A comparative study of diffraction of shallow-water waves by high-level IGN and GN equations

This work is on the nonlinear diffraction analysis of shallow-water waves, impinging on submerged obstacles, by two related theories, namely the classical Green–Naghdi (GN) equations and the Irrotational Green–Naghdi (IGN) equations, both sets of equations being at high levels and derived for incomp...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Journal of computational physics 2015-02, Vol.283, p.129-147
Hauptverfasser: Zhao, B.B., Ertekin, R.C., Duan, W.Y.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 147
container_issue
container_start_page 129
container_title Journal of computational physics
container_volume 283
creator Zhao, B.B.
Ertekin, R.C.
Duan, W.Y.
description This work is on the nonlinear diffraction analysis of shallow-water waves, impinging on submerged obstacles, by two related theories, namely the classical Green–Naghdi (GN) equations and the Irrotational Green–Naghdi (IGN) equations, both sets of equations being at high levels and derived for incompressible and inviscid flows. Recently, the high-level Green–Naghdi equations have been applied to some wave transformation problems. The high-level IGN equations have also been used in the last decade to study certain wave propagation problems. However, past works on these theories used different numerical methods to solve these nonlinear and unsteady sets of differential equations and at different levels. Moreover, different physical problems have been solved in the past. Therefore, it has not been possible to understand the differences produced by these two sets of theories and their range of applicability so far. We are thus motivated to make a direct comparison of the results produced by these theories by use of the same numerical method to solve physically the same wave diffraction problems. We focus on comparing these two theories by using similar codes; only the equations used are different but other parts of the codes, such as the wave-maker, damping zone, discretion method, matrix solver, etc., are exactly the same. This way, we eliminate many potential sources of differences that could be produced by the solution of different equations. The physical problems include the presence of various submerged obstacles that can be used for example as breakwaters or to represent the continental shelf. A numerical wave tank is created by placing a wavemaker on one end and a wave absorbing beach on the other. The nonlinear and unsteady sets of differential equations are solved by the finite-difference method. The results are compared with different equations as well as with the available experimental data.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.11.020
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22382187</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0021999114007785</els_id><sourcerecordid>1677958248</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-1b8444adf2dcdc119e48e7d0e252e3e077c835c1068dbf7c28882a6485050ff73</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kE1rGzEQhkVJoM7HD-hN0Esvu5nRfmnpKYQmDYTkktwCQpZGtcx65Uiyjf99dnHPOQ0DzzO88zL2A6FEwPZmXa7NthSAdYlYgoBvbIHQQyE6bM_YAkBg0fc9fmcXKa0BQDa1XLD3W27CZqujzn5PPOWdPfLguPXORW2yD-O8ppUehnAoDjpT5Ae9p8SXR77y_1bFQHsa-OPDM9ej5dOgj52exXTFzp0eEl3_n5fs7f7P693f4unl4fHu9qkwVSNzgUtZ17W2TlhjDWJPtaTOAolGUEXQdUZWjUFopV26zggppdBtLRtowLmuumQ_T3dDyl4l4zOZlQnjSCYrISopUM7UrxO1jeFjRymrjU-GhkGPFHZJYdt1fSNFLScUT6iJIaVITm2j3-h4VAhq7lut1dS3mvtWiGrqe3J-nxyaPt17inMQGg1ZH-ccNvgv7E-POoc9</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1677958248</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>A comparative study of diffraction of shallow-water waves by high-level IGN and GN equations</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete</source><creator>Zhao, B.B. ; Ertekin, R.C. ; Duan, W.Y.</creator><creatorcontrib>Zhao, B.B. ; Ertekin, R.C. ; Duan, W.Y.</creatorcontrib><description>This work is on the nonlinear diffraction analysis of shallow-water waves, impinging on submerged obstacles, by two related theories, namely the classical Green–Naghdi (GN) equations and the Irrotational Green–Naghdi (IGN) equations, both sets of equations being at high levels and derived for incompressible and inviscid flows. Recently, the high-level Green–Naghdi equations have been applied to some wave transformation problems. The high-level IGN equations have also been used in the last decade to study certain wave propagation problems. However, past works on these theories used different numerical methods to solve these nonlinear and unsteady sets of differential equations and at different levels. Moreover, different physical problems have been solved in the past. Therefore, it has not been possible to understand the differences produced by these two sets of theories and their range of applicability so far. We are thus motivated to make a direct comparison of the results produced by these theories by use of the same numerical method to solve physically the same wave diffraction problems. We focus on comparing these two theories by using similar codes; only the equations used are different but other parts of the codes, such as the wave-maker, damping zone, discretion method, matrix solver, etc., are exactly the same. This way, we eliminate many potential sources of differences that could be produced by the solution of different equations. The physical problems include the presence of various submerged obstacles that can be used for example as breakwaters or to represent the continental shelf. A numerical wave tank is created by placing a wavemaker on one end and a wave absorbing beach on the other. The nonlinear and unsteady sets of differential equations are solved by the finite-difference method. The results are compared with different equations as well as with the available experimental data.