Off-design operation of ORC and CO2 power production cycles for low temperature surplus heat recovery

In process industry, large amounts of surplus heat are available. Electricity production is an interesting method to recover this energy. This paper focuses on the off-design operation of the Rankine cycles and compares the behaviour of transcritical CO2 cycles and an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) wit...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:International journal of low carbon technologies 2011-06, Vol.6 (2), p.134-140
Hauptverfasser: Walnum, Harald Taxt, Ladam, Yves, Nekså, Petter, Andresen, Trond
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext bestellen
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 140
container_issue 2
container_start_page 134
container_title International journal of low carbon technologies
container_volume 6
creator Walnum, Harald Taxt
Ladam, Yves
Nekså, Petter
Andresen, Trond
description In process industry, large amounts of surplus heat are available. Electricity production is an interesting method to recover this energy. This paper focuses on the off-design operation of the Rankine cycles and compares the behaviour of transcritical CO2 cycles and an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) with R-123 as the working fluid. The simulations show that the ORC is more sensitive than the CO2 cycle to reduction in available heat, and will with only small changes get droplets in the inlet of the expander. With small increments in the available heat source, the CO2 cycle also seem to have a marginally better response without control of the process.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/ijlct/ctr003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup_TOX</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_oup_primary_10_1093_ijlct_ctr003</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/ijlct/ctr003</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/ijlct/ctr003</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-o187t-37b79f955312f215aeb092e190d0d75ae7583dba1f06f2ca64d87018ccc177323</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kE9LxDAUxIMouK7e_AC5ear7XtJu2qMU_8FCQfRc0uRFu3Q3JWld-u1du-JpZhhmDj_GbhHuEQq5aredGVZmCADyjC1QpXmCUmTn_x7VJbuKcQuQFamEBaPKucRSbD_33PcU9ND6o3O8eiu53lteVoL3_kCB98Hb0cy9mUxHkTsfeOcPfKDdPB0D8TiGvhsj_yI98EDGf1OYrtmF012kmz9dso-nx_fyJdlUz6_lwybxmKshkapRhSuyTKJwAjNNDRSCsAALVh2jynJpG40O1k4YvU5trgBzYwwqJYVcsrvTrx_7ug_tToepRqh_6dQznfpER_4Ahx9awA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Off-design operation of ORC and CO2 power production cycles for low temperature surplus heat recovery</title><source>Oxford Journals Open Access Collection</source><creator>Walnum, Harald Taxt ; Ladam, Yves ; Nekså, Petter ; Andresen, Trond</creator><creatorcontrib>Walnum, Harald Taxt ; Ladam, Yves ; Nekså, Petter ; Andresen, Trond</creatorcontrib><description>In process industry, large amounts of surplus heat are available. Electricity production is an interesting method to recover this energy. This paper focuses on the off-design operation of the Rankine cycles and compares the behaviour of transcritical CO2 cycles and an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) with R-123 as the working fluid. The simulations show that the ORC is more sensitive than the CO2 cycle to reduction in available heat, and will with only small changes get droplets in the inlet of the expander. With small increments in the available heat source, the CO2 cycle also seem to have a marginally better response without control of the process.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1748-1317</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1748-1325</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/ijlct/ctr003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>International journal of low carbon technologies, 2011-06, Vol.6 (2), p.134-140</ispartof><rights>The Author 2011. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com 2011</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,1604,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><linktorsrc>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ijlct/ctr003$$EView_record_in_Oxford_University_Press$$FView_record_in_$$GOxford_University_Press</linktorsrc></links><search><creatorcontrib>Walnum, Harald Taxt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladam, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nekså, Petter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andresen, Trond</creatorcontrib><title>Off-design operation of ORC and CO2 power production cycles for low temperature surplus heat recovery</title><title>International journal of low carbon technologies</title><description>In process industry, large amounts of surplus heat are available. Electricity production is an interesting method to recover this energy. This paper focuses on the off-design operation of the Rankine cycles and compares the behaviour of transcritical CO2 cycles and an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) with R-123 as the working fluid. The simulations show that the ORC is more sensitive than the CO2 cycle to reduction in available heat, and will with only small changes get droplets in the inlet of the expander. With small increments in the available heat source, the CO2 cycle also seem to have a marginally better response without control of the process.