A survey and analysis of states' methodologies for deriving drinking water guidelines for chemical contaminants

Data from a national survey questionnaire regarding the development of guidelines for chemical contaminants in drinking water were collected from all 50 states. Twenty-three states develop at least some of their own guidelines; the other 27 states rely on guidelines previously developed by the U.S....

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology 1991-02, Vol.13 (1), p.18-35
Hauptverfasser: Paull, Jeffrey M., Joellenbeck, Lois M., Cochran, Roger C., Sidhu, Kirpal S.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 35
container_issue 1
container_start_page 18
container_title Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology
container_volume 13
creator Paull, Jeffrey M.
Joellenbeck, Lois M.
Cochran, Roger C.
Sidhu, Kirpal S.
description Data from a national survey questionnaire regarding the development of guidelines for chemical contaminants in drinking water were collected from all 50 states. Twenty-three states develop at least some of their own guidelines; the other 27 states rely on guidelines previously developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) or by other states. States which derive guidelines generally employ toxicological criteria and risk assessment methodologies developed by the USEPA. Fourteen of the twenty-three states that develop their own guidelines depend on cancer potency factors derived by the USEPA to establish risk-based concentrations for carcinogens. Most of the states develop guidelines based on preventing possible excess cancer risk greater than one in one million. Seventeen of these twenty-three states rely on oral reference doses (RfDs) to derive guidelines for noncarcinogens. Examination and clarification of the states' approaches to guideline derivation reveal that although similar risk assessment techniques are generally employed, differences in assumptions, chemical classifications, and uncertainty factors may lead to variation in resultant guidance levels. Improved communication and coordination between states and the federal government may help reduce the variations and inconsistencies among the states in establishing drinking water guidelines for chemical contaminants.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/0273-2300(91)90039-X
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_5642077</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>027323009190039X</els_id><sourcerecordid>13731190</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-28bdb3689c68d5e7f4f1cb42c3bfa1c48e2862f4a50e63f616ce0130e16a83023</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMo67j6B0Sh8eDHobWS9KQ7F2FZ_IIFD7qwt5BOV2ai3clukh6Zf2_aHvZooEjgfapS9RYhLyi8p0DFB2AtrxkHeCvpOwnAZX3zgGwoSFEDk9uHZHOPPCZPUvoFAKzr2jNyxoA10PANCRdVmuMBj5X2Qwk9HpNLVbBVyjpjelNNmPdhCGPYOUyVDbEaMLqD87tqiM7_Xh5_Chqr3ewGHJ0_YWaPkzN6rEzwWU_Oa5_TU_LI6jHhs9N9Tq4_f_p5-bW--v7l2-XFVW0a3uSadf3Qc9FJI7phi61tLDV9wwzvraam6ZB1gtlGbwEFt4IKg0A5IBW648D4OXm11g0pO5WMy2j2pRGPJqutaBi0bYFer9BtDHczpqwmlwyOo_YY5qQobzmlEgrYrKCJIaWIVt1GN-l4VBTUsgy1OK0Wp5Wk6t8y1E1Je3mqP_cTDvdJJ_eL_nzVrQ5K76JL6vqHpFKUU8SPq4jFpoPDuEyB3uDg4jLEENz_f_8L7n2iIQ</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>13731190</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A survey and analysis of states' methodologies for deriving drinking water guidelines for chemical contaminants</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Paull, Jeffrey M. ; Joellenbeck, Lois M. ; Cochran, Roger C. ; Sidhu, Kirpal S.</creator><creatorcontrib>Paull, Jeffrey M. ; Joellenbeck, Lois M. ; Cochran, Roger C. ; Sidhu, Kirpal S.</creatorcontrib><description>Data from a national survey questionnaire regarding the development of guidelines for chemical contaminants in drinking water were collected from all 50 states. Twenty-three states develop at least some of their own guidelines; the other 27 states rely on guidelines previously developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) or by other states. States which derive guidelines generally employ toxicological criteria and risk assessment methodologies developed by the USEPA. Fourteen of the twenty-three states that develop their own guidelines depend on cancer potency factors derived by the USEPA to establish risk-based concentrations for carcinogens. Most of the states develop guidelines based on preventing possible excess cancer risk greater than one in one million. Seventeen of these twenty-three states rely on oral reference doses (RfDs) to derive guidelines for noncarcinogens. Examination and clarification of the states' approaches to guideline derivation reveal that although similar risk assessment techniques are generally employed, differences in assumptions, chemical classifications, and uncertainty factors may lead to variation in resultant guidance levels. Improved communication and coordination between states and the federal government may help reduce the variations and inconsistencies among the states in establishing drinking water guidelines for chemical contaminants.