Knowledge of Stimulus Repetition Affects the Magnitude and Spatial Distribution of Low-Frequency Event-Related Brain Potentials

Rate effects are defined as a reduction in amplitude of an evoked brain response with increasing stimulus frequency. In auditory paired-stimulus paradigms, a smaller amplitude evoked response to the second stimulus at a latency of 50 ms has been proposed to index a preattentive sensory gating mechan...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Audiology & neurotology 2002-09, Vol.7 (5), p.303-314
Hauptverfasser: Clementz, Brett A., Barber, Stefanie K., Dzau, Jacqueline R.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 314
container_issue 5
container_start_page 303
container_title Audiology & neurotology
container_volume 7
creator Clementz, Brett A.
Barber, Stefanie K.
Dzau, Jacqueline R.
description Rate effects are defined as a reduction in amplitude of an evoked brain response with increasing stimulus frequency. In auditory paired-stimulus paradigms, a smaller amplitude evoked response to the second stimulus at a latency of 50 ms has been proposed to index a preattentive sensory gating mechanism. The present study investigated the possibility that expectancy and/or attentional biases could alter evoked potentials associated with rate effects. EEG data were recorded from 30 channels while subjects received 240 trials of 1, 2 or 3 click stimuli (with successive stimuli being separated by 500-ms intervals). Half of the subjects knew (blocked condition) and half of the subjects did not know (mixed condition) how many stimuli they would receive on a given trial. Subjects in the blocked condition had a significantly larger rate effect than subjects in the mixed condition. This effect was present only for low-frequency components of the event-related brain potential (ERP; below 10 Hz) and occurred from 30 to 60, 90 to 160 and 190 to 260 ms after stimulus presentation (P 1 -N 1 -P 2 complex). Mixed condition subjects also had larger contributions to their ERPs from temporal channels. These results suggest that the rate effect can be significantly altered by expectancy, and they are inconsistent with the thesis that ERPs near 50 ms in a paired-stimulus paradigm solely index a preattentive sensory gating mechanism.
doi_str_mv 10.1159/000064444
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_13906031</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>72095245</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-56180cb2ebc9ef97cff45a0ffc7f42005712e02e55aabedafd7cdb75e3d16f6e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqF0c1vFCEUAHBiNLauHjybGNJEEw-jD2aY6RzXfmjjGk1rzxMGHit1FkZgbHryX5f9aJsYE98FAj8eDx4hzxm8ZUy07yBHXeV4QPZZxVnRNgAPN3MoSihhjzyJ8SorIUT1mOwxzksuAPbJ70_OXw-ol0i9oRfJrqZhivQcR0w2We_o3BhUKdL0HelnuXQ2TRqpdJpejDJZOdBjG1Ow_bThOcvCXxenAX9O6NQNPfmFLhXnOMiEmr4P0jr61ae8mM_Gp-SRyQM-240zcnl68u3oY7H48uHsaL4oVMXqVIiaHYLqOfaqRdM2yphKSDBGNSY_EkTDOAJHIaTsUUujG6X7RmCpWW1qLGfk9TbvGHwuLKZuZaPCYZAO_RS7hkMreCX-C7ODuhZrePAXvPJTcPkRHedw2Ij1J8_Imy1SwccY0HRjsCsZbjoG3bp33V3vsn25Szj1K9T3ctesDF7tgIxKDiZIp2y8d2WuDEqW3Yut-yHDEsMduL3m4J-788vjDehGbco__Qm2lA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>220875122</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Knowledge of Stimulus Repetition Affects the Magnitude and Spatial Distribution of Low-Frequency Event-Related Brain Potentials</title><source>Karger Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><creator>Clementz, Brett A. ; Barber, Stefanie K. ; Dzau, Jacqueline R.</creator><creatorcontrib>Clementz, Brett A. ; Barber, Stefanie K. ; Dzau, Jacqueline R.</creatorcontrib><description>Rate effects are defined as a reduction in amplitude of an evoked brain response with increasing stimulus frequency. In auditory paired-stimulus paradigms, a smaller amplitude evoked response to the second stimulus at a latency of 50 ms has been proposed to index a preattentive sensory gating mechanism. The present study investigated the possibility that expectancy and/or attentional biases could alter evoked potentials associated with rate effects. EEG data were recorded from 30 channels while subjects received 240 trials of 1, 2 or 3 click stimuli (with successive stimuli being separated by 500-ms intervals). Half of the subjects knew (blocked condition) and half of the subjects did not know (mixed condition) how many stimuli they would receive on a given trial. Subjects in the blocked condition had a significantly larger rate effect than subjects in the mixed condition. This effect was present only for low-frequency components of the event-related brain potential (ERP; below 10 Hz) and occurred from 30 to 60, 90 to 160 and 190 to 260 ms after stimulus presentation (P 1 -N 1 -P 2 complex). Mixed condition subjects also had larger contributions to their ERPs from temporal channels. These results suggest that the rate effect can be significantly altered by expectancy, and they are inconsistent with the thesis that ERPs near 50 ms in a paired-stimulus paradigm solely index a preattentive sensory gating mechanism.