Experimental and numerical investigation of fracture conductivity between non-smooth rock surfaces with and without proppant
The enhancement of fracture conductivity is vital for the efficient recovery of subsurface resources, such as geothermal energy and petroleum hydrocarbons. Proppants, granular materials injected into hydraulic fractures to maintain their conductivity, have been studied primarily in the context of sm...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Geoenergy Science and Engineering 2025-03, Vol.246 (C), Article 213582 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | C |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Geoenergy Science and Engineering |
container_volume | 246 |
creator | Li, Zihao Guo, Ruichang Wang, Hongsheng Teng, Yuntian Ripepi, Nino Fernandez, Carlos A. Chen, Cheng |
description | The enhancement of fracture conductivity is vital for the efficient recovery of subsurface resources, such as geothermal energy and petroleum hydrocarbons. Proppants, granular materials injected into hydraulic fractures to maintain their conductivity, have been studied primarily in the context of smooth fractures (i.e., fractures between smooth rock surfaces). However, non-smooth fractures (i.e., fractures between rough rock surfaces) are common in geoenergy reservoirs and thus require further investigations. In this study, we conducted laboratory measurements of fracture conductivity on shale slabs with non-smooth surfaces and carried out numerical simulation using the lattice Boltzmann (LB) method, which aimed to investigate the conductivity of non-smooth fractures with and without proppants placement. When ceramic proppant with an areal concentration of 2 lb/ft2 was placed in the fracture, the conductivity was enhanced by roughly 3 to 8 times compared to fractures without proppant. In fractures with proppant, gas-measured conductivity was higher than that measured with water due to proppant embedment caused by water. The experiments demonstrate the advantages of using proppant in fractures, even if the rock surface roughness can provide certain fracture conductivity via the self-propping mechanism. For fractures without proppants, high rock surface roughness is not necessarily favorable for enhancing fracture conductivity because the self-propping mechanism requires shear slip along the fracture surface. If there is no shear slip, high rock surface roughness can cause a detrimental effect on the fracture conductivity due to the interlocking effect. Utilizing advanced experimental equipment and LB modeling, this research explores the interplays between proppant placement, fracture geometry, and stress conditions to develop a comprehensive understanding of the productivity in non-smooth fractures. The outcomes of this investigation indicate the importance of creating fractures with surface roughness during hydraulic fracturing and will contribute to the development of more efficient stimulation techniques for subsurface energy extraction.
•Study of fracture conductivity between non-smooth rock surfaces with and without proppant.•High rock surface roughness is not necessarily favorable for enhancing fracture conductivity.•Development of more efficient stimulation techniques for subsurface energy extraction. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213582 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>elsevier_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_2479816</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S2949891024009527</els_id><sourcerecordid>S2949891024009527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-e816-cbee45c9b74ec9bc1ea91ac2c64a8325daa30ae8b9faeeafd7b549b38481c5f63</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNpNUMtOwzAQtBBIVKVfwMXinuBX0vjAAVXlISFx6d1ynE3r0tqV7bQg8fE4lAOXfYxGszuD0C0lJSW0vt-Wa_DgSkaYKBnlVcMu0IRJIYtGUnL5b75Gsxi3hBDOuCSknqDv5ecBgt2DS3qHteuwG_YZMHmz7ggx2bVO1jvse9wHbdIQABvvusEke7TpC7eQTgAOO--KuPc-bXDw5gPHIfTaQMQnm6FRehz8kPAh-MNBu3SDrnq9izD761O0elquFi_F2_vz6-LxrYCG1oVpAURlZDsXkKuhoCXVhpla6IazqtOaEw1NK3sNoPtu3lZCtrwRDTVVX_MpujvL-uxGRWMTmE224MAkxcRc5iuZ9HAmQX7kaCGMRHAGOhtGXuetokSNiaut-k1cjYmrc-L8B_ECe38</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Experimental and numerical investigation of fracture conductivity between non-smooth rock surfaces with and without proppant</title><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Li, Zihao ; Guo, Ruichang ; Wang, Hongsheng ; Teng, Yuntian ; Ripepi, Nino ; Fernandez, Carlos A. ; Chen, Cheng</creator><creatorcontrib>Li, Zihao ; Guo, Ruichang ; Wang, Hongsheng ; Teng, Yuntian ; Ripepi, Nino ; Fernandez, Carlos A. ; Chen, Cheng</creatorcontrib><description>The enhancement of fracture conductivity is vital for the efficient recovery of subsurface resources, such as geothermal energy and petroleum hydrocarbons. Proppants, granular materials injected into hydraulic fractures to maintain their conductivity, have been studied primarily in the context of smooth fractures (i.e., fractures between smooth rock surfaces). However, non-smooth fractures (i.e., fractures between rough rock surfaces) are common in geoenergy reservoirs and thus require further investigations. In this study, we conducted laboratory measurements of fracture conductivity on shale slabs with non-smooth surfaces and carried out numerical simulation using the lattice Boltzmann (LB) method, which aimed to investigate the conductivity of non-smooth fractures with and without proppants placement. When ceramic proppant with an areal concentration of 2 lb/ft2 was placed in the fracture, the conductivity was enhanced by roughly 3 to 8 times compared to fractures without proppant. In fractures with proppant, gas-measured conductivity was higher than that measured with water due to proppant embedment caused by water. The experiments demonstrate the advantages of using proppant in fractures, even if the rock surface roughness can provide certain fracture conductivity via the self-propping mechanism. For fractures without proppants, high rock surface roughness is not necessarily favorable for enhancing fracture conductivity because the self-propping mechanism requires shear slip along the fracture surface. If there is no shear slip, high rock surface roughness can cause a detrimental effect on the fracture conductivity due to the interlocking effect. Utilizing advanced experimental equipment and LB modeling, this research explores the interplays between proppant placement, fracture geometry, and stress conditions to develop a comprehensive understanding of the productivity in non-smooth fractures. The outcomes of this investigation indicate the importance of creating fractures with surface roughness during hydraulic fracturing and will contribute to the development of more efficient stimulation techniques for subsurface energy extraction.
