Emissions from US waste collection vehicles

► Life-cycle emissions for alternative fuel technologies. ► Fuel consumption of alternative fuels for waste collection vehicles. ► Actual driving cycle of waste collection vehicles. ► Diesel-fueled waste collection vehicle emissions. This research is an in-depth environmental analysis of potential a...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Waste management (Elmsford) 2013-05, Vol.33 (5), p.1079-1089
Hauptverfasser: Maimoun, Mousa A., Reinhart, Debra R., Gammoh, Fatina T., McCauley Bush, Pamela
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1089
container_issue 5
container_start_page 1079
container_title Waste management (Elmsford)
container_volume 33
creator Maimoun, Mousa A.
Reinhart, Debra R.
Gammoh, Fatina T.
McCauley Bush, Pamela
description ► Life-cycle emissions for alternative fuel technologies. ► Fuel consumption of alternative fuels for waste collection vehicles. ► Actual driving cycle of waste collection vehicles. ► Diesel-fueled waste collection vehicle emissions. This research is an in-depth environmental analysis of potential alternative fuel technologies for waste collection vehicles. Life-cycle emissions, cost, fuel and energy consumption were evaluated for a wide range of fossil and bio-fuel technologies. Emission factors were calculated for a typical waste collection driving cycle as well as constant speed. In brief, natural gas waste collection vehicles (compressed and liquid) fueled with North-American natural gas had 6–10% higher well-to-wheel (WTW) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions relative to diesel-fueled vehicles; however the pump-to-wheel (PTW) GHG emissions of natural gas waste collection vehicles averaged 6% less than diesel-fueled vehicles. Landfill gas had about 80% lower WTW GHG emissions relative to diesel. Biodiesel waste collection vehicles had between 12% and 75% lower WTW GHG emissions relative to diesel depending on the fuel source and the blend. In 2011, natural gas waste collection vehicles had the lowest fuel cost per collection vehicle kilometer travel. Finally, the actual driving cycle of waste collection vehicles consists of repetitive stops and starts during waste collection; this generates more emissions than constant speed driving.
doi_str_mv 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.12.021
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22300348</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0956053X12005879</els_id><sourcerecordid>1349400867</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-2d47cf77bd923d639adf2cd795bae81d6209a4db3c0295c3e707d3823fa090253</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kFFrFDEQx4NU7LX6DYosFKFQ9pxMspvNiyClrULBBy34FnLJLM2xu6nJXsVvb4696lthYB7ym8n8f4ydcVhz4O3H7fq3zaOd1ggc16UA-Su24p3SNcqmPWIr0E1bQyN-HrOTnLcAXHYc3rBjFFJIjmrFLq_HkHOIU676FMfq_ntV1s5UuTgM5ObyUj3RQ3AD5bfsdW-HTO8O_ZTd31z_uPpS3327_Xr1-a52EmGu0UvleqU2XqPwrdDW9-i80s3GUsd9i6Ct9BvhAHXjBClQXnQoegsasBGn7HzZG_McTHZhJvfg4jSVewyiABCyK9TFQj2m-GtHeTYliaNhsBPFXTZcSC0BulYVVC6oSzHnRL15TGG06Y_hYPYyzdYsMs1epilVZJax94cfdpuR_L-hZ3sF-HAAbHZ26JOdXMj_OSVa0XEs3KeFo2LtKVDah6LJkQ9pn8nH8PIlfwFHOZIO</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1349400867</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Emissions from US waste collection vehicles</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)</source><creator>Maimoun, Mousa A. ; Reinhart, Debra R. ; Gammoh, Fatina T. ; McCauley Bush, Pamela</creator><creatorcontrib>Maimoun, Mousa A. ; Reinhart, Debra R. ; Gammoh, Fatina T. ; McCauley Bush, Pamela</creatorcontrib><description>► Life-cycle emissions for alternative fuel technologies. ► Fuel consumption of alternative fuels for waste collection vehicles. ► Actual driving cycle of waste collection vehicles. ► Diesel-fueled waste collection vehicle emissions. This research is an in-depth environmental analysis of potential alternative fuel technologies for waste collection vehicles. Life-cycle emissions, cost, fuel and energy consumption were evaluated for a wide range of fossil and bio-fuel technologies. Emission factors were calculated for a typical waste