Choosing the forcing terms in an inexact Newton method
An inexact Newton method is a generalization of Newton`s method for solving F(x) = 0, F: {Re}{sup n} {r_arrow} {Re}{sup n}, in which each step reduces the norm of the local linear model of F. At the kth iteration, the norm reduction is usefully expressed by the inexact Newton condition where x{sub k...
Gespeichert in:
Hauptverfasser: | , |
---|---|
Format: | Tagungsbericht |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | |
container_title | |
container_volume | 17 |
creator | Eisenstat, S.C. Walker, H.F. |
description | An inexact Newton method is a generalization of Newton`s method for solving F(x) = 0, F: {Re}{sup n} {r_arrow} {Re}{sup n}, in which each step reduces the norm of the local linear model of F. At the kth iteration, the norm reduction is usefully expressed by the inexact Newton condition where x{sub k} is the current approximate solution and s{sub k} is the step. In many applications, an {eta}{sub k} is first specified, and then an S{sub k} is found for which the inexact Newton condition holds. Thus {eta}{sub k} is often called a {open_quotes}forcing term{close_quotes}. In practice, the choice of the forcing terms is usually critical to the efficiency of the method and can affect robustness as well. Here, the authors outline several promising choices, discuss theoretical support for them, and compare their performance in a Newton iterative (truncated Newton) method applied to several large-scale problems. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1137/0917003 |
format | Conference Proceeding |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>osti</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_223833</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>223833</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-osti_scitechconnect_2238333</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqNiksKwjAUAIMo-MUrxANU82mbZl0UV67clxJfTcTmQfNAj-8HD-BmZhbD2FqKrZTa7ISVRgg9YjMpbJEZac3402WeVcoUUzZP6SaELHOrZqysPWIK8crJA-9wcN-GoU88RN7GN-HZOuIneBBG3gN5vCzZpGvvCVY_L9jmsD_XxwwThSa5QOC8wxjBUaOUrrTW_zwvEEY4_g</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype></control><display><type>conference_proceeding</type><title>Choosing the forcing terms in an inexact Newton method</title><source>SIAM Journals</source><creator>Eisenstat, S.C. ; Walker, H.F.</creator><creatorcontrib>Eisenstat, S.C. ; Walker, H.F. ; National Science Foundation, Washington, DC (United States) ; Front Range Scientific Computations, Inc., Boulder, CO (United States) ; USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)</creatorcontrib><description>An inexact Newton method is a generalization of Newton`s method for solving F(x) = 0, F: {Re}{sup n} {r_arrow} {Re}{sup n}, in which each step reduces the norm of the local linear model of F. At the kth iteration, the norm reduction is usefully expressed by the inexact Newton condition where x{sub k} is the current approximate solution and s{sub k} is the step. In many applications, an {eta}{sub k} is first specified, and then an S{sub k} is found for which the inexact Newton condition holds. Thus {eta}{sub k} is often called a {open_quotes}forcing term{close_quotes}. In practice, the choice of the forcing terms is usually critical to the efficiency of the method and can affect robustness as well. Here, the authors outline several promising choices, discuss theoretical support for them, and compare their performance in a Newton iterative (truncated Newton) method applied to several large-scale problems.</description><identifier>ISSN: 1064-8275</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1095-7197</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1137/0917003</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>FORCING FUNCTIONS ; MATHEMATICS, COMPUTERS, INFORMATION SCIENCE, MANAGEMENT, LAW, MISCELLANEOUS ; NEWTON METHOD ; POLYNOMIALS</subject><creationdate>1994</creationdate><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,309,776,780,785,881,23909,27902</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/servlets/purl/223833$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Eisenstat, S.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, H.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Science Foundation, Washington, DC (United States)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Front Range Scientific Computations, Inc., Boulder, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)</creatorcontrib><title>Choosing the forcing terms in an inexact Newton method</title><description>An inexact Newton method is a generalization of Newton`s method for solving F(x) = 0, F: {Re}{sup n} {r_arrow} {Re}{sup n}, in which each step reduces the norm of the local linear model of F. At the kth iteration, the norm reduction is usefully expressed by the inexact Newton condition where x{sub k} is the current approximate solution and s{sub k} is the step. In many applications, an {eta}{sub k} is first specified, and then an S{sub k} is found for which the inexact Newton condition holds. Thus {eta}{sub k} is often called a {open_quotes}forcing term{close_quotes}. In practice, the choice of the forcing terms is usually critical to the efficiency of the method and can affect robustness as well. Here, the authors outline several promising choices, discuss theoretical support for them, and compare their performance in a Newton iterative (truncated Newton) method applied to several large-scale problems.