An Aptitude-Treatment Interaction in a Mastery Learning Model of Instruction
This research examined the interactive effect of cognitive entry behaviors (CEB) with mastery vs. non-mastery learning strategies of instruction on reading comprehension. One hundred eighty grade-three students were randomly assigned to four treatment groups: 90% mastery, 70% mastery, non-mastery, a...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | The Journal of experimental education 1987-07, Vol.55 (4), p.189-200 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 200 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 4 |
| container_start_page | 189 |
| container_title | The Journal of experimental education |
| container_volume | 55 |
| creator | Chan, Kim Sang Cole, Peter G. |
| description | This research examined the interactive effect of cognitive entry behaviors (CEB) with mastery vs. non-mastery learning strategies of instruction on reading comprehension. One hundred eighty grade-three students were randomly assigned to four treatment groups: 90% mastery, 70% mastery, non-mastery, and control. Subjects were individually instructed a sequence of three tasks that aimed to teach the skills of word recognition, word meaning, and word order. Multivariate multiple regression analysis indicated a significant CEB × Treatment interaction on immediate comprehension achievement. A comparison of regression slopes revealed that low CEB mastery learning students benefited relatively more than high CEB mastery learning students. These findings confirmed the interactive relationship between initial abilities and instructional methods postulated in Bloom's theory of school learning. The CEB × Treatment interaction on long-term retention was not significant, suggesting the need for extended mastery learning programs for low CEB students. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1080/00220973.1987.10806453 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>jstor_pasca</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_11807492</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><informt_id>10.3316/aeipt.33523</informt_id><jstor_id>20151697</jstor_id><sourcerecordid>20151697</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-ae508c4805ee5915775bbc21a0168d658e9ed105c4749334effd9a568c58eb523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFP3DAQhS1UJLaUnwCKhHoMHcdxYh9XqAWkRb3A2Zp1HPAqawfbq2r_fZ3NLj3WF0sz37x58wi5oXBHQcAPgKoC2bI7KkV7KDU1Z2dkQWUNJTSCfSGLCSon6oJ8jXED-TEBC7JaumI5Jpt2nSlfgsG0NS4VTy6ZgDpZ7wrrCiyeMebKvlgZDM66t-LZd2YofJ_RmMLugH4j5z0O0Vwd_0vy-uvny_1jufr98HS_XJW65jSVaDgIXQvgxnBJedvy9VpXFIE2omu4MNJ0FLiu21oyVpu-7yTyRujcWvOKXZLbWXcM_mNnYlIbvwsur1S0klIKKTjPVDNTOvgYg-nVGOwWw15RUFNM6pScmpJTp-Ty4PejPEaNQx_QaRv_TVMB2dhkYzlzYWuTQmPHpN5TGqPqMKGyrveHjg9vqvN2WssYbY4kY_mSrHE9a2xi8uFzRwWU0yZb-9wxq-EfH4ZOJdwPPpyMsf_c8xekuKIa</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Aggregation Database</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1299989855</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>An Aptitude-Treatment Interaction in a Mastery Learning Model of Instruction</title><source>Periodicals Index Online</source><source>JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Chan, Kim Sang ; Cole, Peter G.</creator><creatorcontrib>Chan, Kim Sang ; Cole, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><description>This research examined the interactive effect of cognitive entry behaviors (CEB) with mastery vs. non-mastery learning strategies of instruction on reading comprehension. One hundred eighty grade-three students were randomly assigned to four treatment groups: 90% mastery, 70% mastery, non-mastery, and control. Subjects were individually instructed a sequence of three tasks that aimed to teach the skills of word recognition, word meaning, and word order. Multivariate multiple regression analysis indicated a significant CEB × Treatment interaction on immediate comprehension achievement. A comparison of regression slopes revealed that low CEB mastery learning students benefited relatively more than high CEB mastery learning students. These findings confirmed the interactive relationship between initial abilities and instructional methods postulated in Bloom's theory of school learning. The CEB × Treatment interaction on long-term retention was not significant, suggesting the need for extended mastery learning programs for low CEB students.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0022-0973</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1940-0683</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1080/00220973.1987.10806453</identifier><identifier>CODEN: JEXEAI</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Washington, DC: Routledge</publisher><subject>Aptitude treatment interaction ; Control groups ; Educational sciences ; Language comprehension ; Learning procedures ; Mastery learning ; Outcomes of education ; Posttests ; Primary education ; Primary school students ; Reading ability ; Reading achievement ; Reading comprehension ; Reading instruction ; Reading teaching ; Speech discrimination ; Standard deviation ; Teaching methods</subject><ispartof>The Journal of experimental education, 1987-07, Vol.55 (4), p.189-200</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1987 by Helen Dwight Reid Educational Foundation 1987</rights><rights>Copyright 1987 Helen