A Simplified Method for Predicting Shaker Voltage in IMMATs
Impedance Matched Multi-Axis Tests (IMMATs) can replicate in-service vibration induced stress more accurately than single axis shaker table tests as they can better match a part’s operational boundary conditions and excite it in multiple degrees of freedom simultaneously. Here, the shakers used in I...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Experimental techniques (Westport, Conn.) Conn.), 2024-10 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | |
container_title | Experimental techniques (Westport, Conn.) |
container_volume | |
creator | Behling, M. Thomason, B. Mayes, R.L. Allen, M.S. DeLima, W.J. |
description | Impedance Matched Multi-Axis Tests (IMMATs) can replicate in-service vibration induced stress more accurately than single axis shaker table tests as they can better match a part’s operational boundary conditions and excite it in multiple degrees of freedom simultaneously. Here, the shakers used in IMMATs are less powerful than shaker tables, so shaker force limits can be exceeded during tests if they are not placed adequately for the desired environment. The ability to predict shaker voltage and force before performing a test is, therefore, helpful in selecting shaker locations so that their limits are not exceeded. In this study, electrodynamic shakers were modeled as discrete electromechanical systems, and the shaker parameters were chosen to match experimentally obtained acceleration/voltage frequency response functions (FRFs). These models were coupled to a finite element model of the device under test (DUT) via dynamic substructuring, and the substructured model was demonstrated to accurately predict shaker voltage as well as the error in reproducing the environment at multiple accelerometer locations. A simple method called the FRF Multiplication method, in which the FRF of the substructured system is approximated as the product of two separate FRFs of the shaker and DUT respectively, was proposed and applied to the same system, yielding similar voltage and error predictions to those obtained using substructuring. Simple case studies were presented to explore the applicability of the proposed method, and it was demonstrated to have similar accuracy to the substructuring method in a range of cases. Additionally, we showed that while it was not possible to derive a unique model of the shakers from acceleration/voltage FRFs alone, the models that could be obtained were sufficient to predict test error almost perfectly and shaker voltage with less than 40 percent error. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1007/s40799-024-00750-9 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>crossref_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_2462852</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>10_1007_s40799_024_00750_9</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c155t-93614da2df747b632a3ecad3a52c3842393a50c5999f9eb7720113345156605e3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNotkE1LAzEYhIMouFb_gKfgPfrma7PBUylaC10UWr2GNJtto-2mJLn4712tp5mBYRgehG4p3FMA9ZAFKK0JMEHGKIHoM1RRJRShslbnqALFGWka2lyiq5w_AaikSlfocYpX4XDchz74Dre-7GKH-5jwW_JdcCUMW7za2S-f8EfcF7v1OAx40bbTdb5GF73dZ3_zrxP0_vy0nr2Q5et8MZsuiaNSFqJ5TUVnWdePfzY1Z5Z7ZztuJXO8EYzr0YKTWute-41SDCjlXMjxeg3S8wm6O-3GXILJLhTvdi4Og3fFMFGzRrKxxE4ll2LOyffmmMLBpm9DwfwyMidGZmRk_hgZzX8A5PRW4A</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>A Simplified Method for Predicting Shaker Voltage in IMMATs</title><source>Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals</source><creator>Behling, M. ; Thomason, B. ; Mayes, R.L. ; Allen, M.S. ; DeLima, W.J.</creator><creatorcontrib>Behling, M. ; Thomason, B. ; Mayes, R.L. ; Allen, M.S. ; DeLima, W.J. ; Kansas City Nuclear Security Campus (KCNSC), Kansas City, MO (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>Impedance Matched Multi-Axis Tests (IMMATs) can replicate in-service vibration induced stress more accurately than single axis shaker table tests as they can better match a part’s operational boundary conditions and excite it in multiple degrees of freedom simultaneously. Here, the shakers used in IMMATs are less powerful than shaker tables, so shaker force limits can be exceeded during tests if they are not placed adequately for the desired environment. The ability to predict shaker voltage and force before performing a test is, therefore, helpful in selecting shaker locations so that their limits are not exceeded. In this study, electrodynamic shakers were modeled as discrete electromechanical systems, and the shaker parameters were chosen to match experimentally obtained acceleration/voltage frequency response functions (FRFs). These models were coupled to a finite element model of the device under test (DUT) via dynamic substructuring, and the substructured model was demonstrated to accurately predict shaker voltage as