Flux and concentration footprint modelling: State of the art
Since early 1990s, the development of footprint models has been rapid with presently four different approaches being available: (i) analytical models, (ii) Lagrangian stochastic particle dispersion models, (iii) large-eddy simulations, and (iv) closure models. Parameterizations of some of these appr...
Gespeichert in:
| Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental pollution (1987) 2008-04, Vol.152 (3), p.653-666 |
|---|---|
| Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , , , |
| Format: | Artikel |
| Sprache: | eng |
| Schlagworte: | |
| Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
| Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
| container_end_page | 666 |
|---|---|
| container_issue | 3 |
| container_start_page | 653 |
| container_title | Environmental pollution (1987) |
| container_volume | 152 |
| creator | Vesala, T. Kljun, N. Rannik, Ü. Rinne, J. Sogachev, A. Markkanen, T. Sabelfeld, K. Foken, Th Leclerc, M.Y. |
| description | Since early 1990s, the development of footprint models has been rapid with presently four different approaches being available: (i) analytical models, (ii) Lagrangian stochastic particle dispersion models, (iii) large-eddy simulations, and (iv) closure models. Parameterizations of some of these approaches have been developed, simplifying the original algorithms for use in practical applications. The paper provides a review of the footprint modelling. It also discusses our present understanding of the theoretical background, the most successful modelling approaches, as well as the usage and benefits of the footprint concept as it relates to flux measurements. There has recently been a trend emerging in modelling the behavior of the footprint functions using a less idealized, more realistic description of inhomogeneities, vegetation structure and topography, ultimately for reactive compounds. The estimation of footprints for application in the real world, complete with a multitude of interesting gaseous and particulate substances, remains a complex problem.
The estimation of footprints for the real world with a multitude of interesting gaseous and particulate substances remains a complex problem. |
| doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.070 |
| format | Article |
| fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_929554</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0269749107003399</els_id><sourcerecordid>19579714</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-76c4bea7aa9be93cdca2a1f437ca908690fec85353d017c0127952b976cc16523</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1P3DAURS3UCgboP0CQbtglPH8kjitUqUKlICGxoKwtj_MCHmXswfYg-u_rUUbqritvzn2695iQMwoNBdpdrRr075swNQxANtA1IOGALGgved0JJj6RBbBO1VIoekSOU1oBgOCcH5IjKiUVvWALcn07bT8q44fKBm_R52iyC74aQ8ib6Hyu1mHAaXL-5Vv1lE3GKoxVfsXKxHxKPo9mSvhl_56Q59ufv2_u6ofHX_c3Px5qKwTNteysWKKRxqglKm4Ha5iho-DSGgV9p2BE27e85QNQaYEyqVq2VCVnadcyfkK-zndDyk4n6zLa19LXo81aMdW2ojCXM7OJ4W2LKeu1S7Y0Nx7DNmmqWqnK6gKKGbQxpBRx1GXn2sQ_moLemdUrPZvVO7MaOl3Mltj5_v52ucbhX2ivsgAXMzCaoM1LdEk_PzGgHKDv2_IJhfg-E1hcvTuMuylYrA8u7pYMwf2_w1_1VJQb</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>19579714</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Flux and concentration footprint modelling: State of the art</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Vesala, T. ; Kljun, N. ; Rannik, Ü. ; Rinne, J. ; Sogachev, A. ; Markkanen, T. ; Sabelfeld, K. ; Foken, Th ; Leclerc, M.Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Vesala, T. ; Kljun, N. ; Rannik, Ü. ; Rinne, J. ; Sogachev, A. ; Markkanen, T. ; Sabelfeld, K. ; Foken, Th ; Leclerc, M.Y. ; Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>Since early 1990s, the development of footprint models has been rapid with presently four different approaches being available: (i) analytical models, (ii) Lagrangian stochastic particle dispersion models, (iii) large-eddy simulations, and (iv) closure models. Parameterizations of some of these approaches have been developed, simplifying the original algorithms for use in practical applications. The paper provides a review of the footprint modelling. It also discusses our present understanding of the theoretical background, the most successful modelling approaches, as well as the usage and benefits of the footprint concept as it relates to flux measurements. There has recently been a trend emerging in modelling the behavior of the footprint functions using a less idealized, more realistic description of inhomogeneities, vegetation structure and topography, ultimately for reactive compounds. The estimation of footprints for application in the real world, complete with a multitude of interesting gaseous and particulate substances, remains a complex problem.
