Initial Report of a Prospective Dosimetric and Clinical Feasibility Trial Demonstrates the Potential of Protons to Increase the Therapeutic Ratio in Breast Cancer Compared With Photons
Purpose To compare dosimetric endpoints between proton therapy (PT) and conventional radiation and determine the feasibility of PT for regional nodal irradiation (RNI) in women with breast cancer. Methods and Materials From 2012 to 2014, 18 women (stage IIA-IIIB) requiring RNI prospectively enrolled...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2016-05, Vol.95 (1), p.411-421 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 421 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 411 |
container_title | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics |
container_volume | 95 |
creator | Bradley, Julie A., MD Dagan, Roi, MD, MS Ho, Meng Wei, MSc Rutenberg, Michael, MD, PhD Morris, Christopher G., MS Li, Zuofeng, PhD Mendenhall, Nancy P., MD |
description | Purpose To compare dosimetric endpoints between proton therapy (PT) and conventional radiation and determine the feasibility of PT for regional nodal irradiation (RNI) in women with breast cancer. Methods and Materials From 2012 to 2014, 18 women (stage IIA-IIIB) requiring RNI prospectively enrolled on a pilot study. Median age was 51.8 years (range, 42-73 years). The cohort included breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy patients and right- and left-sided cancers. Treatment targets and organs at risk were delineated on computed tomography scans, and PT and conventional plans were developed. Toxicity was prospectively recorded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. A Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test compared the dose-volume parameters. The primary endpoint was a reduction in cardiac V5. Results Median follow-up was 20 months (range, 2-31 months). For all patients, the PT plan better met the dosimetric goals and was used for treatment. Proton therapy alone was used for 10 patients (9 postmastectomy, 1 after BCT) and combined proton–photon in 8 (6 BCT, 2 postmastectomy with immediate expander reconstruction). Proton therapy improved coverage of level 2 axilla ( P =.0005). Adequate coverage of internal mammary nodes was consistently achieved with PT (median D95, 50.3 Gy; range, 46.6-52.1 Gy) but not with conventional radiation therapy (median D95, 48.2 Gy; range, 40.8-55 Gy; P =.0005). Median cardiac V5 was 0.6% with PT and 16.3% with conventional radiation ( P |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.09.018 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>pubmed_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22648655</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0360301615033489</els_id><sourcerecordid>26611875</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-4d59cb2c30847a59cb3339f25d5838ccacb1485fe4e8ce657a698b44216d8ada3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFksFu1DAQhiMEokvhDRCyxDmpHdtZ54IEaUtXqsSqLIKb5TgTxWHXjmxvpX0zHg9nUzhw4WRL_v5_xvNPlr0luCCYVFdjYUbv2qkoMeEFrgtMxLNsRcS6zinnP55nK0wrnNMEX2SvQhgxxoSs2cvsoqwqkkC-yn5trIlG7dEDTM5H5Hqk0Na7MIGO5hHQtQvmANEbjZTtULM31ujE34IKpjV7E09o52eHazg4G6JXEQKKA6Cti2DP5sk1ecb0jKJDG6t9UsMZ2g3g1QTHmAo8qGgcMhZ9mt8japTV4FHjDpPy0KHvJg5oO5yNXmcverUP8ObpvMy-3d7smrv8_svnTfPxPteM8Zizjte6LTXFgq3VfKeU1n3JOy6o0FrpljDBe2AgNFR8rapatIyVpOqE6hS9zN4vvi5EI4M2EfSgnbVpPrIsKyYqzhPFFkqn0QUPvZy8OSh_kgTLOS45yiUuOcclcS1TXEn2bpFNx_YA3V_Rn3wS8GEBIH3x0YCfO4A0lc74uYHOmf9V-NdAPyX4E04QRnf0No1PEhlKieXXeWXmjSEcU8pETX8D46jAug</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>Initial Report of a Prospective Dosimetric and Clinical Feasibility Trial Demonstrates the Potential of Protons to Increase the Therapeutic Ratio in Breast Cancer Compared With Photons</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Bradley, Julie A., MD ; Dagan, Roi, MD, MS ; Ho, Meng Wei, MSc ; Rutenberg, Michael, MD, PhD ; Morris, Christopher G., MS ; Li, Zuofeng, PhD ; Mendenhall, Nancy P., MD</creator><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Julie A., MD ; Dagan, Roi, MD, MS ; Ho, Meng Wei, MSc ; Rutenberg, Michael, MD, PhD ; Morris, Christopher G., MS ; Li, Zuofeng, PhD ; Mendenhall, Nancy P., MD</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose To compare dosimetric endpoints between proton therapy (PT) and conventional radiation and determine the feasibility of PT for regional nodal irradiation (RNI) in women with breast cancer. Methods and Materials From 2012 to 2014, 18 