW3oV-VOFBIijnNOVWzpHJOTI5pykPacr7bP50mKKiVoMNyuk-_u9Aa8ggnd_3Ya_bxuTDEycoc4Qzbve4d9aHUf3xYehkUg-DD4898QvW-Qf_Y72q</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>38546975</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Integrating Economic Dualism and Labor Market Segmentation: The Effects of Race, Gender, and Structural Location on Earnings, 1974-2000</title><source>PAIS Index</source><source>Sociological Abstracts</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><creator>Reid, Lesley Williams ; Rubin, Beth A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Reid, Lesley Williams ; Rubin, Beth A.</creatorcontrib><description>Although the U.S. economy of the early twenty-first century is vastly different from the U.S. economy prior to the 1970s, the nature of these economic changes and their impact on U.S. workers is unclear. This article claims that despite contemporary economic shifts, differential labor and employer power continues to segment the economy, and workers' position in the labor market continues to predict their rewards, beyond the effects of gender, race, and human capital. Drawing on segmented labor market and dual economy research, we propose a four-category model of the structural factors that influence variance in work-related rewards. We examine the distribution of jobs in each of four categories between 1974 and 2000 and observe that losses and gains across categories are unevenly distributed by race and gender. While white men have experienced the greatest declines in employment and earnings, they have maintained their absolute advantage over women and nonwhites. In multivariate analyses, we find that the structural position of employment continues to be a significant determinant of wages. Although women and racial minorities have experienced sizable increases in employment in primary labor market jobs in the core of the economy, both groups remain overrepresented in low-paying jobs. Moreover women, but not nonwhite men, consistently receive significantly fewer rewards for their labor in both low-paying and high-paying jobs. Our findings suggest that structural factors continue to influence earnings inequality, especially across race and gender lines.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0038-0253</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1533-8525</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1111/j.1533-8525.2003.tb00539.x</identifier><identifier>CODEN: SOLQAR</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Malden, MA: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Discrimination in employment ; Dual economies ; Dual Economy ; Earnings ; Economic conditions ; Economic research ; Economic sociology ; Employment ; Feminist economics ; Gender ; Income Inequality ; Labor Force ; Labor Market Segmentation ; Labor markets ; Labor sector ; Labor supply ; Labour market ; Market economies ; Men ; Micro- and Macro-Analyses of Labor Markets ; Minorities ; Occupational Structure ; Race ; Racism ; Sex ; Sexual Inequality ; Sociology ; Sociology of economy and development ; Standard of living. Income ; U.S.A ; United States ; United States of America ; Wage differentials ; Wages and salaries ; White people ; Women ; Workers ; Working women</subject><ispartof>Sociological quarterly, 2003-07, Vol.44 (3), p.405-432</ispartof><rights>Copyright Taylor &amp; Francis</rights><rights>Copyright 2003 Midwest Sociological Society</rights><rights>2004 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-f24524171c9c303573143e799a4e53698909b5fd0d17d561361361587f1a54923</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-f24524171c9c303573143e799a4e53698909b5fd0d17d561361361587f1a54923</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/4120713$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/4120713$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27865,27924,27925,33775,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=15207052$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reid, Lesley Williams</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, Beth A.</creatorcontrib><title>Integrating Economic Dualism and Labor Market Segmentation: The Effects of Race, Gender, and Structural Location on Earnings, 1974-2000</title><title>Sociological quarterly</title><description>Although the U.S. economy of the early twenty-first century is vastly different from the U.S. economy prior to the 1970s, the nature of these economic changes and their impact on U.S. workers is unclear. This article claims that despite contemporary economic shifts, differential labor and employer power continues to segment the economy, and workers' position in the labor market continues to predict their rewards, beyond the effects of gender, race, and human capital. Drawing on segmented labor market and dual economy research, we propose a four-category model of the structural