Effect of lung and target density on small-field dose coverage and PTV definition

Abstract We have studied the effect of target and lung density on block margin for small stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) targets. A phantom (50 × 50 × 50 cm3 ) was created in the Pinnacle (V9.2) planning system with a 23-cm diameter lung region of interest insert. Diameter targets of 1.6, 2.0,...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists 2015, Vol.40 (1), p.16-20
Hauptverfasser: Higgins, Patrick D., Ph.D, Ehler, Eric D., Ph.D, Cho, Lawrence C., M.D, Dusenbery, Kathryn E., M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 20
container_issue 1
container_start_page 16
container_title Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists
container_volume 40
creator Higgins, Patrick D., Ph.D
Ehler, Eric D., Ph.D
Cho, Lawrence C., M.D
Dusenbery, Kathryn E., M.D
description Abstract We have studied the effect of target and lung density on block margin for small stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) targets. A phantom (50 × 50 × 50 cm3 ) was created in the Pinnacle (V9.2) planning system with a 23-cm diameter lung region of interest insert. Diameter targets of 1.6, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 cm were placed in the lung region of interest and centered at a physical depth of 15 cm. Target densities evaluated were 0.1 to 1.0 g/cm3 , whereas the surrounding lung density was varied between 0.05 and 0.6 g/cm3 . A dose of 100 cGy was delivered to the isocenter via a single 6-MV field, and the ratio of the average dose to points defining the lateral edges of the target to the isocenter dose was recorded for each combination. Field margins were varied from none to 1.5 cm in 0.25-cm steps. Data obtained in the phantom study were used to predict planning treatment volume (PTV) margins that would match the clinical PTV and isodose prescription for a clinical set of 39 SBRT cases. The average internal target volume (ITV) density was 0.73 ± 0.17, average local lung density was 0.33 ± 0.16, and average ITV diameter was 2.16 ± 0.8 cm. The phantom results initially underpredicted PTV margins by 0.35 cm. With this offset included in the model, the ratio of predicted-to-clinical PTVs was 1.05 ± 0.32. For a given target and lung density, it was found that treatment margin was insensitive to target diameter, except for the smallest (1.6-cm diameter) target, for which the treatment margin was more sensitive to density changes than the larger targets. We have developed a graphical relationship for block margin as a function of target and lung density, which should save time in the planning phase by shortening the design of PTV margins that can satisfy Radiation Therapy Oncology Group mandated treatment volume ratios.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.meddos.2014.06.005
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22462418</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0958394714000818</els_id><sourcerecordid>1652454270</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-83882b178e98a396b0211522ebe46eee6229386f883a2648031f404699bc34c73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kU1v1DAQhi1ERbeFf4BQJC69JPVXHOeChKpSkCrRisLVcpzx4sVrF9uptP8eLymc5jDPzGieF6G3BHcEE3G56_YwzzF3FBPeYdFh3L9AGyIH1nJM6Uu0wWMvWzby4RSd5bzDleCYvUKntCd9TwnboPtra8GUJtrGL2Hb6DA3RactlGaGkF05NDE0ea-9b60DPzf1JDQmPkHSW_jL3z38qLB1wRUXw2t0YrXP8Oa5nqPvn64frj63t19vvlx9vG0NF7i0kklJJzJIGKVmo5gwJaSnFCbgAgAEpSOTwkrJNBVcYkYsx1yM42QYNwM7R-_XvTEXp7JxBcxPE0Oo7yhKuaCcyEpdrNRjir8XyEXtXTbgvQ4Ql6yI6CnvOR1wRfmKmhRzTmDVY3J7nQ6KYHVUrnZqVa6OyhUWqgqtY--eLyxTbf8f-ue4Ah9WAKqNJwdJGV9dGe1_wQHyLi4pVFGKqEwVVt-OqR1DI7wGJusPfwDyJZCc</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1652454270</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Effect of lung and target density on small-field dose coverage and PTV definition</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Higgins, Patrick D., Ph.D ; Ehler, Eric D., Ph.D ; Cho, Lawrence C., M.D ; Dusenbery, Kathryn E., M.