women (stage IIA-IIIB) requiring RNI prospectively enrolled on a pilot study. Median age was 51.8 years (range, 42-73 years). The cohort included breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy patients and right- and left-sided cancers. Treatment targets and organs at risk were delineated on computed tomography scans, and PT and conventional plans were developed. Toxicity was prospectively recorded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. A Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test compared the dose-volume parameters. The primary endpoint was a reduction in cardiac V5. Results Median follow-up was 20 months (range, 2-31 months). For all patients, the PT plan better met the dosimetric goals and was used for treatment. Proton therapy alone was used for 10 patients (9 postmastectomy, 1 after BCT) and combined proton–photon in 8 (6 BCT, 2 postmastectomy with immediate expander reconstruction). Proton therapy improved coverage of level 2 axilla ( P =.0005). Adequate coverage of internal mammary nodes was consistently achieved with PT (median D95, 50.3 Gy; range, 46.6-52.1 Gy) but not with conventional radiation therapy (median D95, 48.2 Gy; range, 40.8-55 Gy; P =.0005). Median cardiac V5 was 0.6% with PT and 16.3% with conventional radiation ( P <.0001). Median ipsilateral lung V5 and V20 were improved with PT (median V5 35.3% vs 60.5% [ P <.0001]; and median V20, 21.6% vs 35.5% [ P <.0001]). Grade 3 dermatitis developed in 4 patients (22%), which was the only grade 3 toxicity. No grade 4+ toxicities developed. Conclusion Proton therapy for RNI after mastectomy or BCT significantly improves cardiac dose, especially for left-sided patients, and lung V5 and V20 in all patients without excessive acute toxicity. Proton therapy simultaneously improves target coverage for the internal mammary nodes and level 2 axilla, which may positively impact long-term survival in breast cancer patients.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.09.018</identifier><identifier>PMID: 26611875</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Adult ; Aged ; Axilla ; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY ; DOSIMETRY ; Feasibility Studies ; Female ; Follow-Up Studies ; GY RANGE 10-100 ; Heart - diagnostic imaging ; Heart - radiation effects ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Lung - diagnostic imaging ; Lung - radiation effects ; Lymphatic Irradiation - adverse effects ; Lymphatic Irradiation - methods ; MAMMARY GLANDS ; Mastectomy ; Middle Aged ; NEOPLASMS ; Organs at Risk - diagnostic imaging ; Organs at Risk - radiation effects ; PATIENTS ; Photons - adverse effects ; Photons - therapeutic use ; Pilot Projects ; PLATINUM ; Postoperative Care ; Prospective Studies ; PROTON BEAMS ; Proton Therapy - adverse effects ; Proton Therapy - methods ; Protons - adverse effects ; Radiation Exposure - prevention & control ; RADIATION HAZARDS ; Radiodermatitis - pathology ; Radiography ; Radiology ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; RADIOTHERAPY ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Time Factors ; TOXICITY ; Unilateral Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging ; Unilateral Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Unilateral Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><ispartof>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2016-05, Vol.95 (1), p.411-421</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2016 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2016 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-4d59cb2c30847a59cb3339f25d5838ccacb1485fe4e8ce657a698b44216d8ada3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-4d59cb2c30847a59cb3339f25d5838ccacb1485fe4e8ce657a698b44216d8ada3</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0360301615033489$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3537,27901,27902,65306</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26611875$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22648655$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Julie A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dagan, Roi, MD, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Meng Wei, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutenberg, Michael, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Christopher G., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zuofeng, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendenhall, Nancy