Estimating pediatric entrance skin dose from digital radiography examination using DICOM metadata: A quality assurance tool

Purpose: To develop an automated methodology to estimate patient examination dose in digital radiography (DR) imaging using DICOM metadata as a quality assurance (QA) tool. Methods: Patient examination and demographical information were gathered from metadata analysis of DICOM header data. The x‐ray...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2015-05, Vol.42 (5), p.2489-2497
Hauptverfasser: Brady, S. L., Kaufman, R. A.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2497
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2489
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 42
creator Brady, S. L.
Kaufman, R. A.
description Purpose: To develop an automated methodology to estimate patient examination dose in digital radiography (DR) imaging using DICOM metadata as a quality assurance (QA) tool. Methods: Patient examination and demographical information were gathered from metadata analysis of DICOM header data. The x‐ray system radiation output (i.e., air KERMA) was characterized for all filter combinations used for patient examinations. Average patient thicknesses were measured for head, chest, abdomen, knees, and hands using volumetric images from CT. Backscatter factors (BSFs) were calculated from examination kVp. Patient entrance skin air KERMA (ESAK) was calculated by (1) looking up examination technique factors taken from DICOM header metadata (i.e., kVp and mA s) to derive an air KERMA (kair) value based on an x‐ray characteristic radiation output curve; (2) scaling kair with a BSF value; and (3) correcting kair for patient thickness. Finally, patient entrance skin dose (ESD) was calculated by multiplying a mass–energy attenuation coefficient ratio by ESAK. Patient ESD calculations were computed for common DR examinations at our institution: dual view chest, anteroposterior (AP) abdomen, lateral (LAT) skull, dual view knee, and bone age (left hand only) examinations. Results: ESD was calculated for a total of 3794 patients; mean age was 11 ± 8 yr (range: 2 months to 55 yr). The mean ESD range was 0.19–0.42 mGy for dual view chest, 0.28–1.2 mGy for AP abdomen, 0.18–0.65 mGy for LAT view skull, 0.15–0.63 mGy for dual view knee, and 0.10–0.12 mGy for bone age (left hand) examinations. Conclusions: A methodology combining DICOM header metadata and basic x‐ray tube characterization curves was demonstrated. In a regulatory era where patient dose reporting has become increasingly in demand, this methodology will allow a knowledgeable user the means to establish an automatable dose reporting program for DR and perform patient dose related QA testing for digital x‐ray imaging.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.4918324
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22413558</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1681911847</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3514-a4e2a7abb0ff0ba889992a49da2f776ad75103511ea8854200b871797c30bd103</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp1kcFO3DAURa2qFUwHFv2BylI3sAi1HWccd4emFJBAsGjX1ovtDG4Te7AdlRE_X0Om3XX1Fu_oSPdehD5QckYpbT_TMy5pWzP-Bi0YF3XFGZFv0YIQySvGSXOI3qf0kxCyqhtygA5ZI4UknC3Q80XKboTs_AZvrXGQo9PY-hzBa4vTL-exCcniPoYRG7dxGQYcwbiwibB92GH7BKPzxRA8ntKL5-v1-u4WjzaDgQxf8Dl-nGBweYchpWkW5xCGI_SuhyHZ4_1doh_fLr6vr6qbu8vr9flNpeuG8gq4ZSCg60jfkw7aVkrJgEsDrBdiBUY0lBSS2vJrSnTStYIKKXRNOlNeS_Rp9oaSVSXtstUPOnhvdVaMcVo3TVuok5naxvA42ZTV6JK2wwDehikpumqpLG2XfpfodEZ1DClF26ttLCXGnaJEvSyiqNovUtiPe-3Ujdb8I_9OUIBqBn67we7-b1K396_CPwDSkzM</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1681911847</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Estimating pediatric entrance skin dose from digital radiography examination using DICOM metadata: A quality assurance tool</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via Wiley Online Library</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Brady, S. L. ; Kaufman, R. A.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brady, S. L. ; Kaufman, R. A.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: To develop an automated methodology to estimate patient examination dose in digital radiography (DR) imaging using DICOM metadata as a quality assurance (QA) tool. Methods: Patient examination and demographical information were gathered from metadata analysis of DICOM header data. The x‐ray system radiation output (i.e., air KERMA) was characterized for all filter combinations used for patient examinations. Average patient thicknesses were measured for head, chest, abdomen, knees, and hands using volumetric images from CT. Backscatter factors (BSFs) were calculated from examination kVp. Patient entrance skin air KERMA (ESAK) was calculated by (1) looking up examination technique factors taken from DICOM header metadata (i.e., kVp and mA s) to derive an air KERMA (kair) value based on an x‐ray characteristic radiation output curve; (2) scaling kair with a BSF value; and (3) correcting kair for patient thickness. Finally, patient entrance skin dose (ESD) was calculated by multiplying a mass–energy attenuation coefficient ratio by ESAK. Patient ESD calculations were computed for common DR examinations at our institution: dual view chest, anteroposterior (AP) abdomen, lateral (LAT) skull, dual view knee, and bone age (left hand only) examinations. Results: ESD was calculated for a total of 3794 patients; mean age was 11 ± 8 yr (range: 2 months to 55 yr). The mean ESD range was 0.19–0.42 mGy for dual view chest, 0.28–1.2 mGy for AP abdomen, 0.18–0.65 mGy for LAT view skull, 0.15–0.63 mGy for dual view knee, and 0.10–0.12 mGy for bone age (left hand) examinations. Conclusions: A methodology combining DICOM header metadata and basic x‐ray tube characterization curves was demonstrated. In a regulatory era where patient dose reporting has become increasingly in demand, this methodology will allow a knowledgeable user the means to establish an automatable dose reporting program for DR and perform patient dose related QA testing for digital x‐ray imaging.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4918324</identifier><identifier>PMID: 25979042</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES ; ABDOMEN ; Adolescent ; Adult ; Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers ; bone ; Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging ; CHEST ; Child ; Child, Preschool ; Computed radiography ; Computed tomography ; Computerised tomographs ; computerised tomography ; deviation index ; diagnostic radiography ; DICOM ; Digital radiography ; Dose‐volume analysis ; dosimetry ; Dosimetry/exposure assessment ; entrance skin dose ; Hand - diagnostic imaging ; HEAD ; Humans ; Image analysis ; Infant ; KERMA ; Knee - diagnostic imaging ; Metadata ; Middle Aged ; PATIENTS ; Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods ; PEDIATRICS ; QUALITY ASSURANCE ; Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods ; Radiation Dosage ; RADIATION DOSES ; Radiography - methods ; Radiography, Abdominal - methods ; Radiography, Thoracic - methods ; Scattering, Radiation ; Scintigraphy ; SKIN ; Skin - diagnostic imaging ; Skin - radiation effects ; Skull - diagnostic imaging ; Tissues ; X RADIATION ; X-Rays ; X‐ray imaging ; Young Adult</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2015-05, Vol.42 (5), p.2489-2497</ispartof><rights>2015 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3514-a4e2a7abb0ff0ba889992a49da2f776ad75103511ea8854200b871797c30bd103</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3514-a4e2a7abb0ff0ba889992a49da2f776ad75103511ea8854200b871797c30bd103</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.4918324$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.4918324$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,1417,27924,27925,45574,45575</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25979042$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22413558$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brady, S. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, R. A.</creatorcontrib><title>Estimating pediatric entrance skin dose from digital radiography examination using DICOM metadata: A quality assurance tool</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose: To develop an automated methodology to estimate patient examination dose in digital radiography (DR) imaging using DICOM metadata as a quality assurance (QA) tool. Methods: Patient examination and demographical information were gathered from metadata analysis of DICOM header data. The x‐ray system radiation output (i.e., air KERMA) was characterized for all filter combinations used for patient examinations. Average patient thicknesses were measured for head, chest, abdomen, knees, and hands using volumetric images from CT. Backscatter factors (BSFs) were calculated from examination kVp. Patient entrance skin air KERMA (ESAK) was calculated by (1) looking up examination technique factors taken from DICOM header metadata (i.e., kVp and mA s) to derive an air KERMA (kair) value based on an x‐ray characteristic radiation output curve; (2) scaling kair with a BSF value; and (3) correcting kair for patient thickness. Finally, patient entrance skin dose (ESD) was calculated by multiplying a mass–energy attenuation coefficient ratio by ESAK. Patient ESD calculations were computed for common DR examinations at our institution: dual view chest, anteroposterior (AP) abdomen, lateral (LAT) skull, dual view knee, and bone age (left hand only) examinations. Results: ESD was calculated for a total of 3794 patients; mean age was 11 ± 8 yr (range: 2 months to 55 yr). The mean ESD range was 0.19–0.42 mGy for dual view chest, 0.28–1.2 mGy for AP abdomen, 0.18–0.65 mGy for LAT view skull, 0.15–0.63 mGy for dual view knee, and 0.10–0.12 mGy for bone age (left hand) examinations. Conclusions: A methodology combining DICOM header metadata and basic x‐ray tube characterization curves was demonstrated. In a regulatory era where patient dose reporting has become increasingly in demand, this methodology will allow a knowledgeable user the means to establish an automatable dose reporting program for DR and perform patient dose related QA testing for digital x‐ray imaging.</description><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</subject><subject>ABDOMEN</subject><subject>Adolescent</subject><subject>Adult</subject><subject>Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers</subject><subject>bone</subject><subject>Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>CHEST</subject><subject>Child</subject><subject>Child, Preschool</subject><subject>Computed radiography</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computerised tomographs</subject><subject>computerised tomography</subject><subject>deviation index</subject><subject>diagnostic radiography</subject><subject>DICOM</subject><subject>Digital radiography</subject><subject>Dose‐volume analysis</subject><subject>dosimetry</subject><subject>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</subject><subject>entrance skin dose</subject><subject>Hand - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>HEAD</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Image analysis</subject><subject>Infant</subject><subject>KERMA</subject><subject>Knee - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Metadata</subject><subject>Middle Aged</subject><subject>PATIENTS</subject><subject>Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods</subject><subject>PEDIATRICS</subject><subject>QUALITY ASSURANCE</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>RADIATION DOSES</subject><subject>Radiography - methods</subject><subject>Radiography, Abdominal - methods</subject><subject>Radiography, Thoracic - methods</subject><subject>Scattering, Radiation</subject><subject>Scintigraphy</subject><subject>SKIN</subject><subject>Skin - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Skin - radiation effects</subject><subject>Skull - diagnostic imaging</subject><subject>Tissues</subject><subject>X RADIATION</subject><subject>X-Rays</subject><subject>X‐ray imaging</subject><subject>Young Adult</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp1kcFO3DAURa2qFUwHFv2BylI3sAi1HWccd4emFJBAsGjX1ovtDG4Te7AdlRE_X0Om3XX1Fu_oSPdehD5QckYpbT_TMy5pWzP-Bi0YF3XFGZFv0YIQySvGSXOI3qf0kxCyqhtygA5ZI4UknC3Q80XKboTs_AZvrXGQo9PY-hzBa4vTL-exCcniPoYRG7dxGQYcwbiwibB92GH7BKPzxRA8ntKL5-v1-u4WjzaDgQxf8Dl-nGBweYchpWkW5xCGI_SuhyHZ4_1doh_fLr6vr6qbu8vr9flNpeuG8gq4ZSCg60jfkw7aVkrJgEsDrBdiBUY0lBSS2vJrSnTStYIKKXRNOlNeS_Rp9oaSVSXtstUPOnhvdVaMcVo3TVuok5naxvA42ZTV6JK2wwDehikpumqpLG2XfpfodEZ1DClF26ttLCXGnaJEvSyiqNovUtiPe-3Ujdb8I_9OUIBqBn67we7-b1K396_CPwDSkzM</recordid><startdate>201505</startdate><enddate>201505</enddate><creator>Brady, S. L.</creator><creator>Kaufman, R. A.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201505</creationdate><title>Estimating pediatric entrance skin dose from digital radiography examination using DICOM metadata: A quality assurance tool</title><author>Brady, S. L. ; Kaufman, R. A.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3514-a4e2a7abb0ff0ba889992a49da2f776ad75103511ea8854200b871797c30bd103</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</topic><topic>ABDOMEN</topic><topic>Adolescent</topic><topic>Adult</topic><topic>Biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers</topic><topic>bone</topic><topic>Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>CHEST</topic><topic>Child</topic><topic>Child, Preschool</topic><topic>Computed radiography</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computerised tomographs</topic><topic>computerised tomography</topic><topic>deviation index</topic><topic>diagnostic radiography</topic><topic>DICOM</topic><topic>Digital radiography</topic><topic>Dose‐volume analysis</topic><topic>dosimetry</topic><topic>Dosimetry/exposure assessment</topic><topic>entrance skin dose</topic><topic>Hand - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>HEAD</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Image analysis</topic><topic>Infant</topic><topic>KERMA</topic><topic>Knee - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Metadata</topic><topic>Middle Aged</topic><topic>PATIENTS</topic><topic>Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods</topic><topic>PEDIATRICS</topic><topic>QUALITY ASSURANCE</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>RADIATION DOSES</topic><topic>Radiography - methods</topic><topic>Radiography, Abdominal - methods</topic><topic>Radiography, Thoracic - methods</topic><topic>Scattering, Radiation</topic><topic>Scintigraphy</topic><topic>SKIN</topic><topic>Skin - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Skin - radiation effects</topic><topic>Skull - diagnostic imaging</topic><topic>Tissues</topic><topic>X RADIATION</topic><topic>X-Rays</topic><topic>X‐ray imaging</topic><topic>Young Adult</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brady, S. L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kaufman, R. A.