In situ HNO3 to NOy instrument comparison during SOLVE
Measurements of HNO3 mixing ratios from the chemical ionization mass spectrometer have been critically compared with simultaneous measurements of total gas phase NOy from the NO chemiluminescence detector aboard the NASA DC‐8 aircraft during the SAGE 3 Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE). T...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres 2003-03, Vol.108 (D6), p.ACH7.1-n/a |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | n/a |
---|---|
container_issue | D6 |
container_start_page | ACH7.1 |
container_title | Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres |
container_volume | 108 |
creator | Ballenthin, J. O. Thorn, W. F. Miller, T. M. Viggiano, A. A. Hunton, D. E. Koike, M. Kondo, Y. Takegawa, N. Irie, H. Ikeda, H. |
description | Measurements of HNO3 mixing ratios from the chemical ionization mass spectrometer have been critically compared with simultaneous measurements of total gas phase NOy from the NO chemiluminescence detector aboard the NASA DC‐8 aircraft during the SAGE 3 Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE). The data were obtained in the arctic upper troposphere and lower stratosphere in the winter of 1999–2000. A brief comparison to the NOy instrument aboard the NASA ER‐2 is also presented. The time responses, detection limits, relative precision, and stability of relative calibrations for the instruments were in excellent agreement throughout the mission. However, the average slope of the HNO3 to NOy correlation was 1.13 ± 0.03 overall and 1.06 ± 0.03 in stratospheric air, indicating that the two measurements had a systematic calibration offset. Possible sources for the offset error are presented, and methods to reduce the calibration error in future flights are suggested. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1029/2002JD002136 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>istex_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_14804132</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>ark_67375_WNG_CMRMNJSP_J</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-i2643-477258bf15b535daef313c9febf36047728e09ab1c5dd434b1f9d5990d4b64c3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNkE9PwkAQxTdGEwly8wPsxWN19m_ZowEEGmgNED1utu3WrEIhuyXab28JRp3DzOG93yTvIXRL4J4AVQ8UgCbjbhEmL1CPEiEjSoFeoh4QPoyA0vgaDUJ4h264kBxID8l5jYNrjniWZgw3e5xmLXZ1aPxxZ-sGF_vdwXgX9jUuj97Vb3idLV4mN-iqMttgBz-3jzZPk81oFi2y6Xz0uIgclZxFPI6pGOYVEblgojS2YoQVqrJ5xSSc1KEFZXJSiLLkjOekUqVQCkqeS16wPro7vz2YUJht5U1duKAP3u2Mb3UXCzhhtPPRs-_TbW37p4M-VaP_V6OT6WqspGQdFJ0hFxr79QsZ_6FlzGKhX9OpHi1XyzRZP-uEfQM7tGSN</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>In situ HNO3 to NOy instrument comparison during SOLVE</title><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library</source><source>Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection)</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ballenthin, J. O. ; Thorn, W. F. ; Miller, T. M. ; Viggiano, A. A. ; Hunton, D. E. ; Koike, M. ; Kondo, Y. ; Takegawa, N. ; Irie, H. ; Ikeda, H.</creator><creatorcontrib>Ballenthin, J. O. ; Thorn, W. F. ; Miller, T. M. ; Viggiano, A. A. ; Hunton, D. E. ; Koike, M. ; Kondo, Y. ; Takegawa, N. ; Irie, H. ; Ikeda, H.</creatorcontrib><description>Measurements of HNO3 mixing ratios from the chemical ionization mass spectrometer have been critically compared with simultaneous measurements of total gas phase NOy from the NO chemiluminescence detector aboard the NASA DC‐8 aircraft during the SAGE 3 Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE). The data were obtained in the arctic upper troposphere and lower stratosphere in the winter of 1999–2000. A brief comparison to the NOy instrument aboard the NASA ER‐2 is also presented. The time responses, detection limits, relative precision, and stability of relative calibrations for the instruments were in excellent agreement throughout the mission. However, the average slope of the HNO3 to NOy correlation was 1.13 ± 0.03 overall and 1.06 ± 0.03 in stratospheric air, indicating that the two measurements had a systematic calibration offset. Possible sources for the offset error are presented, and methods to reduce the calibration error in future flights are suggested.