P., MD</creatorcontrib><title>Initial Report of a Prospective Dosimetric and Clinical Feasibility Trial Demonstrates the Potential of Protons to Increase the Therapeutic Ratio in Breast Cancer Compared With Photons</title><title>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose To compare dosimetric endpoints between proton therapy (PT) and conventional radiation and determine the feasibility of PT for regional nodal irradiation (RNI) in women with breast cancer. Methods and Materials From 2012 to 2014, 18 women (stage IIA-IIIB) requiring RNI prospectively enrolled on a pilot study. Median age was 51.8 years (range, 42-73 years). The cohort included breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy patients and right- and left-sided cancers. Treatment targets and organs at risk were delineated on computed tomography scans, and PT and conventional plans were developed. Toxicity was prospectively recorded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. A Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test compared the dose-volume parameters. The primary endpoint was a reduction in cardiac V5. Results Median follow-up was 20 months (range, 2-31 months). For all patients, the PT plan better met the dosimetric goals and was used for treatment. Proton therapy alone was used for 10 patients (9 postmastectomy, 1 after BCT) and combined proton–photon in 8 (6 BCT, 2 postmastectomy with immediate expander reconstruction). Proton therapy improved coverage of level 2 axilla ( P =.0005). Adequate coverage of internal mammary nodes was consistently achieved with PT (median D95, 50.3 Gy; range, 46.6-52.1 Gy) but not with conventional radiation therapy (median D95, 48.2 Gy; range, 40.8-55 Gy; P =.0005). Median cardiac V5 was 0.6% with PT and 16.3% with conventional radiation ( P <.0001). Median ipsilateral lung V5 and V20 were improved with PT (median V5 35.3% vs 60.5% [ P <.0001]; and median V20, 21.6% vs 35.5% [ P <.0001]). Grade 3 dermatitis developed in 4 patients (22%), which was the only grade 3 toxicity. No grade 4+ toxicities developed. Conclusion Proton therapy for RNI after mastectomy or BCT significantly improves cardiac dose, especially for left-sided patients, and lung V5 and V20 in all patients without excessive acute toxicity. Proton therapy simultaneously improves target coverage for the internal mammary nodes and level 2 axilla, which may positively impact long-term survival in breast cancer patients.</description><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Aged</subject><subject>Axilla</subject><subject>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</subject><subject>DOSIMETRY</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Follow-Up Studies</subject><subject>GY RANGE 10-100</subject><subject>Heart - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Heart - radiation effects</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Lung - radiation effects</subject><subject>Lymphatic Irradiation - adverse effects</subject><subject>Lymphatic Irradiation - methods</subject><subject>MAMMARY GLANDS</subject><subject>Mastectomy</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>NEOPLASMS</subject><subject>Organs at Risk - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Organs at Risk - radiation effects</subject><subject>PATIENTS</subject><subject>Photons - adverse effects</subject><subject>Photons - therapeutic use</subject><subject>Pilot Projects</subject><subject>PLATINUM</subject><subject>Postoperative Care</subject><subject>Prospective Studies</subject><subject>PROTON BEAMS</subject><subject>Proton Therapy - adverse effects</subject><subject>Proton Therapy - methods</subject><subject>Protons - adverse effects</subject><subject>Radiation Exposure - prevention & control</subject><subject>RADIATION HAZARDS</subject><subject>Radiodermatitis - pathology</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>RADIOTHERAPY</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>TOXICITY</subject><subject>Unilateral Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Unilateral Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Unilateral Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><issn>0360-3016</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2016</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFksFu1DAQhiMEokvhDRCyxDmpHdtZ54IEaUtXqsSqLIKb5TgTxWHXjmxvpX0zHg9nUzhw4WRL_v5_xvNPlr0luCCYVFdjYUbv2qkoMeEFrgtMxLNsRcS6zinnP55nK0wrnNMEX2SvQhgxxoSs2cvsoqwqkkC-yn5trIlG7dEDTM5H5Hqk0Na7MIGO5hHQtQvmANEbjZTtULM31ujE34IKpjV7E09o52eHazg4G6JXEQKKA6Cti2DP5sk1ecb0jKJDG6t9UsMZ2g3g1QTHmAo8qGgcMhZ9mt8japTV4FHjDpPy0KHvJg5oO5yNXmcverUP8ObpvMy-3d7smrv8_svnTfPxPteM8Zizjte6LTXFgq3VfKeU1n3JOy6o0FrpljDBe2AgNFR8rapatIyVpOqE6hS9zN4vvi5EI4M2EfSgnbVpPrIsKyYqzhPFFkqn0QUPvZy8OSh_kgTLOS45yiUuOcclcS1TXEn2bpFNx_YA3V_Rn3wS8GEBIH3x0YCfO4A0lc74uYHOmf9V-NdAPyX4E04QRnf0No1PEhlKieXXeWXmjSEcU8pETX8D46jAug</recordid><startdate>20160501</startdate><enddate>20160501</enddate><creator>Bradley, Julie