In situ HNO3 to NOy instrument comparison during SOLVE

Measurements of HNO3 mixing ratios from the chemical ionization mass spectrometer have been critically compared with simultaneous measurements of total gas phase NOy from the NO chemiluminescence detector aboard the NASA DC‐8 aircraft during the SAGE 3 Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE). T...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 2003-03, Vol.108 (D6), p.ACH7.1-n/a
Hauptverfasser: Ballenthin, J. O., Thorn, W. F., Miller, T. M., Viggiano, A. A., Hunton, D. E., Koike, M., Kondo, Y., Takegawa, N., Irie, H., Ikeda, H.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page n/a
container_issue D6
container_start_page ACH7.1
container_title Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres
container_volume 108
creator Ballenthin, J. O.
Thorn, W. F.
Miller, T. M.
Viggiano, A. A.
Hunton, D. E.
Koike, M.
Kondo, Y.
Takegawa, N.
Irie, H.
Ikeda, H.
description Measurements of HNO3 mixing ratios from the chemical ionization mass spectrometer have been critically compared with simultaneous measurements of total gas phase NOy from the NO chemiluminescence detector aboard the NASA DC‐8 aircraft during the SAGE 3 Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE). The data were obtained in the arctic upper troposphere and lower stratosphere in the winter of 1999–2000. A brief comparison to the NOy instrument aboard the NASA ER‐2 is also presented. The time responses, detection limits, relative precision, and stability of relative calibrations for the instruments were in excellent agreement throughout the mission. However, the average slope of the HNO3 to NOy correlation was 1.13 ± 0.03 overall and 1.06 ± 0.03 in stratospheric air, indicating that the two measurements had a systematic calibration offset. Possible sources for the offset error are presented, and methods to reduce the calibration error in future flights are suggested.
doi_str_mv 10.1029/2002JD002136
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>istex_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_14804132</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_WNG_CMRMNJSP_J</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i2643-477258bf15b535daef313c9febf36047728e09ab1c5dd434b1f9d5990d4b64c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9PwkAQxTdGEwly8wPsxWN19m_ZowEEGmgNED1utu3WrEIhuyXab28JRp3DzOG93yTvIXRL4J4AVQ8UgCbjbhEmL1CPEiEjSoFeoh4QPoyA0vgaDUJ4h264kBxID8l5jYNrjniWZgw3e5xmLXZ1aPxxZ-sGF_vdwXgX9jUuj97Vb3idLV4mN-iqMttgBz-3jzZPk81oFi2y6Xz0uIgclZxFPI6pGOYVEblgojS2YoQVqrJ5xSSc1KEFZXJSiLLkjOekUqVQCkqeS16wPro7vz2YUJht5U1duKAP3u2Mb3UXCzhhtPPRs-_TbW37p4M-VaP_V6OT6WqspGQdFJ0hFxr79QsZ_6FlzGKhX9OpHi1XyzRZP-uEfQM7tGSN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>In situ HNO3 to NOy instrument comparison during SOLVE</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ballenthin, J. O. ; Thorn, W. F. ; Miller, T. M. ; Viggiano, A. A. ; Hunton, D. E. ; Koike, M. ; Kondo, Y. ; Takegawa, N. ; Irie, H. ; Ikeda, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ballenthin, J. O. ; Thorn, W. F. ; Miller, T. M. ; Viggiano, A. A. ; Hunton, D. E. ; Koike, M. ; Kondo, Y. ; Takegawa, N. ; Irie, H. ; Ikeda, H.</creatorcontrib><description>Measurements of HNO3 mixing ratios from the chemical ionization mass spectrometer have been critically compared with simultaneous measurements of total gas phase NOy from the NO chemiluminescence detector aboard the NASA DC‐8 aircraft during the SAGE 3 Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE). The data were obtained in the arctic upper troposphere and lower stratosphere in the winter of 1999–2000. A brief comparison to the NOy instrument aboard the NASA ER‐2 is also presented. The time responses, detection limits, relative precision, and stability of relative calibrations for the instruments were in excellent agreement throughout the mission. However, the average slope of the HNO3 to NOy correlation was 1.13 ± 0.03 overall and 1.06 ± 0.03 in stratospheric air, indicating that the two measurements had a systematic calibration offset. Possible sources for the offset error are presented, and methods to reduce the calibration error in future flights are suggested.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2002JD002136</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Chemical composition and interactions. Ionic interactions and processes ; chemical ionization mass spectrometry ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models ; HNO3 ; instrumentation ; Meteorology ; nitric acid ; NOy ; reactive nitrogen</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2003-03, Vol.108 (D6), p.ACH7.1-n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2002JD002136$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2002JD002136$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,11514,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46468,46833,46892</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=14804132$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ballenthin, J. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorn, W. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, T. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viggiano, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunton, D. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koike, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kondo, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takegawa, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irie, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, H.