factors that influence variance in work-related rewards. We examine the distribution of jobs in each of four categories between 1974 and 2000 and observe that losses and gains across categories are unevenly distributed by race and gender. While white men have experienced the greatest declines in employment and earnings, they have maintained their absolute advantage over women and nonwhites. In multivariate analyses, we find that the structural position of employment continues to be a significant determinant of wages. Although women and racial minorities have experienced sizable increases in employment in primary labor market jobs in the core of the economy, both groups remain overrepresented in low-paying jobs. Moreover women, but not nonwhite men, consistently receive significantly fewer rewards for their labor in both low-paying and high-paying jobs. Our findings suggest that structural factors continue to influence earnings inequality, especially across race and gender lines.</description><subject>Discrimination in employment</subject><subject>Dual economies</subject><subject>Dual Economy</subject><subject>Earnings</subject><subject>Economic conditions</subject><subject>Economic research</subject><subject>Economic sociology</subject><subject>Employment</subject><subject>Feminist economics</subject><subject>Gender</subject><subject>Income Inequality</subject><subject>Labor Force</subject><subject>Labor Market Segmentation</subject><subject>Labor markets</subject><subject>Labor sector</subject><subject>Labor supply</subject><subject>Labour market</subject><subject>Market economies</subject><subject>Men</subject><subject>Micro- and Macro-Analyses of Labor Markets</subject><subject>Minorities</subject><subject>Occupational Structure</subject><subject>Race</subject><subject>Racism</subject><subject>Sex</subject><subject>Sexual Inequality</subject><subject>Sociology</subject><subject>Sociology of economy and development</subject><subject>Standard of living. Income</subject><subject>U.S.A</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States of America</subject><subject>Wage differentials</subject><subject>Wages and salaries</subject><subject>White people</subject><subject>Women</subject><subject>Workers</subject><subject>Working women</subject><issn>0038-0253</issn><issn>1533-8525</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>7TQ</sourceid><sourceid>BHHNA</sourceid><recordid>eNqNkcFu3CAURa2qlTpN-gddoErtauyAAQPZVYmbRJoqUpOuEYNh6qkNKWA1-YL-dvHMJF0m6Ekszr3vPbhF8RHBCuVzsq0QxbjktKZVDSGu0hpCikV1_6pYPKHXxSIzXsKa4rfFuxi3EEJECVkUf69cMpugUu82oNXe-bHX4HxSQx9HoFwHVmrtA_imwi-TwI3ZjMalLPfuFNz-NKC11ugUgbfgu9JmCS6M60xY7rw3KUw6TUENYOX1zgVytSq4PC8uARKMlHlxeFy8sWqI5v3hPip-fG1vzy7L1fXF1dmXVakxr1Npa0JrghjSQmOIKcOIYMOEUMRQ3AguoFhT28EOsY42CO-KcmaRokTU-Kj4vO97F_zvycQkxz5qMwzKGT9F2UDC8l-hZ4WUc9YgwZ8VYk5JIxjNwtO9UAcfYzBW3oV-VOFBIijnNOVWzpHJOTI5pykPacr7bP50mKKiVoMNyuk-_u9Aa8ggnd_3Ya_bxuTDEycoc4Qzbve4d9aHUf3xYehkUg-DD4898QvW-Qf_Y72q</recordid><startdate>20030701</startdate><enddate>20030701</enddate><creator>Reid, Lesley Williams</creator><creator>Rubin, Beth A.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>University of California Press</general><general>Blackwell</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>8BJ</scope><scope>FQK</scope><scope>JBE</scope><scope>7TQ</scope><scope>DHY</scope><scope>DON</scope><scope>7U4</scope><scope>BHHNA</scope><scope>DWI</scope><scope>WZK</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030701</creationdate><title>Integrating Economic Dualism and Labor Market Segmentation: The Effects of Race, Gender, and Structural Location on Earnings, 1974-2000</title><author>Reid, Lesley Williams ; Rubin, Beth A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c382t-f24524171c9c303573143e799a4e53698909b5fd0d17d561361361587f1a54923</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Discrimination in employment</topic><topic>Dual economies</topic><topic>Dual Economy</topic><topic>Earnings</topic><topic>Economic conditions</topic><topic>Economic research</topic><topic>Economic sociology</topic><topic>Employment</topic><topic>Feminist economics</topic><topic>Gender</topic><topic>Income Inequality</topic><topic>Labor Force</topic><topic>Labor Market Segmentation</topic><topic>Labor markets</topic><topic>Labor sector</topic><topic>Labor supply</topic><topic>Labour market</topic><topic>Market economies</topic><topic>Men</topic><topic>Micro- and Macro-Analyses of Labor Markets</topic><topic>Minorities</topic><topic>Occupational Structure</topic><topic>Race</topic><topic>Racism</topic><topic>Sex</topic><topic>Sexual Inequality</topic><topic>Sociology</topic><topic>Sociology of economy and development</topic><topic>Standard of living. Income</topic><topic>U.S.A</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States of America</topic><topic>Wage differentials</topic><topic>Wages and