Preemergence Flumioxazin and Pendimethalin and Postemergence Herbicide Systems for Soybean (Glycine max)

Field studies were conducted in 1998 and 1999 at two Illinois locations to compare flumioxazin and pendimethalin for preemergence (PRE) weed control and determine the benefit of these herbicides when followed by (fb) postemergence (POST) herbicides, glyphosate, imazethapyr, and imazamox. In early we...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Weed technology 2002-07, Vol.16 (3), p.502-511
Hauptverfasser: Sarah Taylor-Lovell, Loyd M. Wax, German Bollero
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 511
container_issue 3
container_start_page 502
container_title Weed technology
container_volume 16
creator Sarah Taylor-Lovell
Loyd M. Wax
German Bollero
description Field studies were conducted in 1998 and 1999 at two Illinois locations to compare flumioxazin and pendimethalin for preemergence (PRE) weed control and determine the benefit of these herbicides when followed by (fb) postemergence (POST) herbicides, glyphosate, imazethapyr, and imazamox. In early weed control ratings taken before POST applications, flumioxazin alone at 105 g ai/ha or pendimethalin alone at 1,120 g ai/ha resulted in less than 80% control of giant foxtail, but controlled common lambsquarters at least 85% in all experiments. Control of large-seeded broadleaf weeds with flumioxazin or pendimethalin varied greatly between experiments. At Urbana in 1998, where moisture was adequate before and after PRE applications, flumioxazin controlled velvetleaf, common cocklebur, and ivyleaf morningglory at least 90%. With the latter two species, control decreased in the subsequent year, probably because of the reduced precipitation after the PRE applications. Sequential applications including a PRE herbicide provided control up to 25% greater than did POST only treatments. At Dekalb in both years and Urbana in 1998, soybean yields were greater with most treatments containing a PRE fb POST application than with the treatments containing only POST applications.
doi_str_mv 10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0502:PFAPAP]2.0.CO;2
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_13915238</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><jstor_id>3989513</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>3989513</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-j136t-5eb955318f42dacb4a3e1cd01bc87a2d616767d8cb3a787ad405eb357e80ee313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpFjF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_wIvcCNtFt5Ok6YdejeE2YbDCFASRkSanLqMfI62w-uutTOfVged9nkPImMGIBcwfQxSDByJ8HXAAPgQWvIEEfp_MJskkeecjGE1XD_yM9JiU4PHQh3PSO1WX5Kqud9BlnEOPbBOHWKD7wFIjneWfha0O6suWVJWGJlgaW2CzVfkfqerm31-gS622Bum6_eE1zSpH11WboirpYJ632pZIC3UYXpOLTOU13vzePnmZPT5PF95yNX-aTpbejomg8SSmsZSCRZnPjdKprwQybYClOgoVNwELwiA0kU6FCjtifOgSIUOMAFEw0Sd3x797VWuVZ06V2tabvbOFcu2GiZhJLqLOuz16u7qp3GkXcRRLJsQ3Pv5qTw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Index Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Preemergence Flumioxazin and Pendimethalin and Postemergence Herbicide Systems for Soybean (Glycine max)</title><source>BioOne Complete</source><source>Jstor Complete Legacy</source><creator>Sarah Taylor-Lovell ; Loyd M. Wax ; German Bollero</creator><creatorcontrib>Sarah Taylor-Lovell ; Loyd M. Wax ; German Bollero</creatorcontrib><description>Field studies were conducted in 1998 and 1999 at two Illinois locations to compare flumioxazin and pendimethalin for preemergence (PRE) weed control and determine the benefit of these herbicides when followed by (fb) postemergence (POST) herbicides, glyphosate, imazethapyr, and imazamox. In early weed control ratings taken before POST applications, flumioxazin alone at 105 g ai/ha or pendimethalin alone at 1,120 g ai/ha resulted in less than 80% control of giant foxtail, but controlled common lambsquarters at least 85% in all experiments. Control of large-seeded broadleaf weeds with flumioxazin or pendimethalin varied greatly between experiments. At Urbana in 1998, where moisture was adequate before and after PRE applications, flumioxazin controlled velvetleaf, common cocklebur, and ivyleaf morningglory at least 90%. With the latter two species, control decreased in the