MO1-18-2Analysis of metastatic foci using in house Gastric 58 SMG panel of 351,050 nt and d/pMMR status by IHC of MMR proteins

Abstract Background The clonality of primary tumors is well elucidated. In contrast, the relation to metastatic foci is not well understood. We examined genomic clonality of primary tumors and metastatic foci. Method We studied 144 foci (34 primaries, 104 lymph nodes, 6 organ mets) from 10 patients...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Annals of oncology 2019-10, Vol.30 (Supplement_6)
Hauptverfasser: Hada, Masao, Hirotsu, Yosuke, Amemiya, Kenji, Nagakubo, Yuki, Oyama, Toshio, Iimuro, Yuji, Hosoda, Kenji, Kojima, Yuichiro, Mochizuki, Hitoshi, Nakagomi, Hiroshi, Omata, Masao
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page
container_issue Supplement_6
container_start_page
container_title Annals of oncology
container_volume 30
creator Hada, Masao
Hirotsu, Yosuke
Amemiya, Kenji
Nagakubo, Yuki
Oyama, Toshio
Iimuro, Yuji
Hosoda, Kenji
Kojima, Yuichiro
Mochizuki, Hitoshi
Nakagomi, Hiroshi
Omata, Masao
description Abstract Background The clonality of primary tumors is well elucidated. In contrast, the relation to metastatic foci is not well understood. We examined genomic clonality of primary tumors and metastatic foci. Method We studied 144 foci (34 primaries, 104 lymph nodes, 6 organ mets) from 10 patients with gastrectomy (c-Stage 3). We also searched the expression of MMR proteins. Results In 10 primaries, mutations were found in all (range 3-12, mean 6). Of 104 lymph nodes, 64 lymph nodes carrying mutations identical to corresponding primaries in all. In addition, all the genomic profiles were replicated in corresponding lymph nodes and visceral mets. Among 3 cases with dMMR, all metastatic foci showed identical phenotypes. Conclusion Surprisingly, significantly mutated genes (SMGs) profiles in all lymph nodes and visceral mets were identical to the primaries. In addition, MMR/MSI status was also identical. These results indicated proper selection of chemo-, molecular-, and immune-oncology treatments could be effectively applied to the spreaded mets. Internoduler ""de novo"" heterogeneity was so scarce. Often claimed tumor heterogeneity could be due to inappropriate selection of drugs and due to their pressure.
doi_str_mv 10.1093/annonc/mdz338.034
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>oup</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_oup_primary_10_1093_annonc_mdz338_034</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><oup_id>10.1093/annonc/mdz338.034</oup_id><sourcerecordid>10.1093/annonc/mdz338.034</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-oup_primary_10_1093_annonc_mdz338_0343</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqVj01OhDAYhhujifhzAHffAYbhK4WRLs1EZ1wQE3XfVChaA21DywJXs_WankSa8QKu3uT9Sx5CbiiuKXKWSWOsabKh_WKsWiMrTkhCyw1PKyzoKUmQ5yy9LVlxTi68_0TEDc95Qg71E01pleZ3Rvaz1x5sB4MK0gcZdAOdbTRMXpt30AY-7OQV7JZwXLKygpd6B04a1ccZK-kKS_w5fJsA0rTQZq6unyFeTR7eZnjcb2Mxmm60QWnjr8hZJ3uvrv_0kqwe7l-3-9ROTrhRD3KcBUURKcWRUhwpxULJ_ln_BXhEWuE</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Publisher</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>MO1-18-2Analysis of metastatic foci using in house Gastric 58 SMG panel of 351,050 nt and d/pMMR status by IHC of MMR proteins</title><source>EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Hada, Masao ; Hirotsu, Yosuke ; Amemiya, Kenji ; Nagakubo, Yuki ; Oyama, Toshio ; Iimuro, Yuji ; Hosoda, Kenji ; Kojima, Yuichiro ; Mochizuki, Hitoshi ; Nakagomi, Hiroshi ; Omata, Masao</creator><creatorcontrib>Hada, Masao ; Hirotsu, Yosuke ; Amemiya, Kenji ; Nagakubo, Yuki ; Oyama, Toshio ; Iimuro, Yuji ; Hosoda, Kenji ; Kojima, Yuichiro ; Mochizuki, Hitoshi ; Nakagomi, Hiroshi ; Omata, Masao</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Background The clonality of primary tumors is well elucidated. In contrast, the relation to metastatic foci is not well understood. We examined genomic clonality of primary tumors and metastatic foci. Method We studied 144 foci (34 primaries, 104 lymph nodes, 6 organ mets) from 10 patients with gastrectomy (c-Stage 3). We also searched the expression of MMR proteins. Results In 10 primaries, mutations were found in all (range 3-12, mean 6). Of 104 lymph nodes, 64 lymph nodes carrying mutations identical to corresponding primaries