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1420-3030</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1421-9700</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1159/000064444</identifier><identifier>PMID: 12232500</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Basel, Switzerland: Karger</publisher><subject>Adolescent ; Adult ; Auditory Perception - physiology ; Biological and medical sciences ; Brain - physiology ; Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording ; Evoked Potentials - physiology ; Female ; Humans ; Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects) ; Male ; Medical sciences ; Nervous system ; Original Paper ; Periodicity ; Theta Rhythm</subject><ispartof>Audiology &amp; neurotology, 2002-09, Vol.7 (5), p.303-314</ispartof><rights>2002 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>2002 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><rights>Copyright (c) 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-56180cb2ebc9ef97cff45a0ffc7f42005712e02e55aabedafd7cdb75e3d16f6e3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-56180cb2ebc9ef97cff45a0ffc7f42005712e02e55aabedafd7cdb75e3d16f6e3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,776,780,2423,27901,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=13906031$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12232500$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Clementz, Brett A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barber, Stefanie K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dzau, Jacqueline R.</creatorcontrib><title>Knowledge of Stimulus Repetition Affects the Magnitude and Spatial Distribution of Low-Frequency Event-Related Brain Potentials</title><title>Audiology &amp; neurotology</title><addtitle>Audiol Neurotol</addtitle><description>Rate effects are defined as a reduction in amplitude of an evoked brain response with increasing stimulus frequency. In auditory paired-stimulus paradigms, a smaller amplitude evoked response to the second stimulus at a latency of 50 ms has been proposed to index a preattentive sensory gating mechanism. The present study investigated the possibility that expectancy and/or attentional biases could alter evoked potentials associated with rate effects. EEG data were recorded from 30 channels while subjects received 240 trials of 1, 2 or 3 click stimuli (with successive stimuli being separated by 500-ms intervals). Half of the subjects knew (blocked condition) and half of the subjects did not know (mixed condition) how many stimuli they would receive on a given trial. Subjects in the blocked condition had a significantly larger rate effect than subjects in the mixed condition. This effect was present only for low-frequency components of the event-related brain potential (ERP; below 10 Hz) and occurred from 30 to 60, 90 to 160 and 190 to 260 ms after stimulus presentation (P 1 -N 1 -P 2 complex). Mixed condition subjects also had larger contributions to their ERPs from temporal channels. These results suggest that the rate effect can be significantly altered by expectancy, and they are inconsistent with the thesis that ERPs near 50 ms in a paired-stimulus paradigm solely index a preattentive sensory gating mechanism.</description><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Auditory Perception - physiology</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Brain - physiology</subject><subject>Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording</subject><subject>Evoked Potentials - physiology</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>Nervous system</subject><subject>Original Paper</subject><subject>Periodicity</subject><subject>Theta Rhythm</subject><issn>1420-3030</issn><issn>1421-9700</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2002</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><sourceid>BENPR</sourceid><recordid>eNqF0c1vFCEUAHBiNLauHjybGNJEEw-jD2aY6RzXfmjjGk1rzxMGHit1FkZgbHryX5f9aJsYE98FAj8eDx4hzxm8ZUy07yBHXeV4QPZZxVnRNgAPN3MoSihhjzyJ8SorIUT1mOwxzksuAPbJ70_OXw-ol0i9oRfJrqZhivQcR0w2We_o3BhUKdL0HelnuXQ2TRqpdJpejDJZOdBjG1Ow_bThOcvCXxenAX9O6NQNPfmFLhXnOMiEmr4P0jr61ae8mM_Gp-SRyQM-240zcnl68u3oY7H48uHsaL4oVMXqVIiaHYLqOfaqRdM2yphKSDBGNSY_EkTDOAJHIaTsUUujG6X7RmCpWW1qLGfk9TbvGHwuLKZuZaPCYZAO_RS7hkMreCX-C7ODuhZrePAXvPJTcPkRHedw2Ij1J8_Imy1SwccY0HRjsCsZbjoG3bp33V3vsn25Szj1K9T3ctesDF7tgIxKDiZIp2y8d2WuDEqW3Yut-yHDEsMduL3m4J-788vjDehGbco__Qm2lA</recordid><startdate>20020901</startdate><enddate>20020901</enddate><creator>Clementz, Brett A.</creator><creator>Barber, Stefanie K.</creator><creator>Dzau, Jacqueline R.</creator><general>Karger</general><general>S. Karger AG</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>3V.</scope><scope>7RV</scope><scope>7X7</scope><scope>7XB</scope><scope>88E</scope><scope>88G</scope><scope>8AO</scope><scope>8FI</scope><scope>8FJ</scope><scope>8FK</scope><scope>ABUWG</scope><scope>AFKRA</scope><scope>AZQEC</scope><scope>BENPR</scope><scope>CCPQU</scope><scope>DWQXO</scope><scope>FYUFA</scope><scope>GHDGH</scope><scope>GNUQQ</scope><scope>K9.</scope><scope>KB0</scope><scope>M0S</scope><scope>M1P</scope><scope>M2M</scope><scope>NAPCQ</scope><scope>PQEST</scope><scope>PQQKQ</scope><scope>PQUKI</scope><scope>PRINS</scope><scope>PSYQQ</scope><scope>Q9U</scope><scope>7TK</scope><scope>7X8</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20020901</creationdate><title>Knowledge of Stimulus Repetition Affects the Magnitude and Spatial Distribution of Low-Frequency Event-Related Brain Potentials</title><author>Clementz, Brett A. ; Barber, Stefanie K. ; Dzau, Jacqueline R.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c416t-56180cb2ebc9ef97cff45a0ffc7f42005712e02e55aabedafd7cdb75e3d16f6e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2002</creationdate><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Auditory Perception - physiology</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Brain - physiology</topic><topic>Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording</topic><topic>Evoked Potentials - physiology</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>Nervous system</topic><topic>Original Paper</topic><topic>Periodicity</topic><topic>Theta Rhythm</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Clementz, Brett A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Barber, Stefanie K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dzau, Jacqueline R.