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0021-9991</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1090-2716</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.jcp.2014.11.020</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS ; COASTAL REGIONS ; COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS ; CONTINENTAL SHELF ; Continental shelves ; DAMPING ; DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS ; DIFFRACTION ; FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD ; Fluid flow ; High-level Green–Naghdi theory ; Irrotational Green–Naghdi theory ; Mathematical analysis ; Mathematical models ; MATRICES ; Nonlinear and dispersive shallow-water waves ; NONLINEAR PROBLEMS ; Nonlinearity ; Obstacles ; POTENTIALS ; Submerged ; Submerged bar and breakwater ; TRANSFORMATIONS ; WATER WAVES ; Wave diffraction ; WAVE PROPAGATION</subject><ispartof>Journal of computational physics, 2015-02, Vol.283, p.129-147</ispartof><rights>2014 Elsevier Inc.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-1b8444adf2dcdc119e48e7d0e252e3e077c835c1068dbf7c28882a6485050ff73</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-1b8444adf2dcdc119e48e7d0e252e3e077c835c1068dbf7c28882a6485050ff73</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.11.020$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22382187$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Zhao, B.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ertekin, R.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duan, W.Y.</creatorcontrib><title>A comparative study of diffraction of shallow-water waves by high-level IGN and GN equations</title><title>Journal of computational physics</title><description>This work is on the nonlinear diffraction analysis of shallow-water waves, impinging on submerged obstacles, by two related theories, namely the classical Green–Naghdi (GN) equations and the Irrotational Green–Naghdi (IGN) equations, both sets of equations being at high levels and derived for incompressible and inviscid flows. Recently, the high-level Green–Naghdi equations have been applied to some wave transformation problems. The high-level IGN equations have also been used in the last decade to study certain wave propagation problems. However, past works on these theories used different numerical methods to solve these nonlinear and unsteady sets of differential equations and at different levels. Moreover, different physical problems have been solved in the past. Therefore, it has not been possible to understand the differences produced by these two sets of theories and their range of applicability so far. We are thus motivated to make a direct comparison of the results produced by these theories by use of the same numerical method to solve physically the same wave diffraction problems. We focus on comparing these two theories by using similar codes; only the equations used are different but other parts of the codes, such as the wave-maker, damping zone, discretion method, matrix solver, etc., are exactly the same. This way, we eliminate many potential sources of differences that could be produced by the solution of different equations. The physical problems include the presence of various submerged obstacles that can be used for example as breakwaters or to represent the continental shelf. A numerical wave tank is created by placing a wavemaker on one end and a wave absorbing beach on the other. The nonlinear and unsteady sets of differential equations are solved by the finite-difference method. The results are compared with different equations as well as with the available experimental data.</description><subject>CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS</subject><subject>COASTAL REGIONS</subject><subject>COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS</subject><subject>CONTINENTAL SHELF</subject><subject>Continental shelves</subject><subject>DAMPING</subject><subject>DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS</subject><subject>DIFFRACTION</subject><subject>FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD</subject><subject>Fluid flow</subject><subject>High-level Green–Naghdi theory</subject><subject>Irrotational Green–Naghdi theory</subject><subject>Mathematical analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>MATRICES</subject><subject>Nonlinear and dispersive shallow-water waves</subject><subject>NONLINEAR PROBLEMS</subject><subject>Nonlinearity</subject><subject>Obstacles</subject><subject>POTENTIALS</subject><subject>Submerged</subject><subject>Submerged bar and breakwater</subject><subject>TRANSFORMATIONS</subject><subject>WATER WAVES</subject><subject>Wave diffraction</subject><subject>WAVE PROPAGATION</subject><issn>0021-9991</issn><issn>1090-2716</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2015</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kE1rGzEQhkVJoM7HD-hN0Esvu5nRfmnpKYQmDYTkktwCQpZGtcx65Uiyjf99dnHPOQ0DzzO88zL2A6FEwPZmXa7NthSAdYlYgoBvbIHQQyE6bM_YAkBg0fc9fmcXKa0BQDa1XLD3W27CZqujzn5PPOWdPfLguPXORW2yD-O8ppUehnAoDjpT5Ae9p8SXR77y_1bFQHsa-OPDM9ej5dOgj52exXTFzp0eEl3_n5fs7f7P693f4unl4fHu9qkwVSNzgUtZ17W2TlhjDWJPtaTOAolGUEXQdUZWjUFopV26zggppdBtLRtowLmuumQ_T3dDyl4l4zOZlQnjSCYrISopUM7UrxO1jeFjRymrjU-GhkGPFHZJYdt1fSNFLScUT6iJIaVITm2j3-h4VAhq7lut1dS3mvtWiGrqe3J-nxyaPt17inMQGg1ZH-ccNvgv7E-POoc9</recordid><startdate>20150215</startdate><enddate>20150215</enddate><creator>Zhao, B.B.</creator><creator>Ertekin, R.C.</creator><creator>Duan, W.Y.</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7SC</scope><scope>7SP</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>JQ2</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>L~C</scope><scope>L~D</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20150215</creationdate><title>A comparative study of diffraction of shallow-water waves by high-level IGN and GN equations</title><author>Zhao, B.B. ; Ertekin, R.C. ; Duan, W.Y.