Converting campus waste into renewable energy – A case study for the University of Cincinnati

•A case study to show the benefits of waste-to-energy projects at a university.•Evaluated the technical and economic feasibilities as well as GHG reduction.•A tool for other universities/communities to evaluate waste-to-energy projects. This paper evaluates the implementation of three waste-to-energ...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Waste management (Elmsford) 2015-05, Vol.39, p.258-265
Hauptverfasser: Tu, Qingshi, Zhu, Chao, McAvoy, Drew C.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
Beschreibung
Zusammenfassung:•A case study to show the benefits of waste-to-energy projects at a university.•Evaluated the technical and economic feasibilities as well as GHG reduction.•A tool for other universities/communities to evaluate waste-to-energy projects. This paper evaluates the implementation of three waste-to-energy projects at the University of Cincinnati: waste cooking oil-to-biodiesel, waste paper-to-fuel pellets and food waste-to-biogas, respectively. The implementation of these waste-to-energy (WTE) projects would lead to the improvement of campus sustainability by minimizing waste management efforts and reducing GHG emissions via the displacement of fossil fuel usage. Technical and economic aspects of their implementation were assessed and the corresponding GHG reduction was estimated. Results showed that on-site implementation of these projects would: (1) divert 3682L (974 gallons) of waste cooking oil to 3712L (982 gallons) of biodiesel; (2) produce 138tonnes of fuel pellets from 133tonnes of waste paper (with the addition of 20.75tonnes of plastics) to replace121tonnes of coal; and (3) produce biogas that would be enough to replace 12,767m3 natural gas every year from 146tonnes of food waste. The economic analysis determined that the payback periods for the three projects would be 16months for the biodiesel, 155months for the fuel pellet, and 74months for the biogas projects. The reduction of GHG emission from the implementation of the three WTE projects was determined to be 9.37 (biodiesel), 260.49 (fuel pellets), and 11.36 (biogas) tonnes of CO2-eq per year, respectively.
ISSN:0956-053X
1879-2456
DOI:10.1016/j.wasman.2015.01.016