in all. In addition, all the genomic profiles were replicated in corresponding lymph nodes and visceral mets. Among 3 cases with dMMR, all metastatic foci showed identical phenotypes. Conclusion Surprisingly, significantly mutated genes (SMGs) profiles in all lymph nodes and visceral mets were identical to the primaries. In addition, MMR/MSI status was also identical. These results indicated proper selection of chemo-, molecular-, and immune-oncology treatments could be effectively applied to the spreaded mets. Internoduler ""de novo"" heterogeneity was so scarce. Often claimed tumor heterogeneity could be due to inappropriate selection of drugs and due to their pressure.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0923-7534</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1569-8041</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdz338.034</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Oxford University Press</publisher><ispartof>Annals of oncology, 2019-10, Vol.30 (Supplement_6)</ispartof><rights>The Author(s) 2019. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com. 2019</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>314,780,784,27924,27925</link.rule.ids></links><search><creatorcontrib>Hada, Masao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirotsu, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amemiya, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagakubo, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyama, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iimuro, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosoda, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kojima, Yuichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mochizuki, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakagomi, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omata, Masao</creatorcontrib><title>MO1-18-2Analysis of metastatic foci using in house Gastric 58 SMG panel of 351,050 nt and d/pMMR status by IHC of MMR proteins</title><title>Annals of oncology</title><description>Abstract Background The clonality of primary tumors is well elucidated. In contrast, the relation to metastatic foci is not well understood. We examined genomic clonality of primary tumors and metastatic foci. Method We studied 144 foci (34 primaries, 104 lymph nodes, 6 organ mets) from 10 patients with gastrectomy (c-Stage 3). We also searched the expression of MMR proteins. Results In 10 primaries, mutations were found in all (range 3-12, mean 6). Of 104 lymph nodes, 64 lymph nodes carrying mutations identical to corresponding primaries in all. In addition, all the genomic profiles were replicated in corresponding lymph nodes and visceral mets. Among 3 cases with dMMR, all metastatic foci showed identical phenotypes. Conclusion Surprisingly, significantly mutated genes (SMGs) profiles in all lymph nodes and visceral mets were identical to the primaries. In addition, MMR/MSI status was also identical. These results indicated proper selection of chemo-, molecular-, and immune-oncology treatments could be effectively applied to the spreaded mets. Internoduler ""de novo"" heterogeneity was so scarce. Often claimed tumor heterogeneity could be due to inappropriate selection of drugs and due to their pressure.</description><issn>0923-7534</issn><issn>1569-8041</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2019</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid/><recordid>eNqVj01OhDAYhhujifhzAHffAYbhK4WRLs1EZ1wQE3XfVChaA21DywJXs_WankSa8QKu3uT9Sx5CbiiuKXKWSWOsabKh_WKsWiMrTkhCyw1PKyzoKUmQ5yy9LVlxTi68_0TEDc95Qg71E01pleZ3Rvaz1x5sB4MK0gcZdAOdbTRMXpt30AY-7OQV7JZwXLKygpd6B04a1ccZK-kKS_w5fJsA0rTQZq6unyFeTR7eZnjcb2Mxmm60QWnjr8hZJ3uvrv_0kqwe7l-3-9ROTrhRD3KcBUURKcWRUhwpxULJ_ln_BXhEWuE</recordid><startdate>20191001</startdate><enddate>20191001</enddate><creator>Hada, Masao</creator><creator>Hirotsu, Yosuke</creator><creator>Amemiya, Kenji</creator><creator>Nagakubo, Yuki</creator><creator>Oyama, Toshio</creator><creator>Iimuro, Yuji</creator><creator>Hosoda, Kenji</creator><creator>Kojima, Yuichiro</creator><creator>Mochizuki, Hitoshi</creator><creator>Nakagomi, Hiroshi</creator><creator>Omata, Masao</creator><general>Oxford University Press</general><scope/></search><sort><creationdate>20191001</creationdate><title>MO1-18-2Analysis of metastatic foci using in house