subsequent year, probably because of the reduced precipitation after the PRE applications. Sequential applications including a PRE herbicide provided control up to 25% greater than did POST only treatments. At Dekalb in both years and Urbana in 1998, soybean yields were greater with most treatments containing a PRE fb POST application than with the treatments containing only POST applications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0890-037X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1550-2740</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0502:PFAPAP]2.0.CO;2</identifier><identifier>CODEN: WETEE9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Lawrence, KS: Weed Science Society of America</publisher><subject>Ammonium nitrates ; Biological and medical sciences ; Broadleaf weeds ; Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology ; Herbicide resistance ; Herbicide resistant weeds ; Herbicides ; Net profits ; Planting ; Soybeans ; Waxes ; Weed control</subject><ispartof>Weed technology, 2002-07, Vol.16 (3), p.502-511</ispartof><rights>Copyright 2002 The Weed Science Society of America</rights><rights>2003 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/3989513$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/3989513$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,799,27903,27904,57995,58228</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13915238$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Sarah Taylor-Lovell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loyd M. Wax</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>German Bollero</creatorcontrib><title>Preemergence Flumioxazin and Pendimethalin and Postemergence Herbicide Systems for Soybean (Glycine max)</title><title>Weed technology</title><description>Field studies were conducted in 1998 and 1999 at two Illinois locations to compare flumioxazin and pendimethalin for preemergence (PRE) weed control and determine the benefit of these herbicides when followed by (fb) postemergence (POST) herbicides, glyphosate, imazethapyr, and imazamox. In early weed control ratings taken before POST applications, flumioxazin alone at 105 g ai/ha or pendimethalin alone at 1,120 g ai/ha resulted in less than 80% control of giant foxtail, but controlled common lambsquarters at least 85% in all experiments. Control of large-seeded broadleaf weeds with flumioxazin or pendimethalin varied greatly between experiments. At Urbana in 1998, where moisture was adequate before and after PRE applications, flumioxazin controlled velvetleaf, common cocklebur, and ivyleaf morningglory at least 90%. With the latter two species, control decreased in the subsequent year, probably because of the reduced precipitation after the PRE applications. Sequential applications including a PRE herbicide provided control up to 25% greater than did POST only treatments. At Dekalb in both years and Urbana in 1998, soybean yields were greater with most treatments containing a PRE fb POST application than with the treatments containing only POST applications.</description><subject>Ammonium nitrates</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Broadleaf weeds</subject><subject>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</subject><subject>Herbicide resistance</subject><subject>Herbicide resistant weeds</subject><subject>Herbicides</subject><subject>Net profits</subject><subject>Planting</subject><subject>Soybeans</subject><subject>Waxes</subject><subject>Weed control</subject><issn>0890-037X</issn><issn>1550-2740</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpFjF1LwzAUhoMoOKf_wIvcCNtFt5Ok6YdejeE2YbDCFASRkSanLqMfI62w-uutTOfVged9nkPImMGIBcwfQxSDByJ8HXAAPgQWvIEEfp_MJskkeecjGE1XD_yM9JiU4PHQh3PSO1WX5Kqud9BlnEOPbBOHWKD7wFIjneWfha0O6suWVJWGJlgaW2CzVfkfqerm31-gS622Bum6_eE1zSpH11WboirpYJ632pZIC3UYXpOLTOU13vzePnmZPT5PF95yNX-aTpbejomg8SSmsZSCRZnPjdKprwQybYClOgoVNwELwiA0kU6FCjtifOgSIUOMAFEw0Sd3x797VWuVZ06V2tabvbOFcu2GiZhJLqLOuz16u7qp3GkXcRRLJsQ3Pv5qTw</recordid><startdate>20020701</startdate><enddate>20020701</enddate><creator>Sarah Taylor-Lovell</creator><creator>Loyd M. Wax</creator><creator>German Bollero</creator><general>Weed Science Society of America</general><scope>IQODW</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020701</creationdate><title>Preemergence