Risks of secondary malignancies with heterotopic bone radiation therapy for patients younger than 40 years
Abstract Heterotopic ossification (HO) of the bone is defined as a benign condition in which abnormal bone formation occurs in soft tissue. One of the most common prophylactic treatments for HO is radiation therapy (RT). This study retrospectively reviewed 20 patients younger than the age of 40 who...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists 2016, Vol.41 (3), p.212-215 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 215 |
---|---|
container_issue | 3 |
container_start_page | 212 |
container_title | Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists |
container_volume | 41 |
creator | Cadieux, Catherine L., B.S., R.T.(T), C.M.D DesRosiers, Colleen, Ph.D McMullen, Kevin, M.D |
description | Abstract Heterotopic ossification (HO) of the bone is defined as a benign condition in which abnormal bone formation occurs in soft tissue. One of the most common prophylactic treatments for HO is radiation therapy (RT). This study retrospectively reviewed 20 patients younger than the age of 40 who received radiation to prevent HO in a single fraction of 7 Gray. The purpose of this study is to assess the risk of a second malignancy in these patients by recreating their treatment fields and contouring organs at risk to estimate the radiation dose absorbed by normal tissues outside the radiation treatment field. Diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans for each patient were used to recreate treatment fields and to calculate dose to structures of interest. The distance from the field edge to each structure and its depth was recorded. Dose measurements in a water phantom were performed for the range of depths, distances, and field sizes used in the actual treatment plans. Computer-generated doses were compared to estimates based on measurement. The structure dose recorded was the higher dose generated between the 2 methods. Scatter dose was recorded to the rectum, bladder, sigmoid colon, small bowel, ovaries and utero-cervix in female patients, and prostate and gonads in male patients. In some patients, there is considerable dose received by certain organs from scatter because of their proximity to the radiation field. The average dose to the ovarian region was 4.125 Gy with a range of 1.085 to 6.228 Gy. The risk estimate for these patients ranged from 0.16% to 0.93%. The average total lifetime risk estimate for the bladder in all patients is 0.22% and the average total lifetime risk estimate for the remainder organs in all patients is 1.25%. In conclusions, proper shielding created from multileaf collimators (MLCs), blocks, and shields should always be used when possible. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.meddos.2016.02.001 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22685149</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0958394716300024</els_id><sourcerecordid>1813622532</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-d126c663a457192b846da71544d2e4c4febea2e001f937c9406c54feb7881e313</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUl2L1TAQDaK4d1f_gUjAF19a89W0fRFkUVdYEPx4DrnJdG-6vUlNUqX_3pSuPvjiU8jMmZkzZw5CLyipKaHyzVifwdqQalZ-NWE1IfQROtCu5ZUgjD1GB9I3XcV70V6gy5RGQkgjCH-KLlhLG8l4d0DjF5fuEw4DTmCCtzqu-Kwnd-e1Nw4S_uXyCZ8gQww5zM7gY_CAo7ZOZxc8zieIel7xECKeSwh8TngNi7-DWJLaY0HwCjqmZ-jJoKcEzx_eK_T9w_tv1zfV7eePn67f3VZGiCZXljJppORaNC3t2bET0urCVwjLQBgxwBE0g7Lt0PPW9IJI02zRtusocMqv0Ku9b0jZqWRcBnMqu3kwWTEmu4aKvqBe76g5hh8LpKzOLhmYJu0hLEnRjnLJWMNZgYodamJIKcKg5ujORSlFidpuoUa130Jtt1CEqcKulL18mLAcS_pv0R_xC-DtDoCixk8HcSML3oB1ceNqg_vfhH8bmMl5Z_R0DyukMSzRF6UVVakUqK-bHzY7UMmLF5jgvwHlGbFh</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1813622532</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Risks of secondary malignancies with heterotopic bone radiation therapy for patients younger than 40 years</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Cadieux, Catherine L., B.S., R.T.(T), C.M.D ; DesRosiers, Colleen, Ph.D ; McMullen, Kevin, M.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Cadieux, Catherine L., B.S., R.T.(T), C.M.D ; DesRosiers, Colleen, Ph.D ; McMullen, Kevin, M.D</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract Heterotopic ossification (HO) of the bone is defined as a benign condition in which abnormal bone formation occurs in soft tissue. One of the most common prophylactic treatments for HO is radiation therapy (RT). This study retrospectively reviewed 20 patients younger than the age of 40 who received radiation to prevent HO in a single fraction of 7 Gray. The purpose of this study is to assess the risk of a second malignancy in these patients by recreating their treatment fields and contouring organs at risk to estimate the radiation dose absorbed by normal tissues outside the radiation treatment field. Diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans for each patient were used to recreate treatment fields and to calculate dose to structures of interest. The distance from the field edge to each structure and its depth was recorded. Dose measurements in a water phantom were performed for the range of depths, distances, and field sizes used in the actual treatment plans. Computer-generated doses were compared to estimates based on measurement. The structure dose recorded was the higher dose generated between the 2 methods. Scatter dose was recorded to the rectum, bladder, sigmoid colon, small bowel, ovaries and utero-cervix in female patients, and prostate and gonads in male patients. In some patients, there is considerable dose received by certain organs from scatter because of their proximity to the radiation field. The average dose to the ovarian region was 4.125 Gy with a range of 1.085 to 6.228 Gy. The risk estimate for these patients ranged from 0.16% to 0.93%. The average total lifetime risk estimate for the bladder in all patients is 0.22% and the average total lifetime risk estimate for the remainder organs in all patients is 1.25%. In conclusions, proper shielding created from multileaf collimators (MLCs), blocks, and shields should always be used when possible.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-3947</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4022</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2016.02.001</identifier><identifier>PMID: 27156238</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>ANIMAL TISSUES ; BLADDER ; COLLIMATORS ; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY ; COMPUTERS ; Female ; FEMALES ; HAZARDS ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Heterotopic bone ossification ; Humans ; IMAGE PROCESSING ; LIFETIME ; Male ; MALES ; NEOPLASMS ; Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - etiology ; Ossification, Heterotopic - prevention & control ; OVARIES ; Ovary - radiation effects ; PATIENTS ; PHANTOMS ; PROSTATE ; RADIATION DOSE UNITS ; RADIATION DOSES ; Radiation Protection ; RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY ; Radiation therapy treatment ; Radiology ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; RADIOTHERAPY ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; RECTUM ; Retrospective Studies ; REVIEWS ; Risk ; Secondary malignancies ; SHIELDING ; SHIELDS ; Side effect ; SIDE EFFECTS ; SKELETON ; Tomography, X-Ray Computed ; Urinary Bladder - radiation effects</subject><ispartof>Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists, 2016, Vol.41 (3), p.212-215</ispartof><rights>2016</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-d126c663a457192b846da71544d2e4c4febea2e001f937c9406c54feb7881e313</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-d126c663a457192b846da71544d2e4c4febea2e001f937c9406c54feb7881e313</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0958394716300024$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27156238$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22685149$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Cadieux, Catherine L., B.S., R.T.(T), C.M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DesRosiers, Colleen, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMullen, Kevin, M.D</creatorcontrib><title>Risks of secondary malignancies with heterotopic bone radiation therapy for patients younger than 40 years</title><title>Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists</title><addtitle>Med Dosim</addtitle><description>Abstract Heterotopic ossification (HO) of the bone is defined as a benign condition in which abnormal bone formation occurs in soft tissue. One of the most common prophylactic treatments for HO is radiation therapy (RT). This study retrospectively reviewed 20 patients younger than the age of 40 who received radiation to prevent HO in a single fraction of 7 Gray. The purpose of this study is to assess the risk of a second malignancy in these patients by recreating their treatment fields and contouring organs at risk to estimate the radiation dose absorbed by normal tissues outside the radiation treatment field. Diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans for each patient were used to recreate treatment fields and to calculate dose to structures of interest. The distance from the field edge to each structure and its depth was recorded. Dose measurements in a water phantom were performed for the range of depths, distances, and field sizes used in the actual treatment plans. Computer-generated doses were compared to estimates based on measurement. The structure dose recorded was the higher dose generated between the 2 methods. Scatter dose was recorded to the rectum, bladder, sigmoid colon, small bowel, ovaries and utero-cervix in female patients, and prostate and gonads in male patients. In some patients, there is considerable dose received by certain organs from scatter because of their proximity to the radiation field. The average dose to the ovarian region was 4.125 Gy with a range of 1.085 to 6.228 Gy. The risk estimate for these patients ranged from 0.16% to 0.93%. The average total lifetime risk estimate for the bladder in all patients is 0.22% and the average total lifetime risk estimate for the remainder organs in all patients is 1.25%. In conclusions, proper shielding created from multileaf collimators (MLCs), blocks, and shields should always be used when possible.</description><subject>ANIMAL TISSUES</subject><subject>BLADDER</subject><subject>COLLIMATORS</subject><subject>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</subject><subject>COMPUTERS</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>FEMALES</subject><subject>HAZARDS</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Heterotopic bone ossification</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>IMAGE PROCESSING</subject><subject>LIFETIME</subject><subject>Male</subject><subject>MALES</subject><subject>NEOPLASMS</subject><subject>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - etiology</subject><subject>Ossification, Heterotopic - prevention & control</subject><subject>OVARIES</subject><subject>Ovary - radiation effects</subject><subject>PATIENTS</subject><subject>PHANTOMS</subject><subject>PROSTATE</subject><subject>RADIATION DOSE UNITS</subject><subject>RADIATION DOSES</subject><subject>Radiation Protection</subject><subject>RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY</subject><subject>Radiation therapy treatment</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>RADIOTHERAPY</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>RECTUM</subject><subject>Retrospective Studies</subject><subject>REVIEWS</subject><subject>Risk</subject><subject>Secondary malignancies</subject><subject>SHIELDING</subject><subject>SHIELDS</subject><subject>Side effect</subject><subject>SIDE EFFECTS</subject><subject>SKELETON</subject><subject>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</subject><subject>Urinary Bladder - radiation effects</subject><issn>0958-3947</issn><issn>1873-4022</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUl2L1TAQDaK4d1f_gUjAF19a89W0fRFkUVdYEPx4DrnJdG-6vUlNUqX_3pSuPvjiU8jMmZkzZw5CLyipKaHyzVifwdqQalZ-NWE1IfQROtCu5ZUgjD1GB9I3XcV70V6gy5RGQkgjCH-KLlhLG8l4d0DjF5fuEw4DTmCCtzqu-Kwnd-e1Nw4S_uXyCZ8gQww5zM7gY_CAo7ZOZxc8zieIel7xECKeSwh8TngNi7-DWJLaY0HwCjqmZ-jJoKcEzx_eK_T9w_tv1zfV7eePn67f3VZGiCZXljJppORaNC3t2bET0urCVwjLQBgxwBE0g7Lt0PPW9IJI02zRtusocMqv0Ku9b0jZqWRcBnMqu3kwWTEmu4aKvqBe76g5hh8LpKzOLhmYJu0hLEnRjnLJWMNZgYodamJIKcKg5ujORSlFidpuoUa130Jtt1CEqcKulL18mLAcS_pv0R_xC-DtDoCixk8HcSML3oB1ceNqg_vfhH8bmMl5Z_R0DyukMSzRF6UVVakUqK-bHzY7UMmLF5jgvwHlGbFh</recordid><startdate>2016</startdate><enddate>2016</enddate><creator>Cadieux, Catherine L., B.S., R.T.(T), C.M.D</creator><creator>DesRosiers, Colleen, Ph.D</creator><creator>McMullen, Kevin, M.D</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2016</creationdate><title>Risks of secondary malignancies with heterotopic bone radiation therapy for patients younger than 40 years</title><author>Cadieux, Catherine L., B.S., R.T.(T), C.M.D ; DesRosiers, Colleen, Ph.D ; McMullen, Kevin, M.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-d126c663a457192b846da71544d2e4c4febea2e001f937c9406c54feb7881e313</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>ANIMAL TISSUES</topic><topic>BLADDER</topic><topic>COLLIMATORS</topic><topic>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</topic><topic>COMPUTERS</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>FEMALES</topic><topic>HAZARDS</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Heterotopic bone ossification</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>IMAGE PROCESSING</topic><topic>LIFETIME</topic><topic>Male</topic><topic>MALES</topic><topic>NEOPLASMS</topic><topic>Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - etiology</topic><topic>Ossification, Heterotopic - prevention & control</topic><topic>OVARIES</topic><topic>Ovary - radiation effects</topic><topic>PATIENTS</topic><topic>PHANTOMS</topic><topic>PROSTATE</topic><topic>RADIATION DOSE UNITS</topic><topic>RADIATION DOSES</topic><topic>Radiation Protection</topic><topic>RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY</topic><topic>Radiation therapy treatment</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>RADIOTHERAPY</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>RECTUM</topic><topic>Retrospective Studies</topic><topic>REVIEWS</topic><topic>Risk</topic><topic>Secondary malignancies</topic><topic>SHIELDING</topic><topic>SHIELDS</topic><topic>Side effect</topic><topic>SIDE EFFECTS</topic><topic>SKELETON</topic><topic>Tomography, X-Ray Computed</topic><topic>Urinary Bladder - radiation effects</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Cadieux, Catherine L., B.S., R.T.(T), C.M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>DesRosiers, Colleen, Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McMullen, Kevin, M.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Cadieux, Catherine L., B.S., R.T.(T), C.M.D</au><au>DesRosiers, Colleen, Ph.D</au><au>McMullen, Kevin, M.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Risks of secondary malignancies with heterotopic bone radiation therapy for patients younger than 40 years</atitle><jtitle>Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists</jtitle><addtitle>Med Dosim</addtitle><date>2016</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>41</volume><issue>3</issue><spage>212</spage><epage>215</epage><pages>212-215</pages><issn>0958-3947</issn><eissn>1873-4022</eissn><abstract>Abstract Heterotopic ossification (HO) of the bone is defined as a benign condition in which abnormal bone formation occurs in soft tissue. One of the most common prophylactic treatments for HO is radiation therapy (RT). This study retrospectively reviewed 20 patients younger than the age of 40 who received radiation to prevent HO in a single fraction of 7 Gray. The purpose of this study is to assess the risk of a second malignancy in these patients by recreating their treatment fields and contouring organs at risk to estimate the radiation dose absorbed by normal tissues outside the radiation treatment field. Diagnostic computed tomography (CT) scans for each patient were used to recreate treatment fields and to calculate dose to structures of interest. The distance from the field edge to each structure and its depth was recorded. Dose measurements in a water phantom were performed for the range of depths, distances, and field sizes used in the actual treatment plans. Computer-generated doses were compared to estimates based on measurement. The structure dose recorded was the higher dose generated between the 2 methods. Scatter dose was recorded to the rectum, bladder, sigmoid colon, small bowel, ovaries and utero-cervix in female patients, and prostate and gonads in male patients. In some patients, there is considerable dose received by certain organs from scatter because of their proximity to the radiation field. The average dose to the ovarian region was 4.125 Gy with a range of 1.085 to 6.228 Gy. The risk estimate for these patients ranged from 0.16% to 0.93%. The average total lifetime risk estimate for the bladder in all patients is 0.22% and the average total lifetime risk estimate for the remainder organs in all patients is 1.25%. In conclusions, proper shielding created from multileaf collimators (MLCs), blocks, and shields should always be used when possible.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>27156238</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.meddos.2016.02.001</doi><tpages>4</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0958-3947 |
ispartof | Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists, 2016, Vol.41 (3), p.212-215 |
issn | 0958-3947 1873-4022 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22685149 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete |
subjects | ANIMAL TISSUES BLADDER COLLIMATORS COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY COMPUTERS Female FEMALES HAZARDS Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Heterotopic bone ossification Humans IMAGE PROCESSING LIFETIME Male MALES NEOPLASMS Neoplasms, Radiation-Induced - etiology Ossification, Heterotopic - prevention & control OVARIES Ovary - radiation effects PATIENTS PHANTOMS PROSTATE RADIATION DOSE UNITS RADIATION DOSES Radiation Protection RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY Radiation therapy treatment Radiology RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE RADIOTHERAPY Radiotherapy Dosage RECTUM Retrospective Studies REVIEWS Risk Secondary malignancies SHIELDING SHIELDS Side effect SIDE EFFECTS SKELETON Tomography, X-Ray Computed Urinary Bladder - radiation effects |
title | Risks of secondary malignancies with heterotopic bone radiation therapy for patients younger than 40 years |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-04T17%3A32%3A23IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Risks%20of%20secondary%20malignancies%20with%20heterotopic%20bone%20radiation%20therapy%20for%20patients%20younger%20than%2040%20years&rft.jtitle=Medical%20dosimetry%20:%20official%20journal%20of%20the%20American%20Association%20of%20Medical%20Dosimetrists&rft.au=Cadieux,%20Catherine%20L.,%20B.S.,%20R.T.(T),%20C.M.D&rft.date=2016&rft.volume=41&rft.issue=3&rft.spage=212&rft.epage=215&rft.pages=212-215&rft.issn=0958-3947&rft.eissn=1873-4022&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.meddos.2016.02.001&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1813622532%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1813622532&rft_id=info:pmid/27156238&rft_els_id=S0958394716300024&rfr_iscdi=true |