A., MD</creator><creator>Dagan, Roi, MD, MS</creator><creator>Ho, Meng Wei, MSc</creator><creator>Rutenberg, Michael, MD, PhD</creator><creator>Morris, Christopher G., MS</creator><creator>Li, Zuofeng, PhD</creator><creator>Mendenhall, Nancy P., MD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20160501</creationdate><title>Initial Report of a Prospective Dosimetric and Clinical Feasibility Trial Demonstrates the Potential of Protons to Increase the Therapeutic Ratio in Breast Cancer Compared With Photons</title><author>Bradley, Julie A., MD ; Dagan, Roi, MD, MS ; Ho, Meng Wei, MSc ; Rutenberg, Michael, MD, PhD ; Morris, Christopher G., MS ; Li, Zuofeng, PhD ; Mendenhall, Nancy P., MD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-4d59cb2c30847a59cb3339f25d5838ccacb1485fe4e8ce657a698b44216d8ada3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2016</creationdate><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Aged</topic><topic>Axilla</topic><topic>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</topic><topic>DOSIMETRY</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Follow-Up Studies</topic><topic>GY RANGE 10-100</topic><topic>Heart - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Heart - radiation effects</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Lung - radiation effects</topic><topic>Lymphatic Irradiation - adverse effects</topic><topic>Lymphatic Irradiation - methods</topic><topic>MAMMARY GLANDS</topic><topic>Mastectomy</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>NEOPLASMS</topic><topic>Organs at Risk - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Organs at Risk - radiation effects</topic><topic>PATIENTS</topic><topic>Photons - adverse effects</topic><topic>Photons - therapeutic use</topic><topic>Pilot Projects</topic><topic>PLATINUM</topic><topic>Postoperative Care</topic><topic>Prospective Studies</topic><topic>PROTON BEAMS</topic><topic>Proton Therapy - adverse effects</topic><topic>Proton Therapy - methods</topic><topic>Protons - adverse effects</topic><topic>Radiation Exposure - prevention & control</topic><topic>RADIATION HAZARDS</topic><topic>Radiodermatitis - pathology</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>RADIOTHERAPY</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>TOXICITY</topic><topic>Unilateral Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Unilateral Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Unilateral Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bradley, Julie A., MD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dagan, Roi, MD, MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ho, Meng Wei, MSc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Rutenberg, Michael, MD, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Morris, Christopher G., MS</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Li, Zuofeng, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Mendenhall, Nancy P., MD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bradley, Julie A., MD</au><au>Dagan, Roi, MD, MS</au><au>Ho, Meng Wei, MSc</au><au>Rutenberg, Michael, MD, PhD</au><au>Morris, Christopher G., MS</au><au>Li, Zuofeng, PhD</au><au>Mendenhall, Nancy P., MD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Initial Report of a Prospective Dosimetric and Clinical Feasibility Trial Demonstrates the Potential of Protons to Increase the Therapeutic Ratio in Breast Cancer Compared With Photons</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><date>2016-05-01</date><risdate>2016</risdate><volume>95</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>411</spage><epage>421</epage><pages>411-421</pages><issn>0360-3016</issn><eissn>1879-355X</eissn><abstract>Purpose To compare dosimetric endpoints between proton therapy (PT) and conventional radiation and determine the feasibility of PT for regional nodal irradiation (RNI) in women with breast cancer. Methods and Materials From 2012 to 2014, 18 women (stage IIA-IIIB) requiring RNI prospectively enrolled on a pilot study. Median age was 51.8 years (range, 42-73 years). The cohort included breast-conserving therapy (BCT) and mastectomy patients and right- and left-sided cancers. Treatment targets and organs at risk were delineated on computed tomography scans, and PT and conventional plans were developed. Toxicity was prospectively recorded using Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events version 4.0. A Wilcoxon signed-rank sum test compared the dose-volume parameters. The primary endpoint was a reduction in cardiac V5. Results Median follow-up was 20 months (range, 2-31 months). For all patients, the PT plan better met the dosimetric goals and was used for treatment. Proton therapy alone was used for 10 patients (9 postmastectomy, 1 after BCT) and combined proton–photon in 8 (6 BCT, 2 postmastectomy with immediate expander reconstruction). Proton therapy improved coverage of level 2 axilla ( P =.0005). Adequate coverage of internal mammary nodes was consistently achieved with PT (median D95, 50.3 Gy; range, 46.6-52.1 Gy) but not with conventional radiation therapy (median D95, 48.2 Gy; range, 40.8-55 Gy; P =.0005). Median cardiac V5 was 0.6% with PT and 16.3% with conventional radiation ( P <.0001). Median ipsilateral lung V5 and V20 were improved with PT (median V5 35.3% vs 60.5% [ P <.0001]; and median V20, 21.6% vs 35.5% [ P <.0001]). Grade 3 dermatitis developed in 4 patients (22%), which was the only grade 3 toxicity. No grade 4+ toxicities developed. Conclusion Proton therapy for RNI after mastectomy or BCT significantly improves cardiac dose, especially for left-sided patients, and lung V5 and V20 in all patients without excessive acute toxicity. Proton therapy simultaneously improves target coverage for the internal mammary nodes and level 2 axilla, which may positively impact long-term survival in breast cancer patients.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>26611875</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.09.018</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-3016 |
ispartof | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2016-05, Vol.95 (1), p.411-421 |
issn | 0360-3016 1879-355X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22648655 |
source | MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | Adult Aged Axilla COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY DOSIMETRY Feasibility Studies Female Follow-Up Studies GY RANGE 10-100 Heart - diagnostic imaging Heart - radiation effects Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Lung - diagnostic imaging Lung - radiation effects Lymphatic Irradiation - adverse effects Lymphatic Irradiation - methods MAMMARY GLANDS Mastectomy Middle Aged NEOPLASMS Organs at Risk - diagnostic imaging Organs at Risk - radiation effects PATIENTS Photons - adverse effects Photons - therapeutic use Pilot Projects PLATINUM Postoperative Care Prospective Studies PROTON BEAMS Proton Therapy - adverse effects Proton Therapy - methods Protons - adverse effects Radiation Exposure - prevention & control RADIATION HAZARDS Radiodermatitis - pathology Radiography Radiology RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE RADIOTHERAPY Radiotherapy Dosage Time Factors TOXICITY Unilateral Breast Neoplasms - diagnostic imaging Unilateral Breast Neoplasms - pathology Unilateral Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy |
title | Initial Report of a Prospective Dosimetric and Clinical Feasibility Trial Demonstrates the Potential of Protons to Increase the Therapeutic Ratio in Breast Cancer Compared With Photons |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-08T05%3A43%3A55IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-pubmed_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Initial%20Report%20of%20a%20Prospective%20Dosimetric%20and%20Clinical%20Feasibility%20Trial%20Demonstrates%20the%20Potential%20of%20Protons%20to%20Increase%20the%20Therapeutic%20Ratio%20in%20Breast%20Cancer%20Compared%20With%20Photons&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20oncology,%20biology,%20physics&rft.au=Bradley,%20Julie%20A.,%20MD&rft.date=2016-05-01&rft.volume=95&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=411&rft.epage=421&rft.pages=411-421&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2015.09.018&rft_dat=%3Cpubmed_osti_%3E26611875%3C/pubmed_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/26611875&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0360301615033489&rfr_iscdi=true |