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0148-0227</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2156-2202</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1029/2002JD002136</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Blackwell Publishing Ltd</publisher><subject>Chemical composition and interactions. Ionic interactions and processes ; chemical ionization mass spectrometry ; Earth, ocean, space ; Exact sciences and technology ; External geophysics ; Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models ; HNO3 ; instrumentation ; Meteorology ; nitric acid ; NOy ; reactive nitrogen</subject><ispartof>Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2003-03, Vol.108 (D6), p.ACH7.1-n/a</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2003 by the American Geophysical Union.</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029%2F2002JD002136$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1029%2F2002JD002136$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1417,1433,11514,27924,27925,45574,45575,46409,46468,46833,46892</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=14804132$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ballenthin, J. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorn, W. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, T. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viggiano, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunton, D. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koike, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kondo, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takegawa, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irie, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, H.</creatorcontrib><title>In situ HNO3 to NOy instrument comparison during SOLVE</title><title>Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres</title><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><description>Measurements of HNO3 mixing ratios from the chemical ionization mass spectrometer have been critically compared with simultaneous measurements of total gas phase NOy from the NO chemiluminescence detector aboard the NASA DC‐8 aircraft during the SAGE 3 Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE). The data were obtained in the arctic upper troposphere and lower stratosphere in the winter of 1999–2000. A brief comparison to the NOy instrument aboard the NASA ER‐2 is also presented. The time responses, detection limits, relative precision, and stability of relative calibrations for the instruments were in excellent agreement throughout the mission. However, the average slope of the HNO3 to NOy correlation was 1.13 ± 0.03 overall and 1.06 ± 0.03 in stratospheric air, indicating that the two measurements had a systematic calibration offset. Possible sources for the offset error are presented, and methods to reduce the calibration error in future flights are suggested.</description><subject>Chemical composition and interactions. Ionic interactions and processes</subject><subject>chemical ionization mass spectrometry</subject><subject>Earth, ocean, space</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>External geophysics</subject><subject>Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models</subject><subject>HNO3</subject><subject>instrumentation</subject><subject>Meteorology</subject><subject>nitric acid</subject><subject>NOy</subject><subject>reactive nitrogen</subject><issn>0148-0227</issn><issn>2156-2202</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2003</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNkE9PwkAQxTdGEwly8wPsxWN19m_ZowEEGmgNED1utu3WrEIhuyXab28JRp3DzOG93yTvIXRL4J4AVQ8UgCbjbhEmL1CPEiEjSoFeoh4QPoyA0vgaDUJ4h264kBxID8l5jYNrjniWZgw3e5xmLXZ1aPxxZ-sGF_vdwXgX9jUuj97Vb3idLV4mN-iqMttgBz-3jzZPk81oFi2y6Xz0uIgclZxFPI6pGOYVEblgojS2YoQVqrJ5xSSc1KEFZXJSiLLkjOekUqVQCkqeS16wPro7vz2YUJht5U1duKAP3u2Mb3UXCzhhtPPRs-_TbW37p4M-VaP_V6OT6WqspGQdFJ0hFxr79QsZ_6FlzGKhX9OpHi1XyzRZP-uEfQM7tGSN</recordid><startdate>20030327</startdate><enddate>20030327</enddate><creator>Ballenthin, J. O.</creator><creator>Thorn, W. F.</creator><creator>Miller, T. M.</creator><creator>Viggiano, A. A.</creator><creator>Hunton, D. E.</creator><creator>Koike, M.</creator><creator>Kondo, Y.</creator><creator>Takegawa, N.</creator><creator>Irie, H.</creator><creator>Ikeda, H.</creator><general>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</general><general>American Geophysical Union</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20030327</creationdate><title>In situ HNO3 to NOy instrument comparison during SOLVE</title><author>Ballenthin, J. O. ; Thorn, W. F. ; Miller, T. M. ; Viggiano, A. A. ; Hunton, D. E. ; Koike, M. ; Kondo, Y. ; Takegawa, N. ; Irie, H. ; Ikeda, H.