Implications of OSHA's reliance on TLVs in developing the air contaminants standard

This paper evaluates the decision by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to base its Air Contaminants Standard on the threshold limit values (TLVs) of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Contrary to the claim made by OSHA in promulgating the standard,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:American journal of industrial medicine 1991, Vol.19 (1), p.3-13
Hauptverfasser: Robinson, James C., Paxman, Dalton G., Rappaport, Stephen M.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 13
container_issue 1
container_start_page 3
container_title American journal of industrial medicine
container_volume 19
creator Robinson, James C.
Paxman, Dalton G.
Rappaport, Stephen M.
description This paper evaluates the decision by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to base its Air Contaminants Standard on the threshold limit values (TLVs) of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Contrary to the claim made by OSHA in promulgating the standard, the TLV list was not the sole available basis for a generic standard covering toxic air contaminants. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) presented data indicating that the TLVs were insufficiently protective for 98 substances. NIOSH Recommended Exposure Limits (RELs) were available for 59 of these substances. The ratio of PEL to REL ranged up to 1,000, with a median of 2.5 and a mean of 71.4. OSHA excluded 42 substances from the standard altogether despite the availability of NIOSH RELs, solely because no TLV had been established.
doi_str_mv 10.1002/ajim.4700190103
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_5897726</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>16331328</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5113-46a7b3136810aed8948d455f8fd7f97828d358bb1d8b01825795ce8874eb81eb3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFkEFv1DAQRi0EKtvCmROShQSc0tqxHTvqaVWgXbpQUJfSm-U4E-qSOFvbC_Tf4yorCidOc5j3zTx9CD2jZJ8SUh6Yazfsc0kIrQkl7AGaUVLLgpSSP0SzPGjBhKoeo90YrzNFecV30A6tVc2ZmKHzxbDunTXJjT7iscNn5yfz1xEH6J3xFvDo8Wp5EbHzuIUf0I9r57_hdAXYuIDt6JMZnDc-RRyT8a0J7RP0qDN9hKfbuYe-vHu7OjoplmfHi6P5srCCUlbwysiGUVYpSgy0WUi1XIhOda3saqlK1Wb1pqGtaghVpZC1sKCU5NAoCg3bQy-mu2NMTkfrEtirbOTBJi1ULWVZZejVBK3DeLOBmPTgooW-Nx7GTdS0YtmhVBk8mEAbxhgDdHod3GDCraZE33Wt77rW913nxPPt6U0zQHvPT-Xm_cvt3kRr-i7kQl38C-NCMUUydzhxP10Pt_97q-fvFx_-sSimtIsJfv1Jm_BdV5JJob9-PNafP60uTk_fXOpL9hs8oKZF</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>16331328</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Implications of OSHA's reliance on TLVs in developing the air contaminants standard</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><creator>Robinson, James C. ; Paxman, Dalton G. ; Rappaport, Stephen M.</creator><creatorcontrib>Robinson, James C. ; Paxman, Dalton G. ; Rappaport, Stephen M.</creatorcontrib><description>This paper evaluates the decision by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to base its Air Contaminants Standard on the threshold limit values (TLVs) of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Contrary to the claim made by OSHA in promulgating the standard, the TLV list was not the sole available basis for a generic standard covering toxic air contaminants. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) presented data indicating that the TLVs were insufficiently protective for 98 substances. NIOSH Recommended Exposure Limits (RELs) were available for 59 of these substances. The ratio of PEL to REL ranged up to 1,000, with a median of 2.5 and a mean of 71.4. OSHA excluded 42 substances from the standard altogether despite the availability of NIOSH RELs, solely because no TLV had been established.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0271-3586</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1097-0274</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1002/ajim.4700190103</identifier><identifier>PMID: 1989435</identifier><identifier>CODEN: AJIMD8</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</publisher><subject>290300 - Energy Planning &amp; Policy- Environment, Health, &amp; Safety ; 540120 - Environment, Atmospheric- Chemicals Monitoring &amp; Transport- (1990-) ; air contaminants ; Air Pollutants, Occupational ; AIR POLLUTION ; AIR QUALITY ; Biological and medical sciences ; Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases ; DECISION MAKING ; ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY ; ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; Evaluation Studies as Topic ; General aspects ; Humans ; Maximum Allowable Concentration ; MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE LEVEL ; Medical sciences ; National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (U.S.) - organization &amp; administration ; National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (U.S.) - standards ; NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS ; NIOSH ; Occupational Exposure - standards ; occupational health ; OSHA ; permissible exposure limit ; POLLUTION ; SAFETY STANDARDS ; threshold limit value ; Toxicology ; United States ; United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration - organization &amp; administration ; United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration - standards ; US DOL ; US ORGANIZATIONS ; US OSHA</subject><ispartof>American journal of industrial medicine, 1991, Vol.19 (1), p.3-13</ispartof><rights>Copyright © 1991 Wiley Periodicals, Inc., A Wiley Company</rights><rights>1991 INIST-CNRS</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5113-46a7b3136810aed8948d455f8fd7f97828d358bb1d8b01825795ce8874eb81eb3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5113-46a7b3136810aed8948d455f8fd7f97828d358bb1d8b01825795ce8874eb81eb3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002%2Fajim.4700190103$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1002%2Fajim.4700190103$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,4024,27923,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=19458380$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1989435$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/5897726$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Robinson, James C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paxman, Dalton G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rappaport, Stephen M.</creatorcontrib><title>Implications of OSHA's reliance on TLVs in developing the air contaminants standard</title><title>American journal of industrial medicine</title><addtitle>Am. J. Ind. Med</addtitle><description>This paper evaluates the decision by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to base its Air Contaminants Standard on the threshold limit values (TLVs) of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Contrary to the claim made by OSHA in promulgating the standard, the TLV list was not the sole available basis for a generic standard covering toxic air contaminants. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) presented data indicating that the TLVs were insufficiently protective for 98 substances. NIOSH Recommended Exposure Limits (RELs) were available for 59 of these substances. The ratio of PEL to REL ranged up to 1,000, with a median of 2.5 and a mean of 71.4. OSHA excluded 42 substances from the standard altogether despite the availability of NIOSH RELs, solely because no TLV had been established.</description><subject>290300 - Energy Planning &amp; Policy- Environment, Health, &amp; Safety</subject><subject>540120 - Environment, Atmospheric- Chemicals Monitoring &amp; Transport- (1990-)</subject><subject>air contaminants</subject><subject>Air Pollutants, Occupational</subject><subject>AIR POLLUTION</subject><subject>AIR QUALITY</subject><subject>Biological and medical sciences</subject><subject>Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases</subject><subject>DECISION MAKING</subject><subject>ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>Evaluation Studies as Topic</subject><subject>General aspects</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Maximum Allowable Concentration</subject><subject>MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE LEVEL</subject><subject>Medical sciences</subject><subject>National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (U.S.) - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (U.S.) - standards</subject><subject>NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS</subject><subject>NIOSH</subject><subject>Occupational Exposure - standards</subject><subject>occupational health</subject><subject>OSHA</subject><subject>permissible exposure limit</subject><subject>POLLUTION</subject><subject>SAFETY STANDARDS</subject><subject>threshold limit value</subject><subject>Toxicology</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration - organization &amp; administration</subject><subject>United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration - standards</subject><subject>US DOL</subject><subject>US ORGANIZATIONS</subject><subject>US OSHA</subject><issn>0271-3586</issn><issn>1097-0274</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFkEFv1DAQRi0EKtvCmROShQSc0tqxHTvqaVWgXbpQUJfSm-U4E-qSOFvbC_Tf4yorCidOc5j3zTx9CD2jZJ8SUh6Yazfsc0kIrQkl7AGaUVLLgpSSP0SzPGjBhKoeo90YrzNFecV30A6tVc2ZmKHzxbDunTXJjT7iscNn5yfz1xEH6J3xFvDo8Wp5EbHzuIUf0I9r57_hdAXYuIDt6JMZnDc-RRyT8a0J7RP0qDN9hKfbuYe-vHu7OjoplmfHi6P5srCCUlbwysiGUVYpSgy0WUi1XIhOda3saqlK1Wb1pqGtaghVpZC1sKCU5NAoCg3bQy-mu2NMTkfrEtirbOTBJi1ULWVZZejVBK3DeLOBmPTgooW-Nx7GTdS0YtmhVBk8mEAbxhgDdHod3GDCraZE33Wt77rW913nxPPt6U0zQHvPT-Xm_cvt3kRr-i7kQl38C-NCMUUydzhxP10Pt_97q-fvFx_-sSimtIsJfv1Jm_BdV5JJob9-PNafP60uTk_fXOpL9hs8oKZF</recordid><startdate>1991</startdate><enddate>1991</enddate><creator>Robinson, James C.</creator><creator>Paxman, Dalton G.</creator><creator>Rappaport, Stephen M.</creator><general>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</general><general>Wiley-Liss</general><scope>BSCLL</scope><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7TV</scope><scope>7U7</scope><scope>C1K</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>1991</creationdate><title>Implications of OSHA's reliance on TLVs in developing the air contaminants standard</title><author>Robinson, James C. ; Paxman, Dalton G. ; Rappaport, Stephen M.