collection driving cycle as well as constant speed. In brief, natural gas waste collection vehicles (compressed and liquid) fueled with North-American natural gas had 6–10% higher well-to-wheel (WTW) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions relative to diesel-fueled vehicles; however the pump-to-wheel (PTW) GHG emissions of natural gas waste collection vehicles averaged 6% less than diesel-fueled vehicles. Landfill gas had about 80% lower WTW GHG emissions relative to diesel. Biodiesel waste collection vehicles had between 12% and 75% lower WTW GHG emissions relative to diesel depending on the fuel source and the blend. In 2011, natural gas waste collection vehicles had the lowest fuel cost per collection vehicle kilometer travel. Finally, the actual driving cycle of waste collection vehicles consists of repetitive stops and starts during waste collection; this generates more emissions than constant speed driving.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0956-053X</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-2456</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2012.12.021</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23434127</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>Kidlington: Elsevier Ltd</publisher><subject>Alternative fuels ; Applied sciences ; Automobile Driving ; BIODIESEL FUELS ; Biofuels - economics ; Carbon Dioxide - analysis ; COST ; Emissions ; ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY ; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ; Exact sciences and technology ; FUEL CONSUMPTION ; Fuel life-cycle ; General treatment and storage processes ; GHG ; GREENHOUSE GASES ; LANDFILL GAS ; LIFE CYCLE ; MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES ; NATURAL GAS ; New York City ; Other wastes and particular components of wastes ; Pollution ; Refuse Disposal - methods ; United States ; Vehicle Emissions - analysis ; VEHICLES ; Waste collection vehicles ; WASTE MANAGEMENT ; Wastes</subject><ispartof>Waste management (Elmsford), 2013-05, Vol.33 (5), p.1079-1089</ispartof><rights>2013</rights><rights>2014 INIST-CNRS</rights><rights>Published by Elsevier Ltd.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-2d47cf77bd923d639adf2cd795bae81d6209a4db3c0295c3e707d3823fa090253</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-2d47cf77bd923d639adf2cd795bae81d6209a4db3c0295c3e707d3823fa090253</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.12.021$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3550,27924,27925,45995</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttp://pascal-francis.inist.fr/vibad/index.php?action=getRecordDetail&amp;idt=27363812$$DView record in Pascal Francis$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23434127$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22300348$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Maimoun, Mousa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinhart, Debra R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gammoh, Fatina T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCauley Bush, Pamela</creatorcontrib><title>Emissions from US waste collection vehicles</title><title>Waste management (Elmsford)</title><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><description>► Life-cycle emissions for alternative fuel technologies. ► Fuel consumption of alternative fuels for waste collection vehicles. ► Actual driving cycle of waste collection vehicles. ► Diesel-fueled waste collection vehicle emissions. This research is an in-depth environmental analysis of potential alternative fuel technologies for waste collection vehicles. Life-cycle emissions, cost, fuel and energy consumption were evaluated for a wide range of fossil and bio-fuel technologies. Emission factors were calculated for a typical waste collection driving cycle as well as constant speed. In brief, natural gas waste collection vehicles (compressed and liquid) fueled with North-American natural gas had 6–10% higher well-to-wheel (WTW) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions relative to diesel-fueled vehicles; however the pump-to-wheel (PTW) GHG emissions of natural gas waste collection vehicles averaged 6% less than diesel-fueled vehicles. Landfill gas had about 80% lower WTW GHG emissions relative to diesel. Biodiesel waste collection vehicles had between 12% and 75% lower WTW GHG emissions relative to diesel depending on the fuel source and the blend. In 2011, natural gas waste collection vehicles had the lowest fuel cost per collection vehicle kilometer travel. Finally, the actual driving cycle of waste collection vehicles consists of repetitive stops and starts during waste collection; this generates more emissions than constant speed driving.