Dwight Reid Educational Foundation</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-ae508c4805ee5915775bbc21a0168d658e9ed105c4749334effd9a568c58eb523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-ae508c4805ee5915775bbc21a0168d658e9ed105c4749334effd9a568c58eb523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/pdf/20151697$$EPDF$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.jstor.org/stable/20151697$$EHTML$$P50$$Gjstor$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,803,27869,27924,27925,58017,58250</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&idt=11807492$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Chan, Kim Sang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><title>An Aptitude-Treatment Interaction in a Mastery Learning Model of Instruction</title><title>The Journal of experimental education</title><description>This research examined the interactive effect of cognitive entry behaviors (CEB) with mastery vs. non-mastery learning strategies of instruction on reading comprehension. One hundred eighty grade-three students were randomly assigned to four treatment groups: 90% mastery, 70% mastery, non-mastery, and control. Subjects were individually instructed a sequence of three tasks that aimed to teach the skills of word recognition, word meaning, and word order. Multivariate multiple regression analysis indicated a significant CEB × Treatment interaction on immediate comprehension achievement. A comparison of regression slopes revealed that low CEB mastery learning students benefited relatively more than high CEB mastery learning students. These findings confirmed the interactive relationship between initial abilities and instructional methods postulated in Bloom's theory of school learning. The CEB × Treatment interaction on long-term retention was not significant, suggesting the need for extended mastery learning programs for low CEB students.</description><subject>Aptitude treatment interaction</subject><subject>Control groups</subject><subject>Educational sciences</subject><subject>Language comprehension</subject><subject>Learning procedures</subject><subject>Mastery learning</subject><subject>Outcomes of education</subject><subject>Posttests</subject><subject>Primary education</subject><subject>Primary school students</subject><subject>Reading ability</subject><subject>Reading achievement</subject><subject>Reading comprehension</subject><subject>Reading instruction</subject><subject>Reading teaching</subject><subject>Speech discrimination</subject><subject>Standard deviation</subject><subject>Teaching methods</subject><issn>0022-0973</issn><issn>1940-0683</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1987</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>HYQOX</sourceid><sourceid>K30</sourceid><sourceid>~OU</sourceid><sourceid>~OW</sourceid><sourceid>~PQ</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFP3DAQhS1UJLaUnwCKhHoMHcdxYh9XqAWkRb3A2Zp1HPAqawfbq2r_fZ3NLj3WF0sz37x58wi5oXBHQcAPgKoC2bI7KkV7KDU1Z2dkQWUNJTSCfSGLCSon6oJ8jXED-TEBC7JaumI5Jpt2nSlfgsG0NS4VTy6ZgDpZ7wrrCiyeMebKvlgZDM66t-LZd2YofJ_RmMLugH4j5z0O0Vwd_0vy-uvny_1jufr98HS_XJW65jSVaDgIXQvgxnBJedvy9VpXFIE2omu4MNJ0FLiu21oyVpu-7yTyRujcWvOKXZLbWXcM_mNnYlIbvwsur1S0klIKKTjPVDNTOvgYg-nVGOwWw15RUFNM6pScmpJTp-Ty4PejPEaNQx_QaRv_TVMB2dhkYzlzYWuTQmPHpN5TGqPqMKGyrveHjg9vqvN2WssYbY4kY_mSrHE9a2xi8uFzRwWU0yZb-9wxq-EfH4ZOJdwPPpyMsf_c8xekuKIa</recordid><startdate>19870701</startdate><enddate>19870701</enddate><creator>Chan, Kim Sang</creator><creator>Cole, Peter G.</creator><general>Routledge</general><general>Heldref Publications</general><general>Heldref</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>ABKTN</scope><scope>HFIND</scope><scope>HYQOX</scope><scope>HZAIM</scope><scope>JSICY</scope><scope>K30</scope><scope>PAAUG</scope><scope>PAWHS</scope><scope>PAWZZ</scope><scope>PAXOH</scope><scope>PBHAV</scope><scope>PBQSW</scope><scope>PBYQZ</scope><scope>PCIWU</scope><scope>PCMID</scope><scope>PCZJX</scope><scope>PDGRG</scope><scope>PDWWI</scope><scope>PETMR</scope><scope>PFVGT</scope><scope>PGXDX</scope><scope>PIHIL</scope><scope>PISVA</scope><scope>PJCTQ</scope><scope>PJTMS</scope><scope>PLCHJ</scope><scope>PMHAD</scope><scope>PNQDJ</scope><scope>POUND</scope><scope>PPLAD</scope><scope>PQAPC</scope><scope>PQCAN</scope><scope>PQCMW</scope><scope>PQEME</scope><scope>PQHKH</scope><scope>PQMID</scope><scope>PQNCT</scope><scope>PQNET</scope><scope>PQSCT</scope><scope>PQSET</scope><scope>PSVJG</scope><scope>PVMQY</scope><scope>PZGFC</scope><scope>~OT</scope><scope>~OU</scope><scope>~OV</scope><scope>~OW</scope><scope>~PM</scope><scope>~PQ</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19870701</creationdate><title>An Aptitude-Treatment Interaction in a Mastery Learning Model of Instruction</title><author>Chan, Kim Sang ; Cole, Peter G.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c451t-ae508c4805ee5915775bbc21a0168d658e9ed105c4749334effd9a568c58eb523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1987</creationdate><topic>Aptitude treatment interaction</topic><topic>Control groups</topic><topic>Educational sciences</topic><topic>Language comprehension</topic><topic>Learning procedures</topic><topic>Mastery learning</topic><topic>Outcomes of education</topic><topic>Posttests</topic><topic>Primary education</topic><topic>Primary school students</topic><topic>Reading ability</topic><topic>Reading achievement</topic><topic>Reading comprehension</topic><topic>Reading instruction</topic><topic>Reading teaching</topic><topic>Speech discrimination</topic><topic>Standard deviation</topic><topic>Teaching methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Chan, Kim Sang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cole, Peter G.