•Study of fracture conductivity between non-smooth rock surfaces with and without proppant.•High rock surface roughness is not necessarily favorable for enhancing fracture conductivity.•Development of more efficient stimulation techniques for subsurface energy extraction.</description><identifier>ISSN: 2949-8910</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2949-8910</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213582</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier B.V</publisher><subject>Fracture conductivity ; Hydraulic fracturing ; Lattice Boltzmann ; Non-smooth surface ; Proppant</subject><ispartof>Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 2025-03, Vol.246 (C), Article 213582</ispartof><rights>2024 Elsevier B.V.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><orcidid>0000-0002-0815-0228 ; 0000-0001-9343-8826 ; 0000000193438826 ; 0000000208150228</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/2479816$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Li, Zihao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Ruichang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hongsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teng, Yuntian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ripepi, Nino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, Carlos A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Cheng</creatorcontrib><title>Experimental and numerical investigation of fracture conductivity between non-smooth rock surfaces with and without proppant</title><title>Geoenergy Science and Engineering</title><description>The enhancement of fracture conductivity is vital for the efficient recovery of subsurface resources, such as geothermal energy and petroleum hydrocarbons. Proppants, granular materials injected into hydraulic fractures to maintain their conductivity, have been studied primarily in the context of smooth fractures (i.e., fractures between smooth rock surfaces). However, non-smooth fractures (i.e., fractures between rough rock surfaces) are common in geoenergy reservoirs and thus require further investigations. In this study, we conducted laboratory measurements of fracture conductivity on shale slabs with non-smooth surfaces and carried out numerical simulation using the lattice Boltzmann (LB) method, which aimed to investigate the conductivity of non-smooth fractures with and without proppants placement. When ceramic proppant with an areal concentration of 2 lb/ft2 was placed in the fracture, the conductivity was enhanced by roughly 3 to 8 times compared to fractures without proppant. In fractures with proppant, gas-measured conductivity was higher than that measured with water due to proppant embedment caused by water. The experiments demonstrate the advantages of using proppant in fractures, even if the rock surface roughness can provide certain fracture conductivity via the self-propping mechanism. For fractures without proppants, high rock surface roughness is not necessarily favorable for enhancing fracture conductivity because the self-propping mechanism requires shear slip along the fracture surface. If there is no shear slip, high rock surface roughness can cause a detrimental effect on the fracture conductivity due to the interlocking effect. Utilizing advanced experimental equipment and LB modeling, this research explores the interplays between proppant placement, fracture geometry, and stress conditions to develop a comprehensive understanding of the productivity in non-smooth fractures. The outcomes of this investigation indicate the importance of creating fractures with surface roughness during hydraulic fracturing and will contribute to the development of more efficient stimulation techniques for subsurface energy extraction.
