SU‐E‐J‐151: Day‐To‐Day Variations in Fraction‐Specific Motion Modeling Using Patient 4DCBCT Images

Purpose: The goal of this study is to quantify the interfraction reproducibility of patient‐specific motion models derived from 4DCBCT acquired on the day of treatment of lung cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) patients. Methods: Motion models are derived from patient 4DCBCT images acquire...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2015-06, Vol.42 (6Part9), p.3299-3299
Hauptverfasser: Dhou, S, Cai, W, Hurwitz, M, Williams, C, Cifter, F, Myronakis, M, Ionascu, D, Lewis, J
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3299
container_issue 6Part9
container_start_page 3299
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 42
creator Dhou, S
Cai, W
Hurwitz, M
Williams, C
Cifter, F
Myronakis, M
Ionascu, D
Lewis, J
description Purpose: The goal of this study is to quantify the interfraction reproducibility of patient‐specific motion models derived from 4DCBCT acquired on the day of treatment of lung cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) patients. Methods: Motion models are derived from patient 4DCBCT images acquired daily over 3–5 fractions of treatment by 1) applying deformable image registration between each 4DCBCT image and a reference phase from that day, resulting in a set of displacement vector fields (DVFs), and 2) performing principal component analysis (PCA) on the DVFs to derive a motion model. The motion model from the first day of treatment is compared to motion models from each successive day of treatment to quantify variability in motion models generated from different days. Four SBRT patient datasets have been acquired thus far in this IRB approved study. Results: Fraction‐specific motion models for each fraction and patient were derived and PCA eigenvectors and their associated eigenvalues are compared for each fraction. For the first patient dataset, the average root mean square error between the first two eigenvectors associated with the highest two eigenvalues, in four fractions was 0.1, while it was 0.25 between the last three PCA eigenvectors associated with the lowest three eigenvalues. It was found that the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of PCA motion models for each treatment fraction have variations and the first few eigenvectors are shown to be more stable across treatment fractions than others. Conclusion: Analysis of this dataset showed that the first two eigenvectors of the PCA patient‐specific motion models derived from 4DCBCT were stable over the course of several treatment fractions. The third, fourth, and fifth eigenvectors had larger variations.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.4924236
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22494162</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MP4236</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1006-d3bf269aabbc747d7cca1a29a5f53c56eeeafde0a9adce013261a1e13d440cad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kM1OwzAMxyMEEmNw4A0iceLQESdpS7nBPmBoE5O2cY281B1BW4uaSmg3HoFn5ElI2a4cbP9t_2xZZuwSRA8Abm-gpzOppUqOWEfqVEVaiuyYdYTIdCS1iE_ZmffvQohExaLDyvny5-t7GOw5GMRwxwe4C3JRBRckf8XaYeOq0nNX8lGNtk1Cc_5B1hXO8mnVVkLIaePKNV_61s_CEJUN14P-Q3_Bx1tckz9nJwVuPF0cYpctR8NF_ymavDyO-_eTyEK4LMrVqpBJhrha2VSneWotAsoM4yJWNk6ICIucBGaYWxKgZAIIBCrXWljMVZdd7fdWvnHGW9eQfbNVWZJtjJQ605DIQF3vKVtX3tdUmI_abbHeGRCmfacBc3hnYKM9--k2tPsfNNPZH_8LufN5qA</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>SU‐E‐J‐151: Day‐To‐Day Variations in Fraction‐Specific Motion Modeling Using Patient 4DCBCT Images</title><source>Wiley Online Library All Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Dhou, S ; Cai, W ; Hurwitz, M ; Williams, C ; Cifter, F ; Myronakis, M ; Ionascu, D ; Lewis, J</creator><creatorcontrib>Dhou, S ; Cai, W ; Hurwitz, M ; Williams, C ; Cifter, F ; Myronakis, M ; Ionascu, D ; Lewis, J</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: The goal of this study is to quantify the interfraction reproducibility of patient‐specific motion models derived from 4DCBCT acquired on the day of treatment of lung cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) patients. Methods: Motion models are derived from patient 4DCBCT images acquired daily over 3–5 fractions of treatment by 1) applying deformable image registration between each 4DCBCT image and a reference phase from that day, resulting in a set of displacement vector fields (DVFs), and 2) performing principal component analysis (PCA) on the DVFs to derive a motion model. The motion model from the first day of treatment is compared to motion models from each successive day of treatment to quantify variability in motion models generated from different days. Four SBRT patient datasets have been acquired thus far in this IRB approved study. Results: Fraction‐specific motion models for each fraction and patient were derived and PCA eigenvectors and their associated eigenvalues are compared for each fraction. For the first patient dataset, the average root mean square error between the first two eigenvectors associated with the highest two eigenvalues, in four fractions was 0.1, while it was 0.25 between the last three PCA eigenvectors associated with the lowest three eigenvalues. It was found that the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of PCA motion models for each treatment fraction have variations and the first few eigenvectors are shown to be more stable across treatment fractions than others. Conclusion: Analysis of this dataset showed that the first two eigenvectors of the PCA patient‐specific motion models derived from 4DCBCT were stable over the course of several treatment fractions. The third, fourth, and fifth eigenvectors had larger variations.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4924236</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES ; Biomedical modeling ; Cancer ; Computer modeling ; DATASETS ; EIGENVALUES ; EIGENVECTORS ; ERRORS ; Image motion analysis ; Image registration ; LUNGS ; Medical imaging ; NEOPLASMS ; PATIENTS ; Radiation therapy ; RADIOTHERAPY ; SIMULATION ; VECTOR FIELDS</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2015-06, Vol.42 (6Part9), p.3299-3299</ispartof><rights>2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.4924236$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1416,27923,27924,45574</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22494162$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Dhou, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurwitz, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cifter, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myronakis, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ionascu, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, J</creatorcontrib><title>SU‐E‐J‐151: Day‐To‐Day Variations in Fraction‐Specific Motion Modeling Using Patient 4DCBCT Images</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><description>Purpose: The goal of this study is to quantify the interfraction reproducibility of patient‐specific motion models derived from 4DCBCT acquired on the day of treatment of lung cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) patients. Methods: Motion models are derived from patient 4DCBCT images acquired daily over 3–5 fractions of treatment by 1) applying deformable image registration between each 4DCBCT image and a reference phase from that day, resulting in a set of displacement vector fields (DVFs), and 2) performing principal component analysis (PCA) on the DVFs to derive a motion model. The motion model from the first day of treatment is compared to motion models from each successive day of treatment to quantify variability in motion models generated from different days. Four SBRT patient datasets have been acquired thus far in this IRB approved study. Results: Fraction‐specific motion models for each fraction and patient were derived and PCA eigenvectors and their associated eigenvalues are compared for each fraction. For the first patient dataset, the average root mean square error between the first two eigenvectors associated with the highest two eigenvalues, in four fractions was 0.1, while it was 0.25 between the last three PCA eigenvectors associated with the lowest three eigenvalues. It was found that the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of PCA motion models for each treatment fraction have variations and the first few eigenvectors are shown to be more stable across treatment fractions than others. Conclusion: Analysis of this dataset showed that the first two eigenvectors of the PCA patient‐specific motion models derived from 4DCBCT were stable over the course of several treatment fractions. The third, fourth, and fifth eigenvectors had larger variations.</description><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</subject><subject>Biomedical modeling</subject><subject>Cancer</subject><subject>Computer modeling</subject><subject>DATASETS</subject><subject>EIGENVALUES</subject><subject>EIGENVECTORS</subject><subject>ERRORS</subject><subject>Image motion analysis</subject><subject>Image registration</subject><subject>LUNGS</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>NEOPLASMS</subject><subject>PATIENTS</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>RADIOTHERAPY</subject><subject>SIMULATION</subject><subject>VECTOR FIELDS</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp1kM1OwzAMxyMEEmNw4A0iceLQESdpS7nBPmBoE5O2cY281B1BW4uaSmg3HoFn5ElI2a4cbP9t_2xZZuwSRA8Abm-gpzOppUqOWEfqVEVaiuyYdYTIdCS1iE_ZmffvQohExaLDyvny5-t7GOw5GMRwxwe4C3JRBRckf8XaYeOq0nNX8lGNtk1Cc_5B1hXO8mnVVkLIaePKNV_61s_CEJUN14P-Q3_Bx1tckz9nJwVuPF0cYpctR8NF_ymavDyO-_eTyEK4LMrVqpBJhrha2VSneWotAsoM4yJWNk6ICIucBGaYWxKgZAIIBCrXWljMVZdd7fdWvnHGW9eQfbNVWZJtjJQ605DIQF3vKVtX3tdUmI_abbHeGRCmfacBc3hnYKM9--k2tPsfNNPZH_8LufN5qA</recordid><startdate>201506</startdate><enddate>201506</enddate><creator>Dhou, S</creator><creator>Cai, W</creator><creator>Hurwitz, M</creator><creator>Williams, C</creator><creator>Cifter, F</creator><creator>Myronakis, M</creator><creator>Ionascu, D</creator><creator>Lewis, J</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201506</creationdate><title>SU‐E‐J‐151: Day‐To‐Day Variations in Fraction‐Specific Motion Modeling Using Patient 4DCBCT Images</title><author>Dhou, S ; Cai, W ; Hurwitz, M ; Williams, C ; Cifter, F ; Myronakis, M ; Ionascu, D ; Lewis, J</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1006-d3bf269aabbc747d7cca1a29a5f53c56eeeafde0a9adce013261a1e13d440cad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</topic><topic>Biomedical modeling</topic><topic>Cancer</topic><topic>Computer modeling</topic><topic>DATASETS</topic><topic>EIGENVALUES</topic><topic>EIGENVECTORS</topic><topic>ERRORS</topic><topic>Image motion analysis</topic><topic>Image registration</topic><topic>LUNGS</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>NEOPLASMS</topic><topic>PATIENTS</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>RADIOTHERAPY</topic><topic>SIMULATION</topic><topic>VECTOR FIELDS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Dhou, S</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cai, W</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hurwitz, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Williams, C</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cifter, F</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Myronakis, M</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ionascu, D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lewis, J</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Dhou, S</au><au>Cai, W</au><au>Hurwitz, M</au><au>Williams, C</au><au>Cifter, F</au><au>Myronakis, M</au><au>Ionascu, D</au><au>Lewis, J</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SU‐E‐J‐151: Day‐To‐Day Variations in Fraction‐Specific Motion Modeling Using Patient 4DCBCT Images</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><date>2015-06</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6Part9</issue><spage>3299</spage><epage>3299</epage><pages>3299-3299</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><abstract>Purpose: The goal of this study is to quantify the interfraction reproducibility of patient‐specific motion models derived from 4DCBCT acquired on the day of treatment of lung cancer stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) patients. Methods: Motion models are derived from patient 4DCBCT images acquired daily over 3–5 fractions of treatment by 1) applying deformable image registration between each 4DCBCT image and a reference phase from that day, resulting in a set of displacement vector fields (DVFs), and 2) performing principal component analysis (PCA) on the DVFs to derive a motion model. The motion model from the first day of treatment is compared to motion models from each successive day of treatment to quantify variability in motion models generated from different days. Four SBRT patient datasets have been acquired thus far in this IRB approved study. Results: Fraction‐specific motion models for each fraction and patient were derived and PCA eigenvectors and their associated eigenvalues are compared for each fraction. For the first patient dataset, the average root mean square error between the first two eigenvectors associated with the highest two eigenvalues, in four fractions was 0.1, while it was 0.25 between the last three PCA eigenvectors associated with the lowest three eigenvalues. It was found that the eigenvectors and eigenvalues of PCA motion models for each treatment fraction have variations and the first few eigenvectors are shown to be more stable across treatment fractions than others. Conclusion: Analysis of this dataset showed that the first two eigenvectors of the PCA patient‐specific motion models derived from 4DCBCT were stable over the course of several treatment fractions. The third, fourth, and fifth eigenvectors had larger variations.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><doi>10.1118/1.4924236</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2015-06, Vol.42 (6Part9), p.3299-3299
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22494162
source Wiley Online Library All Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects 60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES
Biomedical modeling
Cancer
Computer modeling
DATASETS
EIGENVALUES
EIGENVECTORS
ERRORS
Image motion analysis
Image registration
LUNGS
Medical imaging
NEOPLASMS
PATIENTS
Radiation therapy
RADIOTHERAPY
SIMULATION
VECTOR FIELDS
title SU‐E‐J‐151: Day‐To‐Day Variations in Fraction‐Specific Motion Modeling Using Patient 4DCBCT Images
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-13T07%3A19%3A36IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SU%E2%80%90E%E2%80%90J%E2%80%90151:%20Day%E2%80%90To%E2%80%90Day%20Variations%20in%20Fraction%E2%80%90Specific%20Motion%20Modeling%20Using%20Patient%204DCBCT%20Images&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Dhou,%20S&rft.date=2015-06&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6Part9&rft.spage=3299&rft.epage=3299&rft.pages=3299-3299&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4924236&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_osti_%3EMP4236%3C/wiley_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true