Gastric 58 SMG panel of 351,050 nt and d/pMMR status by IHC of MMR proteins</title><author>Hada, Masao ; Hirotsu, Yosuke ; Amemiya, Kenji ; Nagakubo, Yuki ; Oyama, Toshio ; Iimuro, Yuji ; Hosoda, Kenji ; Kojima, Yuichiro ; Mochizuki, Hitoshi ; Nakagomi, Hiroshi ; Omata, Masao</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-oup_primary_10_1093_annonc_mdz338_0343</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2019</creationdate><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Hada, Masao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hirotsu, Yosuke</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Amemiya, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nagakubo, Yuki</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Oyama, Toshio</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Iimuro, Yuji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hosoda, Kenji</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kojima, Yuichiro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mochizuki, Hitoshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Nakagomi, Hiroshi</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Omata, Masao</creatorcontrib><jtitle>Annals of oncology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Hada, Masao</au><au>Hirotsu, Yosuke</au><au>Amemiya, Kenji</au><au>Nagakubo, Yuki</au><au>Oyama, Toshio</au><au>Iimuro, Yuji</au><au>Hosoda, Kenji</au><au>Kojima, Yuichiro</au><au>Mochizuki, Hitoshi</au><au>Nakagomi, Hiroshi</au><au>Omata, Masao</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>MO1-18-2Analysis of metastatic foci using in house Gastric 58 SMG panel of 351,050 nt and d/pMMR status by IHC of MMR proteins</atitle><jtitle>Annals of oncology</jtitle><date>2019-10-01</date><risdate>2019</risdate><volume>30</volume><issue>Supplement_6</issue><issn>0923-7534</issn><eissn>1569-8041</eissn><abstract>Abstract Background The clonality of primary tumors is well elucidated. In contrast, the relation to metastatic foci is not well understood. We examined genomic clonality of primary tumors and metastatic foci. Method We studied 144 foci (34 primaries, 104 lymph nodes, 6 organ mets) from 10 patients with gastrectomy (c-Stage 3). We also searched the expression of MMR proteins. Results In 10 primaries, mutations were found in all (range 3-12, mean 6). Of 104 lymph nodes, 64 lymph nodes carrying mutations identical to corresponding primaries in all. In addition, all the genomic profiles were replicated in corresponding lymph nodes and visceral mets. Among 3 cases with dMMR, all metastatic foci showed identical phenotypes. Conclusion Surprisingly, significantly mutated genes (SMGs) profiles in all lymph nodes and visceral mets were identical to the primaries. In addition, MMR/MSI status was also identical. These results indicated proper selection of chemo-, molecular-, and immune-oncology treatments could be effectively applied to the spreaded mets. Internoduler ""de novo"" heterogeneity was so scarce. Often claimed tumor heterogeneity could be due to inappropriate selection of drugs and due to their pressure.</abstract><pub>Oxford University Press</pub><doi>10.1093/annonc/mdz338.034</doi></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0923-7534
ispartof Annals of oncology, 2019-10, Vol.30 (Supplement_6)
issn 0923-7534
1569-8041
language eng
recordid cdi_oup_primary_10_1093_annonc_mdz338_034
source EZB-FREE-00999 freely available EZB journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
title MO1-18-2Analysis of metastatic foci using in house Gastric 58 SMG panel of 351,050 nt and d/pMMR status by IHC of MMR proteins
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-28T01%3A26%3A01IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-oup&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=MO1-18-2Analysis%20of%20metastatic%20foci%20using%20in%20house%20Gastric%2058%20SMG%20panel%20of%20351,050%E2%80%89nt%20and%20d/pMMR%20status%20by%20IHC%20of%20MMR%20proteins&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20oncology&rft.au=Hada,%20Masao&rft.date=2019-10-01&rft.volume=30&rft.issue=Supplement_6&rft.issn=0923-7534&rft.eissn=1569-8041&rft_id=info:doi/10.1093/annonc/mdz338.034&rft_dat=%3Coup%3E10.1093/annonc/mdz338.034%3C/oup%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_oup_id=10.1093/annonc/mdz338.034&rfr_iscdi=true