Knowledge of Stimulus Repetition Affects the Magnitude and Spatial Distribution of Low-Frequency Event-Related Brain Potentials
Rate effects are defined as a reduction in amplitude of an evoked brain response with increasing stimulus frequency. In auditory paired-stimulus paradigms, a smaller amplitude evoked response to the second stimulus at a latency of 50 ms has been proposed to index a preattentive sensory gating mechan...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Audiology & neurotology 2002-09, Vol.7 (5), p.303-314 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 314 |
---|---|
container_issue | 5 |
container_start_page | 303 |
container_title | Audiology & neurotology |
container_volume | 7 |
creator | Clementz, Brett A. Barber, Stefanie K. Dzau, Jacqueline R. |
description | Rate effects are defined as a reduction in amplitude of an evoked brain response with increasing stimulus frequency. In auditory paired-stimulus paradigms, a smaller amplitude evoked response to the second stimulus at a latency of 50 ms has been proposed to index a preattentive sensory gating mechanism. The present study investigated the possibility that expectancy and/or attentional biases could alter evoked potentials associated with rate effects. EEG data were recorded from 30 channels while subjects received 240 trials of 1, 2 or 3 click stimuli (with successive stimuli being separated by 500-ms intervals). Half of the subjects knew (blocked condition) and half of the subjects did not know (mixed condition) how many stimuli they would receive on a given trial. Subjects in the blocked condition had a significantly larger rate effect than subjects in the mixed condition. This effect was present only for low-frequency components of the event-related brain potential (ERP; below 10 Hz) and occurred from 30 to 60, 90 to 160 and 190 to 260 ms after stimulus presentation (P 1 -N 1 -P 2 complex). Mixed condition subjects also had larger contributions to their ERPs from temporal channels. These results suggest that the rate effect can be significantly altered by expectancy, and they are inconsistent with the thesis that ERPs near 50 ms in a paired-stimulus paradigm solely index a preattentive sensory gating mechanism. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1159/000064444 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_13906031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72095245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-56180cb2ebc9ef97cff45a0ffc7f42005712e02e55aabedafd7cdb75e3d16f6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1vFCEUAHBiNLauHjybGNJEEw-jD2aY6RzXfmjjGk1rzxMGHit1FkZgbHryX5f9aJsYE98FAj8eDx4hzxm8ZUy07yBHXeV4QPZZxVnRNgAPN3MoSihhjzyJ8SorIUT1mOwxzksuAPbJ70_OXw-ol0i9oRfJrqZhivQcR0w2We_o3BhUKdL0HelnuXQ2TRqpdJpejDJZOdBjG1Ow_bThOcvCXxenAX9O6NQNPfmFLhXnOMiEmr4P0jr61ae8mM_Gp-SRyQM-240zcnl68u3oY7H48uHsaL4oVMXqVIiaHYLqOfaqRdM2yphKSDBGNSY_EkTDOAJHIaTsUUujG6X7RmCpWW1qLGfk9TbvGHwuLKZuZaPCYZAO_RS7hkMreCX-C7ODuhZrePAXvPJTcPkRHedw2Ij1J8_Imy1SwccY0HRjsCsZbjoG3bp33V3vsn25Szj1K9T3ctesDF7tgIxKDiZIp2y8d2WuDEqW3Yut-yHDEsMduL3m4J-788vjDehGbco__Qm2lA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220875122</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Knowledge of Stimulus Repetition Affects the Magnitude and Spatial Distribution of Low-Frequency Event-Related Brain Potentials</title><source>Karger Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Clementz, Brett A. ; Barber, Stefanie K. ; Dzau, Jacqueline R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clementz, Brett A. ; Barber, Stefanie K. ; Dzau, Jacqueline R.</creatorcontrib><description>Rate effects are defined as a reduction in amplitude of an evoked brain response with increasing stimulus frequency. In auditory paired-stimulus paradigms, a smaller amplitude evoked response to the second stimulus at a latency of 50 ms has been proposed to index a preattentive sensory gating mechanism. The present study investigated the possibility that expectancy and/or attentional biases could alter evoked potentials associated with rate effects. EEG data were recorded from 30 channels while subjects received 240 trials of 1, 2 or 3 click stimuli (with successive stimuli being separated by 500-ms intervals). Half of the subjects knew (blocked condition) and half of the subjects did not know (mixed condition) how many stimuli they would receive on a given trial. Subjects in the blocked condition had a significantly larger rate effect than subjects