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Patrick D., Ph.D ; Ehler, Eric D., Ph.D ; Cho, Lawrence C., M.D ; Dusenbery, Kathryn E., M.D</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract We have studied the effect of target and lung density on block margin for small stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) targets. A phantom (50 × 50 × 50 cm3 ) was created in the Pinnacle (V9.2) planning system with a 23-cm diameter lung region of interest insert. Diameter targets of 1.6, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 cm were placed in the lung region of interest and centered at a physical depth of 15 cm. Target densities evaluated were 0.1 to 1.0 g/cm3 , whereas the surrounding lung density was varied between 0.05 and 0.6 g/cm3 . A dose of 100 cGy was delivered to the isocenter via a single 6-MV field, and the ratio of the average dose to points defining the lateral edges of the target to the isocenter dose was recorded for each combination. Field margins were varied from none to 1.5 cm in 0.25-cm steps. Data obtained in the phantom study were used to predict planning treatment volume (PTV) margins that would match the clinical PTV and isodose prescription for a clinical set of 39 SBRT cases. The average internal target volume (ITV) density was 0.73 ± 0.17, average local lung density was 0.33 ± 0.16, and average ITV diameter was 2.16 ± 0.8 cm. The phantom results initially underpredicted PTV margins by 0.35 cm. With this offset included in the model, the ratio of predicted-to-clinical PTVs was 1.05 ± 0.32. For a given target and lung density, it was found that treatment margin was insensitive to target diameter, except for the smallest (1.6-cm diameter) target, for which the treatment margin was more sensitive to density changes than the larger targets. We have developed a graphical relationship for block margin as a function of target and lung density, which should save time in the planning phase by shortening the design of PTV margins that can satisfy Radiation Therapy Oncology Group mandated treatment volume ratios.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-3947</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4022</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2014.06.005</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25155213</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>DENSITY ; DEPTH ; DESIGN ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Lung - pathology ; Lung - physiopathology ; Lung - surgery ; Lung Neoplasms - pathology ; Lung Neoplasms - physiopathology ; Lung Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; LUNGS ; PHANTOMS ; PLANNING ; RADIATION DOSES ; RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY ; Radiology ; Radiometry - methods ; Radiosurgery - methods ; RADIOTHERAPY ; Radiotherapy Dosage ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Reproducibility of Results ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; Treatment Outcome ; Tumor Burden</subject><ispartof>Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists, 2015, Vol.40 (1), p.16-20</ispartof><rights>American Association of Medical Dosimetrists</rights><rights>Copyright © 2015 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-83882b178e98a396b0211522ebe46eee6229386f883a2648031f404699bc34c73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-83882b178e98a396b0211522ebe46eee6229386f883a2648031f404699bc34c73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27923,27924</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25155213$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22462418$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Patrick D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehler, Eric D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Lawrence C., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dusenbery, Kathryn E., M.D</creatorcontrib><title>Effect of lung and target density on small-field dose coverage and PTV definition</title><title>Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists</title><addtitle>Med Dosim</addtitle><description>Abstract We have studied the effect of target and lung density on block margin for small stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) targets. A phantom (50 × 50 × 50 cm3 ) was created in the Pinnacle (V9.2) planning system with a 23-cm diameter lung region of interest insert. Diameter targets of 1.6, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 cm were placed in the lung region of interest and centered at a physical depth of 15 cm. Target densities evaluated were 0.1 to 1.0 g/cm3 , whereas the surrounding