Multicenter Collaborative Quality Assurance Program for the Province of Ontario, Canada: First-Year Results
Purpose The objective of this work was to develop a collaborative quality assurance (CQA) program to assess the performance of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning and delivery across the province of Ontario, Canada. Methods and Materials The CQA program was designed to be a compreh...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics biology, physics, 2013-05, Vol.86 (1), p.164-169 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 169 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 164 |
container_title | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics |
container_volume | 86 |
creator | Létourneau, Daniel, PhD McNiven, Andrea, PhD Jaffray, David A., PhD |
description | Purpose The objective of this work was to develop a collaborative quality assurance (CQA) program to assess the performance of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning and delivery across the province of Ontario, Canada. Methods and Materials The CQA program was designed to be a comprehensive end-to-end test that can be completed on multiple planning and delivery platforms. The first year of the program included a head-and-neck (H&N) planning exercise and on-site visit to acquire dosimetric measurements to assess planning and delivery performance. A single dosimeter was used at each institution, and the planned to measured dose agreement was evaluated for both the H&N plan and a standard plan (linear-accelerator specific) that was created to enable a direct comparison between centers with similar infrastructure. Results CQA program feasibility was demonstrated through participation of all 13 radiation therapy centers in the province. Planning and delivery was completed on a variety of infrastructure (treatment planning systems and linear accelerators). The planning exercise was completed using both static gantry and rotational IMRT, and planned-to-delivered dose agreement (pass rates) for 3%/3-mm gamma evaluation were greater than 90% (92.6%-99.6%). Conclusions All centers had acceptable results, but variation in planned to delivered dose agreement for the same planning and delivery platform was noted. The upper end of the range will provide an achievable target for other centers through continued quality improvement, aided by feedback provided by the program through the use of standard plans and simple test fields. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.12.003 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22224459</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0360301612038990</els_id><sourcerecordid>1327725467</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-22ffce27726e400418b6d0c514dbba7f065fe088ec3727fa5b769c287d647a183</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNqFUl1rFDEUDWKx2-o_EAn44kNnzddMZnwQytJqoVI_QZ9CJnPHZjqbbJPMwv57M071wRfDhRBy7j2Hcy5CzylZU0Kr18PaDsG3uzUjlK1zEcIfoRWtZVPwsvz-GK0Ir0jBM_gYncQ4EEIoleIJOmZcVEwwukJ3H6YxWQMuQcAbP4669UEnuwf8adKjTQd8HuMUtDOAPwb_M-gt7n3A6fb3e2_nD9_jG5d0sP4Mb7TTnX6DL22IqfgBOuDPEDNLfIqOej1GePZwn6JvlxdfN--L65t3V5vz68IIUaaCsb43wKRkFQhCBK3bqiOmpKJrWy17UpU9kLoGwyWTvS5bWTWG1bKrhNS05qfo5TLXx2RVNDaBuTXeOTBJsXwyTZNRrxbULvj7CWJSWxsNZAcc-CkqymcJpahkhooFaoKPMUCvdsFudTgoStQchhrUEoaaw1C5chi57cUDw9Ruofvb9Mf9DHi7ACC7sbcQZrGQDe1smLV23v6P4d8BZrTOGj3ewQHi4KfgstOKqpgb1Jd5IeZ9oIzwumkI_wXoYrFH</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1327725467</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Multicenter Collaborative Quality Assurance Program for the Province of Ontario, Canada: First-Year Results</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present)</source><creator>Létourneau, Daniel, PhD ; McNiven, Andrea, PhD ; Jaffray, David A., PhD</creator><creatorcontrib>Létourneau, Daniel, PhD ; McNiven, Andrea, PhD ; Jaffray, David A., PhD</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose The objective of this work was to develop a collaborative quality assurance (CQA) program to assess the performance of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning and delivery across the province of Ontario, Canada. Methods and Materials The CQA program was designed to be a comprehensive end-to-end test that can be completed on multiple planning and delivery platforms. The first year of the program included a head-and-neck (H&N) planning exercise and on-site visit to acquire dosimetric measurements to assess planning and delivery performance. A single dosimeter was used at each institution, and the planned to measured dose agreement was evaluated for both the H&N plan and a standard plan (linear-accelerator specific) that was created to enable a direct comparison between centers with similar infrastructure. Results CQA program feasibility was demonstrated through participation of all 13 radiation therapy centers in the province. Planning and delivery was completed on a variety of infrastructure (treatment planning systems and linear accelerators). The planning exercise was completed using both static gantry and rotational IMRT, and planned-to-delivered dose agreement (pass rates) for 3%/3-mm gamma evaluation were greater than 90% (92.6%-99.6%). Conclusions All centers had acceptable results, but variation in planned to delivered dose agreement for the same planning and delivery platform was noted. The upper end of the range will provide an achievable target for other centers through continued quality improvement, aided by feedback provided by the program through the use of standard plans and simple test fields.