salaries</topic><topic>White people</topic><topic>Women</topic><topic>Workers</topic><topic>Working women</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reid, Lesley Williams</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rubin, Beth A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences (IBSS)</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>International Bibliography of the Social Sciences</collection><collection>PAIS Index</collection><collection>PAIS International</collection><collection>PAIS International (Ovid)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (pre-2017)</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts</collection><collection>Sociological Abstracts (Ovid)</collection><jtitle>Sociological quarterly</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reid, Lesley Williams</au><au>Rubin, Beth A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Integrating Economic Dualism and Labor Market Segmentation: The Effects of Race, Gender, and Structural Location on Earnings, 1974-2000</atitle><jtitle>Sociological quarterly</jtitle><date>2003-07-01</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>44</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>405</spage><epage>432</epage><pages>405-432</pages><issn>0038-0253</issn><eissn>1533-8525</eissn><coden>SOLQAR</coden><abstract>Although the U.S. economy of the early twenty-first century is vastly different from the U.S. economy prior to the 1970s, the nature of these economic changes and their impact on U.S. workers is unclear. This article claims that despite contemporary economic shifts, differential labor and employer power continues to segment the economy, and workers' position in the labor market continues to predict their rewards, beyond the effects of gender, race, and human capital. Drawing on segmented labor market and dual economy research, we propose a four-category model of the structural factors that influence variance in work-related rewards. We examine the distribution of jobs in each of four categories between 1974 and 2000 and observe that losses and gains across categories are unevenly distributed by race and gender. While white men have experienced the greatest declines in employment and earnings, they have maintained their absolute advantage over women and nonwhites. In multivariate analyses, we find that the structural position of employment continues to be a significant determinant of wages. Although women and racial minorities have experienced sizable increases in employment in primary labor market jobs in the core of the economy, both groups remain overrepresented in low-paying jobs. Moreover women, but not nonwhite men, consistently receive significantly fewer rewards for their labor in both low-paying and high-paying jobs. Our findings suggest that structural factors continue to influence earnings inequality, especially across race and gender lines.</abstract><cop>Malden, MA</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1111/j.1533-8525.2003.tb00539.x</doi><tpages>28</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0038-0253
ispartof Sociological quarterly, 2003-07, Vol.44 (3), p.405-432
issn 0038-0253
1533-8525
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_15207052
source PAIS Index; Sociological Abstracts; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing
subjects Discrimination in employment
Dual economies
Dual Economy
Earnings
Economic conditions
Economic research
Economic sociology
Employment
Feminist economics
Gender
Income Inequality
Labor Force
Labor Market Segmentation
Labor markets
Labor sector
Labor supply
Labour market
Market economies
Men
Micro- and Macro-Analyses of Labor Markets
Minorities
Occupational Structure
Race
Racism
Sex
Sexual Inequality
Sociology
Sociology of economy and development
Standard of living. Income
U.S.A
United States
United States of America
Wage differentials
Wages and salaries
White people
Women
Workers
Working women
title Integrating Economic Dualism and Labor Market Segmentation: The Effects of Race, Gender, and Structural Location on Earnings, 1974-2000
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T06%3A21%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Integrating%20Economic%20Dualism%20and%20Labor%20Market%20Segmentation:%20The%20Effects%20of%20Race,%20Gender,%20and%20Structural%20Location%20on%20Earnings,%201974-2000&rft.jtitle=Sociological%20quarterly&rft.au=Reid,%20Lesley%20Williams&rft.date=2003-07-01&rft.volume=44&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=405&rft.epage=432&rft.pages=405-432&rft.issn=0038-0253&rft.eissn=1533-8525&rft.coden=SOLQAR&rft_id=info:doi/10.1111/j.1533-8525.2003.tb00539.x&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pasca%3E4120713%3C/jstor_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=38546975&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=4120713&rfr_iscdi=true