Association between human and animal thermal comfort indices and physiological heat stress indicators in dairy calves
Warm summer episodes have a significant effect on the overall health and well-being of young cattle; however, it is not known which temperature measure should be used for estimating heat stress in dairy calves. In this study, generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate the relation...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Environmental research 2018-10, Vol.166, p.108-111 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 111 |
---|---|
container_issue | |
container_start_page | 108 |
container_title | Environmental research |
container_volume | 166 |
creator | Kovács, L. Kézér, F.L. Ruff, F. Szenci, O. Jurkovich, V. |
description | Warm summer episodes have a significant effect on the overall health and well-being of young cattle; however, it is not known which temperature measure should be used for estimating heat stress in dairy calves. In this study, generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate the relationships between thermal comfort indices and animal-based heat stress indicators in sixteen Holstein bull calves that were housed in individual calf hutches. Data were collected under continental weather characteristics over a 5-day period: day 1 (lower-temperature day), days 2 and 3 (heat stress days), and a 2-day post-stress period. Relative humidity, ambient temperature, the heat index, the humidex and five different temperature–humidity indices (THI) were used as thermal indices. Physiological variables monitored included respiratory rate, rectal temperature, ear skin temperature and heart rate. The heat index and the humidex measuring human thermal comfort were more closely associated with physiological measures than were the ambient temperature or the THIs (in case of heat index: R2 = 0.87 for respiratory rate, R2 = 0.63 for rectal temperature, R2 = 0.70 for ear skin temperature, and R2 = 0.78 for heart rate, respectively; in case of humidex: R2 = 0.85 for respiratory rate, R2 = 0.60 for rectal temperature, R2 = 0.68 for ear skin temperature, and R2 = 0.75 for heart rate, respectively). Based on our results, parameters of human outdoor comfort seem better to estimate heat stress in dairy calves in a continental region than those of THIs or ambient temperature. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.envres.2018.05.036 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_23105866</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0013935118302883</els_id><sourcerecordid>2052807527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-e8f960d13a617e0c2dc4db7bf072d3ab3d18580610edbad72a0c24af72ea69f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUGL1DAUx4Mo7uzqNxApePHS8SWZpO1FWBZ1hQUveg5p8moztMmYpLPMtze1q0cP4SXwe3l_3o-QNxT2FKj8cNyjP0dMewa03YPYA5fPyI5CJ2voBH9OdgCU1x0X9Ipcp3QsTyo4vCRXrGtbISndkeU2pWCczi74qsf8iOircZm1r7S35bhZT1UeMa7VhHkIMVfOW2cw_UFO4yW5MIWfzhRiRJ2rlEuutFE6h7heK6tdvFSFOWN6RV4Mekr4-qnekB-fP32_u68fvn35enf7UBveQa6xHToJlnItaYNgmDUH2zf9AA2zXPfc0la0ICmg7bVtmC7MQQ8NQy27QfAb8m77N6TsVDIuoxlN8B5NVoxTEK2UhXq_UacYfi2YsppdMjhN2mNYkmIgWAuNYE1BDxtqYkgp4qBOsWwoXhQFtWpRR7VpUasWBUIVLaXt7dOEpZ_R_mv666EAHzcAyzbODuMaFr1B6-Ka1Qb3_wm_AeKmooM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2052807527</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Association between human and animal thermal comfort indices and physiological heat stress indicators in dairy calves</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kovács, L. ; Kézér, F.L. ; Ruff, F. ; Szenci, O. ; Jurkovich, V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kovács, L. ; Kézér, F.L. ; Ruff, F. ; Szenci, O. ; Jurkovich, V.</creatorcontrib><description>Warm summer episodes have a significant effect on the overall health and well-being of young cattle; however, it is not known which temperature measure should be used for estimating heat stress in dairy calves. In this study, generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate the relationships between thermal comfort indices and animal-based heat stress indicators in sixteen Holstein bull calves that were housed in individual calf hutches. Data were collected under continental weather characteristics over a 5-day period: day 1 (lower-temperature day), days 2 and 3 (heat stress days), and a 2-day post-stress period. Relative humidity, ambient temperature, the heat index, the humidex and five different temperature–humidity indices (THI) were used as thermal indices. Physiological variables monitored included respiratory rate, rectal temperature, ear skin temperature and heart rate. The heat index and the humidex measuring human thermal comfort were more closely associated with physiological measures than were the ambient temperature or the THIs (in case of heat index: R2 = 0.87 for respiratory rate, R2 = 0.63 for rectal temperature, R2 = 0.70 for ear skin temperature, and R2 = 0.78 for heart rate, respectively; in case of humidex: R2 = 0.85 for respiratory rate, R2 = 0.60 for rectal temperature, R2 = 0.68 for ear skin temperature, and R2 = 0.75 for heart rate, respectively). Based on our results, parameters of human outdoor comfort seem better to estimate heat stress in dairy calves in a continental region than those of THIs or ambient temperature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-9351</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0953</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.05.036</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29885611</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>AMBIENT TEMPERATURE ; AUDITORY ORGANS ; CALVES ; Ear temperature ; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; HEART ; Heart rate ; Heat index ; HEAT STRESS ; HUMAN POPULATIONS ; HUMIDITY ; RECTUM ; Respiratory rate ; SKIN ; THERMAL COMFORT ; WEATHER</subject><ispartof>Environmental research, 2018-10, Vol.166, p.108-111</ispartof><rights>2018</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-e8f960d13a617e0c2dc4db7bf072d3ab3d18580610edbad72a0c24af72ea69f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-e8f960d13a617e0c2dc4db7bf072d3ab3d18580610edbad72a0c24af72ea69f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.05.036$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29885611$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/23105866$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kovács, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kézér, F.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruff, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szenci, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurkovich, V.</creatorcontrib><title>Association between human and animal thermal comfort indices and physiological heat stress indicators in dairy calves</title><title>Environmental research</title><addtitle>Environ Res</addtitle><description>Warm summer episodes have a significant effect on the overall health and well-being of young cattle; however, it is not known which temperature measure should be used for estimating heat stress in dairy calves. In this study, generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate the relationships between thermal comfort indices and animal-based heat stress indicators in sixteen Holstein bull calves that were housed in individual calf hutches. Data were collected under continental weather characteristics over a 5-day period: day 1 (lower-temperature day), days 2 and 3 (heat stress days), and a 2-day post-stress period. Relative humidity, ambient temperature, the heat index, the humidex and five different temperature–humidity indices (THI) were used as thermal indices. Physiological variables monitored included respiratory rate, rectal temperature, ear skin temperature and heart rate. The heat index and the humidex measuring human thermal comfort were more closely associated with physiological measures than were the ambient temperature or the THIs (in case of heat index: R2 = 0.87 for respiratory rate, R2 = 0.63 for rectal temperature, R2 = 0.70 for ear skin temperature, and R2 = 0.78 for heart rate, respectively; in case of humidex: R2 = 0.85 for respiratory rate, R2 = 0.60 for rectal temperature, R2 = 0.68 for ear skin temperature, and R2 = 0.75 for heart rate, respectively). Based on our results, parameters of human outdoor comfort seem better to estimate heat stress in dairy calves in a continental region than those of THIs or ambient temperature.</description><subject>AMBIENT TEMPERATURE</subject><subject>AUDITORY ORGANS</subject><subject>CALVES</subject><subject>Ear temperature</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>HEART</subject><subject>Heart rate</subject><subject>Heat index</subject><subject>HEAT STRESS</subject><subject>HUMAN POPULATIONS</subject><subject>HUMIDITY</subject><subject>RECTUM</subject><subject>Respiratory rate</subject><subject>SKIN</subject><subject>THERMAL COMFORT</subject><subject>WEATHER</subject><issn>0013-9351</issn><issn>1096-0953</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUGL1DAUx4Mo7uzqNxApePHS8SWZpO1FWBZ1hQUveg5p8moztMmYpLPMtze1q0cP4SXwe3l_3o-QNxT2FKj8cNyjP0dMewa03YPYA5fPyI5CJ2voBH9OdgCU1x0X9Ipcp3QsTyo4vCRXrGtbISndkeU2pWCczi74qsf8iOircZm1r7S35bhZT1UeMa7VhHkIMVfOW2cw_UFO4yW5MIWfzhRiRJ2rlEuutFE6h7heK6tdvFSFOWN6RV4Mekr4-qnekB-fP32_u68fvn35enf7UBveQa6xHToJlnItaYNgmDUH2zf9AA2zXPfc0la0ICmg7bVtmC7MQQ8NQy27QfAb8m77N6TsVDIuoxlN8B5NVoxTEK2UhXq_UacYfi2YsppdMjhN2mNYkmIgWAuNYE1BDxtqYkgp4qBOsWwoXhQFtWpRR7VpUasWBUIVLaXt7dOEpZ_R_mv666EAHzcAyzbODuMaFr1B6-Ka1Qb3_wm_AeKmooM</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Kovács, L.</creator><creator>Kézér, F.L.</creator><creator>Ruff, F.</creator><creator>Szenci, O.</creator><creator>Jurkovich, V.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Association between human and animal thermal comfort indices and physiological heat stress indicators in dairy calves</title><author>Kovács, L. ; Kézér, F.L. ; Ruff, F. ; Szenci, O. ; Jurkovich, V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-e8f960d13a617e0c2dc4db7bf072d3ab3d18580610edbad72a0c24af72ea69f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>AMBIENT TEMPERATURE</topic><topic>AUDITORY ORGANS</topic><topic>CALVES</topic><topic>Ear temperature</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>HEART</topic><topic>Heart rate</topic><topic>Heat index</topic><topic>HEAT STRESS</topic><topic>HUMAN POPULATIONS</topic><topic>HUMIDITY</topic><topic>RECTUM</topic><topic>Respiratory rate</topic><topic>SKIN</topic><topic>THERMAL COMFORT</topic><topic>WEATHER</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kovács, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kézér, F.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruff, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szenci, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurkovich, V.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Environmental research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kovács, L.</au><au>Kézér, F.L.</au><au>Ruff, F.</au><au>Szenci, O.</au><au>Jurkovich, V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Association between human and animal thermal comfort indices and physiological heat stress indicators in dairy calves</atitle><jtitle>Environmental research</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Res</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>166</volume><spage>108</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>108-111</pages><issn>0013-9351</issn><eissn>1096-0953</eissn><abstract>Warm summer episodes have a significant effect on the overall health and well-being of young cattle; however, it is not known which temperature measure should be used for estimating heat stress in dairy calves. In this study, generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate the relationships between thermal comfort indices and animal-based heat stress indicators in sixteen Holstein bull calves that were housed in individual calf hutches. Data were collected under continental weather characteristics over a 5-day period: day 1 (lower-temperature day), days 2 and 3 (heat stress days), and a 2-day post-stress period. Relative humidity, ambient temperature, the heat index, the humidex and five different temperature–humidity indices (THI) were used as thermal indices. Physiological variables monitored included respiratory rate, rectal temperature, ear skin temperature and heart rate. The heat index and the humidex measuring human thermal comfort were more closely associated with physiological measures than were the ambient temperature or the THIs (in case of heat index: R2 = 0.87 for respiratory rate, R2 = 0.63 for rectal temperature, R2 = 0.70 for ear skin temperature, and R2 = 0.78 for heart rate, respectively; in case of humidex: R2 = 0.85 for respiratory rate, R2 = 0.60 for rectal temperature, R2 = 0.68 for ear skin temperature, and R2 = 0.75 for heart rate, respectively). Based on our results, parameters of human outdoor comfort seem better to estimate heat stress in dairy calves in a continental region than those of THIs or ambient temperature.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29885611</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.envres.2018.05.036</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0013-9351 |
ispartof | Environmental research, 2018-10, Vol.166, p.108-111 |
issn | 0013-9351 1096-0953 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_23105866 |
source | ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | AMBIENT TEMPERATURE AUDITORY ORGANS CALVES Ear temperature ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES HEART Heart rate Heat index HEAT STRESS HUMAN POPULATIONS HUMIDITY RECTUM Respiratory rate SKIN THERMAL COMFORT WEATHER |
title | Association between human and animal thermal comfort indices and physiological heat stress indicators in dairy calves |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A32%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Association%20between%20human%20and%20animal%20thermal%20comfort%20indices%20and%20physiological%20heat%20stress%20indicators%20in%20dairy%20calves&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20research&rft.au=Kov%C3%A1cs,%20L.&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=166&rft.spage=108&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=108-111&rft.issn=0013-9351&rft.eissn=1096-0953&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.envres.2018.05.036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2052807527%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2052807527&rft_id=info:pmid/29885611&rft_els_id=S0013935118302883&rfr_iscdi=true |