</description><subject>FORCING FUNCTIONS</subject><subject>MATHEMATICS, COMPUTERS, INFORMATION SCIENCE, MANAGEMENT, LAW, MISCELLANEOUS</subject><subject>NEWTON METHOD</subject><subject>POLYNOMIALS</subject><issn>1064-8275</issn><issn>1095-7197</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>conference_proceeding</rsrctype><creationdate>1994</creationdate><recordtype>conference_proceeding</recordtype><recordid>eNqNiksKwjAUAIMo-MUrxANU82mbZl0UV67clxJfTcTmQfNAj-8HD-BmZhbD2FqKrZTa7ISVRgg9YjMpbJEZac3402WeVcoUUzZP6SaELHOrZqysPWIK8crJA-9wcN-GoU88RN7GN-HZOuIneBBG3gN5vCzZpGvvCVY_L9jmsD_XxwwThSa5QOC8wxjBUaOUrrTW_zwvEEY4_g</recordid><startdate>19941231</startdate><enddate>19941231</enddate><creator>Eisenstat, S.C.</creator><creator>Walker, H.F.</creator><scope>OIOZB</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>19941231</creationdate><title>Choosing the forcing terms in an inexact Newton method</title><author>Eisenstat, S.C. ; Walker, H.F.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-osti_scitechconnect_2238333</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>conference_proceedings</rsrctype><prefilter>conference_proceedings</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>1994</creationdate><topic>FORCING FUNCTIONS</topic><topic>MATHEMATICS, COMPUTERS, INFORMATION SCIENCE, MANAGEMENT, LAW, MISCELLANEOUS</topic><topic>NEWTON METHOD</topic><topic>POLYNOMIALS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Eisenstat, S.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Walker, H.F.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>National Science Foundation, Washington, DC (United States)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Front Range Scientific Computations, Inc., Boulder, CO (United States)</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)</creatorcontrib><collection>OSTI.GOV - Hybrid</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Eisenstat, S.C.</au><au>Walker, H.F.</au><aucorp>National Science Foundation, Washington, DC (United States)</aucorp><aucorp>Front Range Scientific Computations, Inc., Boulder, CO (United States)</aucorp><aucorp>USDOE, Washington, DC (United States)</aucorp><format>book</format><genre>proceeding</genre><ristype>CONF</ristype><atitle>Choosing the forcing terms in an inexact Newton method</atitle><date>1994-12-31</date><risdate>1994</risdate><volume>17</volume><issue>1</issue><issn>1064-8275</issn><eissn>1095-7197</eissn><abstract>An inexact Newton method is a generalization of Newton`s method for solving F(x) = 0, F: {Re}{sup n} {r_arrow} {Re}{sup n}, in which each step reduces the norm of the local linear model of F. At the kth iteration, the norm reduction is usefully expressed by the inexact Newton condition where x{sub k} is the current approximate solution and s{sub k} is the step. In many applications, an {eta}{sub k} is first specified, and then an S{sub k} is found for which the inexact Newton condition holds. Thus {eta}{sub k} is often called a {open_quotes}forcing term{close_quotes}. In practice, the choice of the forcing terms is usually critical to the efficiency of the method and can affect robustness as well. Here, the authors outline several promising choices, discuss theoretical support for them, and compare their performance in a Newton iterative (truncated Newton) method applied to several large-scale problems.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><doi>10.1137/0917003</doi><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 1064-8275 |
ispartof | |
issn | 1064-8275 1095-7197 |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_223833 |
source | SIAM Journals |
subjects | FORCING FUNCTIONS MATHEMATICS, COMPUTERS, INFORMATION SCIENCE, MANAGEMENT, LAW, MISCELLANEOUS NEWTON METHOD POLYNOMIALS |
title | Choosing the forcing terms in an inexact Newton method |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T15%3A59%3A00IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-osti&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:book&rft.genre=proceeding&rft.atitle=Choosing%20the%20forcing%20terms%20in%20an%20inexact%20Newton%20method&rft.au=Eisenstat,%20S.C.&rft.aucorp=National%20Science%20Foundation,%20Washington,%20DC%20(United%20States)&rft.date=1994-12-31&rft.volume=17&rft.issue=1&rft.issn=1064-8275&rft.eissn=1095-7197&rft_id=info:doi/10.1137/0917003&rft_dat=%3Costi%3E223833%3C/osti%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_id=info:pmid/&rfr_iscdi=true |