Accident consequences analysis of the HYLIFE-II inertial fusion energy power plant design
Previous studies of the safety and environmental aspects of the HYLIFE-II inertial fusion energy power plant design have used simplistic assumptions in order to estimate radioactivity releases under accident conditions. Conservatisms associated with these traditional analyses can mask the actual beh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment, 2001-05, Vol.464 (1), p.416-421 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 421 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 416 |
container_title | Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment |
container_volume | 464 |
creator | Reyes, S. Latkowski, J.F. Gomez del Rio, J. Sanz, J. |
description | Previous studies of the safety and environmental aspects of the HYLIFE-II inertial fusion energy power plant design have used simplistic assumptions in order to estimate radioactivity releases under accident conditions. Conservatisms associated with these traditional analyses can mask the actual behavior of the plant and have revealed the need for more accurate modeling and analysis of accident conditions and radioactivity mobilization mechanisms. In the present work, computer codes traditionally used for magnetic fusion safety analyses (CHEMCON, MELCOR) have been applied for simulating accident conditions in a simple model of the HYLIFE-II IFE design. Here we consider a severe loss of coolant accident (LOCA) in conjunction with simultaneous failures of the beam tubes (providing a pathway for radioactivity release from the vacuum vessel towards the confinement) and of the two barriers surrounding the chamber (inner shielding and confinement building itself). Even though confinement failure would be a very unlikely event it would be needed in order to produce significant off-site doses. CHEMCON code allows calculation of long-term temperature transients in fusion reactor first wall, blanket, and shield structures resulting from decay heating. MELCOR is used to simulate a wide range of physical phenomena including thermal-hydraulics, heat transfer, aerosol physics and fusion product transport and release. The results of these calculations show that the estimated off-site dose is less than 5
mSv (0.5
rem), which is well below the value of 10
mSv (1
rem) given by the DOE Fusion Safety Standards for protection of the public from exposure to radiation during off-normal conditions. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00078-X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_756839</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S016890020100078X</els_id><sourcerecordid>S016890020100078X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-553ac28bf11fa687e5045e047acd9a9973131750cd7227b357815596b664a11a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFLwzAUx4MoOKcfQYg3PVSTdmmSk4yxucLAgwrbKWTp6xap6Uw6pd_edBOvXt7jwf__g_dD6JqSe0po_vASh0gkIektoXeEEC6S5QkaUMHTRDKen6LBX-QcXYTwHkNEcjFAq7ExtgTXYtO4AJ97cAYC1k7XXbABNxVut4Dnq0UxmyZFga0D31pd42ofbOMwxHvT4V3zDR7vah1JJQS7cZforNJ1gKvfPURvs-nrZJ4snp-KyXiRmEyQNmEs0yYV64rSSueCAyMjBmTEtSmllpJnNKOcEVPyNOXrjHFBGZP5Os9HmlKdDdHNkduE1qpgbAtmG59xYFrFWS4yGTPsmDG-CcFDpXbefmjfKUpU71AdHKpekCJUHRyqZew9HnsQH_iy4Ht-b6i0vseXjf2H8AOxtngP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accident consequences analysis of the HYLIFE-II inertial fusion energy power plant design</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Reyes, S. ; Latkowski, J.F. ; Gomez del Rio, J. ; Sanz, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Reyes, S. ; Latkowski, J.F. ; Gomez del Rio, J. ; Sanz, J. ; Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (US)</creatorcontrib><description>Previous studies of the safety and environmental aspects of the HYLIFE-II inertial fusion energy power plant design have used simplistic assumptions in order to estimate radioactivity releases under accident conditions. Conservatisms associated with these traditional analyses can mask the actual behavior of the plant and have revealed the need for more accurate modeling and analysis of accident conditions and radioactivity mobilization mechanisms. In the present work, computer codes traditionally used for magnetic fusion safety analyses (CHEMCON, MELCOR) have been applied for simulating accident conditions in a simple model of the HYLIFE-II IFE design. Here we consider a severe loss of coolant accident (LOCA) in conjunction with simultaneous failures of the beam tubes (providing a pathway for radioactivity release from the vacuum vessel towards the confinement) and of the two barriers surrounding the chamber (inner shielding and confinement building itself). Even though confinement failure would be a very unlikely event it would be needed in order to produce significant off-site doses. CHEMCON code allows calculation of long-term temperature transients in fusion reactor first wall, blanket, and shield structures resulting from decay heating. MELCOR is used to simulate a wide range of physical phenomena including thermal-hydraulics, heat transfer, aerosol physics and fusion product transport and release. The results of these calculations show that the estimated off-site dose is less than 5