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Corporate)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>Medical Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Psychology Database (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Pharma Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection</collection><collection>Hospital Premium Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni) (purchase pre-March 2016)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central UK/Ireland</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Essentials</collection><collection>ProQuest Central</collection><collection>ProQuest One Community College</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Korea</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection</collection><collection>Health Research Premium Collection (Alumni)</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Student</collection><collection>ProQuest Health &amp; Medical Complete (Alumni)</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Database (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Health &amp; Medical Collection (Alumni Edition)</collection><collection>Medical Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Psychology</collection><collection>Nursing &amp; Allied Health Premium</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic Eastern Edition (DO NOT USE)</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic</collection><collection>ProQuest One Academic UKI Edition</collection><collection>ProQuest Central China</collection><collection>ProQuest One Psychology</collection><collection>ProQuest Central Basic</collection><collection>Neurosciences Abstracts</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><jtitle>Audiology &amp; neurotology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Clementz, Brett A.</au><au>Barber, Stefanie K.</au><au>Dzau, Jacqueline R.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Knowledge of Stimulus Repetition Affects the Magnitude and Spatial Distribution of Low-Frequency Event-Related Brain Potentials</atitle><jtitle>Audiology &amp; neurotology</jtitle><addtitle>Audiol Neurotol</addtitle><date>2002-09-01</date><risdate>2002</risdate><volume>7</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>303</spage><epage>314</epage><pages>303-314</pages><issn>1420-3030</issn><eissn>1421-9700</eissn><abstract>Rate effects are defined as a reduction in amplitude of an evoked brain response with increasing stimulus frequency. In auditory paired-stimulus paradigms, a smaller amplitude evoked response to the second stimulus at a latency of 50 ms has been proposed to index a preattentive sensory gating mechanism. The present study investigated the possibility that expectancy and/or attentional biases could alter evoked potentials associated with rate effects. EEG data were recorded from 30 channels while subjects received 240 trials of 1, 2 or 3 click stimuli (with successive stimuli being separated by 500-ms intervals). Half of the subjects knew (blocked condition) and half of the subjects did not know (mixed condition) how many stimuli they would receive on a given trial. Subjects in the blocked condition had a significantly larger rate effect than subjects in the mixed condition. This effect was present only for low-frequency components of the event-related brain potential (ERP; below 10 Hz) and occurred from 30 to 60, 90 to 160 and 190 to 260 ms after stimulus presentation (P 1 -N 1 -P 2 complex). Mixed condition subjects also had larger contributions to their ERPs from temporal channels. These results suggest that the rate effect can be significantly altered by expectancy, and they are inconsistent with the thesis that ERPs near 50 ms in a paired-stimulus paradigm solely index a preattentive sensory gating mechanism.</abstract><cop>Basel, Switzerland</cop><pub>Karger</pub><pmid>12232500</pmid><doi>10.1159/000064444</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 1420-3030
ispartof Audiology & neurotology, 2002-09, Vol.7 (5), p.303-314
issn 1420-3030
1421-9700
language eng
recordid cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_13906031
source Karger Journals; MEDLINE
subjects Adolescent
Adult
Auditory Perception - physiology
Biological and medical sciences
Brain - physiology
Electrodiagnosis. Electric activity recording
Evoked Potentials - physiology
Female
Humans
Investigative techniques, diagnostic techniques (general aspects)
Male
Medical sciences
Nervous system
Original Paper
Periodicity
Theta Rhythm
title Knowledge of Stimulus Repetition Affects the Magnitude and Spatial Distribution of Low-Frequency Event-Related Brain Potentials
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-09T12%3A03%3A41IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Knowledge%20of%20Stimulus%20Repetition%20Affects%20the%20Magnitude%20and%20Spatial%20Distribution%20of%20Low-Frequency%20Event-Related%20Brain%20Potentials&rft.jtitle=Audiology%20&%20neurotology&rft.au=Clementz,%20Brett%20A.&rft.date=2002-09-01&rft.volume=7&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=303&rft.epage=314&rft.pages=303-314&rft.issn=1420-3030&rft.eissn=1421-9700&rft_id=info:doi/10.1159/000064444&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_pasca%3E72095245%3C/proquest_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=220875122&rft_id=info:pmid/12232500&rfr_iscdi=true