A survey and analysis of states' methodologies for deriving drinking water guidelines for chemical contaminants
Data from a national survey questionnaire regarding the development of guidelines for chemical contaminants in drinking water were collected from all 50 states. Twenty-three states develop at least some of their own guidelines; the other 27 states rely on guidelines previously developed by the U.S....
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology 1991-02, Vol.13 (1), p.18-35 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 35 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 18 |
container_title | Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology |
container_volume | 13 |
creator | Paull, Jeffrey M. Joellenbeck, Lois M. Cochran, Roger C. Sidhu, Kirpal S. |
description | Data from a national survey questionnaire regarding the development of guidelines for chemical contaminants in drinking water were collected from all 50 states. Twenty-three states develop at least some of their own guidelines; the other 27 states rely on guidelines previously developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) or by other states. States which derive guidelines generally employ toxicological criteria and risk assessment methodologies developed by the USEPA. Fourteen of the twenty-three states that develop their own guidelines depend on cancer potency factors derived by the USEPA to establish risk-based concentrations for carcinogens. Most of the states develop guidelines based on preventing possible excess cancer risk greater than one in one million. Seventeen of these twenty-three states rely on oral reference doses (RfDs) to derive guidelines for noncarcinogens. Examination and clarification of the states' approaches to guideline derivation reveal that although similar risk assessment techniques are generally employed, differences in assumptions, chemical classifications, and uncertainty factors may lead to variation in resultant guidance levels. Improved communication and coordination between states and the federal government may help reduce the variations and inconsistencies among the states in establishing drinking water guidelines for chemical contaminants. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/0273-2300(91)90039-X |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_5642077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>027323009190039X</els_id><sourcerecordid>13731190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-28bdb3689c68d5e7f4f1cb42c3bfa1c48e2862f4a50e63f616ce0130e16a83023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMo67j6B0Sh8eDHobWS9KQ7F2FZ_IIFD7qwt5BOV2ai3clukh6Zf2_aHvZooEjgfapS9RYhLyi8p0DFB2AtrxkHeCvpOwnAZX3zgGwoSFEDk9uHZHOPPCZPUvoFAKzr2jNyxoA10PANCRdVmuMBj5X2Qwk9HpNLVbBVyjpjelNNmPdhCGPYOUyVDbEaMLqD87tqiM7_Xh5_Chqr3ewGHJ0_YWaPkzN6rEzwWU_Oa5_TU_LI6jHhs9N9Tq4_f_p5-bW--v7l2-XFVW0a3uSadf3Qc9FJI7phi61tLDV9wwzvraam6ZB1gtlGbwEFt4IKg0A5IBW648D4OXm11g0pO5WMy2j2pRGPJqutaBi0bYFer9BtDHczpqwmlwyOo_YY5qQobzmlEgrYrKCJIaWIVt1GN-l4VBTUsgy1OK0Wp5Wk6t8y1E1Je3mqP_cTDvdJJ_eL_nzVrQ5K76JL6vqHpFKUU8SPq4jFpoPDuEyB3uDg4jLEENz_f_8L7n2iIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13731190</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A survey and analysis of states' methodologies for deriving drinking water guidelines for chemical contaminants</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Paull, Jeffrey M. ; Joellenbeck, Lois M. ; Cochran, Roger C. ; Sidhu, Kirpal S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Paull, Jeffrey M. ; Joellenbeck, Lois M. ; Cochran, Roger C. ; Sidhu, Kirpal S.</creatorcontrib><description>Data from a national survey questionnaire regarding the development of guidelines for chemical contaminants in drinking water were collected from all 50 states. Twenty-three states develop at least some of their own guidelines; the other 27 states rely on guidelines previously developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) or by other states. States which derive guidelines generally employ toxicological criteria and risk assessment methodologies developed by the USEPA. Fourteen of the twenty-three states that develop their own guidelines depend on cancer potency factors derived by the USEPA to establish risk-based concentrations for carcinogens. Most of the states develop guidelines based on preventing possible excess cancer risk greater than one in one million. Seventeen of these twenty-three states rely on oral reference doses (RfDs) to derive guidelines for noncarcinogens. Examination and clarification