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c358t-1b8444adf2dcdc119e48e7d0e252e3e077c835c1068dbf7c28882a6485050ff73</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2015</creationdate><topic>CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS</topic><topic>COASTAL REGIONS</topic><topic>COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS</topic><topic>CONTINENTAL SHELF</topic><topic>Continental shelves</topic><topic>DAMPING</topic><topic>DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS</topic><topic>DIFFRACTION</topic><topic>FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD</topic><topic>Fluid flow</topic><topic>High-level Green–Naghdi theory</topic><topic>Irrotational Green–Naghdi theory</topic><topic>Mathematical analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>MATRICES</topic><topic>Nonlinear and dispersive shallow-water waves</topic><topic>NONLINEAR PROBLEMS</topic><topic>Nonlinearity</topic><topic>Obstacles</topic><topic>POTENTIALS</topic><topic>Submerged</topic><topic>Submerged bar and breakwater</topic><topic>TRANSFORMATIONS</topic><topic>WATER WAVES</topic><topic>Wave diffraction</topic><topic>WAVE PROPAGATION</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Zhao, B.B.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ertekin, R.C.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Duan, W.Y.</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts</collection><collection>Electronics &amp; Communications Abstracts</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>ProQuest Computer Science Collection</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts – Academic</collection><collection>Computer and Information Systems Abstracts Professional</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Journal of computational physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Zhao, B.B.</au><au>Ertekin, R.C.</au><au>Duan, W.Y.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>A comparative study of diffraction of shallow-water waves by high-level IGN and GN equations</atitle><jtitle>Journal of computational physics</jtitle><date>2015-02-15</date><risdate>2015</risdate><volume>283</volume><spage>129</spage><epage>147</epage><pages>129-147</pages><issn>0021-9991</issn><eissn>1090-2716</eissn><abstract>This work is on the nonlinear diffraction analysis of shallow-water waves, impinging on submerged obstacles, by two related theories, namely the classical Green–Naghdi (GN) equations and the Irrotational Green–Naghdi (IGN) equations, both sets of equations being at high levels and derived for incompressible and inviscid flows. Recently, the high-level Green–Naghdi equations have been applied to some wave transformation problems. The high-level IGN equations have also been used in the last decade to study certain wave propagation problems. However, past works on these theories used different numerical methods to solve these nonlinear and unsteady sets of differential equations and at different levels. Moreover, different physical problems have been solved in the past. Therefore, it has not been possible to understand the differences produced by these two sets of theories and their range of applicability so far. We are thus motivated to make a direct comparison of the results produced by these theories by use of the same numerical method to solve physically the same wave diffraction problems. We focus on comparing these two theories by using similar codes; only the equations used are different but other parts of the codes, such as the wave-maker, damping zone, discretion method, matrix solver, etc., are exactly the same. This way, we eliminate many potential sources of differences that could be produced by the solution of different equations. The physical problems include the presence of various submerged obstacles that can be used for example as breakwaters or to represent the continental shelf. A numerical wave tank is created by placing a wavemaker on one end and a wave absorbing beach on the other. The nonlinear and unsteady sets of differential equations are solved by the finite-difference method. The results are compared with different equations as well as with the available experimental data.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.jcp.2014.11.020</doi><tpages>19</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0021-9991
ispartof Journal of computational physics, 2015-02, Vol.283, p.129-147
issn 0021-9991
1090-2716
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22382187
source Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals Complete
subjects CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS
COASTAL REGIONS
COMPARATIVE EVALUATIONS
CONTINENTAL SHELF
Continental shelves
DAMPING
DIFFERENTIAL EQUATIONS
DIFFRACTION
FINITE DIFFERENCE METHOD
Fluid flow
High-level Green–Naghdi theory
Irrotational Green–Naghdi theory
Mathematical analysis
Mathematical models
MATRICES
Nonlinear and dispersive shallow-water waves
NONLINEAR PROBLEMS
Nonlinearity
Obstacles
POTENTIALS
Submerged
Submerged bar and breakwater
TRANSFORMATIONS
WATER WAVES
Wave diffraction
WAVE PROPAGATION
title A comparative study of diffraction of shallow-water waves by high-level IGN and GN equations
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2024-12-27T03%3A41%3A10IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=A%20comparative%20study%20of%20diffraction%20of%20shallow-water%20waves%20by%20high-level%20IGN%20and%20GN%20equations&rft.jtitle=Journal%20of%20computational%20physics&rft.au=Zhao,%20B.B.&rft.date=2015-02-15&rft.volume=283&rft.spage=129&rft.epage=147&rft.pages=129-147&rft.issn=0021-9991&rft.eissn=1090-2716&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.jcp.2014.11.020&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1677958248%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1677958248&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0021999114007785&rfr_iscdi=true