Association between human and animal thermal comfort indices and physiological heat stress indicators in dairy calves

Warm summer episodes have a significant effect on the overall health and well-being of young cattle; however, it is not known which temperature measure should be used for estimating heat stress in dairy calves. In this study, generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate the relation...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Environmental research 2018-10, Vol.166, p.108-111
Hauptverfasser: Kovács, L., Kézér, F.L., Ruff, F., Szenci, O., Jurkovich, V.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 111
container_issue
container_start_page 108
container_title Environmental research
container_volume 166
creator Kovács, L.
Kézér, F.L.
Ruff, F.
Szenci, O.
Jurkovich, V.
description Warm summer episodes have a significant effect on the overall health and well-being of young cattle; however, it is not known which temperature measure should be used for estimating heat stress in dairy calves. In this study, generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate the relationships between thermal comfort indices and animal-based heat stress indicators in sixteen Holstein bull calves that were housed in individual calf hutches. Data were collected under continental weather characteristics over a 5-day period: day 1 (lower-temperature day), days 2 and 3 (heat stress days), and a 2-day post-stress period. Relative humidity, ambient temperature, the heat index, the humidex and five different temperature–humidity indices (THI) were used as thermal indices. Physiological variables monitored included respiratory rate, rectal temperature, ear skin temperature and heart rate. The heat index and the humidex measuring human thermal comfort were more closely associated with physiological measures than were the ambient temperature or the THIs (in case of heat index: R2 = 0.87 for respiratory rate, R2 = 0.63 for rectal temperature, R2 = 0.70 for ear skin temperature, and R2 = 0.78 for heart rate, respectively; in case of humidex: R2 = 0.85 for respiratory rate, R2 = 0.60 for rectal temperature, R2 = 0.68 for ear skin temperature, and R2 = 0.75 for heart rate, respectively). Based on our results, parameters of human outdoor comfort seem better to estimate heat stress in dairy calves in a continental region than those of THIs or ambient temperature.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.envres.2018.05.036
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_23105866</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0013935118302883</els_id><sourcerecordid>2052807527</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-e8f960d13a617e0c2dc4db7bf072d3ab3d18580610edbad72a0c24af72ea69f53</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kUGL1DAUx4Mo7uzqNxApePHS8SWZpO1FWBZ1hQUveg5p8moztMmYpLPMtze1q0cP4SXwe3l_3o-QNxT2FKj8cNyjP0dMewa03YPYA5fPyI5CJ2voBH9OdgCU1x0X9Ipcp3QsTyo4vCRXrGtbISndkeU2pWCczi74qsf8iOircZm1r7S35bhZT1UeMa7VhHkIMVfOW2cw_UFO4yW5MIWfzhRiRJ2rlEuutFE6h7heK6tdvFSFOWN6RV4Mekr4-qnekB-fP32_u68fvn35enf7UBveQa6xHToJlnItaYNgmDUH2zf9AA2zXPfc0la0ICmg7bVtmC7MQQ8NQy27QfAb8m77N6TsVDIuoxlN8B5NVoxTEK2UhXq_UacYfi2YsppdMjhN2mNYkmIgWAuNYE1BDxtqYkgp4qBOsWwoXhQFtWpRR7VpUasWBUIVLaXt7dOEpZ_R_mv666EAHzcAyzbODuMaFr1B6-Ka1Qb3_wm_AeKmooM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>2052807527</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Association between human and animal thermal comfort indices and physiological heat stress indicators in dairy calves</title><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Kovács, L. ; Kézér, F.L. ; Ruff, F. ; Szenci, O. ; Jurkovich, V.</creator><creatorcontrib>Kovács, L. ; Kézér, F.L. ; Ruff, F. ; Szenci, O. ; Jurkovich, V.</creatorcontrib><description>Warm summer episodes have a significant effect on the overall health and well-being of young cattle; however, it is not known which temperature measure should be used for estimating heat stress in dairy calves. In this study, generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate the relationships between thermal comfort indices and animal-based heat stress indicators in sixteen Holstein bull calves that were housed in individual calf hutches. Data were collected under continental weather characteristics over a 5-day period: day 1 (lower-temperature day), days 2 and 3 (heat stress days), and a 2-day post-stress period. Relative humidity, ambient temperature, the heat index, the humidex and five different temperature–humidity indices (THI) were used as thermal indices. Physiological variables monitored included respiratory rate, rectal temperature, ear skin temperature and heart rate. The heat index and the humidex measuring human thermal comfort were more closely associated with physiological measures than were the ambient temperature or the THIs (in case of heat index: R2 = 0.87 for respiratory rate, R2 = 0.63 for rectal temperature, R2 = 0.70 for ear skin temperature, and R2 = 0.78 for heart rate, respectively; in case of humidex: R2 = 0.85 for respiratory rate, R2 = 0.60 for rectal temperature, R2 = 0.68 for ear skin temperature, and R2 = 0.75 for heart rate, respectively). Based on our results, parameters of human outdoor comfort seem better to estimate heat stress in dairy calves in a continental region than those of THIs or ambient temperature.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0013-9351</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-0953</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2018.05.036</identifier><identifier>PMID: 29885611</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Netherlands: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>AMBIENT TEMPERATURE ; AUDITORY ORGANS ; CALVES ; Ear temperature ; ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE ; ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES ; HEART ; Heart rate ; Heat index ; HEAT STRESS ; HUMAN POPULATIONS ; HUMIDITY ; RECTUM ; Respiratory rate ; SKIN ; THERMAL COMFORT ; WEATHER</subject><ispartof>Environmental research, 2018-10, Vol.166, p.108-111</ispartof><rights>2018</rights><rights>Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-e8f960d13a617e0c2dc4db7bf072d3ab3d18580610edbad72a0c24af72ea69f53</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-e8f960d13a617e0c2dc4db7bf072d3ab3d18580610edbad72a0c24af72ea69f53</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2018.05.036$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3548,27922,27923,45993</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29885611$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/23105866$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Kovács, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kézér, F.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruff, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szenci, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurkovich, V.</creatorcontrib><title>Association between human and animal thermal comfort indices and physiological heat stress indicators in dairy calves</title><title>Environmental research</title><addtitle>Environ Res</addtitle><description>Warm summer episodes have a significant effect on the overall health and well-being of young cattle; however, it is not known which temperature measure should be used for estimating heat stress in dairy calves. In this study, generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate the relationships between thermal comfort indices and animal-based heat stress indicators in sixteen Holstein bull calves that were housed in individual calf hutches. Data were collected under continental weather characteristics over a 5-day period: day 1 (lower-temperature day), days 2 and 3 (heat stress days), and a 2-day post-stress period. Relative humidity, ambient temperature, the heat index, the humidex and five different temperature–humidity indices (THI) were used as thermal indices. Physiological variables monitored included respiratory rate, rectal temperature, ear skin temperature and heart rate. The heat index and the humidex measuring human thermal comfort were more closely associated with physiological measures than were the ambient temperature or the THIs (in case of heat index: R2 = 0.87 for respiratory rate, R2 = 0.63 for rectal temperature, R2 = 0.70 for ear skin temperature, and R2 = 0.78 for heart rate, respectively; in case of humidex: R2 = 0.85 for respiratory rate, R2 = 0.60 for rectal temperature, R2 = 0.68 for ear skin temperature, and R2 = 0.75 for heart rate, respectively). Based on our results, parameters of human outdoor comfort seem better to estimate heat stress in dairy calves in a continental region than those of THIs or ambient temperature.</description><subject>AMBIENT TEMPERATURE</subject><subject>AUDITORY ORGANS</subject><subject>CALVES</subject><subject>Ear temperature</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</subject><subject>HEART</subject><subject>Heart rate</subject><subject>Heat index</subject><subject>HEAT STRESS</subject><subject>HUMAN POPULATIONS</subject><subject>HUMIDITY</subject><subject>RECTUM</subject><subject>Respiratory rate</subject><subject>SKIN</subject><subject>THERMAL COMFORT</subject><subject>WEATHER</subject><issn>0013-9351</issn><issn>1096-0953</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2018</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kUGL1DAUx4Mo7uzqNxApePHS8SWZpO1FWBZ1hQUveg5p8moztMmYpLPMtze1q0cP4SXwe3l_3o-QNxT2FKj8cNyjP0dMewa03YPYA5fPyI5CJ2voBH9OdgCU1x0X9Ipcp3QsTyo4vCRXrGtbISndkeU2pWCczi74qsf8iOircZm1r7S35bhZT1UeMa7VhHkIMVfOW2cw_UFO4yW5MIWfzhRiRJ2rlEuutFE6h7heK6tdvFSFOWN6RV4Mekr4-qnekB-fP32_u68fvn35enf7UBveQa6xHToJlnItaYNgmDUH2zf9AA2zXPfc0la0ICmg7bVtmC7MQQ8NQy27QfAb8m77N6TsVDIuoxlN8B5NVoxTEK2UhXq_UacYfi2YsppdMjhN2mNYkmIgWAuNYE1BDxtqYkgp4qBOsWwoXhQFtWpRR7VpUasWBUIVLaXt7dOEpZ_R_mv666EAHzcAyzbODuMaFr1B6-Ka1Qb3_wm_AeKmooM</recordid><startdate>20181001</startdate><enddate>20181001</enddate><creator>Kovács, L.</creator><creator>Kézér, F.L.</creator><creator>Ruff, F.</creator><creator>Szenci, O.