of the states' approaches to guideline derivation reveal that although similar risk assessment techniques are generally employed, differences in assumptions, chemical classifications, and uncertainty factors may lead to variation in resultant guidance levels. Improved communication and coordination between states and the federal government may help reduce the variations and inconsistencies among the states in establishing drinking water guidelines for chemical contaminants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-2300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0295</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0273-2300(91)90039-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2024043</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>290300 - Energy Planning & Policy- Environment, Health, & Safety ; 540320 - Environment, Aquatic- Chemicals Monitoring & Transport- (1990-) ; ADMINISTRACION ; ADMINISTRATION ; ADMINISTRATION CENTRALE ; AGUA POTABLE ; AGUAS SUBTERRANEAS ; CARCINOGENS ; Carcinogens - analysis ; CONTAMINANTES ; CONTAMINATION ; Databases, Bibliographic ; DRINKING WATER ; EAU POTABLE ; EAU SOUTERRAINE ; ENCUESTAS ; ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY ; ENQUETE ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA ; ETATS UNIS ; GOBIERNO CENTRAL ; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS ; NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS ; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS ; POLLUANT ; POLLUTION ; POLLUTION DE L'EAU ; POLLUTION REGULATIONS ; POLUCION DEL AGUA ; PRODUCTOS QUIMICOS ; PRODUIT CHIMIQUE ; RECOMMENDATIONS ; REGULATIONS ; RISK ASSESSMENT ; Risk Management ; STATE GOVERNMENT ; SURVEYS ; United States ; United States Environmental Protection Agency ; US EPA ; US ORGANIZATIONS ; WATER ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity ; WATER POLLUTION ; WATER SUPPLY ; Water Supply - analysis ; Water Supply - standards</subject><ispartof>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 1991-02, Vol.13 (1), p.18-35</ispartof><rights>1991</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-28bdb3689c68d5e7f4f1cb42c3bfa1c48e2862f4a50e63f616ce0130e16a83023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-28bdb3689c68d5e7f4f1cb42c3bfa1c48e2862f4a50e63f616ce0130e16a83023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0273-2300(91)90039-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2024043$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/5642077$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paull, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joellenbeck, Lois M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, Roger C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidhu, Kirpal S.</creatorcontrib><title>A survey and analysis of states' methodologies for deriving drinking water guidelines for chemical contaminants</title><title>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology</title><addtitle>Regul Toxicol Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Data from a national survey questionnaire regarding the development of guidelines for chemical contaminants in drinking water were collected from all 50 states. Twenty-three states develop at least some of their own guidelines; the other 27 states rely on guidelines previously developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) or by other states. States which derive guidelines generally employ toxicological criteria and risk assessment methodologies developed by the USEPA. Fourteen of the twenty-three states that develop their own guidelines depend on cancer potency factors derived by the USEPA to establish risk-based concentrations for carcinogens. Most of the states develop guidelines based on preventing possible excess cancer risk greater than one in one million. Seventeen of these twenty-three states rely on oral reference doses (RfDs) to derive guidelines for noncarcinogens. Examination and clarification of the states' approaches to guideline derivation reveal that although similar risk assessment techniques are generally employed, differences in assumptions, chemical classifications, and uncertainty factors may lead to variation in resultant guidance levels. Improved communication and coordination between states and the federal government may help reduce the variations and inconsistencies among the states in establishing drinking water guidelines for chemical contaminants.