Accident consequences analysis of the HYLIFE-II inertial fusion energy power plant design

Previous studies of the safety and environmental aspects of the HYLIFE-II inertial fusion energy power plant design have used simplistic assumptions in order to estimate radioactivity releases under accident conditions. Conservatisms associated with these traditional analyses can mask the actual beh...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment, 2001-05, Vol.464 (1), p.416-421
Hauptverfasser: Reyes, S., Latkowski, J.F., Gomez del Rio, J., Sanz, J.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 421
container_issue 1
container_start_page 416
container_title Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment
container_volume 464
creator Reyes, S.
Latkowski, J.F.
Gomez del Rio, J.
Sanz, J.
description Previous studies of the safety and environmental aspects of the HYLIFE-II inertial fusion energy power plant design have used simplistic assumptions in order to estimate radioactivity releases under accident conditions. Conservatisms associated with these traditional analyses can mask the actual behavior of the plant and have revealed the need for more accurate modeling and analysis of accident conditions and radioactivity mobilization mechanisms. In the present work, computer codes traditionally used for magnetic fusion safety analyses (CHEMCON, MELCOR) have been applied for simulating accident conditions in a simple model of the HYLIFE-II IFE design. Here we consider a severe loss of coolant accident (LOCA) in conjunction with simultaneous failures of the beam tubes (providing a pathway for radioactivity release from the vacuum vessel towards the confinement) and of the two barriers surrounding the chamber (inner shielding and confinement building itself). Even though confinement failure would be a very unlikely event it would be needed in order to produce significant off-site doses. CHEMCON code allows calculation of long-term temperature transients in fusion reactor first wall, blanket, and shield structures resulting from decay heating. MELCOR is used to simulate a wide range of physical phenomena including thermal-hydraulics, heat transfer, aerosol physics and fusion product transport and release. The results of these calculations show that the estimated off-site dose is less than 5 mSv (0.5 rem), which is well below the value of 10 mSv (1 rem) given by the DOE Fusion Safety Standards for protection of the public from exposure to radiation during off-normal conditions.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00078-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_756839</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S016890020100078X</els_id><sourcerecordid>S016890020100078X</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-553ac28bf11fa687e5045e047acd9a9973131750cd7227b357815596b664a11a3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFLwzAUx4MoOKcfQYg3PVSTdmmSk4yxucLAgwrbKWTp6xap6Uw6pd_edBOvXt7jwf__g_dD6JqSe0po_vASh0gkIektoXeEEC6S5QkaUMHTRDKen6LBX-QcXYTwHkNEcjFAq7ExtgTXYtO4AJ97cAYC1k7XXbABNxVut4Dnq0UxmyZFga0D31pd42ofbOMwxHvT4V3zDR7vah1JJQS7cZforNJ1gKvfPURvs-nrZJ4snp-KyXiRmEyQNmEs0yYV64rSSueCAyMjBmTEtSmllpJnNKOcEVPyNOXrjHFBGZP5Os9HmlKdDdHNkduE1qpgbAtmG59xYFrFWS4yGTPsmDG-CcFDpXbefmjfKUpU71AdHKpekCJUHRyqZew9HnsQH_iy4Ht-b6i0vseXjf2H8AOxtngP</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Accident consequences analysis of the HYLIFE-II inertial fusion energy power plant design</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Reyes, S. ; Latkowski, J.F. ; Gomez del Rio, J. ; Sanz, J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Reyes, S. ; Latkowski, J.F. ; Gomez del Rio, J. ; Sanz, J. ; Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (US)</creatorcontrib><description>Previous studies of the safety and environmental aspects of the HYLIFE-II inertial fusion energy power plant design have used simplistic assumptions in order to estimate radioactivity releases under accident conditions. Conservatisms associated with these traditional analyses can mask the actual behavior of the plant and have revealed the need for more accurate modeling and analysis of accident conditions and radioactivity mobilization mechanisms. In the present work, computer codes traditionally used for magnetic fusion safety analyses (CHEMCON, MELCOR) have been applied for simulating accident conditions in a simple model of the HYLIFE-II IFE design. Here we consider a severe loss of coolant accident (LOCA) in conjunction with simultaneous failures of the beam tubes (providing a pathway for radioactivity release from the vacuum vessel towards the confinement) and of the two barriers surrounding the chamber (inner shielding and confinement building itself). Even though confinement failure would be a very unlikely event it would be needed in order to produce significant off-site doses. CHEMCON code allows calculation of long-term temperature transients in fusion reactor first wall, blanket, and shield structures resulting from decay heating. MELCOR is used to simulate a wide range of physical phenomena including thermal-hydraulics, heat transfer, aerosol physics and fusion product transport and release. The results of these calculations show that the estimated off-site dose is less than 5 mSv (0.5 rem), which is well below the value of 10 mSv (1 rem) given by the DOE Fusion Safety Standards for protection of the public from exposure to radiation during off-normal conditions.