</description><subject>Alternative fuels</subject><subject>Applied sciences</subject><subject>Automobile Driving</subject><subject>BIODIESEL FUELS</subject><subject>Biofuels - economics</subject><subject>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</subject><subject>COST</subject><subject>Emissions</subject><subject>ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY</subject><subject>ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS</subject><subject>Exact sciences and technology</subject><subject>FUEL CONSUMPTION</subject><subject>Fuel life-cycle</subject><subject>General treatment and storage processes</subject><subject>GHG</subject><subject>GREENHOUSE GASES</subject><subject>LANDFILL GAS</subject><subject>LIFE CYCLE</subject><subject>MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES</subject><subject>NATURAL GAS</subject><subject>New York City</subject><subject>Other wastes and particular components of wastes</subject><subject>Pollution</subject><subject>Refuse Disposal - methods</subject><subject>United States</subject><subject>Vehicle Emissions - analysis</subject><subject>VEHICLES</subject><subject>Waste collection vehicles</subject><subject>WASTE MANAGEMENT</subject><subject>Wastes</subject><issn>0956-053X</issn><issn>1879-2456</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kFFrFDEQx4NU7LX6DYosFKFQ9pxMspvNiyClrULBBy34FnLJLM2xu6nJXsVvb4696lthYB7ym8n8f4ydcVhz4O3H7fq3zaOd1ggc16UA-Su24p3SNcqmPWIr0E1bQyN-HrOTnLcAXHYc3rBjFFJIjmrFLq_HkHOIU676FMfq_ntV1s5UuTgM5ObyUj3RQ3AD5bfsdW-HTO8O_ZTd31z_uPpS3327_Xr1-a52EmGu0UvleqU2XqPwrdDW9-i80s3GUsd9i6Ct9BvhAHXjBClQXnQoegsasBGn7HzZG_McTHZhJvfg4jSVewyiABCyK9TFQj2m-GtHeTYliaNhsBPFXTZcSC0BulYVVC6oSzHnRL15TGG06Y_hYPYyzdYsMs1epilVZJax94cfdpuR_L-hZ3sF-HAAbHZ26JOdXMj_OSVa0XEs3KeFo2LtKVDah6LJkQ9pn8nH8PIlfwFHOZIO</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Maimoun, Mousa A.</creator><creator>Reinhart, Debra R.</creator><creator>Gammoh, Fatina T.</creator><creator>McCauley Bush, Pamela</creator><general>Elsevier Ltd</general><general>Elsevier</general><scope>IQODW</scope><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>Emissions from US waste collection vehicles</title><author>Maimoun, Mousa A. ; Reinhart, Debra R. ; Gammoh, Fatina T. ; McCauley Bush, Pamela</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c420t-2d47cf77bd923d639adf2cd795bae81d6209a4db3c0295c3e707d3823fa090253</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Alternative fuels</topic><topic>Applied sciences</topic><topic>Automobile Driving</topic><topic>BIODIESEL FUELS</topic><topic>Biofuels - economics</topic><topic>Carbon Dioxide - analysis</topic><topic>COST</topic><topic>Emissions</topic><topic>ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY</topic><topic>ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS</topic><topic>Exact sciences and technology</topic><topic>FUEL CONSUMPTION</topic><topic>Fuel life-cycle</topic><topic>General treatment and storage processes</topic><topic>GHG</topic><topic>GREENHOUSE GASES</topic><topic>LANDFILL GAS</topic><topic>LIFE CYCLE</topic><topic>MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES</topic><topic>NATURAL GAS</topic><topic>New York City</topic><topic>Other wastes and particular components of wastes</topic><topic>Pollution</topic><topic>Refuse Disposal - methods</topic><topic>United States</topic><topic>Vehicle Emissions - analysis</topic><topic>VEHICLES</topic><topic>Waste collection vehicles</topic><topic>WASTE MANAGEMENT</topic><topic>Wastes</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Maimoun, Mousa A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Reinhart, Debra R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Gammoh, Fatina T.