</description><subject>290300 - Energy Planning & Policy- Environment, Health, & Safety</subject><subject>540320 - Environment, Aquatic- Chemicals Monitoring & Transport- (1990-)</subject><subject>ADMINISTRACION</subject><subject>ADMINISTRATION</subject><subject>ADMINISTRATION CENTRALE</subject><subject>AGUA POTABLE</subject><subject>AGUAS SUBTERRANEAS</subject><subject>CARCINOGENS</subject><subject>Carcinogens - analysis</subject><subject>CONTAMINANTES</subject><subject>CONTAMINATION</subject><subject>Databases, Bibliographic</subject><subject>DRINKING WATER</subject><subject>EAU POTABLE</subject><subject>EAU SOUTERRAINE</subject><subject>ENCUESTAS</subject><subject>ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY</subject><subject>ENQUETE</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA</subject><subject>ETATS UNIS</subject><subject>GOBIERNO CENTRAL</subject><subject>HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS</subject><subject>NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS</subject><subject>OXYGEN COMPOUNDS</subject><subject>POLLUANT</subject><subject>POLLUTION</subject><subject>POLLUTION DE L'EAU</subject><subject>POLLUTION REGULATIONS</subject><subject>POLUCION DEL AGUA</subject><subject>PRODUCTOS QUIMICOS</subject><subject>PRODUIT CHIMIQUE</subject><subject>RECOMMENDATIONS</subject><subject>REGULATIONS</subject><subject>RISK ASSESSMENT</subject><subject>Risk Management</subject><subject>STATE GOVERNMENT</subject><subject>SURVEYS</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Environmental Protection Agency</subject><subject>US EPA</subject><subject>US ORGANIZATIONS</subject><subject>WATER</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</subject><subject>WATER POLLUTION</subject><subject>WATER SUPPLY</subject><subject>Water Supply - analysis</subject><subject>Water Supply - standards</subject><issn>0273-2300</issn><issn>1096-0295</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMo67j6B0Sh8eDHobWS9KQ7F2FZ_IIFD7qwt5BOV2ai3clukh6Zf2_aHvZooEjgfapS9RYhLyi8p0DFB2AtrxkHeCvpOwnAZX3zgGwoSFEDk9uHZHOPPCZPUvoFAKzr2jNyxoA10PANCRdVmuMBj5X2Qwk9HpNLVbBVyjpjelNNmPdhCGPYOUyVDbEaMLqD87tqiM7_Xh5_Chqr3ewGHJ0_YWaPkzN6rEzwWU_Oa5_TU_LI6jHhs9N9Tq4_f_p5-bW--v7l2-XFVW0a3uSadf3Qc9FJI7phi61tLDV9wwzvraam6ZB1gtlGbwEFt4IKg0A5IBW648D4OXm11g0pO5WMy2j2pRGPJqutaBi0bYFer9BtDHczpqwmlwyOo_YY5qQobzmlEgrYrKCJIaWIVt1GN-l4VBTUsgy1OK0Wp5Wk6t8y1E1Je3mqP_cTDvdJJ_eL_nzVrQ5K76JL6vqHpFKUU8SPq4jFpoPDuEyB3uDg4jLEENz_f_8L7n2iIQ</recordid><startdate>19910201</startdate><enddate>19910201</enddate><creator>Paull, Jeffrey M.</creator><creator>Joellenbeck, Lois M.</creator><creator>Cochran, Roger C.</creator><creator>Sidhu, Kirpal S.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910201</creationdate><title>A survey and analysis of states' methodologies for deriving drinking water guidelines for chemical contaminants</title><author>Paull, Jeffrey M. ; Joellenbeck, Lois M. ; Cochran, Roger C. ; Sidhu, Kirpal S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-28bdb3689c68d5e7f4f1cb42c3bfa1c48e2862f4a50e63f616ce0130e16a83023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>290300 - Energy Planning & Policy- Environment, Health, & Safety</topic><topic>540320 - Environment, Aquatic- Chemicals Monitoring & Transport- (1990-)</topic><topic>ADMINISTRACION</topic><topic>ADMINISTRATION</topic><topic>ADMINISTRATION CENTRALE</topic><topic>AGUA POTABLE</topic><topic>AGUAS SUBTERRANEAS</topic><topic>CARCINOGENS</topic><topic>Carcinogens - analysis</topic><topic>CONTAMINANTES</topic><topic>CONTAMINATION</topic><topic>Databases, Bibliographic</topic><topic>DRINKING WATER</topic><topic>EAU POTABLE</topic><topic>EAU SOUTERRAINE</topic><topic>ENCUESTAS</topic><topic>ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY</topic><topic>ENQUETE</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA</topic><topic>ETATS UNIS</topic><topic>GOBIERNO CENTRAL</topic><topic>HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS</topic><topic>NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS</topic><topic>OXYGEN COMPOUNDS</topic><topic>POLLUANT</topic><topic>POLLUTION</topic><topic>POLLUTION DE L'EAU</topic><topic>POLLUTION REGULATIONS</topic><topic>POLUCION DEL AGUA</topic><topic>PRODUCTOS QUIMICOS</topic><topic>PRODUIT CHIMIQUE</topic><topic>RECOMMENDATIONS</topic><topic>REGULATIONS</topic><topic>RISK ASSESSMENT</topic><topic>Risk Management</topic><topic>STATE GOVERNMENT</topic><topic>SURVEYS</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Environmental Protection Agency</topic><topic>US EPA</topic><topic>US ORGANIZATIONS</topic><topic>WATER</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</topic><topic>WATER POLLUTION</topic><topic>WATER SUPPLY</topic><topic>Water Supply - analysis</topic><topic>Water Supply - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paull, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joellenbeck, Lois M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, Roger C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidhu, Kirpal S.