Flumioxazin and Pendimethalin and Postemergence Herbicide Systems for Soybean (Glycine max)</title><author>Sarah Taylor-Lovell ; Loyd M. Wax ; German Bollero</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-j136t-5eb955318f42dacb4a3e1cd01bc87a2d616767d8cb3a787ad405eb357e80ee313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Ammonium nitrates</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Broadleaf weeds</topic><topic>Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology</topic><topic>Herbicide resistance</topic><topic>Herbicide resistant weeds</topic><topic>Herbicides</topic><topic>Net profits</topic><topic>Planting</topic><topic>Soybeans</topic><topic>Waxes</topic><topic>Weed control</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Sarah Taylor-Lovell</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Loyd M. Wax</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>German Bollero</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Sarah Taylor-Lovell</au><au>Loyd M. Wax</au><au>German Bollero</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Preemergence Flumioxazin and Pendimethalin and Postemergence Herbicide Systems for Soybean (Glycine max)</atitle><jtitle>Weed technology</jtitle><date>2002-07-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>16</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>502</spage><epage>511</epage><pages>502-511</pages><issn>0890-037X</issn><eissn>1550-2740</eissn><coden>WETEE9</coden><abstract>Field studies were conducted in 1998 and 1999 at two Illinois locations to compare flumioxazin and pendimethalin for preemergence (PRE) weed control and determine the benefit of these herbicides when followed by (fb) postemergence (POST) herbicides, glyphosate, imazethapyr, and imazamox. In early weed control ratings taken before POST applications, flumioxazin alone at 105 g ai/ha or pendimethalin alone at 1,120 g ai/ha resulted in less than 80% control of giant foxtail, but controlled common lambsquarters at least 85% in all experiments. Control of large-seeded broadleaf weeds with flumioxazin or pendimethalin varied greatly between experiments. At Urbana in 1998, where moisture was adequate before and after PRE applications, flumioxazin controlled velvetleaf, common cocklebur, and ivyleaf morningglory at least 90%. With the latter two species, control decreased in the subsequent year, probably because of the reduced precipitation after the PRE applications. Sequential applications including a PRE herbicide provided control up to 25% greater than did POST only treatments. At Dekalb in both years and Urbana in 1998, soybean yields were greater with most treatments containing a PRE fb POST application than with the treatments containing only POST applications.</abstract><cop>Lawrence, KS</cop><pub>Weed Science Society of America</pub><doi>10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016[0502:PFAPAP]2.0.CO;2</doi><tpages>10</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0890-037X
ispartof Weed technology, 2002-07, Vol.16 (3), p.502-511
issn 0890-037X
1550-2740
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_13915238
source BioOne Complete; Jstor Complete Legacy
subjects Ammonium nitrates
Biological and medical sciences
Broadleaf weeds
Fundamental and applied biological sciences. Psychology
Herbicide resistance
Herbicide resistant weeds
Herbicides
Net profits
Planting
Soybeans
Waxes
Weed control
title Preemergence Flumioxazin and Pendimethalin and Postemergence Herbicide Systems for Soybean (Glycine max)
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T13%3A42%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Preemergence%20Flumioxazin%20and%20Pendimethalin%20and%20Postemergence%20Herbicide%20Systems%20for%20Soybean%20(Glycine%20max)&rft.jtitle=Weed%20technology&rft.au=Sarah%20Taylor-Lovell&rft.date=2002-07-01&rft.volume=16&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=502&rft.epage=511&rft.pages=502-511&rft.issn=0890-037X&rft.eissn=1550-2740&rft.coden=WETEE9&rft_id=info:doi/10.1614/0890-037X(2002)016%5B0502:PFAPAP%5D2.0.CO;2&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pasca%3E3989513%3C/jstor_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_jstor_id=3989513&rfr_iscdi=true