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5113-46a7b3136810aed8948d455f8fd7f97828d358bb1d8b01825795ce8874eb81eb3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>290300 - Energy Planning &amp; Policy- Environment, Health, &amp; Safety</topic><topic>540120 - Environment, Atmospheric- Chemicals Monitoring &amp; Transport- (1990-)</topic><topic>air contaminants</topic><topic>Air Pollutants, Occupational</topic><topic>AIR POLLUTION</topic><topic>AIR QUALITY</topic><topic>Biological and medical sciences</topic><topic>Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases</topic><topic>DECISION MAKING</topic><topic>ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>Evaluation Studies as Topic</topic><topic>General aspects</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Maximum Allowable Concentration</topic><topic>MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE LEVEL</topic><topic>Medical sciences</topic><topic>National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (U.S.) - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (U.S.) - standards</topic><topic>NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS</topic><topic>NIOSH</topic><topic>Occupational Exposure - standards</topic><topic>occupational health</topic><topic>OSHA</topic><topic>permissible exposure limit</topic><topic>POLLUTION</topic><topic>SAFETY STANDARDS</topic><topic>threshold limit value</topic><topic>Toxicology</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration - organization &amp; administration</topic><topic>United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration - standards</topic><topic>US DOL</topic><topic>US ORGANIZATIONS</topic><topic>US OSHA</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Robinson, James C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Paxman, Dalton G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rappaport, Stephen M.</creatorcontrib><collection>Istex</collection><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Pollution Abstracts</collection><collection>Toxicology Abstracts</collection><collection>Environmental Sciences and Pollution Management</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>American journal of industrial medicine</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Robinson, James C.</au><au>Paxman, Dalton G.</au><au>Rappaport, Stephen M.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Implications of OSHA's reliance on TLVs in developing the air contaminants standard</atitle><jtitle>American journal of industrial medicine</jtitle><addtitle>Am. J. Ind. Med</addtitle><date>1991</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>19</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>3</spage><epage>13</epage><pages>3-13</pages><issn>0271-3586</issn><eissn>1097-0274</eissn><coden>AJIMD8</coden><abstract>This paper evaluates the decision by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) to base its Air Contaminants Standard on the threshold limit values (TLVs) of the American Conference of Governmental Industrial Hygienists. Contrary to the claim made by OSHA in promulgating the standard, the TLV list was not the sole available basis for a generic standard covering toxic air contaminants. The National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) presented data indicating that the TLVs were insufficiently protective for 98 substances. NIOSH Recommended Exposure Limits (RELs) were available for 59 of these substances. The ratio of PEL to REL ranged up to 1,000, with a median of 2.5 and a mean of 71.4. OSHA excluded 42 substances from the standard altogether despite the availability of NIOSH RELs, solely because no TLV had been established.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Wiley Subscription Services, Inc., A Wiley Company</pub><pmid>1989435</pmid><doi>10.1002/ajim.4700190103</doi><tpages>11</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0271-3586
ispartof American journal of industrial medicine, 1991, Vol.19 (1), p.3-13
issn 0271-3586
1097-0274
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_5897726
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library
subjects 290300 - Energy Planning & Policy- Environment, Health, & Safety
540120 - Environment, Atmospheric- Chemicals Monitoring & Transport- (1990-)
air contaminants
Air Pollutants, Occupational
AIR POLLUTION
AIR QUALITY
Biological and medical sciences
Chemical and industrial products toxicology. Toxic occupational diseases
DECISION MAKING
ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY
ENVIRONMENTAL QUALITY
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
Evaluation Studies as Topic
General aspects
Humans
Maximum Allowable Concentration
MAXIMUM PERMISSIBLE LEVEL
Medical sciences
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (U.S.) - organization & administration
National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (U.S.) - standards
NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
NIOSH
Occupational Exposure - standards
occupational health
OSHA
permissible exposure limit
POLLUTION
SAFETY STANDARDS
threshold limit value
Toxicology
United States
United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration - organization & administration
United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration - standards
US DOL
US ORGANIZATIONS
US OSHA
title Implications of OSHA's reliance on TLVs in developing the air contaminants standard
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-22T02%3A48%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Implications%20of%20OSHA's%20reliance%20on%20TLVs%20in%20developing%20the%20air%20contaminants%20standard&rft.jtitle=American%20journal%20of%20industrial%20medicine&rft.au=Robinson,%20James%20C.&rft.date=1991&rft.volume=19&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=3&rft.epage=13&rft.pages=3-13&rft.issn=0271-3586&rft.eissn=1097-0274&rft.coden=AJIMD8&rft_id=info:doi/10.1002/ajim.4700190103&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E16331328%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=16331328&rft_id=info:pmid/1989435&rfr_iscdi=true