in the mixed condition. This effect was present only for low-frequency components of the event-related brain potential (ERP; below 10 Hz) and occurred from 30 to 60, 90 to 160 and 190 to 260 ms after stimulus presentation (P 1 -N 1 -P 2 complex). Mixed condition subjects also had larger contributions to their ERPs from temporal channels. These results suggest that the rate effect can be significantly altered by expectancy, and they are inconsistent with the thesis that ERPs near 50 ms in a paired-stimulus paradigm solely index a preattentive sensory gating mechanism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1420-3030</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1421-9700</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000064444</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12232500</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: Karger</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain - physiology ; Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording ; Evoked Potentials - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Nervous system ; Original Paper ; Periodicity ; Theta Rhythm</subject><ispartof>Audiology & neurotology, 2002-09, Vol.7 (5), p.303-314</ispartof><rights>2002 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-56180cb2ebc9ef97cff45a0ffc7f42005712e02e55aabedafd7cdb75e3d16f6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-56180cb2ebc9ef97cff45a0ffc7f42005712e02e55aabedafd7cdb75e3d16f6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2423,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=13906031$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12232500$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clementz, Brett A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barber, Stefanie K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dzau, Jacqueline R.</creatorcontrib><title>Knowledge of Stimulus Repetition Affects the Magnitude and Spatial Distribution of Low-Frequency Event-Related Brain Potentials</title><title>Audiology & neurotology</title><addtitle>Audiol Neurotol</addtitle><description>Rate effects are defined as a reduction in amplitude of an evoked brain response with increasing stimulus frequency. In auditory paired-stimulus paradigms, a smaller amplitude evoked response to the second stimulus at a latency of 50 ms has been proposed to index a preattentive sensory gating mechanism. The present study investigated the possibility that expectancy and/or attentional biases could alter evoked potentials associated with rate effects. EEG data were recorded from 30 channels while subjects received 240 trials of 1, 2 or 3 click stimuli (with successive stimuli being separated by 500-ms intervals). Half of the subjects knew (blocked condition) and half of the subjects did not know (mixed condition) how many stimuli they would receive on a given trial. Subjects in the blocked condition had a significantly larger rate effect than subjects in the mixed condition. This effect was present only for low-frequency components of the event-related brain potential (ERP; below 10 Hz) and occurred from 30 to 60, 90 to 160 and 190 to 260 ms after stimulus presentation (P 1 -N 1 -P 2 complex). Mixed condition subjects also had larger contributions to their ERPs from temporal channels. These results suggest that the rate effect can be significantly altered by expectancy, and they are inconsistent with the thesis that ERPs near 50 ms in a paired-stimulus paradigm solely index a preattentive sensory gating mechanism.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Periodicity</subject><subject>Theta Rhythm</subject><issn>1420-3030</issn><issn>1421-9700</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c1vFCEUAHBiNLauHjybGNJEEw-jD2aY6RzXfmjjGk1rzxMGHit1FkZgbHryX5f9aJsYE98FAj8eDx4hzxm8ZUy07yBHXeV4QPZZxVnRNgAPN3MoSihhjzyJ8SorIUT1mOwxzksuAPbJ70_OXw-ol0i9oRfJrqZhivQcR0w2We_o3BhUKdL0HelnuXQ2TRqpdJpejDJZOdBjG1Ow_bThOcvCXxenAX9O6NQNPfmFLhXnOMiEmr4P0jr61ae8mM_Gp-SRyQM-240zcnl68u3oY7H48uHsaL4oVMXqVIiaHYLqOfaqRdM2yphKSDBGNSY_EkTDOAJHIaTsUUujG6X7RmCpWW1qLGfk9TbvGHwuLKZuZaPCYZAO_RS7hkMreCX-C7ODuhZrePAXvPJTcPkRHedw2Ij1J8_Imy1SwccY0HRjsCsZbjoG3bp33V3vsn25Szj1K9T3ctesDF7tgIxKDiZIp2y8d2WuDEqW3Yut-yHDEsMduL3m4J-788vjDehGbco__Qm2lA</recordid><startdate>20020901</startdate><enddate>20020901</enddate><creator>Clementz, Brett A.</creator><creator>Barber, Stefanie K.</creator><creator>Dzau, Jacqueline R.