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-i2643-477258bf15b535daef313c9febf36047728e09ab1c5dd434b1f9d5990d4b64c3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2003</creationdate><topic>Chemical composition and interactions. Ionic interactions and processes</topic><topic>chemical ionization mass spectrometry</topic><topic>Earth, ocean, space</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>External geophysics</topic><topic>Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models</topic><topic>HNO3</topic><topic>instrumentation</topic><topic>Meteorology</topic><topic>nitric acid</topic><topic>NOy</topic><topic>reactive nitrogen</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ballenthin, J. O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thorn, W. F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Miller, T. M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Viggiano, A. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hunton, D. E.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Koike, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kondo, Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Takegawa, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Irie, H.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ikeda, H.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ballenthin, J. O.</au><au>Thorn, W. F.</au><au>Miller, T. M.</au><au>Viggiano, A. A.</au><au>Hunton, D. E.</au><au>Koike, M.</au><au>Kondo, Y.</au><au>Takegawa, N.</au><au>Irie, H.</au><au>Ikeda, H.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>In situ HNO3 to NOy instrument comparison during SOLVE</atitle><jtitle>Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres</jtitle><addtitle>J. Geophys. Res</addtitle><date>2003-03-27</date><risdate>2003</risdate><volume>108</volume><issue>D6</issue><spage>ACH7.1</spage><epage>n/a</epage><pages>ACH7.1-n/a</pages><issn>0148-0227</issn><eissn>2156-2202</eissn><abstract>Measurements of HNO3 mixing ratios from the chemical ionization mass spectrometer have been critically compared with simultaneous measurements of total gas phase NOy from the NO chemiluminescence detector aboard the NASA DC‐8 aircraft during the SAGE 3 Ozone Loss and Validation Experiment (SOLVE). The data were obtained in the arctic upper troposphere and lower stratosphere in the winter of 1999–2000. A brief comparison to the NOy instrument aboard the NASA ER‐2 is also presented. The time responses, detection limits, relative precision, and stability of relative calibrations for the instruments were in excellent agreement throughout the mission. However, the average slope of the HNO3 to NOy correlation was 1.13 ± 0.03 overall and 1.06 ± 0.03 in stratospheric air, indicating that the two measurements had a systematic calibration offset. Possible sources for the offset error are presented, and methods to reduce the calibration error in future flights are suggested.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Blackwell Publishing Ltd</pub><doi>10.1029/2002JD002136</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0148-0227 |
ispartof | Journal of Geophysical Research: Atmospheres, 2003-03, Vol.108 (D6), p.ACH7.1-n/a |
issn | 0148-0227 2156-2202 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_14804132 |
source | Access via Wiley Online Library; Wiley-Blackwell AGU Digital Library; Wiley Online Library (Open Access Collection); Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Chemical composition and interactions. Ionic interactions and processes chemical ionization mass spectrometry Earth, ocean, space Exact sciences and technology External geophysics Geophysics. Techniques, methods, instrumentation and models HNO3 instrumentation Meteorology nitric acid NOy reactive nitrogen |
title | In situ HNO3 to NOy instrument comparison during SOLVE |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-29T13%3A57%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-istex_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=In%20situ%20HNO3%20to%20NOy%20instrument%20comparison%20during%20SOLVE&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20Geophysical%20Research:%20Atmospheres&rft.au=Ballenthin,%20J.%20O.&rft.date=2003-03-27&rft.volume=108&rft.issue=D6&rft.spage=ACH7.1&rft.epage=n/a&rft.pages=ACH7.1-n/a&rft.issn=0148-0227&rft.eissn=2156-2202&rft_id=info:doi/10.1029/2002JD002136&rft_dat=%3Cistex_pasca%3Eark_67375_WNG_CMRMNJSP_J%3C/istex_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |