A dosimetric evaluation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm and Millennium 120 MLC for cranial intensity-modulated radiosurgery

Abstract The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of a convolution-based algorithm (anisotropic analytical algorithm [AAA]) implemented in the Eclipse planning system for intensity-modulated radiosurgery (IMRS) planning of small cranial targets by using a 5-mm leaf-width multileaf collimator...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists 2014, Vol.39 (2), p.129-133
Hauptverfasser: Calvo Ortega, Juan Francisco, M.Sc, Moragues, Sandra, R.T.T, Pozo, Miquel, R.T.T, José, Sol San, M.D, Puertas, Enrique, M.D, Fernández, Jaime, M.D, Casals, Joan, M.D
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 133
container_issue 2
container_start_page 129
container_title Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists
container_volume 39
creator Calvo Ortega, Juan Francisco, M.Sc
Moragues, Sandra, R.T.T
Pozo, Miquel, R.T.T
José, Sol San, M.D
Puertas, Enrique, M.D
Fernández, Jaime, M.D
Casals, Joan, M.D
description Abstract The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of a convolution-based algorithm (anisotropic analytical algorithm [AAA]) implemented in the Eclipse planning system for intensity-modulated radiosurgery (IMRS) planning of small cranial targets by using a 5-mm leaf-width multileaf collimator (MLC). Overall, 24 patient-based IMRS plans for cranial lesions of variable size (0.3 to 15.1 cc) were planned (Eclipse, AAA, version 10.0.28) using fixed field-based IMRS produced by a Varian linear accelerator equipped with a 120 MLC (5-mm width on central leaves). Plan accuracy was evaluated according to phantom-based measurements performed with radiochromic film (EBT2, ISP, Wayne, NJ). Film 2D dose distributions were performed with the FilmQA Pro software (version 2011, Ashland, OH) by using the triple-channel dosimetry method. Comparison between computed and measured 2D dose distributions was performed using the gamma method (3%/1 mm). Performance of the MLC was checked by inspection of the DynaLog files created by the linear accelerator during the delivery of each dynamic field. The absolute difference between the calculated and measured isocenter doses for all the IMRS plans was 2.5% ± 2.1%. The gamma evaluation method resulted in high average passing rates of 98.9% ± 1.4% (red channel) and 98.9% ± 1.5% (blue and green channels). DynaLog file analysis revealed a maximum root mean square error of 0.46 mm. According to our results, we conclude that the Eclipse/AAA algorithm provides accurate cranial IMRS dose distributions that may be accurately delivered by a Varian linac equipped with a Millennium 120 MLC.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.meddos.2013.11.003
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22395906</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>1_s2_0_S0958394713001398</els_id><sourcerecordid>1521324524</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-11d7f20b93894caa0504402e6bc2b235ab78e87ca63053f8ac075a2e752916e83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo9kU2P0zAQhi0EYkvhHyBkiQuXhLGdzwtSVS0fUlccgLPlOJOti2MX21lt_z2usnCawzwzo3kfQt4yKBmw5uOpnHEcfSw5MFEyVgKIZ2TDulYUFXD-nGygr7tC9FV7Q17FeAKAugLxktzwSlScNc2GPO5o3mFmTMFoig_KLioZ76ifaDoivdXWnCPS3W5Hlb33waTjTJUb6Z2xFp0zy0wZB3p32NPJB6qDckZZalxCF026FLMfF6sSjjSo0fi4hHsMl9fkxaRsxDdPdUt-fb79uf9aHL5_-bbfHQotekgFY2M7cRh60fWVVgpqqPJ32AyaD1zUamg77FqtGgG1mDqloa0Vx7bmPWuwE1vyft3rYzIyapNQH7V3DnWSnIu-7qHJ1IeVOgf_Z8GY5GyiRmuVQ79EyWrOBK_qHNyWVCuqg48x4CTPwcwqXCQDeTUjT3I1I69mJGMym8lj754uLENu_x_6pyIDn1YAcxoPBoPM0Tujlf2NF4wnvwSXg5JMRi5B_rjKvbplAvKZvhN_AaLOn8U</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1521324524</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A dosimetric evaluation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm and Millennium 120 MLC for cranial intensity-modulated radiosurgery</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Calvo Ortega, Juan Francisco, M.Sc ; Moragues, Sandra, R.T.T ; Pozo, Miquel, R.T.T ; José, Sol San, M.D ; Puertas, Enrique, M.D ; Fernández, Jaime, M.D ; Casals, Joan, M.D</creator><creatorcontrib>Calvo Ortega, Juan Francisco, M.Sc ; Moragues, Sandra, R.T.T ; Pozo, Miquel, R.T.T ; José, Sol San, M.D ; Puertas, Enrique, M.D ; Fernández, Jaime, M.D ; Casals, Joan, M.D</creatorcontrib><description>Abstract The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of a convolution-based algorithm (anisotropic analytical algorithm [AAA]) implemented in the Eclipse planning system for intensity-modulated radiosurgery (IMRS) planning of small cranial targets by using a 5-mm leaf-width multileaf collimator (MLC). Overall, 24 patient-based IMRS plans for cranial lesions of variable size (0.3 to 15.1 cc) were planned (Eclipse, AAA, version 10.0.28) using fixed field-based IMRS produced by a Varian linear accelerator equipped with a 120 MLC (5-mm width on central leaves). Plan accuracy was evaluated according to phantom-based measurements performed with radiochromic film (EBT2, ISP, Wayne, NJ). Film 2D dose distributions were performed with the FilmQA Pro software (version 2011, Ashland, OH) by using the triple-channel dosimetry method. Comparison between computed and measured 2D dose distributions was performed using the gamma method (3%/1 mm). Performance of the MLC was checked by inspection of the DynaLog files created by the linear accelerator during the delivery of each dynamic field. The absolute difference between the calculated and measured isocenter doses for all the IMRS plans was 2.5% ± 2.1%. The gamma evaluation method resulted in high average passing rates of 98.9% ± 1.4% (red channel) and 98.9% ± 1.5% (blue and green channels). DynaLog file analysis revealed a maximum root mean square error of 0.46 mm. According to our results, we conclude that the Eclipse/AAA algorithm provides accurate cranial IMRS dose distributions that may be accurately delivered by a Varian linac equipped with a Millennium 120 MLC.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0958-3947</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1873-4022</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.meddos.2013.11.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 24342166</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>ACCURACY ; ALGORITHMS ; Brain Diseases - surgery ; COMPUTER CODES ; DOSIMETRY ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; LINEAR ACCELERATORS ; PHANTOMS ; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS ; RADIATION DOSES ; RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY ; Radiology ; Radiosurgery ; RADIOTHERAPY ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted ; SURGERY</subject><ispartof>Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists, 2014, Vol.39 (2), p.129-133</ispartof><rights>American Association of Medical Dosimetrists</rights><rights>2013 American Association of Medical Dosimetrists Published by American Association of Medical Dosimetrists All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-11d7f20b93894caa0504402e6bc2b235ab78e87ca63053f8ac075a2e752916e83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-11d7f20b93894caa0504402e6bc2b235ab78e87ca63053f8ac075a2e752916e83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,4010,27902,27903,27904</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24342166$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22395906$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Calvo Ortega, Juan Francisco, M.Sc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moragues, Sandra, R.T.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pozo, Miquel, R.T.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>José, Sol San, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puertas, Enrique, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández, Jaime, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casals, Joan, M.D</creatorcontrib><title>A dosimetric evaluation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm and Millennium 120 MLC for cranial intensity-modulated radiosurgery</title><title>Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists</title><addtitle>Med Dosim</addtitle><description>Abstract The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of a convolution-based algorithm (anisotropic analytical algorithm [AAA]) implemented in the Eclipse planning system for intensity-modulated radiosurgery (IMRS) planning of small cranial targets by using a 5-mm leaf-width multileaf collimator (MLC). Overall, 24 patient-based IMRS plans for cranial lesions of variable size (0.3 to 15.1 cc) were planned (Eclipse, AAA, version 10.0.28) using fixed field-based IMRS produced by a Varian linear accelerator equipped with a 120 MLC (5-mm width on central leaves). Plan accuracy was evaluated according to phantom-based measurements performed with radiochromic film (EBT2, ISP, Wayne, NJ). Film 2D dose distributions were performed with the FilmQA Pro software (version 2011, Ashland, OH) by using the triple-channel dosimetry method. Comparison between computed and measured 2D dose distributions was performed using the gamma method (3%/1 mm). Performance of the MLC was checked by inspection of the DynaLog files created by the linear accelerator during the delivery of each dynamic field. The absolute difference between the calculated and measured isocenter doses for all the IMRS plans was 2.5% ± 2.1%. The gamma evaluation method resulted in high average passing rates of 98.9% ± 1.4% (red channel) and 98.9% ± 1.5% (blue and green channels). DynaLog file analysis revealed a maximum root mean square error of 0.46 mm. According to our results, we conclude that the Eclipse/AAA algorithm provides accurate cranial IMRS dose distributions that may be accurately delivered by a Varian linac equipped with a Millennium 120 MLC.</description><subject>ACCURACY</subject><subject>ALGORITHMS</subject><subject>Brain Diseases - surgery</subject><subject>COMPUTER CODES</subject><subject>DOSIMETRY</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>LINEAR ACCELERATORS</subject><subject>PHANTOMS</subject><subject>RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS</subject><subject>RADIATION DOSES</subject><subject>RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>Radiosurgery</subject><subject>RADIOTHERAPY</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>SURGERY</subject><issn>0958-3947</issn><issn>1873-4022</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo9kU2P0zAQhi0EYkvhHyBkiQuXhLGdzwtSVS0fUlccgLPlOJOti2MX21lt_z2usnCawzwzo3kfQt4yKBmw5uOpnHEcfSw5MFEyVgKIZ2TDulYUFXD-nGygr7tC9FV7Q17FeAKAugLxktzwSlScNc2GPO5o3mFmTMFoig_KLioZ76ifaDoivdXWnCPS3W5Hlb33waTjTJUb6Z2xFp0zy0wZB3p32NPJB6qDckZZalxCF026FLMfF6sSjjSo0fi4hHsMl9fkxaRsxDdPdUt-fb79uf9aHL5_-bbfHQotekgFY2M7cRh60fWVVgpqqPJ32AyaD1zUamg77FqtGgG1mDqloa0Vx7bmPWuwE1vyft3rYzIyapNQH7V3DnWSnIu-7qHJ1IeVOgf_Z8GY5GyiRmuVQ79EyWrOBK_qHNyWVCuqg48x4CTPwcwqXCQDeTUjT3I1I69mJGMym8lj754uLENu_x_6pyIDn1YAcxoPBoPM0Tujlf2NF4wnvwSXg5JMRi5B_rjKvbplAvKZvhN_AaLOn8U</recordid><startdate>2014</startdate><enddate>2014</enddate><creator>Calvo Ortega, Juan Francisco, M.Sc</creator><creator>Moragues, Sandra, R.T.T</creator><creator>Pozo, Miquel, R.T.T</creator><creator>José, Sol San, M.D</creator><creator>Puertas, Enrique, M.D</creator><creator>Fernández, Jaime, M.D</creator><creator>Casals, Joan, M.D</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>2014</creationdate><title>A dosimetric evaluation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm and Millennium 120 MLC for cranial intensity-modulated radiosurgery</title><author>Calvo Ortega, Juan Francisco, M.Sc ; Moragues, Sandra, R.T.T ; Pozo, Miquel, R.T.T ; José, Sol San, M.D ; Puertas, Enrique, M.D ; Fernández, Jaime, M.D ; Casals, Joan, M.D</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c390t-11d7f20b93894caa0504402e6bc2b235ab78e87ca63053f8ac075a2e752916e83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>ACCURACY</topic><topic>ALGORITHMS</topic><topic>Brain Diseases - surgery</topic><topic>COMPUTER CODES</topic><topic>DOSIMETRY</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>LINEAR ACCELERATORS</topic><topic>PHANTOMS</topic><topic>RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS</topic><topic>RADIATION DOSES</topic><topic>RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>Radiosurgery</topic><topic>RADIOTHERAPY</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>SURGERY</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Calvo Ortega, Juan Francisco, M.Sc</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Moragues, Sandra, R.T.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pozo, Miquel, R.T.T</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>José, Sol San, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Puertas, Enrique, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Fernández, Jaime, M.D</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Casals, Joan, M.D</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Calvo Ortega, Juan Francisco, M.Sc</au><au>Moragues, Sandra, R.T.T</au><au>Pozo, Miquel, R.T.T</au><au>José, Sol San, M.D</au><au>Puertas, Enrique, M.D</au><au>Fernández, Jaime, M.D</au><au>Casals, Joan, M.D</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A dosimetric evaluation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm and Millennium 120 MLC for cranial intensity-modulated radiosurgery</atitle><jtitle>Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists</jtitle><addtitle>Med Dosim</addtitle><date>2014</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>2</issue><spage>129</spage><epage>133</epage><pages>129-133</pages><issn>0958-3947</issn><eissn>1873-4022</eissn><abstract>Abstract The aim of this study is to assess the accuracy of a convolution-based algorithm (anisotropic analytical algorithm [AAA]) implemented in the Eclipse planning system for intensity-modulated radiosurgery (IMRS) planning of small cranial targets by using a 5-mm leaf-width multileaf collimator (MLC). Overall, 24 patient-based IMRS plans for cranial lesions of variable size (0.3 to 15.1 cc) were planned (Eclipse, AAA, version 10.0.28) using fixed field-based IMRS produced by a Varian linear accelerator equipped with a 120 MLC (5-mm width on central leaves). Plan accuracy was evaluated according to phantom-based measurements performed with radiochromic film (EBT2, ISP, Wayne, NJ). Film 2D dose distributions were performed with the FilmQA Pro software (version 2011, Ashland, OH) by using the triple-channel dosimetry method. Comparison between computed and measured 2D dose distributions was performed using the gamma method (3%/1 mm). Performance of the MLC was checked by inspection of the DynaLog files created by the linear accelerator during the delivery of each dynamic field. The absolute difference between the calculated and measured isocenter doses for all the IMRS plans was 2.5% ± 2.1%. The gamma evaluation method resulted in high average passing rates of 98.9% ± 1.4% (red channel) and 98.9% ± 1.5% (blue and green channels). DynaLog file analysis revealed a maximum root mean square error of 0.46 mm. According to our results, we conclude that the Eclipse/AAA algorithm provides accurate cranial IMRS dose distributions that may be accurately delivered by a Varian linac equipped with a Millennium 120 MLC.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>24342166</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.meddos.2013.11.003</doi><tpages>5</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0958-3947
ispartof Medical dosimetry : official journal of the American Association of Medical Dosimetrists, 2014, Vol.39 (2), p.129-133
issn 0958-3947
1873-4022
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22395906
source MEDLINE; Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals
subjects ACCURACY
ALGORITHMS
Brain Diseases - surgery
COMPUTER CODES
DOSIMETRY
Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine
Humans
LINEAR ACCELERATORS
PHANTOMS
RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS
RADIATION DOSES
RADIATION PROTECTION AND DOSIMETRY
Radiology
Radiosurgery
RADIOTHERAPY
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
SURGERY
title A dosimetric evaluation of the Eclipse AAA algorithm and Millennium 120 MLC for cranial intensity-modulated radiosurgery
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-28T04%3A03%3A43IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20dosimetric%20evaluation%20of%20the%20Eclipse%20AAA%20algorithm%20and%20Millennium%20120%20MLC%20for%20cranial%20intensity-modulated%20radiosurgery&rft.jtitle=Medical%20dosimetry%20:%20official%20journal%20of%20the%20American%20Association%20of%20Medical%20Dosimetrists&rft.au=Calvo%20Ortega,%20Juan%20Francisco,%20M.Sc&rft.date=2014&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=2&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=133&rft.pages=129-133&rft.issn=0958-3947&rft.eissn=1873-4022&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.meddos.2013.11.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1521324524%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1521324524&rft_id=info:pmid/24342166&rft_els_id=1_s2_0_S0958394713001398&rfr_iscdi=true