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0360-3016</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1879-355X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.12.003</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23462421</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>Cancer Care Facilities - standards ; DOSEMETERS ; Feasibility Studies ; HEAD ; Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine ; Humans ; Interinstitutional Relations ; LINEAR ACCELERATORS ; NECK ; Ontario ; Particle Accelerators - standards ; PLANNING ; Program Evaluation ; QUALITY ASSURANCE ; Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards ; RADIATION DOSES ; Radiology ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; RADIOTHERAPY ; Radiotherapy Dosage - standards ; Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - instrumentation ; Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - standards</subject><ispartof>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2013-05, Vol.86 (1), p.164-169</ispartof><rights>Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-22ffce27726e400418b6d0c514dbba7f065fe088ec3727fa5b769c287d647a183</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-22ffce27726e400418b6d0c514dbba7f065fe088ec3727fa5b769c287d647a183</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.12.003$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,3548,27923,27924,45994</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23462421$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22224459$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Létourneau, Daniel, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNiven, Andrea, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaffray, David A., PhD</creatorcontrib><title>Multicenter Collaborative Quality Assurance Program for the Province of Ontario, Canada: First-Year Results</title><title>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</title><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose The objective of this work was to develop a collaborative quality assurance (CQA) program to assess the performance of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning and delivery across the province of Ontario, Canada. Methods and Materials The CQA program was designed to be a comprehensive end-to-end test that can be completed on multiple planning and delivery platforms. The first year of the program included a head-and-neck (H&N) planning exercise and on-site visit to acquire dosimetric measurements to assess planning and delivery performance. A single dosimeter was used at each institution, and the planned to measured dose agreement was evaluated for both the H&N plan and a standard plan (linear-accelerator specific) that was created to enable a direct comparison between centers with similar infrastructure. Results CQA program feasibility was demonstrated through participation of all 13 radiation therapy centers in the province. Planning and delivery was completed on a variety of infrastructure (treatment planning systems and linear accelerators). The planning exercise was completed using both static gantry and rotational IMRT, and planned-to-delivered dose agreement (pass rates) for 3%/3-mm gamma evaluation were greater than 90% (92.6%-99.6%). Conclusions All centers had acceptable results, but variation in planned to delivered dose agreement for the same planning and delivery platform was noted. The upper end of the range will provide an achievable target for other centers through continued quality improvement, aided by feedback provided by the program through the use of standard plans and simple test fields.</description><subject>Cancer Care Facilities - standards</subject><subject>DOSEMETERS</subject><subject>Feasibility Studies</subject><subject>HEAD</subject><subject>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>Interinstitutional Relations</subject><subject>LINEAR ACCELERATORS</subject><subject>NECK</subject><subject>Ontario</subject><subject>Particle Accelerators - standards</subject><subject>PLANNING</subject><subject>Program Evaluation</subject><subject>QUALITY ASSURANCE</subject><subject>Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards</subject><subject>RADIATION DOSES</subject><subject>Radiology</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>RADIOTHERAPY</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Dosage - standards</subject><subject>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - instrumentation</subject><subject>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - standards</subject><issn>0360-3016</issn><issn>1879-355X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2013</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNqFUl1rFDEUDWKx2-o_EAn44kNnzddMZnwQytJqoVI_QZ9CJnPHZjqbbJPMwv57M071wRfDhRBy7j2Hcy5CzylZU0Kr18PaDsG3uzUjlK1zEcIfoRWtZVPwsvz-GK0Ir0jBM_gYncQ4EEIoleIJOmZcVEwwukJ3H6YxWQMuQcAbP4669UEnuwf8adKjTQd8HuMUtDOAPwb_M-gt7n3A6fb3e2_nD9_jG5d0sP4Mb7TTnX6DL22IqfgBOuDPEDNLfIqOej1GePZwn6JvlxdfN--L65t3V5vz68IIUaaCsb43wKRkFQhCBK3bqiOmpKJrWy17UpU9kLoGwyWTvS5bWTWG1bKrhNS05qfo5TLXx2RVNDaBuTXeOTBJsXwyTZNRrxbULvj7CWJSWxsNZAcc-CkqymcJpahkhooFaoKPMUCvdsFudTgoStQchhrUEoaaw1C5chi57cUDw9Ruofvb9Mf9DHi7ACC7sbcQZrGQDe1smLV23v6P4d8BZrTOGj3ewQHi4KfgstOKqpgb1Jd5IeZ9oIzwumkI_wXoYrFH</recordid><startdate>20130501</startdate><enddate>20130501</enddate><creator>Létourneau, Daniel, PhD</creator><creator>McNiven, Andrea, PhD</creator><creator>Jaffray, David A., PhD</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20130501</creationdate><title>Multicenter Collaborative Quality Assurance Program for the Province of Ontario, Canada: First-Year Results</title><author>Létourneau, Daniel, PhD ; McNiven, Andrea, PhD ; Jaffray, David