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paull, Jeffrey M.</au><au>Joellenbeck, Lois M.</au><au>Cochran, Roger C.</au><au>Sidhu, Kirpal S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A survey and analysis of states' methodologies for deriving drinking water guidelines for chemical contaminants</atitle><jtitle>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Regul Toxicol Pharmacol</addtitle><date>1991-02-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>18-35</pages><issn>0273-2300</issn><eissn>1096-0295</eissn><abstract>Data from a national survey questionnaire regarding the development of guidelines for chemical contaminants in drinking water were collected from all 50 states. Twenty-three states develop at least some of their own guidelines; the other 27 states rely on guidelines previously developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) or by other states. States which derive guidelines generally employ toxicological criteria and risk assessment methodologies developed by the USEPA. Fourteen of the twenty-three states that develop their own guidelines depend on cancer potency factors derived by the USEPA to establish risk-based concentrations for carcinogens. Most of the states develop guidelines based on preventing possible excess cancer risk greater than one in one million. Seventeen of these twenty-three states rely on oral reference doses (RfDs) to derive guidelines for noncarcinogens. Examination and clarification of the states' approaches to guideline derivation reveal that although similar risk assessment techniques are generally employed, differences in assumptions, chemical classifications, and uncertainty factors may lead to variation in resultant guidance levels. Improved communication and coordination between states and the federal government may help reduce the variations and inconsistencies among the states in establishing drinking water guidelines for chemical contaminants.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>2024043</pmid><doi>10.1016/0273-2300(91)90039-X</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0273-2300 |
ispartof | Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 1991-02, Vol.13 (1), p.18-35 |
issn | 0273-2300 1096-0295 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_5642077 |
source | MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier) |
subjects | 290300 - Energy Planning & Policy- Environment, Health, & Safety 540320 - Environment, Aquatic- Chemicals Monitoring & Transport- (1990-) ADMINISTRACION ADMINISTRATION ADMINISTRATION CENTRALE AGUA POTABLE AGUAS SUBTERRANEAS CARCINOGENS Carcinogens - analysis CONTAMINANTES CONTAMINATION Databases, Bibliographic DRINKING WATER EAU POTABLE EAU SOUTERRAINE ENCUESTAS ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY ENQUETE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA ETATS UNIS GOBIERNO CENTRAL HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS OXYGEN COMPOUNDS POLLUANT POLLUTION POLLUTION DE L'EAU POLLUTION REGULATIONS POLUCION DEL AGUA PRODUCTOS QUIMICOS PRODUIT CHIMIQUE RECOMMENDATIONS REGULATIONS RISK ASSESSMENT Risk Management STATE GOVERNMENT SURVEYS United States United States Environmental Protection Agency US EPA US ORGANIZATIONS WATER Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity WATER POLLUTION WATER SUPPLY Water Supply - analysis Water Supply - standards |
title | A survey and analysis of states' methodologies for deriving drinking water guidelines for chemical contaminants |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T23%3A56%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20survey%20and%20analysis%20of%20states'%20methodologies%20for%20deriving%20drinking%20water%20guidelines%20for%20chemical%20contaminants&rft.jtitle=Regulatory%20toxicology%20and%20pharmacology&rft.au=Paull,%20Jeffrey%20M.&rft.date=1991-02-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=18-35&rft.issn=0273-2300&rft.eissn=1096-0295&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0273-2300(91)90039-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E13731190%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13731190&rft_id=info:pmid/2024043&rft_els_id=027323009190039X&rfr_iscdi=true |