</creatorcontrib><title>In situ HNO3 to NOy instrument comparison during SOLVE</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>Measurements of HNO3 mixing ratios from the chemical ionization mass spectrometer have been critically compared with simultaneous measurements of total gas phase NOy from the NO chemiluminescence detector aboard the NASA DC‐8 aircraft during the SAGE 3 Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE). The data were obtained in the arctic upper troposphere and lower stratosphere in the winter of 1999–2000. A brief comparison to the NOy instrument aboard the NASA ER‐2 is also presented. The time responses, detection limits, relative precision, and stability of relative calibrations for the instruments were in excellent agreement throughout the mission. However, the average slope of the HNO3 to NOy correlation was 1.13 ± 0.03 overall and 1.06 ± 0.03 in stratospheric air, indicating that the two measurements had a systematic calibration offset. Possible sources for the offset error are presented, and methods to reduce the calibration error in future flights are suggested.</description><subject>Chemical composition and interactions. Ionic interactions and processes</subject><subject>chemical ionization mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models</subject><subject>HNO3</subject><subject>instrumentation</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>nitric acid</subject><subject>NOy</subject><subject>reactive nitrogen</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkE9PwkAQxTdGEwly8wPsxWN19m_ZowEEGmgNED1utu3WrEIhuyXab28JRp3DzOG93yTvIXRL4J4AVQ8UgCbjbhEmL1CPEiEjSoFeoh4QPoyA0vgaDUJ4h264kBxID8l5jYNrjniWZgw3e5xmLXZ1aPxxZ-sGF_vdwXgX9jUuj97Vb3idLV4mN-iqMttgBz-3jzZPk81oFi2y6Xz0uIgclZxFPI6pGOYVEblgojS2YoQVqrJ5xSSc1KEFZXJSiLLkjOekUqVQCkqeS16wPro7vz2YUJht5U1duKAP3u2Mb3UXCzhhtPPRs-_TbW37p4M-VaP_V6OT6WqspGQdFJ0hFxr79QsZ_6FlzGKhX9OpHi1XyzRZP-uEfQM7tGSN</recordid><startdate>20030327</startdate><enddate>20030327</enddate><creator>Ballenthin, J. O.</creator><creator>Thorn, W. F.</creator><creator>Miller, T. M.</creator><creator>Viggiano, A. A.</creator><creator>Hunton, D. E.</creator><creator>Koike, M.</creator><creator>Kondo, Y.</creator><creator>Takegawa, N.</creator><creator>Irie, H.</creator><creator>Ikeda, H.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030327</creationdate><title>In situ HNO3 to NOy instrument comparison during SOLVE</title><author>Ballenthin, J. O. ; Thorn, W. F. ; Miller, T. M. ; Viggiano, A. A. ; Hunton, D. E. ; Koike, M. ; Kondo, Y. ; Takegawa, N. ; Irie, H. ; Ikeda, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i2643-477258bf15b535daef313c9febf36047728e09ab1c5dd434b1f9d5990d4b64c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Chemical composition and interactions. Ionic interactions and processes</topic><topic>chemical ionization mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models</topic><topic>HNO3</topic><topic>instrumentation</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>nitric acid</topic><topic>NOy</topic><topic>reactive nitrogen</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ballenthin, J. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorn, W. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, T. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viggiano, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunton, D. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koike, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kondo, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takegawa, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irie, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ballenthin, J. O.</au><au>Thorn, W. F.</au><au>Miller, T. M.</au><au>Viggiano, A. A.</au><au>Hunton, D. E.</au><au>Koike, M.</au><au>Kondo, Y.</au><au>Takegawa, N.</au><au>Irie, H.</au><au>Ikeda, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In situ HNO3 to NOy instrument comparison during SOLVE</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2003-03-27</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>D6</issue><spage>ACH7.1</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>ACH7.1-n/a</pages><issn>0148-0227</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><abstract>Measurements of HNO3 mixing ratios from the chemical ionization mass spectrometer have been critically compared with simultaneous measurements of total gas phase NOy from the NO chemiluminescence detector aboard the NASA DC‐8 aircraft during the SAGE 3 Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE). The data were obtained in the arctic upper troposphere and lower stratosphere in the winter of 1999–2000. A brief comparison to the NOy instrument aboard the NASA ER‐2 is also presented. The time responses, detection limits, relative precision, and stability of relative calibrations for the instruments were in excellent agreement throughout the mission. However, the average slope of the HNO3 to NOy correlation was 1.13 ± 0.03 overall and 1.06 ± 0.03 in stratospheric air, indicating that the two measurements had a systematic calibration offset. Possible sources for the offset error are presented, and methods to reduce the calibration error in future flights are suggested.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2002JD002136</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0148-0227
ispartof Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2003-03, Vol.108 (D6), p.ACH7.1-n/a
issn 0148-0227
2156-2202
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_14804132
source Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects Chemical composition and interactions. Ionic interactions and processes
chemical ionization mass spectrometry
Earth, ocean, space
Exact sciences and technology
External geophysics
Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models
HNO3
instrumentation
Meteorology
nitric acid
NOy
reactive nitrogen
title In situ HNO3 to NOy instrument comparison during SOLVE
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T13%3A57%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20situ%20HNO3%20to%20NOy%20instrument%20comparison%20during%20SOLVE&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research:%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Ballenthin,%20J.%20O.&rft.date=2003-03-27&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=D6&rft.spage=ACH7.1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=ACH7.1-n/a&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2002JD002136&rft_dat=%3Cistex_pasca%3Eark_67375_WNG_CMRMNJSP_J%3C/istex_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true