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brady, S. L.</au><au>Kaufman, R. A.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Estimating pediatric entrance skin dose from digital radiography examination using DICOM metadata: A quality assurance tool</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2015-05</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>42</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2489</spage><epage>2497</epage><pages>2489-2497</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><abstract>Purpose: To develop an automated methodology to estimate patient examination dose in digital radiography (DR) imaging using DICOM metadata as a quality assurance (QA) tool. Methods: Patient examination and demographical information were gathered from metadata analysis of DICOM header data. The x‐ray system radiation output (i.e., air KERMA) was characterized for all filter combinations used for patient examinations. Average patient thicknesses were measured for head, chest, abdomen, knees, and hands using volumetric images from CT. Backscatter factors (BSFs) were calculated from examination kVp. Patient entrance skin air KERMA (ESAK) was calculated by (1) looking up examination technique factors taken from DICOM header metadata (i.e., kVp and mA s) to derive an air KERMA (kair) value based on an x‐ray characteristic radiation output curve; (2) scaling kair with a BSF value; and (3) correcting kair for patient thickness. Finally, patient entrance skin dose (ESD) was calculated by multiplying a mass–energy attenuation coefficient ratio by ESAK. Patient ESD calculations were computed for common DR examinations at our institution: dual view chest, anteroposterior (AP) abdomen, lateral (LAT) skull, dual view knee, and bone age (left hand only) examinations. Results: ESD was calculated for a total of 3794 patients; mean age was 11 ± 8 yr (range: 2 months to 55 yr). The mean ESD range was 0.19–0.42 mGy for dual view chest, 0.28–1.2 mGy for AP abdomen, 0.18–0.65 mGy for LAT view skull, 0.15–0.63 mGy for dual view knee, and 0.10–0.12 mGy for bone age (left hand) examinations. Conclusions: A methodology combining DICOM header metadata and basic x‐ray tube characterization curves was demonstrated. In a regulatory era where patient dose reporting has become increasingly in demand, this methodology will allow a knowledgeable user the means to establish an automatable dose reporting program for DR and perform patient dose related QA testing for digital x‐ray imaging.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>25979042</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.4918324</doi><tpages>9</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2015-05, Vol.42 (5), p.2489-2497
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22413558
source MEDLINE; Access via Wiley Online Library; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects 60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES
ABDOMEN
Adolescent
Adult
Biological material, e.g. blood, urine
Haemocytometers
bone
Bone and Bones - diagnostic imaging
CHEST
Child
Child, Preschool
Computed radiography
Computed tomography
Computerised tomographs
computerised tomography
deviation index
diagnostic radiography
DICOM
Digital radiography
Dose‐volume analysis
dosimetry
Dosimetry/exposure assessment
entrance skin dose
Hand - diagnostic imaging
HEAD
Humans
Image analysis
Infant
KERMA
Knee - diagnostic imaging
Metadata
Middle Aged
PATIENTS
Pattern Recognition, Automated - methods
PEDIATRICS
QUALITY ASSURANCE
Quality Assurance, Health Care - methods
Radiation Dosage
RADIATION DOSES
Radiography - methods
Radiography, Abdominal - methods
Radiography, Thoracic - methods
Scattering, Radiation
Scintigraphy
SKIN
Skin - diagnostic imaging
Skin - radiation effects
Skull - diagnostic imaging
Tissues
X RADIATION
X-Rays
X‐ray imaging
Young Adult
title Estimating pediatric entrance skin dose from digital radiography examination using DICOM metadata: A quality assurance tool
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-26T15%3A38%3A58IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Estimating%20pediatric%20entrance%20skin%20dose%20from%20digital%20radiography%20examination%20using%20DICOM%20metadata:%20A%20quality%20assurance%20tool&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Brady,%20S.%20L.&rft.date=2015-05&rft.volume=42&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2489&rft.epage=2497&rft.pages=2489-2497&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4918324&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1681911847%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1681911847&rft_id=info:pmid/25979042&rfr_iscdi=true