The estimation of footprints for the real world with a multitude of interesting gaseous and particulate substances remains a complex problem.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0269-7491</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-6424</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.070</identifier><identifier>PMID: 17714842</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>England: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Aerosols ; Air Movements ; air pollution ; Air Pollution - analysis ; atmospheric circulation ; Atmospheric pollutants ; Atmospheric turbulence ; Computer Simulation ; Environmental Monitoring - instrumentation ; Environmental Monitoring - methods ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; equations ; Footprint ; gas emissions ; gas exchange ; mathematical models ; model validation ; Models, Statistical ; Particulate Matter ; simulation models ; Source area ; Turbulent flux</subject><ispartof>Environmental pollution (1987), 2008-04, Vol.152 (3), p.653-666</ispartof><rights>2007 Elsevier Ltd</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-76c4bea7aa9be93cdca2a1f437ca908690fec85353d017c0127952b976cc16523</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-76c4bea7aa9be93cdca2a1f437ca908690fec85353d017c0127952b976cc16523</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.070$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17714842$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/929554$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Vesala, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kljun, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rannik, Ü.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinne, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sogachev, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markkanen, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabelfeld, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foken, Th</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leclerc, M.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Flux and concentration footprint modelling: State of the art</title><title>Environmental pollution (1987)</title><addtitle>Environ Pollut</addtitle><description>Since early 1990s, the development of footprint models has been rapid with presently four different approaches being available: (i) analytical models, (ii) Lagrangian stochastic particle dispersion models, (iii) large-eddy simulations, and (iv) closure models. Parameterizations of some of these approaches have been developed, simplifying the original algorithms for use in practical applications. The paper provides a review of the footprint modelling. It also discusses our present understanding of the theoretical background, the most successful modelling approaches, as well as the usage and benefits of the footprint concept as it relates to flux measurements. There has recently been a trend emerging in modelling the behavior of the footprint functions using a less idealized, more realistic description of inhomogeneities, vegetation structure and topography, ultimately for reactive compounds. The estimation of footprints for application in the real world, complete with a multitude of interesting gaseous and particulate substances, remains a complex problem.
The estimation of footprints for the real world with a multitude of interesting gaseous and particulate substances remains a complex problem.</description><subject>Aerosols</subject><subject>Air Movements</subject><subject>air pollution</subject><subject>Air Pollution - analysis</subject><subject>atmospheric circulation</subject><subject>Atmospheric pollutants</subject><subject>Atmospheric turbulence</subject><subject>Computer Simulation</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - instrumentation</subject><subject>Environmental Monitoring - methods</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>equations</subject><subject>Footprint</subject><subject>gas emissions</subject><subject>gas exchange</subject><subject>mathematical models</subject><subject>model validation</subject><subject>Models, Statistical</subject><subject>Particulate Matter</subject><subject>simulation models</subject><subject>Source area</subject><subject>Turbulent flux</subject><issn>0269-7491</issn><issn>1873-6424</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2008</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1P3DAURS3UCgboP0CQbtglPH8kjitUqUKlICGxoKwtj_MCHmXswfYg-u_rUUbqritvzn2695iQMwoNBdpdrRr075swNQxANtA1IOGALGgved0JJj6RBbBO1VIoekSOU1oBgOCcH5IjKiUVvWALcn07bT8q44fKBm_R52iyC74aQ8ib6Hyu1mHAaXL-5Vv1lE3GKoxVfsXKxHxKPo9mSvhl_56Q59ufv2_u6ofHX_c3Px5qKwTNteysWKKRxqglKm4Ha5iho-DSGgV9p2BE27e85QNQaYEyqVq2VCVnadcyfkK-zndDyk4n6zLa19LXo81aMdW2ojCXM7OJ4W2LKeu1S7Y0Nx7DNmmqWqnK6gKKGbQxpBRx1GXn2sQ_moLemdUrPZvVO7MaOl3Mltj5_v52ucbhX2ivsgAXMzCaoM1LdEk_PzGgHKDv2_IJhfg-E1hcvTuMuylYrA8u7pYMwf2_w1_1VJQb</recordid><startdate>20080401</startdate><enddate>20080401</enddate><creator>Vesala, T.</creator><creator>Kljun, N.</creator><creator>Rannik, Ü.</creator><creator>Rinne, J.</creator><creator>Sogachev, A.</creator><creator>Markkanen, T.</creator><creator>Sabelfeld, K.</creator><creator>Foken, Th</creator><creator>Leclerc, M.Y.</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20080401</creationdate><title>Flux and concentration footprint modelling: State of the art</title><author>Vesala, T. ; Kljun, N. ; Rannik, Ü. ; Rinne, J. ; Sogachev, A. ; Markkanen, T. ; Sabelfeld, K. ; Foken, Th ; Leclerc, M.Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c441t-76c4bea7aa9be93cdca2a1f437ca908690fec85353d017c0127952b976cc16523</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2008</creationdate><topic>Aerosols</topic><topic>Air Movements</topic><topic>air pollution</topic><topic>Air Pollution - analysis</topic><topic>atmospheric circulation</topic><topic>Atmospheric pollutants</topic><topic>Atmospheric turbulence</topic><topic>Computer Simulation</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - instrumentation</topic><topic>Environmental Monitoring - methods</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>equations</topic><topic>Footprint</topic><topic>gas emissions</topic><topic>gas exchange</topic><topic>mathematical models</topic><topic>model validation</topic><topic>Models, Statistical</topic><topic>Particulate Matter</topic><topic>simulation models</topic><topic>Source area</topic><topic>Turbulent flux</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Vesala, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kljun, N.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rannik, Ü.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rinne, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sogachev, A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Markkanen, T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sabelfeld, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Foken, Th</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Leclerc, M.Y.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Vesala, T.</au><au>Kljun, N.</au><au>Rannik, Ü.</au><au>Rinne, J.</au><au>Sogachev, A.</au><au>Markkanen, T.</au><au>Sabelfeld, K.</au><au>Foken, Th</au><au>Leclerc, M.Y.</au><aucorp>Univ. of Georgia, Athens, GA (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Flux and concentration footprint modelling: State of the art</atitle><jtitle>Environmental pollution (1987)</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Pollut</addtitle><date>2008-04-01</date><risdate>2008</risdate><volume>152</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>653</spage><epage>666</epage><pages>653-666</pages><issn>0269-7491</issn><eissn>1873-6424</eissn><abstract>Since early 1990s, the development of footprint models has been rapid with presently four different approaches being available: (i) analytical models, (ii) Lagrangian stochastic particle dispersion models, (iii) large-eddy simulations, and (iv) closure models. Parameterizations of some of these approaches have been developed, simplifying the original algorithms for use in practical applications. The paper provides a review of the footprint modelling. It also discusses our present understanding of the theoretical background, the most successful modelling approaches, as well as the usage and benefits of the footprint concept as it relates to flux measurements. There has recently been a trend emerging in modelling the behavior of the footprint functions using a less idealized, more realistic description of inhomogeneities, vegetation structure and topography, ultimately for reactive compounds. The estimation of footprints for application in the real world, complete with a multitude of interesting gaseous and particulate substances, remains a complex problem.
The estimation of footprints for the real world with a multitude of interesting gaseous and particulate substances remains a complex problem.</abstract><cop>England</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>17714842</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.070</doi><tpages>14</tpages></addata></record> |
| fulltext | fulltext |
| identifier | ISSN: 0269-7491 |
| ispartof | Environmental pollution (1987), 2008-04, Vol.152 (3), p.653-666 |
| issn | 0269-7491 1873-6424 |
| language | eng |
| recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_929554 |
| source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
| subjects | Aerosols Air Movements air pollution Air Pollution - analysis atmospheric circulation Atmospheric pollutants Atmospheric turbulence Computer Simulation Environmental Monitoring - instrumentation Environmental Monitoring - methods ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES equations Footprint gas emissions gas exchange mathematical models model validation Models, Statistical Particulate Matter simulation models Source area Turbulent flux |
| title | Flux and concentration footprint modelling: State of the art |
| url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-12T04%3A34%3A32IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Flux%20and%20concentration%20footprint%20modelling:%20State%20of%20the%20art&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20pollution%20(1987)&rft.au=Vesala,%20T.&rft.aucorp=Univ.%20of%20Georgia,%20Athens,%20GA%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2008-04-01&rft.volume=152&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=653&rft.epage=666&rft.pages=653-666&rft.issn=0269-7491&rft.eissn=1873-6424&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.envpol.2007.06.070&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E19579714%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=19579714&rft_id=info:pmid/17714842&rft_els_id=S0269749107003399&rfr_iscdi=true |