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0168-9002</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1872-9576</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00078-X</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY ; Accident consequences ; ACCIDENTS ; COMPUTER CODES ; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ; HYLIFE CONVERTER ; IFE safety analysis ; Off-site doses ; RADIATION DOSES ; SAFETY ANALYSIS</subject><ispartof>Nuclear instruments &amp; methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment, 2001-05, Vol.464 (1), p.416-421</ispartof><rights>2001 Elsevier Science B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-553ac28bf11fa687e5045e047acd9a9973131750cd7227b357815596b664a11a3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-553ac28bf11fa687e5045e047acd9a9973131750cd7227b357815596b664a11a3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00078-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,309,314,777,781,786,882,3537,23911,27905,27906,45976</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/756839$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Reyes, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latkowski, J.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez del Rio, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanz, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (US)</creatorcontrib><title>Accident consequences analysis of the HYLIFE-II inertial fusion energy power plant design</title><title>Nuclear instruments &amp; methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment</title><description>Previous studies of the safety and environmental aspects of the HYLIFE-II inertial fusion energy power plant design have used simplistic assumptions in order to estimate radioactivity releases under accident conditions. Conservatisms associated with these traditional analyses can mask the actual behavior of the plant and have revealed the need for more accurate modeling and analysis of accident conditions and radioactivity mobilization mechanisms. In the present work, computer codes traditionally used for magnetic fusion safety analyses (CHEMCON, MELCOR) have been applied for simulating accident conditions in a simple model of the HYLIFE-II IFE design. Here we consider a severe loss of coolant accident (LOCA) in conjunction with simultaneous failures of the beam tubes (providing a pathway for radioactivity release from the vacuum vessel towards the confinement) and of the two barriers surrounding the chamber (inner shielding and confinement building itself). Even though confinement failure would be a very unlikely event it would be needed in order to produce significant off-site doses. CHEMCON code allows calculation of long-term temperature transients in fusion reactor first wall, blanket, and shield structures resulting from decay heating. MELCOR is used to simulate a wide range of physical phenomena including thermal-hydraulics, heat transfer, aerosol physics and fusion product transport and release. The results of these calculations show that the estimated off-site dose is less than 5 mSv (0.5 rem), which is well below the value of 10 mSv (1 rem) given by the DOE Fusion Safety Standards for protection of the public from exposure to radiation during off-normal conditions.</description><subject>70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY</subject><subject>Accident consequences</subject><subject>ACCIDENTS</subject><subject>COMPUTER CODES</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS</subject><subject>HYLIFE CONVERTER</subject><subject>IFE safety analysis</subject><subject>Off-site doses</subject><subject>RADIATION DOSES</subject><subject>SAFETY ANALYSIS</subject><issn>0168-9002</issn><issn>1872-9576</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2001</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNqFkEFLwzAUx4MoOKcfQYg3PVSTdmmSk4yxucLAgwrbKWTp6xap6Uw6pd_edBOvXt7jwf__g_dD6JqSe0po_vASh0gkIektoXeEEC6S5QkaUMHTRDKen6LBX-QcXYTwHkNEcjFAq7ExtgTXYtO4AJ97cAYC1k7XXbABNxVut4Dnq0UxmyZFga0D31pd42ofbOMwxHvT4V3zDR7vah1JJQS7cZforNJ1gKvfPURvs-nrZJ4snp-KyXiRmEyQNmEs0yYV64rSSueCAyMjBmTEtSmllpJnNKOcEVPyNOXrjHFBGZP5Os9HmlKdDdHNkduE1qpgbAtmG59xYFrFWS4yGTPsmDG-CcFDpXbefmjfKUpU71AdHKpekCJUHRyqZew9HnsQH_iy4Ht-b6i0vseXjf2H8AOxtngP</recordid><startdate>20010521</startdate><enddate>20010521</enddate><creator>Reyes, S.</creator><creator>Latkowski, J.F.</creator><creator>Gomez del Rio, J.</creator><creator>Sanz, J.