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McCauley Bush, Pamela</creatorcontrib><collection>Pascal-Francis</collection><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Maimoun, Mousa A.</au><au>Reinhart, Debra R.</au><au>Gammoh, Fatina T.</au><au>McCauley Bush, Pamela</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Emissions from US waste collection vehicles</atitle><jtitle>Waste management (Elmsford)</jtitle><addtitle>Waste Manag</addtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>33</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>1079</spage><epage>1089</epage><pages>1079-1089</pages><issn>0956-053X</issn><eissn>1879-2456</eissn><abstract>► Life-cycle emissions for alternative fuel technologies. ► Fuel consumption of alternative fuels for waste collection vehicles. ► Actual driving cycle of waste collection vehicles. ► Diesel-fueled waste collection vehicle emissions. This research is an in-depth environmental analysis of potential alternative fuel technologies for waste collection vehicles. Life-cycle emissions, cost, fuel and energy consumption were evaluated for a wide range of fossil and bio-fuel technologies. Emission factors were calculated for a typical waste collection driving cycle as well as constant speed. In brief, natural gas waste collection vehicles (compressed and liquid) fueled with North-American natural gas had 6–10% higher well-to-wheel (WTW) greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions relative to diesel-fueled vehicles; however the pump-to-wheel (PTW) GHG emissions of natural gas waste collection vehicles averaged 6% less than diesel-fueled vehicles. Landfill gas had about 80% lower WTW GHG emissions relative to diesel. Biodiesel waste collection vehicles had between 12% and 75% lower WTW GHG emissions relative to diesel depending on the fuel source and the blend. In 2011, natural gas waste collection vehicles had the lowest fuel cost per collection vehicle kilometer travel. Finally, the actual driving cycle of waste collection vehicles consists of repetitive stops and starts during waste collection; this generates more emissions than constant speed driving.</abstract><cop>Kidlington</cop><pub>Elsevier Ltd</pub><pmid>23434127</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.wasman.2012.12.021</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0956-053X
ispartof Waste management (Elmsford), 2013-05, Vol.33 (5), p.1079-1089
issn 0956-053X
1879-2456
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22300348
source MEDLINE; Access via ScienceDirect (Elsevier)
subjects Alternative fuels
Applied sciences
Automobile Driving
BIODIESEL FUELS
Biofuels - economics
Carbon Dioxide - analysis
COST
Emissions
ENERGY PLANNING, POLICY AND ECONOMY
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS
Exact sciences and technology
FUEL CONSUMPTION
Fuel life-cycle
General treatment and storage processes
GHG
GREENHOUSE GASES
LANDFILL GAS
LIFE CYCLE
MANAGEMENT OF RADIOACTIVE WASTES, AND NON-RADIOACTIVE WASTES FROM NUCLEAR FACILITIES
NATURAL GAS
New York City
Other wastes and particular components of wastes
Pollution
Refuse Disposal - methods
United States
Vehicle Emissions - analysis
VEHICLES
Waste collection vehicles
WASTE MANAGEMENT
Wastes
title Emissions from US waste collection vehicles
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-02T07%3A26%3A47IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Emissions%20from%20US%20waste%20collection%20vehicles&rft.jtitle=Waste%20management%20(Elmsford)&rft.au=Maimoun,%20Mousa%20A.&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=33&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=1079&rft.epage=1089&rft.pages=1079-1089&rft.issn=0956-053X&rft.eissn=1879-2456&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.wasman.2012.12.021&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1349400867%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1349400867&rft_id=info:pmid/23434127&rft_els_id=S0956053X12005879&rfr_iscdi=true