lung density was varied between 0.05 and 0.6 g/cm3 . A dose of 100 cGy was delivered to the isocenter via a single 6-MV field, and the ratio of the average dose to points defining the lateral edges of the target to the isocenter dose was recorded for each combination. Field margins were varied from none to 1.5 cm in 0.25-cm steps. Data obtained in the phantom study were used to predict planning treatment volume (PTV) margins that would match the clinical PTV and isodose prescription for a clinical set of 39 SBRT cases. The average internal target volume (ITV) density was 0.73 ± 0.17, average local lung density was 0.33 ± 0.16, and average ITV diameter was 2.16 ± 0.8 cm. The phantom results initially underpredicted PTV margins by 0.35 cm. With this offset included in the model, the ratio of predicted-to-clinical PTVs was 1.05 ± 0.32. For a given target and lung density, it was found that treatment margin was insensitive to target diameter, except for the smallest (1.6-cm diameter) target, for which the treatment margin was more sensitive to density changes than the larger targets. We have developed a graphical relationship for block margin as a function of target and lung density, which should save time in the planning phase by shortening the design of PTV margins that can satisfy Radiation Therapy Oncology Group mandated treatment volume ratios.</description><subject>DENSITY</subject><subject>DEPTH</subject><subject>DESIGN</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Lung - pathology</subject><subject>Lung - physiopathology</subject><subject>Lung - surgery</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - physiopathology</subject><subject>Lung Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>LUNGS</subject><subject>PHANTOMS</subject><subject>PLANNING</subject><subject>RADIATION DOSES</subject><subject>RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radiometry - methods</subject><subject>Radiosurgery - methods</subject><subject>RADIOTHERAPY</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>Treatment Outcome</subject><subject>Tumor Burden</subject><issn>0958-3947</issn><issn>1873-4022</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kU1v1DAQhi1ERbeFf4BQJC69JPVXHOeChKpSkCrRisLVcpzx4sVrF9uptP8eLymc5jDPzGieF6G3BHcEE3G56_YwzzF3FBPeYdFh3L9AGyIH1nJM6Uu0wWMvWzby4RSd5bzDleCYvUKntCd9TwnboPtra8GUJtrGL2Hb6DA3RactlGaGkF05NDE0ea-9b60DPzf1JDQmPkHSW_jL3z38qLB1wRUXw2t0YrXP8Oa5nqPvn64frj63t19vvlx9vG0NF7i0kklJJzJIGKVmo5gwJaSnFCbgAgAEpSOTwkrJNBVcYkYsx1yM42QYNwM7R-_XvTEXp7JxBcxPE0Oo7yhKuaCcyEpdrNRjir8XyEXtXTbgvQ4Ql6yI6CnvOR1wRfmKmhRzTmDVY3J7nQ6KYHVUrnZqVa6OyhUWqgqtY--eLyxTbf8f-ue4Ah9WAKqNJwdJGV9dGe1_wQHyLi4pVFGKqEwVVt-OqR1DI7wGJusPfwDyJZCc</recordid><startdate>2015</startdate><enddate>2015</enddate><creator>Higgins, Patrick D., Ph.D</creator><creator>Ehler, Eric D., Ph.D</creator><creator>Cho, Lawrence C., M.D</creator><creator>Dusenbery, Kathryn E., M.D</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2015</creationdate><title>Effect of lung and target density on small-field dose coverage and PTV definition</title><author>Higgins, Patrick D., Ph.D ; Ehler, Eric D., Ph.D ; Cho, Lawrence C., M.D ; Dusenbery, Kathryn E., M.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c460t-83882b178e98a396b0211522ebe46eee6229386f883a2648031f404699bc34c73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>DENSITY</topic><topic>DEPTH</topic><topic>DESIGN</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Lung - pathology</topic><topic>Lung - physiopathology</topic><topic>Lung - surgery</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - physiopathology</topic><topic>Lung Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>LUNGS</topic><topic>PHANTOMS</topic><topic>PLANNING</topic><topic>RADIATION DOSES</topic><topic>RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radiometry - methods</topic><topic>Radiosurgery - methods</topic><topic>RADIOTHERAPY</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>Treatment Outcome</topic><topic>Tumor Burden</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Higgins, Patrick D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ehler, Eric D., Ph.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cho, Lawrence C., M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dusenbery, Kathryn E., M.