A., PhD</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c445t-22ffce27726e400418b6d0c514dbba7f065fe088ec3727fa5b769c287d647a183</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2013</creationdate><topic>Cancer Care Facilities - standards</topic><topic>DOSEMETERS</topic><topic>Feasibility Studies</topic><topic>HEAD</topic><topic>Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>Interinstitutional Relations</topic><topic>LINEAR ACCELERATORS</topic><topic>NECK</topic><topic>Ontario</topic><topic>Particle Accelerators - standards</topic><topic>PLANNING</topic><topic>Program Evaluation</topic><topic>QUALITY ASSURANCE</topic><topic>Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards</topic><topic>RADIATION DOSES</topic><topic>Radiology</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>RADIOTHERAPY</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Dosage - standards</topic><topic>Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - instrumentation</topic><topic>Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - standards</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Létourneau, Daniel, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>McNiven, Andrea, PhD</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jaffray, David A., PhD</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Létourneau, Daniel, PhD</au><au>McNiven, Andrea, PhD</au><au>Jaffray, David A., PhD</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Multicenter Collaborative Quality Assurance Program for the Province of Ontario, Canada: First-Year Results</atitle><jtitle>International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics</jtitle><addtitle>Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys</addtitle><date>2013-05-01</date><risdate>2013</risdate><volume>86</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>164</spage><epage>169</epage><pages>164-169</pages><issn>0360-3016</issn><eissn>1879-355X</eissn><abstract>Purpose The objective of this work was to develop a collaborative quality assurance (CQA) program to assess the performance of intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) planning and delivery across the province of Ontario, Canada. Methods and Materials The CQA program was designed to be a comprehensive end-to-end test that can be completed on multiple planning and delivery platforms. The first year of the program included a head-and-neck (H&N) planning exercise and on-site visit to acquire dosimetric measurements to assess planning and delivery performance. A single dosimeter was used at each institution, and the planned to measured dose agreement was evaluated for both the H&N plan and a standard plan (linear-accelerator specific) that was created to enable a direct comparison between centers with similar infrastructure. Results CQA program feasibility was demonstrated through participation of all 13 radiation therapy centers in the province. Planning and delivery was completed on a variety of infrastructure (treatment planning systems and linear accelerators). The planning exercise was completed using both static gantry and rotational IMRT, and planned-to-delivered dose agreement (pass rates) for 3%/3-mm gamma evaluation were greater than 90% (92.6%-99.6%). Conclusions All centers had acceptable results, but variation in planned to delivered dose agreement for the same planning and delivery platform was noted. The upper end of the range will provide an achievable target for other centers through continued quality improvement, aided by feedback provided by the program through the use of standard plans and simple test fields.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><pmid>23462421</pmid><doi>10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.12.003</doi><tpages>6</tpages></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0360-3016 |
ispartof | International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics, 2013-05, Vol.86 (1), p.164-169 |
issn | 0360-3016 1879-355X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22224459 |
source | MEDLINE; ScienceDirect Journals (5 years ago - present) |
subjects | Cancer Care Facilities - standards DOSEMETERS Feasibility Studies HEAD Head and Neck Neoplasms - radiotherapy Hematology, Oncology and Palliative Medicine Humans Interinstitutional Relations LINEAR ACCELERATORS NECK Ontario Particle Accelerators - standards PLANNING Program Evaluation QUALITY ASSURANCE Quality Assurance, Health Care - standards RADIATION DOSES Radiology RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE RADIOTHERAPY Radiotherapy Dosage - standards Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted - standards Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - instrumentation Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated - standards |
title | Multicenter Collaborative Quality Assurance Program for the Province of Ontario, Canada: First-Year Results |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-11T06%3A51%3A15IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Multicenter%20Collaborative%20Quality%20Assurance%20Program%20for%20the%20Province%20of%20Ontario,%20Canada:%20First-Year%20Results&rft.jtitle=International%20journal%20of%20radiation%20oncology,%20biology,%20physics&rft.au=L%C3%A9tourneau,%20Daniel,%20PhD&rft.date=2013-05-01&rft.volume=86&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=164&rft.epage=169&rft.pages=164-169&rft.issn=0360-3016&rft.eissn=1879-355X&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.12.003&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1327725467%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1327725467&rft_id=info:pmid/23462421&rft_els_id=S0360301612038990&rfr_iscdi=true |