well as the error in reproducing the environment at multiple accelerometer locations. A simple method called the FRF Multiplication method, in which the FRF of the substructured system is approximated as the product of two separate FRFs of the shaker and DUT respectively, was proposed and applied to the same system, yielding similar voltage and error predictions to those obtained using substructuring. Simple case studies were presented to explore the applicability of the proposed method, and it was demonstrated to have similar accuracy to the substructuring method in a range of cases. Additionally, we showed that while it was not possible to derive a unique model of the shakers from acceleration/voltage FRFs alone, the models that could be obtained were sufficient to predict test error almost perfectly and shaker voltage with less than 40 percent error.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0732-8818</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1747-1567</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1007/s40799-024-00750-9</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Wiley</publisher><subject>Dynamic Substructuring ; Qualification Testing ; Shaker ; Test Planning</subject><ispartof>Experimental techniques (Westport, Conn.), 2024-10</ispartof><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c155t-93614da2df747b632a3ecad3a52c3842393a50c5999f9eb7720113345156605e3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-0625-6424 ; 0000000206256424</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/2462852$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Behling, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomason, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayes, R.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLima, W.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kansas City Nuclear Security Campus (KCNSC), Kansas City, MO (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>A Simplified Method for Predicting Shaker Voltage in IMMATs</title><title>Experimental techniques (Westport, Conn.)</title><description>Impedance Matched Multi-Axis Tests (IMMATs) can replicate in-service vibration induced stress more accurately than single axis shaker table tests as they can better match a part’s operational boundary conditions and excite it in multiple degrees of freedom simultaneously. Here, the shakers used in IMMATs are less powerful than shaker tables, so shaker force limits can be exceeded during tests if they are not placed adequately for the desired environment. The ability to predict shaker voltage and force before performing a test is, therefore, helpful in selecting shaker locations so that their limits are not exceeded. In this study, electrodynamic shakers were modeled as discrete electromechanical systems, and the shaker parameters were chosen to match experimentally obtained acceleration/voltage frequency response functions (FRFs). These models were coupled to a finite element model of the device under test (DUT) via dynamic substructuring, and the substructured model was demonstrated to accurately predict shaker voltage as well as the error in reproducing the environment at multiple accelerometer locations. A simple method called the FRF Multiplication method, in which the FRF of the substructured system is approximated as the product of two separate FRFs of the shaker and DUT respectively, was proposed and applied to the same system, yielding similar voltage and error predictions to those obtained using substructuring. Simple case studies were presented to explore the applicability of the proposed method, and it was demonstrated to have similar accuracy to the substructuring method in a range of cases. Additionally, we showed that while it was not possible to derive a unique model of the shakers from acceleration/voltage FRFs alone, the models that could be obtained were sufficient to predict test error almost perfectly and shaker voltage with less than 40 percent error.</description><subject>Dynamic Substructuring</subject><subject>Qualification Testing</subject><subject>Shaker</subject><subject>Test Planning</subject><issn>0732-8818</issn><issn>1747-1567</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2024</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNotkE1LAzEYhIMouFb_gKfgPfrma7PBUylaC10UWr2GNJtto-2mJLn4712tp5mBYRgehG4p3FMA9ZAFKK0JMEHGKIHoM1RRJRShslbnqALFGWka2lyiq5w_AaikSlfocYpX4XDchz74Dre-7GKH-5jwW_JdcCUMW7za2S-f8EfcF7v1OAx40bbTdb5GF73dZ3_zrxP0_vy0nr2Q5et8MZsuiaNSFqJ5TUVnWdePfzY1Z5Z7ZztuJXO8EYzr0YKTWute-41SDCjlXMjxeg3S8wm6O-3GXILJLhTvdi4Og3fFMFGzRrKxxE4ll2LOyffmmMLBpm9DwfwyMidGZmRk_hgZzX8A5PRW4A</recordid><startdate>20241003</startdate><enddate>20241003</enddate><creator>Behling, M.</creator><creator>Thomason, B.</creator><creator>Mayes, R.L.</creator><creator>Allen, M.S.</creator><creator>DeLima, W.J.