</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JSTOR Titles</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 16</collection><collection>ProQuest Historical Periodicals</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 26</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segment 36</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - International</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - West</collection><collection>Periodicals Index Online Segments 1-50</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - MEA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Canada</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - West</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - EMEALA</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Midwest</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - North Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Northeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - South Central</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access & Build (Plan A) - Southeast</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access (Plan D) - UK / I</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - APAC</collection><collection>Primary Sources Access—Foundation Edition (Plan E) - MEA</collection><collection>PAO Collection 2 (purchase pre Oct/2008)</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 2</collection><collection>PAO Collection 2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Collection 2.2</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online JISC Collection</collection><collection>Periodicals Archive Online Liberal Arts Collection 4</collection><jtitle>The Journal of experimental education</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Chan, Kim Sang</au><au>Cole, Peter G.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>An Aptitude-Treatment Interaction in a Mastery Learning Model of Instruction</atitle><jtitle>The Journal of experimental education</jtitle><date>1987-07-01</date><risdate>1987</risdate><volume>55</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>189</spage><epage>200</epage><pages>189-200</pages><issn>0022-0973</issn><eissn>1940-0683</eissn><coden>JEXEAI</coden><abstract>This research examined the interactive effect of cognitive entry behaviors (CEB) with mastery vs. non-mastery learning strategies of instruction on reading comprehension. One hundred eighty grade-three students were randomly assigned to four treatment groups: 90% mastery, 70% mastery, non-mastery, and control. Subjects were individually instructed a sequence of three tasks that aimed to teach the skills of word recognition, word meaning, and word order. Multivariate multiple regression analysis indicated a significant CEB × Treatment interaction on immediate comprehension achievement. A comparison of regression slopes revealed that low CEB mastery learning students benefited relatively more than high CEB mastery learning students. These findings confirmed the interactive relationship between initial abilities and instructional methods postulated in Bloom's theory of school learning. The CEB × Treatment interaction on long-term retention was not significant, suggesting the need for extended mastery learning programs for low CEB students.</abstract><cop>Washington, DC</cop><pub>Routledge</pub><doi>10.1080/00220973.1987.10806453</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0022-0973 |
| ispartof | The Journal of experimental education, 1987-07, Vol.55 (4), p.189-200 |
| issn | 0022-0973 1940-0683 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_pascalfrancis_primary_11807492 |
| source | Periodicals Index Online; JSTOR Archive Collection A-Z Listing; Alma/SFX Local Collection |
| subjects | Aptitude treatment interaction Control groups Educational sciences Language comprehension Learning procedures Mastery learning Outcomes of education Posttests Primary education Primary school students Reading ability Reading achievement Reading comprehension Reading instruction Reading teaching Speech discrimination Standard deviation Teaching methods |
| title | An Aptitude-Treatment Interaction in a Mastery Learning Model of Instruction |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-07T00%3A10%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-jstor_pasca&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=An%20Aptitude-Treatment%20Interaction%20in%20a%20Mastery%20Learning%20Model%20of%20Instruction&rft.jtitle=The%20Journal%20of%20experimental%20education&rft.au=Chan,%20Kim%20Sang&rft.date=1987-07-01&rft.volume=55&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=189&rft.epage=200&rft.pages=189-200&rft.issn=0022-0973&rft.eissn=1940-0683&rft.coden=JEXEAI&rft_id=info:doi/10.1080/00220973.1987.10806453&rft_dat=%3Cjstor_pasca%3E20151697%3C/jstor_pasca%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1299989855&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_informt_id=10.3316/aeipt.33523&rft_jstor_id=20151697&rfr_iscdi=true |