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Higgins, Patrick D., Ph.D</au><au>Ehler, Eric D., Ph.D</au><au>Cho, Lawrence C., M.D</au><au>Dusenbery, Kathryn E., M.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Effect of lung and target density on small-field dose coverage and PTV definition</atitle><jtitle>Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists</jtitle><addtitle>Med Dosim</addtitle><date>2015</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>40</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>16</spage><epage>20</epage><pages>16-20</pages><issn>0958-3947</issn><eissn>1873-4022</eissn><abstract>Abstract We have studied the effect of target and lung density on block margin for small stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) targets. A phantom (50 × 50 × 50 cm3 ) was created in the Pinnacle (V9.2) planning system with a 23-cm diameter lung region of interest insert. Diameter targets of 1.6, 2.0, 3.0, and 4.0 cm were placed in the lung region of interest and centered at a physical depth of 15 cm. Target densities evaluated were 0.1 to 1.0 g/cm3 , whereas the surrounding lung density was varied between 0.05 and 0.6 g/cm3 . A dose of 100 cGy was delivered to the isocenter via a single 6-MV field, and the ratio of the average dose to points defining the lateral edges of the target to the isocenter dose was recorded for each combination. Field margins were varied from none to 1.5 cm in 0.25-cm steps. Data obtained in the phantom study were used to predict planning treatment volume (PTV) margins that would match the clinical PTV and isodose prescription for a clinical set of 39 SBRT cases. The average internal target volume (ITV) density was 0.73 ± 0.17, average local lung density was 0.33 ± 0.16, and average ITV diameter was 2.16 ± 0.8 cm. The phantom results initially underpredicted PTV margins by 0.35 cm. With this offset included in the model, the ratio of predicted-to-clinical PTVs was 1.05 ± 0.32. For a given target and lung density, it was found that treatment margin was insensitive to target diameter, except for the smallest (1.6-cm diameter) target, for which the treatment margin was more sensitive to density changes than the larger targets. We have developed a graphical relationship for block margin as a function of target and lung density, which should save time in the planning phase by shortening the design of PTV margins that can satisfy Radiation Therapy Oncology Group mandated treatment volume ratios.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>25155213</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.meddos.2014.06.005</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0958-3947
ispartof Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists, 2015, Vol.40 (1), p.16-20
issn 0958-3947
1873-4022
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22462418
source MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)
subjects DENSITY
DEPTH
DESIGN
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
Lung - pathology
Lung - physiopathology
Lung - surgery
Lung Neoplasms - pathology
Lung Neoplasms - physiopathology
Lung Neoplasms - radiotherapy
LUNGS
PHANTOMS
PLANNING
RADIATION DOSES
RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY
Radiology
Radiometry - methods
Radiosurgery - methods
RADIOTHERAPY
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - methods
Reproducibility of Results
Sensitivity and Specificity
Treatment Outcome
Tumor Burden
title Effect of lung and target density on small-field dose coverage and PTV definition
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T03%3A19%3A38IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Effect%20of%20lung%20and%20target%20density%20on%20small-field%20dose%20coverage%20and%20PTV%20definition&rft.jtitle=Medical%20dosimetry%20:%20official%20journal%20of%20the%20American%20Association%20of%20Medical%20Dosimetrists&rft.au=Higgins,%20Patrick%20D.,%20Ph.D&rft.date=2015&rft.volume=40&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=16&rft.epage=20&rft.pages=16-20&rft.issn=0958-3947&rft.eissn=1873-4022&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.meddos.2014.06.005&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1652454270%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1652454270&rft_id=info:pmid/25155213&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0958394714000818&rfr_iscdi=true