</creator><general>Wiley</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0625-6424</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000206256424</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20241003</creationdate><title>A Simplified Method for Predicting Shaker Voltage in IMMATs</title><author>Behling, M. ; Thomason, B. ; Mayes, R.L. ; Allen, M.S. ; DeLima, W.J.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c155t-93614da2df747b632a3ecad3a52c3842393a50c5999f9eb7720113345156605e3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2024</creationdate><topic>Dynamic Substructuring</topic><topic>Qualification Testing</topic><topic>Shaker</topic><topic>Test Planning</topic><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Behling, M.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Thomason, B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mayes, R.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Allen, M.S.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DeLima, W.J.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kansas City Nuclear Security Campus (KCNSC), Kansas City, MO (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Experimental techniques (Westport, Conn.)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Behling, M.</au><au>Thomason, B.</au><au>Mayes, R.L.</au><au>Allen, M.S.</au><au>DeLima, W.J.</au><aucorp>Kansas City Nuclear Security Campus (KCNSC), Kansas City, MO (United States)</aucorp><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A Simplified Method for Predicting Shaker Voltage in IMMATs</atitle><jtitle>Experimental techniques (Westport, Conn.)</jtitle><date>2024-10-03</date><risdate>2024</risdate><issn>0732-8818</issn><eissn>1747-1567</eissn><abstract>Impedance Matched Multi-Axis Tests (IMMATs) can replicate in-service vibration induced stress more accurately than single axis shaker table tests as they can better match a part’s operational boundary conditions and excite it in multiple degrees of freedom simultaneously. Here, the shakers used in IMMATs are less powerful than shaker tables, so shaker force limits can be exceeded during tests if they are not placed adequately for the desired environment. The ability to predict shaker voltage and force before performing a test is, therefore, helpful in selecting shaker locations so that their limits are not exceeded. In this study, electrodynamic shakers were modeled as discrete electromechanical systems, and the shaker parameters were chosen to match experimentally obtained acceleration/voltage frequency response functions (FRFs). These models were coupled to a finite element model of the device under test (DUT) via dynamic substructuring, and the substructured model was demonstrated to accurately predict shaker voltage as well as the error in reproducing the environment at multiple accelerometer locations. A simple method called the FRF Multiplication method, in which the FRF of the substructured system is approximated as the product of two separate FRFs of the shaker and DUT respectively, was proposed and applied to the same system, yielding similar voltage and error predictions to those obtained using substructuring. Simple case studies were presented to explore the applicability of the proposed method, and it was demonstrated to have similar accuracy to the substructuring method in a range of cases. Additionally, we showed that while it was not possible to derive a unique model of the shakers from acceleration/voltage FRFs alone, the models that could be obtained were sufficient to predict test error almost perfectly and shaker voltage with less than 40 percent error.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Wiley</pub><doi>10.1007/s40799-024-00750-9</doi><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0625-6424</orcidid><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000000206256424</orcidid></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0732-8818 |
ispartof | Experimental techniques (Westport, Conn.), 2024-10 |
issn | 0732-8818 1747-1567 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_2462852 |
source | Springer Nature - Complete Springer Journals |
subjects | Dynamic Substructuring Qualification Testing Shaker Test Planning |
title | A Simplified Method for Predicting Shaker Voltage in IMMATs |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-26T22%3A58%3A09IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-crossref_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20Simplified%20Method%20for%20Predicting%20Shaker%20Voltage%20in%20IMMATs&rft.jtitle=Experimental%20techniques%20(Westport,%20Conn.)&rft.au=Behling,%20M.&rft.aucorp=Kansas%20City%20Nuclear%20Security%20Campus%20(KCNSC),%20Kansas%20City,%20MO%20(United%20States)&rft.date=2024-10-03&rft.issn=0732-8818&rft.eissn=1747-1567&rft_id=info:doi/10.1007/s40799-024-00750-9&rft_dat=%3Ccrossref_osti_%3E10_1007_s40799_024_00750_9%3C/crossref_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |