SU‐E‐J‐79: Evaluation of Prostate Volume Changes During Radiotherapy Using Implanted Markers and On‐Board Imaging

Purpose: To evaluate prostate volume changes during radiation therapy using implanted gold markers and on‐board imaging. Methods: Twenty‐five patients were included who underwent an implantation of three gold markers. Cartesian coordinates of markers were assessed in kV‐images. The coordinates of ce...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2015-06, Vol.42 (6Part8), p.3282-3282
Hauptverfasser: Ispir, B, Ugurluer, G, Akdeniz, Y, Eken, A, Arpaci, T, Serin, M
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 3282
container_issue 6Part8
container_start_page 3282
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 42
creator Ispir, B
Ugurluer, G
Akdeniz, Y
Eken, A
Arpaci, T
Serin, M
description Purpose: To evaluate prostate volume changes during radiation therapy using implanted gold markers and on‐board imaging. Methods: Twenty‐five patients were included who underwent an implantation of three gold markers. Cartesian coordinates of markers were assessed in kV‐images. The coordinates of centers of two markers were measured on kV‐images from the center of the marker at the apex which was reference. The distances between the markers were extrapolated from the coordinates using the Euclid formula. The radius of the sphere through markers was calculated using sinus theorem. The prostate volume for the first and last fraction was substituted with a sphere model and was calculated for each patient. The t‐test was used for analysis. Results: The mean prostate volume for first and last fraction was 24.65 and 20.87 cc, respectively (p≤0.05). The prostate volume was smaller for 23 patients, whereas there was an expansion for 2 patients. Fifteen patients had androgen deprivation during radiotherapy (H group) and ten did not (NH group). The mean prostate volume for the first and last fraction for the NH group was 30.73 cc and 24.89 cc and for the H group 20.84 cc and 18.19 cc, respectively. There was a 15.8% volume change during treatment for the NH group and 12.2% for the H group, but the difference was not statistically significant. The radius difference of the theoretical sphere for the first and last fraction was 0.98 mm (range, 0.09–2.95 mm) and remained below 2 mm in 88% of measurements. Conclusion: There was a significant volume change during prostate radiotherapy. The difference between H group and NH group was not significant. The radius changes did not exceed 3 mm and it was below adaptive treatment requirements. Our results indicate that prostate volume changes during treatment should be taken into account during contouring and treatment planning.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.4924166
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>wiley_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22494098</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>MP4166</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c1006-e40a6464074a4788d51e2a97c44fcd8b789f3e37cb03c2ba50b746d1775f9d063</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp10LFOwzAQBmALgUQpDLyBJSaGFDtx4pgNSoGiVq2AslpX22kDqVPZKSgbj8Az8iS4lJXhdNLp0-n-Q-iUkh6lNL-gPSZiRrNsD3VixpOIxUTsow4hgkUxI-khOvL-lRCSJSnpoPZp9v35NQj1EIqLSzx4h2oDTVlbXBd46mrfQGPwS11tVgb3l2AXxuObjSvtAj-CLutmaRysWzzz29Fwta7ANkbjMbg34zwGq_HEhvXXNTgdACwCPEYHBVTenPz1LprdDp7799FocjfsX40iRcORkWEEMpYxwhkwnuc6pSYGwRVjhdL5nOeiSEzC1ZwkKp5DSuacZZpynhZCh5RddLbbG4KU0quyMWqpamuNamQcM8GIyIM63ykVAntnCrl25QpcKymR289KKv8-G2y0sx9lZdr_oRxPf_0PZCZ7Ig</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype></control><display><type>article</type><title>SU‐E‐J‐79: Evaluation of Prostate Volume Changes During Radiotherapy Using Implanted Markers and On‐Board Imaging</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Ispir, B ; Ugurluer, G ; Akdeniz, Y ; Eken, A ; Arpaci, T ; Serin, M</creator><creatorcontrib>Ispir, B ; Ugurluer, G ; Akdeniz, Y ; Eken, A ; Arpaci, T ; Serin, M</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To evaluate prostate volume changes during radiation therapy using implanted gold markers and on‐board imaging. Methods: Twenty‐five patients were included who underwent an implantation of three gold markers. Cartesian coordinates of markers were assessed in kV‐images. The coordinates of centers of two markers were measured on kV‐images from the center of the marker at the apex which was reference. The distances between the markers were extrapolated from the coordinates using the Euclid formula. The radius of the sphere through markers was calculated using sinus theorem. The prostate volume for the first and last fraction was substituted with a sphere model and was calculated for each patient. The t‐test was used for analysis. Results: The mean prostate volume for first and last fraction was 24.65 and 20.87 cc, respectively (p≤0.05). The prostate volume was smaller for 23 patients, whereas there was an expansion for 2 patients. Fifteen patients had androgen deprivation during radiotherapy (H group) and ten did not (NH group). The mean prostate volume for the first and last fraction for the NH group was 30.73 cc and 24.89 cc and for the H group 20.84 cc and 18.19 cc, respectively. There was a 15.8% volume change during treatment for the NH group and 12.2% for the H group, but the difference was not statistically significant. The radius difference of the theoretical sphere for the first and last fraction was 0.98 mm (range, 0.09–2.95 mm) and remained below 2 mm in 88% of measurements. Conclusion: There was a significant volume change during prostate radiotherapy. The difference between H group and NH group was not significant. The radius changes did not exceed 3 mm and it was below adaptive treatment requirements. Our results indicate that prostate volume changes during treatment should be taken into account during contouring and treatment planning.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4924166</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES ; ANDROGENS ; BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY ; Gold ; Medical imaging ; Medical treatment planning ; PATIENTS ; PROSTATE ; Radiation therapy ; RADIOTHERAPY</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2015-06, Vol.42 (6Part8), p.3282-3282</ispartof><rights>2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.4924166$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22494098$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Ispir, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ugurluer, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akdeniz, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eken, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arpaci, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serin, M</creatorcontrib><title>SU‐E‐J‐79: Evaluation of Prostate Volume Changes During Radiotherapy Using Implanted Markers and On‐Board Imaging</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><description>Purpose: To evaluate prostate volume changes during radiation therapy using implanted gold markers and on‐board imaging. Methods: Twenty‐five patients were included who underwent an implantation of three gold markers. Cartesian coordinates of markers were assessed in kV‐images. The coordinates of centers of two markers were measured on kV‐images from the center of the marker at the apex which was reference. The distances between the markers were extrapolated from the coordinates using the Euclid formula. The radius of the sphere through markers was calculated using sinus theorem. The prostate volume for the first and last fraction was substituted with a sphere model and was calculated for each patient. The t‐test was used for analysis. Results: The mean prostate volume for first and last fraction was 24.65 and 20.87 cc, respectively (p≤0.05). The prostate volume was smaller for 23 patients, whereas there was an expansion for 2 patients. Fifteen patients had androgen deprivation during radiotherapy (H group) and ten did not (NH group). The mean prostate volume for the first and last fraction for the NH group was 30.73 cc and 24.89 cc and for the H group 20.84 cc and 18.19 cc, respectively. There was a 15.8% volume change during treatment for the NH group and 12.2% for the H group, but the difference was not statistically significant. The radius difference of the theoretical sphere for the first and last fraction was 0.98 mm (range, 0.09–2.95 mm) and remained below 2 mm in 88% of measurements. Conclusion: There was a significant volume change during prostate radiotherapy. The difference between H group and NH group was not significant. The radius changes did not exceed 3 mm and it was below adaptive treatment requirements. Our results indicate that prostate volume changes during treatment should be taken into account during contouring and treatment planning.</description><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</subject><subject>ANDROGENS</subject><subject>BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY</subject><subject>Gold</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>Medical treatment planning</subject><subject>PATIENTS</subject><subject>PROSTATE</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>RADIOTHERAPY</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp10LFOwzAQBmALgUQpDLyBJSaGFDtx4pgNSoGiVq2AslpX22kDqVPZKSgbj8Az8iS4lJXhdNLp0-n-Q-iUkh6lNL-gPSZiRrNsD3VixpOIxUTsow4hgkUxI-khOvL-lRCSJSnpoPZp9v35NQj1EIqLSzx4h2oDTVlbXBd46mrfQGPwS11tVgb3l2AXxuObjSvtAj-CLutmaRysWzzz29Fwta7ANkbjMbg34zwGq_HEhvXXNTgdACwCPEYHBVTenPz1LprdDp7799FocjfsX40iRcORkWEEMpYxwhkwnuc6pSYGwRVjhdL5nOeiSEzC1ZwkKp5DSuacZZpynhZCh5RddLbbG4KU0quyMWqpamuNamQcM8GIyIM63ykVAntnCrl25QpcKymR289KKv8-G2y0sx9lZdr_oRxPf_0PZCZ7Ig</recordid><startdate>201506</startdate><enddate>201506</enddate><creator>Ispir, B</creator><creator>Ugurluer, G</creator><creator>Akdeniz, Y</creator><creator>Eken, A</creator><creator>Arpaci, T</creator><creator>Serin, M</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201506</creationdate><title>SU‐E‐J‐79: Evaluation of Prostate Volume Changes During Radiotherapy Using Implanted Markers and On‐Board Imaging</title><author>Ispir, B ; Ugurluer, G ; Akdeniz, Y ; Eken, A ; Arpaci, T ; Serin, M</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c1006-e40a6464074a4788d51e2a97c44fcd8b789f3e37cb03c2ba50b746d1775f9d063</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</topic><topic>ANDROGENS</topic><topic>BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY</topic><topic>Gold</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>Medical treatment planning</topic><topic>PATIENTS</topic><topic>PROSTATE</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>RADIOTHERAPY</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Ispir, B</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ugurluer, G</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Akdeniz, Y</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Eken, A</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Arpaci, T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Serin, M</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Ispir, B</au><au>Ugurluer, G</au><au>Akdeniz, Y</au><au>Eken, A</au><au>Arpaci, T</au><au>Serin, M</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>SU‐E‐J‐79: Evaluation of Prostate Volume Changes During Radiotherapy Using Implanted Markers and On‐Board Imaging</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><date>2015-06</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>6Part8</issue><spage>3282</spage><epage>3282</epage><pages>3282-3282</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><abstract>Purpose: To evaluate prostate volume changes during radiation therapy using implanted gold markers and on‐board imaging. Methods: Twenty‐five patients were included who underwent an implantation of three gold markers. Cartesian coordinates of markers were assessed in kV‐images. The coordinates of centers of two markers were measured on kV‐images from the center of the marker at the apex which was reference. The distances between the markers were extrapolated from the coordinates using the Euclid formula. The radius of the sphere through markers was calculated using sinus theorem. The prostate volume for the first and last fraction was substituted with a sphere model and was calculated for each patient. The t‐test was used for analysis. Results: The mean prostate volume for first and last fraction was 24.65 and 20.87 cc, respectively (p≤0.05). The prostate volume was smaller for 23 patients, whereas there was an expansion for 2 patients. Fifteen patients had androgen deprivation during radiotherapy (H group) and ten did not (NH group). The mean prostate volume for the first and last fraction for the NH group was 30.73 cc and 24.89 cc and for the H group 20.84 cc and 18.19 cc, respectively. There was a 15.8% volume change during treatment for the NH group and 12.2% for the H group, but the difference was not statistically significant. The radius difference of the theoretical sphere for the first and last fraction was 0.98 mm (range, 0.09–2.95 mm) and remained below 2 mm in 88% of measurements. Conclusion: There was a significant volume change during prostate radiotherapy. The difference between H group and NH group was not significant. The radius changes did not exceed 3 mm and it was below adaptive treatment requirements. Our results indicate that prostate volume changes during treatment should be taken into account during contouring and treatment planning.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><doi>10.1118/1.4924166</doi><tpages>1</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2015-06, Vol.42 (6Part8), p.3282-3282
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22494098
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects 60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES
ANDROGENS
BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY
Gold
Medical imaging
Medical treatment planning
PATIENTS
PROSTATE
Radiation therapy
RADIOTHERAPY
title SU‐E‐J‐79: Evaluation of Prostate Volume Changes During Radiotherapy Using Implanted Markers and On‐Board Imaging
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-31T18%3A24%3A42IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-wiley_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=SU%E2%80%90E%E2%80%90J%E2%80%9079:%20Evaluation%20of%20Prostate%20Volume%20Changes%20During%20Radiotherapy%20Using%20Implanted%20Markers%20and%20On%E2%80%90Board%20Imaging&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Ispir,%20B&rft.date=2015-06&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=6Part8&rft.spage=3282&rft.epage=3282&rft.pages=3282-3282&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4924166&rft_dat=%3Cwiley_osti_%3EMP4166%3C/wiley_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true