•Study of fracture conductivity between non-smooth rock surfaces with and without proppant.•High rock surface roughness is not necessarily favorable for enhancing fracture conductivity.•Development of more efficient stimulation techniques for subsurface energy extraction.</description><subject>Fracture conductivity</subject><subject>Hydraulic fracturing</subject><subject>Lattice Boltzmann</subject><subject>Non-smooth surface</subject><subject>Proppant</subject><issn>2949-8910</issn><issn>2949-8910</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2025</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNpNUMtOwzAQtBBIVKVfwMXinuBX0vjAAVXlISFx6d1ynE3r0tqV7bQg8fE4lAOXfYxGszuD0C0lJSW0vt-Wa_DgSkaYKBnlVcMu0IRJIYtGUnL5b75Gsxi3hBDOuCSknqDv5ecBgt2DS3qHteuwG_YZMHmz7ggx2bVO1jvse9wHbdIQABvvusEke7TpC7eQTgAOO--KuPc-bXDw5gPHIfTaQMQnm6FRehz8kPAh-MNBu3SDrnq9izD761O0elquFi_F2_vz6-LxrYCG1oVpAURlZDsXkKuhoCXVhpla6IazqtOaEw1NK3sNoPtu3lZCtrwRDTVVX_MpujvL-uxGRWMTmE224MAkxcRc5iuZ9HAmQX7kaCGMRHAGOhtGXuetokSNiaut-k1cjYmrc-L8B_ECe38</recordid><startdate>202503</startdate><enddate>202503</enddate><creator>Li, Zihao</creator><creator>Guo, Ruichang</creator><creator>Wang, Hongsheng</creator><creator>Teng, Yuntian</creator><creator>Ripepi, Nino</creator><creator>Fernandez, Carlos A.</creator><creator>Chen, Cheng</creator><general>Elsevier B.V</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0815-0228</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9343-8826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000193438826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000208150228</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>202503</creationdate><title>Experimental and numerical investigation of fracture conductivity between non-smooth rock surfaces with and without proppant</title><author>Li, Zihao ; Guo, Ruichang ; Wang, Hongsheng ; Teng, Yuntian ; Ripepi, Nino ; Fernandez, Carlos A. ; Chen, Cheng</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-e816-cbee45c9b74ec9bc1ea91ac2c64a8325daa30ae8b9faeeafd7b549b38481c5f63</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2025</creationdate><topic>Fracture conductivity</topic><topic>Hydraulic fracturing</topic><topic>Lattice Boltzmann</topic><topic>Non-smooth surface</topic><topic>Proppant</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Li, Zihao</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Guo, Ruichang</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Wang, Hongsheng</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Teng, Yuntian</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ripepi, Nino</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernandez, Carlos A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Chen, Cheng</creatorcontrib><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Geoenergy Science and Engineering</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Li, Zihao</au><au>Guo, Ruichang</au><au>Wang, Hongsheng</au><au>Teng, Yuntian</au><au>Ripepi, Nino</au><au>Fernandez, Carlos A.</au><au>Chen, Cheng</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Experimental and numerical investigation of fracture conductivity between non-smooth rock surfaces with and without proppant</atitle><jtitle>Geoenergy Science and Engineering</jtitle><date>2025-03</date><risdate>2025</risdate><volume>246</volume><issue>C</issue><artnum>213582</artnum><issn>2949-8910</issn><eissn>2949-8910</eissn><abstract>The enhancement of fracture conductivity is vital for the efficient recovery of subsurface resources, such as geothermal energy and petroleum hydrocarbons. Proppants, granular materials injected into hydraulic fractures to maintain their conductivity, have been studied primarily in the context of smooth fractures (i.e., fractures between smooth rock surfaces). However, non-smooth fractures (i.e., fractures between rough rock surfaces) are common in geoenergy reservoirs and thus require further investigations. In this study, we conducted laboratory measurements of fracture conductivity on shale slabs with non-smooth surfaces and carried out numerical simulation using the lattice Boltzmann (LB) method, which aimed to investigate the conductivity of non-smooth fractures with and without proppants placement. When ceramic proppant with an areal concentration of 2 lb/ft2 was placed in the fracture, the conductivity was enhanced by roughly 3 to 8 times compared to fractures without proppant. In fractures with proppant, gas-measured conductivity was higher than that measured with water due to proppant embedment caused by water. The experiments demonstrate the advantages of using proppant in fractures, even if the rock surface roughness can provide certain fracture conductivity via the self-propping mechanism. For fractures without proppants, high rock surface roughness is not necessarily favorable for enhancing fracture conductivity because the self-propping mechanism requires shear slip along the fracture surface. If there is no shear slip, high rock surface roughness can cause a detrimental effect on the fracture conductivity due to the interlocking effect. Utilizing advanced experimental equipment and LB modeling, this research explores the interplays between proppant placement, fracture geometry, and stress conditions to develop a comprehensive understanding of the productivity in non-smooth fractures. The outcomes of this investigation indicate the importance of creating fractures with surface roughness during hydraulic fracturing and will contribute to the development of more efficient stimulation techniques for subsurface energy extraction.
•Study of fracture conductivity between non-smooth rock surfaces with and without proppant.•High rock surface roughness is not necessarily favorable for enhancing fracture conductivity.•Development of more efficient stimulation techniques for subsurface energy extraction.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier B.V</pub><doi>10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213582</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0815-0228</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9343-8826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000193438826</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000208150228</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 2949-8910 |
ispartof | Geoenergy Science and Engineering, 2025-03, Vol.246 (C), Article 213582 |
issn | 2949-8910 2949-8910 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_2479816 |
source | Alma/SFX Local Collection |
subjects | Fracture conductivity Hydraulic fracturing Lattice Boltzmann Non-smooth surface Proppant |
title | Experimental and numerical investigation of fracture conductivity between non-smooth rock surfaces with and without proppant |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-19T08%3A31%3A21IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-elsevier_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Experimental%20and%20numerical%20investigation%20of%20fracture%20conductivity%20between%20non-smooth%20rock%20surfaces%20with%20and%20without%20proppant&rft.jtitle=Geoenergy%20Science%20and%20Engineering&rft.au=Li,%20Zihao&rft.date=2025-03&rft.volume=246&rft.issue=C&rft.artnum=213582&rft.issn=2949-8910&rft.eissn=2949-8910&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.geoen.2024.213582&rft_dat=%3Celsevier_osti_%3ES2949891024009527%3C/elsevier_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S2949891024009527&rfr_iscdi=true |