</description><issn>1748-1317</issn><issn>1748-1325</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2011</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNo9kE9LxDAUxIMouK7e_AC5ear7XtJu2qMU_8FCQfRc0uRFu3Q3JWld-u1du-JpZhhmDj_GbhHuEQq5aredGVZmCADyjC1QpXmCUmTn_x7VJbuKcQuQFamEBaPKucRSbD_33PcU9ND6o3O8eiu53lteVoL3_kCB98Hb0cy9mUxHkTsfeOcPfKDdPB0D8TiGvhsj_yI98EDGf1OYrtmF012kmz9dso-nx_fyJdlUz6_lwybxmKshkapRhSuyTKJwAjNNDRSCsAALVh2jynJpG40O1k4YvU5trgBzYwwqJYVcsrvTrx_7ug_tToepRqh_6dQznfpER_4Ahx9awA</recordid><startdate>20110601</startdate><enddate>20110601</enddate><creator>Walnum, Harald Taxt</creator><creator>Ladam, Yves</creator><creator>Nekså, Petter</creator><creator>Andresen, Trond</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20110601</creationdate><title>Off-design operation of ORC and CO2 power production cycles for low temperature surplus heat recovery</title><author>Walnum, Harald Taxt ; Ladam, Yves ; Nekså, Petter ; Andresen, Trond</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-o187t-37b79f955312f215aeb092e190d0d75ae7583dba1f06f2ca64d87018ccc177323</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2011</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Walnum, Harald Taxt</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ladam, Yves</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nekså, Petter</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Andresen, Trond</creatorcontrib><jtitle>International journal of low carbon technologies</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext_linktorsrc</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Walnum, Harald Taxt</au><au>Ladam, Yves</au><au>Nekså, Petter</au><au>Andresen, Trond</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Off-design operation of ORC and CO2 power production cycles for low temperature surplus heat recovery</atitle><jtitle>International journal of low carbon technologies</jtitle><date>2011-06-01</date><risdate>2011</risdate><volume>6</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>134</spage><epage>140</epage><pages>134-140</pages><issn>1748-1317</issn><eissn>1748-1325</eissn><abstract>In process industry, large amounts of surplus heat are available. Electricity production is an interesting method to recover this energy. This paper focuses on the off-design operation of the Rankine cycles and compares the behaviour of transcritical CO2 cycles and an organic Rankine cycle (ORC) with R-123 as the working fluid. The simulations show that the ORC is more sensitive than the CO2 cycle to reduction in available heat, and will with only small changes get droplets in the inlet of the expander. With small increments in the available heat source, the CO2 cycle also seem to have a marginally better response without control of the process.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/ijlct/ctr003</doi><tpages>7</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext_linktorsrc
identifier ISSN: 1748-1317
ispartof International journal of low carbon technologies, 2011-06, Vol.6 (2), p.134-140
issn 1748-1317
1748-1325
language eng
recordid cdi_oup_primary_10_1093_ijlct_ctr003
source Oxford Journals Open Access Collection
title Off-design operation of ORC and CO2 power production cycles for low temperature surplus heat recovery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-06T17%3A31%3A27IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup_TOX&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Off-design%20operation%20of%20ORC%20and%20CO2%20power%20production%20cycles%20for%20low%20temperature%20surplus%20heat%20recovery&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20low%20carbon%20technologies&rft.au=Walnum,%20Harald%20Taxt&rft.date=2011-06-01&rft.volume=6&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=134&rft.epage=140&rft.pages=134-140&rft.issn=1748-1317&rft.eissn=1748-1325&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/ijlct/ctr003&rft_dat=%3Coup_TOX%3E10.1093/ijlct/ctr003%3C/oup_TOX%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/ijlct/ctr003&rfr_iscdi=true