</creator><general>Karger</general><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020901</creationdate><title>Knowledge of Stimulus Repetition Affects the Magnitude and Spatial Distribution of Low-Frequency Event-Related Brain Potentials</title><author>Clementz, Brett A. ; Barber, Stefanie K. ; Dzau, Jacqueline R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-56180cb2ebc9ef97cff45a0ffc7f42005712e02e55aabedafd7cdb75e3d16f6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Periodicity</topic><topic>Theta Rhythm</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clementz, Brett A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barber, Stefanie K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dzau, Jacqueline R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health & Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health & Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing & Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Audiology & neurotology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clementz, Brett A.</au><au>Barber, Stefanie K.</au><au>Dzau, Jacqueline R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Knowledge of Stimulus Repetition Affects the Magnitude and Spatial Distribution of Low-Frequency Event-Related Brain Potentials</atitle><jtitle>Audiology & neurotology</jtitle><addtitle>Audiol Neurotol</addtitle><date>2002-09-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>303</spage><epage>314</epage><pages>303-314</pages><issn>1420-3030</issn><eissn>1421-9700</eissn><abstract>Rate effects are defined as a reduction in amplitude of an evoked brain response with increasing stimulus frequency. In auditory paired-stimulus paradigms, a smaller amplitude evoked response to the second stimulus at a latency of 50 ms has been proposed to index a preattentive sensory gating mechanism. The present study investigated the possibility that expectancy and/or attentional biases could alter evoked potentials associated with rate effects. EEG data were recorded from 30 channels while subjects received 240 trials of 1, 2 or 3 click stimuli (with successive stimuli being separated by 500-ms intervals). Half of the subjects knew (blocked condition) and half of the subjects did not know (mixed condition) how many stimuli they would receive on a given trial. Subjects in the blocked condition had a significantly larger rate effect than subjects in the mixed condition. This effect was present only for low-frequency components of the event-related brain potential (ERP; below 10 Hz) and occurred from 30 to 60, 90 to 160 and 190 to 260 ms after stimulus presentation (P 1 -N 1 -P 2 complex). Mixed condition subjects also had larger contributions to their ERPs from temporal channels. These results suggest that the rate effect can be significantly altered by expectancy, and they are inconsistent with the thesis that ERPs near 50 ms in a paired-stimulus paradigm solely index a preattentive sensory gating mechanism.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>Karger</pub><pmid>12232500</pmid><doi>10.1159/000064444</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1420-3030 |
ispartof | Audiology & neurotology, 2002-09, Vol.7 (5), p.303-314 |
issn | 1420-3030 1421-9700 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_13906031 |
source | Karger Journals; MEDLINE |
subjects | Adolescent Adult Auditory Perception - physiology Biological and medical sciences Brain - physiology Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording Evoked Potentials - physiology Female Humans Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) Male Medical sciences Nervous system Original Paper Periodicity Theta Rhythm |
title | Knowledge of Stimulus Repetition Affects the Magnitude and Spatial Distribution of Low-Frequency Event-Related Brain Potentials |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T12%3A03%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Knowledge%20of%20Stimulus%20Repetition%20Affects%20the%20Magnitude%20and%20Spatial%20Distribution%20of%20Low-Frequency%20Event-Related%20Brain%20Potentials&rft.jtitle=Audiology%20&%20neurotology&rft.au=Clementz,%20Brett%20A.&rft.date=2002-09-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=303&rft.epage=314&rft.pages=303-314&rft.issn=1420-3030&rft.eissn=1421-9700&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000064444&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E72095245%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220875122&rft_id=info:pmid/12232500&rfr_iscdi=true |