mSv (0.5
rem), which is well below the value of 10
mSv (1
rem) given by the DOE Fusion Safety Standards for protection of the public from exposure to radiation during off-normal conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-9002</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9576</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00078-X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY ; Accident consequences ; ACCIDENTS ; COMPUTER CODES ; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ; HYLIFE CONVERTER ; IFE safety analysis ; Off-site doses ; RADIATION DOSES ; SAFETY ANALYSIS</subject><ispartof>Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment, 2001-05, Vol.464 (1), p.416-421</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-553ac28bf11fa687e5045e047acd9a9973131750cd7227b357815596b664a11a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-553ac28bf11fa687e5045e047acd9a9973131750cd7227b357815596b664a11a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00078-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,309,314,777,781,786,882,3537,23911,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/756839$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reyes, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latkowski, J.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez del Rio, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanz, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (US)</creatorcontrib><title>Accident consequences analysis of the HYLIFE-II inertial fusion energy power plant design</title><title>Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment</title><description>Previous studies of the safety and environmental aspects of the HYLIFE-II inertial fusion energy power plant design have used simplistic assumptions in order to estimate radioactivity releases under accident conditions. Conservatisms associated with these traditional analyses can mask the actual behavior of the plant and have revealed the need for more accurate modeling and analysis of accident conditions and radioactivity mobilization mechanisms. In the present work, computer codes traditionally used for magnetic fusion safety analyses (CHEMCON, MELCOR) have been applied for simulating accident conditions in a simple model of the HYLIFE-II IFE design. Here we consider a severe loss of coolant accident (LOCA) in conjunction with simultaneous failures of the beam tubes (providing a pathway for radioactivity release from the vacuum vessel towards the confinement) and of the two barriers surrounding the chamber (inner shielding and confinement building itself). Even though confinement failure would be a very unlikely event it would be needed in order to produce significant off-site doses. CHEMCON code allows calculation of long-term temperature transients in fusion reactor first wall, blanket, and shield structures resulting from decay heating. MELCOR is used to simulate a wide range of physical phenomena including thermal-hydraulics, heat transfer, aerosol physics and fusion product transport and release. The results of these calculations show that the estimated off-site dose is less than 5
mSv (0.5
rem), which is well below the value of 10
mSv (1
rem) given by the DOE Fusion Safety Standards for protection of the public from exposure to radiation during off-normal conditions.</description><subject>70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY</subject><subject>Accident consequences</subject><subject>ACCIDENTS</subject><subject>COMPUTER CODES</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS</subject><subject>HYLIFE CONVERTER</subject><subject>IFE safety analysis</subject><subject>Off-site doses</subject><subject>RADIATION DOSES</subject><subject>SAFETY ANALYSIS</subject><issn>0168-9002</issn><issn>1872-9576</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFLwzAUx4MoOKcfQYg3PVSTdmmSk4yxucLAgwrbKWTp6xap6Uw6pd_edBOvXt7jwf__g_dD6JqSe0po_vASh0gkIektoXeEEC6S5QkaUMHTRDKen6LBX-QcXYTwHkNEcjFAq7ExtgTXYtO4AJ97cAYC1k7XXbABNxVut4Dnq0UxmyZFga0D31pd42ofbOMwxHvT4V3zDR7vah1JJQS7cZforNJ1gKvfPURvs-nrZJ4snp-KyXiRmEyQNmEs0yYV64rSSueCAyMjBmTEtSmllpJnNKOcEVPyNOXrjHFBGZP5Os9HmlKdDdHNkduE1qpgbAtmG59xYFrFWS4yGTPsmDG-CcFDpXbefmjfKUpU71AdHKpekCJUHRyqZew9HnsQH_iy4Ht-b6i0vseXjf2H8AOxtngP</recordid><startdate>20010521</startdate><enddate>20010521</enddate><creator>Reyes, S.</creator><creator>Latkowski, J.F.</creator><creator>Gomez del Rio, J.</creator><creator>Sanz, J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010521</creationdate><title>Accident consequences analysis of the HYLIFE-II inertial fusion energy power plant design</title><author>Reyes, S. ; Latkowski, J.F. ; Gomez del Rio, J. ; Sanz, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-553ac28bf11fa687e5045e047acd9a9973131750cd7227b357815596b664a11a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY</topic><topic>Accident consequences</topic><topic>ACCIDENTS</topic><topic>COMPUTER CODES</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS</topic><topic>HYLIFE CONVERTER</topic><topic>IFE safety analysis</topic><topic>Off-site doses</topic><topic>RADIATION DOSES</topic><topic>SAFETY ANALYSIS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reyes, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latkowski, J.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez del Rio, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanz, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (US)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reyes, S.</au><au>Latkowski, J.F.</au><au>Gomez del Rio, J.</au><au>Sanz, J.</au><aucorp>Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (US)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accident consequences analysis of the HYLIFE-II inertial fusion energy power plant design</atitle><jtitle>Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment</jtitle><date>2001-05-21</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>464</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>416</spage><epage>421</epage><pages>416-421</pages><issn>0168-9002</issn><eissn>1872-9576</eissn><abstract>Previous studies of the safety and environmental aspects of the HYLIFE-II inertial fusion energy power plant design have used simplistic assumptions in order to estimate radioactivity releases under accident conditions. Conservatisms associated with these traditional analyses can mask the actual behavior of the plant and have revealed the need for more accurate modeling and analysis of accident conditions and radioactivity mobilization mechanisms. In the present work, computer codes traditionally used for magnetic fusion safety analyses (CHEMCON, MELCOR) have been applied for simulating accident conditions in a simple model of the HYLIFE-II IFE design. Here we consider a severe loss of coolant accident (LOCA) in conjunction with simultaneous failures of the beam tubes (providing a pathway for radioactivity release from the vacuum vessel towards the confinement) and of the two barriers surrounding the chamber (inner shielding and confinement building itself). Even though confinement failure would be a very unlikely event it would be needed in order to produce significant off-site doses. CHEMCON code allows calculation of long-term temperature transients in fusion reactor first wall, blanket, and shield structures resulting from decay heating. MELCOR is used to simulate a wide range of physical phenomena including thermal-hydraulics, heat transfer, aerosol physics and fusion product transport and release. The results of these calculations show that the estimated off-site dose is less than 5
mSv (0.5
rem), which is well below the value of 10
mSv (1
rem) given by the DOE Fusion Safety Standards for protection of the public from exposure to radiation during off-normal conditions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00078-X</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0168-9002 |
ispartof | Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment, 2001-05, Vol.464 (1), p.416-421 |
issn | 0168-9002 1872-9576 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_756839 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | 70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY Accident consequences ACCIDENTS COMPUTER CODES ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS HYLIFE CONVERTER IFE safety analysis Off-site doses RADIATION DOSES SAFETY ANALYSIS |
title | Accident consequences analysis of the HYLIFE-II inertial fusion energy power plant design |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T02%3A11%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accident%20consequences%20analysis%20of%20the%20HYLIFE-II%20inertial%20fusion%20energy%20power%20plant%20design&rft.jtitle=Nuclear%20instruments%20&%20methods%20in%20physics%20research.%20Section%20A,%20Accelerators,%20spectrometers,%20detectors%20and%20associated%20equipment&rft.au=Reyes,%20S.&rft.aucorp=Lawrence%20Livermore%20National%20Lab.,%20CA%20(US)&rft.date=2001-05-21&rft.volume=464&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=416&rft.epage=421&rft.pages=416-421&rft.issn=0168-9002&rft.eissn=1872-9576&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00078-X&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_osti_%3ES016890020100078X%3C/elsevier_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S016890020100078X&rfr_iscdi=true |