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0273-2300</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0295</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/0273-2300(91)90039-X</identifier><identifier>PMID: 2024043</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>290300 - Energy Planning &amp; Policy- Environment, Health, &amp; Safety ; 540320 - Environment, Aquatic- Chemicals Monitoring &amp; Transport- (1990-) ; ADMINISTRACION ; ADMINISTRATION ; ADMINISTRATION CENTRALE ; AGUA POTABLE ; AGUAS SUBTERRANEAS ; CARCINOGENS ; Carcinogens - analysis ; CONTAMINANTES ; CONTAMINATION ; Databases, Bibliographic ; DRINKING WATER ; EAU POTABLE ; EAU SOUTERRAINE ; ENCUESTAS ; ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY ; ENQUETE ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA ; ETATS UNIS ; GOBIERNO CENTRAL ; HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS ; NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS ; OXYGEN COMPOUNDS ; POLLUANT ; POLLUTION ; POLLUTION DE L'EAU ; POLLUTION REGULATIONS ; POLUCION DEL AGUA ; PRODUCTOS QUIMICOS ; PRODUIT CHIMIQUE ; RECOMMENDATIONS ; REGULATIONS ; RISK ASSESSMENT ; Risk Management ; STATE GOVERNMENT ; SURVEYS ; United States ; United States Environmental Protection Agency ; US EPA ; US ORGANIZATIONS ; WATER ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis ; Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity ; WATER POLLUTION ; WATER SUPPLY ; Water Supply - analysis ; Water Supply - standards</subject><ispartof>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 1991-02, Vol.13 (1), p.18-35</ispartof><rights>1991</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-28bdb3689c68d5e7f4f1cb42c3bfa1c48e2862f4a50e63f616ce0130e16a83023</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-28bdb3689c68d5e7f4f1cb42c3bfa1c48e2862f4a50e63f616ce0130e16a83023</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0273-2300(91)90039-X$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,315,781,785,886,3551,27929,27930,46000</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2024043$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/5642077$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Paull, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joellenbeck, Lois M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, Roger C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidhu, Kirpal S.</creatorcontrib><title>A survey and analysis of states' methodologies for deriving drinking water guidelines for chemical contaminants</title><title>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology</title><addtitle>Regul Toxicol Pharmacol</addtitle><description>Data from a national survey questionnaire regarding the development of guidelines for chemical contaminants in drinking water were collected from all 50 states. Twenty-three states develop at least some of their own guidelines; the other 27 states rely on guidelines previously developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) or by other states. States which derive guidelines generally employ toxicological criteria and risk assessment methodologies developed by the USEPA. Fourteen of the twenty-three states that develop their own guidelines depend on cancer potency factors derived by the USEPA to establish risk-based concentrations for carcinogens. Most of the states develop guidelines based on preventing possible excess cancer risk greater than one in one million. Seventeen of these twenty-three states rely on oral reference doses (RfDs) to derive guidelines for noncarcinogens. Examination and clarification of the states' approaches to guideline derivation reveal that although similar risk assessment techniques are generally employed, differences in assumptions, chemical classifications, and uncertainty factors may lead to variation in resultant guidance levels. Improved communication and coordination between states and the federal government may help reduce the variations and inconsistencies among the states in establishing drinking water guidelines for chemical contaminants.