</creator><creator>Jurkovich, V.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20181001</creationdate><title>Association between human and animal thermal comfort indices and physiological heat stress indicators in dairy calves</title><author>Kovács, L. ; Kézér, F.L. ; Ruff, F. ; Szenci, O. ; Jurkovich, V.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-e8f960d13a617e0c2dc4db7bf072d3ab3d18580610edbad72a0c24af72ea69f53</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2018</creationdate><topic>AMBIENT TEMPERATURE</topic><topic>AUDITORY ORGANS</topic><topic>CALVES</topic><topic>Ear temperature</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES</topic><topic>HEART</topic><topic>Heart rate</topic><topic>Heat index</topic><topic>HEAT STRESS</topic><topic>HUMAN POPULATIONS</topic><topic>HUMIDITY</topic><topic>RECTUM</topic><topic>Respiratory rate</topic><topic>SKIN</topic><topic>THERMAL COMFORT</topic><topic>WEATHER</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Kovács, L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kézér, F.L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ruff, F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Szenci, O.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jurkovich, V.</creatorcontrib><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Environmental research</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Kovács, L.</au><au>Kézér, F.L.</au><au>Ruff, F.</au><au>Szenci, O.</au><au>Jurkovich, V.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Association between human and animal thermal comfort indices and physiological heat stress indicators in dairy calves</atitle><jtitle>Environmental research</jtitle><addtitle>Environ Res</addtitle><date>2018-10-01</date><risdate>2018</risdate><volume>166</volume><spage>108</spage><epage>111</epage><pages>108-111</pages><issn>0013-9351</issn><eissn>1096-0953</eissn><abstract>Warm summer episodes have a significant effect on the overall health and well-being of young cattle; however, it is not known which temperature measure should be used for estimating heat stress in dairy calves. In this study, generalized linear mixed-effects models were used to estimate the relationships between thermal comfort indices and animal-based heat stress indicators in sixteen Holstein bull calves that were housed in individual calf hutches. Data were collected under continental weather characteristics over a 5-day period: day 1 (lower-temperature day), days 2 and 3 (heat stress days), and a 2-day post-stress period. Relative humidity, ambient temperature, the heat index, the humidex and five different temperature–humidity indices (THI) were used as thermal indices. Physiological variables monitored included respiratory rate, rectal temperature, ear skin temperature and heart rate. The heat index and the humidex measuring human thermal comfort were more closely associated with physiological measures than were the ambient temperature or the THIs (in case of heat index: R2 = 0.87 for respiratory rate, R2 = 0.63 for rectal temperature, R2 = 0.70 for ear skin temperature, and R2 = 0.78 for heart rate, respectively; in case of humidex: R2 = 0.85 for respiratory rate, R2 = 0.60 for rectal temperature, R2 = 0.68 for ear skin temperature, and R2 = 0.75 for heart rate, respectively). Based on our results, parameters of human outdoor comfort seem better to estimate heat stress in dairy calves in a continental region than those of THIs or ambient temperature.</abstract><cop>Netherlands</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>29885611</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.envres.2018.05.036</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0013-9351
ispartof Environmental research, 2018-10, Vol.166, p.108-111
issn 0013-9351
1096-0953
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_23105866
source ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects AMBIENT TEMPERATURE
AUDITORY ORGANS
CALVES
Ear temperature
ENVIRONMENTAL EXPOSURE
ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES
HEART
Heart rate
Heat index
HEAT STRESS
HUMAN POPULATIONS
HUMIDITY
RECTUM
Respiratory rate
SKIN
THERMAL COMFORT
WEATHER
title Association between human and animal thermal comfort indices and physiological heat stress indicators in dairy calves
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-14T13%3A32%3A04IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Association%20between%20human%20and%20animal%20thermal%20comfort%20indices%20and%20physiological%20heat%20stress%20indicators%20in%20dairy%20calves&rft.jtitle=Environmental%20research&rft.au=Kov%C3%A1cs,%20L.&rft.date=2018-10-01&rft.volume=166&rft.spage=108&rft.epage=111&rft.pages=108-111&rft.issn=0013-9351&rft.eissn=1096-0953&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.envres.2018.05.036&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E2052807527%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=2052807527&rft_id=info:pmid/29885611&rft_els_id=S0013935118302883&rfr_iscdi=true