</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20010521</creationdate><title>Accident consequences analysis of the HYLIFE-II inertial fusion energy power plant design</title><author>Reyes, S. ; Latkowski, J.F. ; Gomez del Rio, J. ; Sanz, J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c380t-553ac28bf11fa687e5045e047acd9a9973131750cd7227b357815596b664a11a3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2001</creationdate><topic>70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY</topic><topic>Accident consequences</topic><topic>ACCIDENTS</topic><topic>COMPUTER CODES</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS</topic><topic>HYLIFE CONVERTER</topic><topic>IFE safety analysis</topic><topic>Off-site doses</topic><topic>RADIATION DOSES</topic><topic>SAFETY ANALYSIS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Reyes, S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Latkowski, J.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gomez del Rio, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sanz, J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (US)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Nuclear instruments &amp; methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Reyes, S.</au><au>Latkowski, J.F.</au><au>Gomez del Rio, J.</au><au>Sanz, J.</au><aucorp>Lawrence Livermore National Lab., CA (US)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Accident consequences analysis of the HYLIFE-II inertial fusion energy power plant design</atitle><jtitle>Nuclear instruments &amp; methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment</jtitle><date>2001-05-21</date><risdate>2001</risdate><volume>464</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>416</spage><epage>421</epage><pages>416-421</pages><issn>0168-9002</issn><eissn>1872-9576</eissn><abstract>Previous studies of the safety and environmental aspects of the HYLIFE-II inertial fusion energy power plant design have used simplistic assumptions in order to estimate radioactivity releases under accident conditions. Conservatisms associated with these traditional analyses can mask the actual behavior of the plant and have revealed the need for more accurate modeling and analysis of accident conditions and radioactivity mobilization mechanisms. In the present work, computer codes traditionally used for magnetic fusion safety analyses (CHEMCON, MELCOR) have been applied for simulating accident conditions in a simple model of the HYLIFE-II IFE design. Here we consider a severe loss of coolant accident (LOCA) in conjunction with simultaneous failures of the beam tubes (providing a pathway for radioactivity release from the vacuum vessel towards the confinement) and of the two barriers surrounding the chamber (inner shielding and confinement building itself). Even though confinement failure would be a very unlikely event it would be needed in order to produce significant off-site doses. CHEMCON code allows calculation of long-term temperature transients in fusion reactor first wall, blanket, and shield structures resulting from decay heating. MELCOR is used to simulate a wide range of physical phenomena including thermal-hydraulics, heat transfer, aerosol physics and fusion product transport and release. The results of these calculations show that the estimated off-site dose is less than 5 mSv (0.5 rem), which is well below the value of 10 mSv (1 rem) given by the DOE Fusion Safety Standards for protection of the public from exposure to radiation during off-normal conditions.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00078-X</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0168-9002
ispartof Nuclear instruments & methods in physics research. Section A, Accelerators, spectrometers, detectors and associated equipment, 2001-05, Vol.464 (1), p.416-421
issn 0168-9002
1872-9576
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_756839
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects 70 PLASMA PHYSICS AND FUSION TECHNOLOGY
Accident consequences
ACCIDENTS
COMPUTER CODES
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
HYLIFE CONVERTER
IFE safety analysis
Off-site doses
RADIATION DOSES
SAFETY ANALYSIS
title Accident consequences analysis of the HYLIFE-II inertial fusion energy power plant design
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-18T02%3A11%3A29IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Accident%20consequences%20analysis%20of%20the%20HYLIFE-II%20inertial%20fusion%20energy%20power%20plant%20design&rft.jtitle=Nuclear%20instruments%20&%20methods%20in%20physics%20research.%20Section%20A,%20Accelerators,%20spectrometers,%20detectors%20and%20associated%20equipment&rft.au=Reyes,%20S.&rft.aucorp=Lawrence%20Livermore%20National%20Lab.,%20CA%20(US)&rft.date=2001-05-21&rft.volume=464&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=416&rft.epage=421&rft.pages=416-421&rft.issn=0168-9002&rft.eissn=1872-9576&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/S0168-9002(01)00078-X&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_osti_%3ES016890020100078X%3C/elsevier_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S016890020100078X&rfr_iscdi=true