</description><subject>290300 - Energy Planning &amp; Policy- Environment, Health, &amp; Safety</subject><subject>540320 - Environment, Aquatic- Chemicals Monitoring &amp; Transport- (1990-)</subject><subject>ADMINISTRACION</subject><subject>ADMINISTRATION</subject><subject>ADMINISTRATION CENTRALE</subject><subject>AGUA POTABLE</subject><subject>AGUAS SUBTERRANEAS</subject><subject>CARCINOGENS</subject><subject>Carcinogens - analysis</subject><subject>CONTAMINANTES</subject><subject>CONTAMINATION</subject><subject>Databases, Bibliographic</subject><subject>DRINKING WATER</subject><subject>EAU POTABLE</subject><subject>EAU SOUTERRAINE</subject><subject>ENCUESTAS</subject><subject>ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY</subject><subject>ENQUETE</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA</subject><subject>ETATS UNIS</subject><subject>GOBIERNO CENTRAL</subject><subject>HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS</subject><subject>NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS</subject><subject>OXYGEN COMPOUNDS</subject><subject>POLLUANT</subject><subject>POLLUTION</subject><subject>POLLUTION DE L'EAU</subject><subject>POLLUTION REGULATIONS</subject><subject>POLUCION DEL AGUA</subject><subject>PRODUCTOS QUIMICOS</subject><subject>PRODUIT CHIMIQUE</subject><subject>RECOMMENDATIONS</subject><subject>REGULATIONS</subject><subject>RISK ASSESSMENT</subject><subject>Risk Management</subject><subject>STATE GOVERNMENT</subject><subject>SURVEYS</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>United States Environmental Protection Agency</subject><subject>US EPA</subject><subject>US ORGANIZATIONS</subject><subject>WATER</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</subject><subject>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</subject><subject>WATER POLLUTION</subject><subject>WATER SUPPLY</subject><subject>Water Supply - analysis</subject><subject>Water Supply - standards</subject><issn>0273-2300</issn><issn>1096-0295</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>1991</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU2LFDEQhoMo67j6B0Sh8eDHobWS9KQ7F2FZ_IIFD7qwt5BOV2ai3clukh6Zf2_aHvZooEjgfapS9RYhLyi8p0DFB2AtrxkHeCvpOwnAZX3zgGwoSFEDk9uHZHOPPCZPUvoFAKzr2jNyxoA10PANCRdVmuMBj5X2Qwk9HpNLVbBVyjpjelNNmPdhCGPYOUyVDbEaMLqD87tqiM7_Xh5_Chqr3ewGHJ0_YWaPkzN6rEzwWU_Oa5_TU_LI6jHhs9N9Tq4_f_p5-bW--v7l2-XFVW0a3uSadf3Qc9FJI7phi61tLDV9wwzvraam6ZB1gtlGbwEFt4IKg0A5IBW648D4OXm11g0pO5WMy2j2pRGPJqutaBi0bYFer9BtDHczpqwmlwyOo_YY5qQobzmlEgrYrKCJIaWIVt1GN-l4VBTUsgy1OK0Wp5Wk6t8y1E1Je3mqP_cTDvdJJ_eL_nzVrQ5K76JL6vqHpFKUU8SPq4jFpoPDuEyB3uDg4jLEENz_f_8L7n2iIQ</recordid><startdate>19910201</startdate><enddate>19910201</enddate><creator>Paull, Jeffrey M.</creator><creator>Joellenbeck, Lois M.</creator><creator>Cochran, Roger C.</creator><creator>Sidhu, Kirpal S.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>FBQ</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7QH</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19910201</creationdate><title>A survey and analysis of states' methodologies for deriving drinking water guidelines for chemical contaminants</title><author>Paull, Jeffrey M. ; Joellenbeck, Lois M. ; Cochran, Roger C. ; Sidhu, Kirpal S.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c434t-28bdb3689c68d5e7f4f1cb42c3bfa1c48e2862f4a50e63f616ce0130e16a83023</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1991</creationdate><topic>290300 - Energy Planning &amp; Policy- Environment, Health, &amp; Safety</topic><topic>540320 - Environment, Aquatic- Chemicals Monitoring &amp; Transport- (1990-)</topic><topic>ADMINISTRACION</topic><topic>ADMINISTRATION</topic><topic>ADMINISTRATION CENTRALE</topic><topic>AGUA POTABLE</topic><topic>AGUAS SUBTERRANEAS</topic><topic>CARCINOGENS</topic><topic>Carcinogens - analysis</topic><topic>CONTAMINANTES</topic><topic>CONTAMINATION</topic><topic>Databases, Bibliographic</topic><topic>DRINKING WATER</topic><topic>EAU POTABLE</topic><topic>EAU SOUTERRAINE</topic><topic>ENCUESTAS</topic><topic>ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY</topic><topic>ENQUETE</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA</topic><topic>ETATS UNIS</topic><topic>GOBIERNO CENTRAL</topic><topic>HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS</topic><topic>NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS</topic><topic>OXYGEN COMPOUNDS</topic><topic>POLLUANT</topic><topic>POLLUTION</topic><topic>POLLUTION DE L'EAU</topic><topic>POLLUTION REGULATIONS</topic><topic>POLUCION DEL AGUA</topic><topic>PRODUCTOS QUIMICOS</topic><topic>PRODUIT CHIMIQUE</topic><topic>RECOMMENDATIONS</topic><topic>REGULATIONS</topic><topic>RISK ASSESSMENT</topic><topic>Risk Management</topic><topic>STATE GOVERNMENT</topic><topic>SURVEYS</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>United States Environmental Protection Agency</topic><topic>US EPA</topic><topic>US ORGANIZATIONS</topic><topic>WATER</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis</topic><topic>Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity</topic><topic>WATER POLLUTION</topic><topic>WATER SUPPLY</topic><topic>Water Supply - analysis</topic><topic>Water Supply - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Paull, Jeffrey M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Joellenbeck, Lois M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cochran, Roger C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Sidhu, Kirpal S.</creatorcontrib><collection>AGRIS</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Aqualine</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Paull, Jeffrey M.</au><au>Joellenbeck, Lois M.</au><au>Cochran, Roger C.</au><au>Sidhu, Kirpal S.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A survey and analysis of states' methodologies for deriving drinking water guidelines for chemical contaminants</atitle><jtitle>Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology</jtitle><addtitle>Regul Toxicol Pharmacol</addtitle><date>1991-02-01</date><risdate>1991</risdate><volume>13</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>18</spage><epage>35</epage><pages>18-35</pages><issn>0273-2300</issn><eissn>1096-0295</eissn><abstract>Data from a national survey questionnaire regarding the development of guidelines for chemical contaminants in drinking water were collected from all 50 states. Twenty-three states develop at least some of their own guidelines; the other 27 states rely on guidelines previously developed by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) or by other states. States which derive guidelines generally employ toxicological criteria and risk assessment methodologies developed by the USEPA. Fourteen of the twenty-three states that develop their own guidelines depend on cancer potency factors derived by the USEPA to establish risk-based concentrations for carcinogens. Most of the states develop guidelines based on preventing possible excess cancer risk greater than one in one million. Seventeen of these twenty-three states rely on oral reference doses (RfDs) to derive guidelines for noncarcinogens. Examination and clarification of the states' approaches to guideline derivation reveal that although similar risk assessment techniques are generally employed, differences in assumptions, chemical classifications, and uncertainty factors may lead to variation in resultant guidance levels. Improved communication and coordination between states and the federal government may help reduce the variations and inconsistencies among the states in establishing drinking water guidelines for chemical contaminants.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>2024043</pmid><doi>10.1016/0273-2300(91)90039-X</doi><tpages>18</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0273-2300
ispartof Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology, 1991-02, Vol.13 (1), p.18-35
issn 0273-2300
1096-0295
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_5642077
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects 290300 - Energy Planning & Policy- Environment, Health, & Safety
540320 - Environment, Aquatic- Chemicals Monitoring & Transport- (1990-)
ADMINISTRACION
ADMINISTRATION
ADMINISTRATION CENTRALE
AGUA POTABLE
AGUAS SUBTERRANEAS
CARCINOGENS
Carcinogens - analysis
CONTAMINANTES
CONTAMINATION
Databases, Bibliographic
DRINKING WATER
EAU POTABLE
EAU SOUTERRAINE
ENCUESTAS
ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY
ENQUETE
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
ESTADOS UNIDOS DE AMERICA
ETATS UNIS
GOBIERNO CENTRAL
HYDROGEN COMPOUNDS
NATIONAL ORGANIZATIONS
OXYGEN COMPOUNDS
POLLUANT
POLLUTION
POLLUTION DE L'EAU
POLLUTION REGULATIONS
POLUCION DEL AGUA
PRODUCTOS QUIMICOS
PRODUIT CHIMIQUE
RECOMMENDATIONS
REGULATIONS
RISK ASSESSMENT
Risk Management
STATE GOVERNMENT
SURVEYS
United States
United States Environmental Protection Agency
US EPA
US ORGANIZATIONS
WATER
Water Pollutants, Chemical - analysis
Water Pollutants, Chemical - toxicity
WATER POLLUTION
WATER SUPPLY
Water Supply - analysis
Water Supply - standards
title A survey and analysis of states' methodologies for deriving drinking water guidelines for chemical contaminants
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-13T23%3A56%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20survey%20and%20analysis%20of%20states'%20methodologies%20for%20deriving%20drinking%20water%20guidelines%20for%20chemical%20contaminants&rft.jtitle=Regulatory%20toxicology%20and%20pharmacology&rft.au=Paull,%20Jeffrey%20M.&rft.date=1991-02-01&rft.volume=13&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=18&rft.epage=35&rft.pages=18-35&rft.issn=0273-2300&rft.eissn=1096-0295&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/0273-2300(91)90039-X&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E13731190%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=13731190&rft_id=info:pmid/2024043&rft_els_id=027323009190039X&rfr_iscdi=true