On the spontaneous emission of electromagnetic radiation in the CSL model
Spontaneous photon emission in the Continuous Spontaneous Localization (CSL) model is studied one more time. In the CSL model each particle interacts with a noise field that induces the collapse of its wave function. As a consequence of this interaction, when the particle is electrically charged, it...
Gespeichert in:
Veröffentlicht in: | Annals of physics 2014-01, Vol.340 (1), p.70-86 |
---|---|
Hauptverfasser: | , , |
Format: | Artikel |
Sprache: | eng |
Schlagworte: | |
Online-Zugang: | Volltext |
Tags: |
Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
|
container_end_page | 86 |
---|---|
container_issue | 1 |
container_start_page | 70 |
container_title | Annals of physics |
container_volume | 340 |
creator | Donadi, Sandro Deckert, Dirk-André Bassi, Angelo |
description | Spontaneous photon emission in the Continuous Spontaneous Localization (CSL) model is studied one more time. In the CSL model each particle interacts with a noise field that induces the collapse of its wave function. As a consequence of this interaction, when the particle is electrically charged, it radiates. As discussed in Adler (2013) the formula for the emission rate, to first perturbative order, contains two terms: one is proportional to the Fourier component of the noise field at the same frequency as that of the emitted photon and one is proportional to the zero Fourier component of the noise field. As discussed in previous works, this second term seems unphysical. In Adler (2013) it was shown that the unphysical term disappears when the noise is confined to a bounded region and the final particle’s state is a wave packet. Here we investigate the origin of this unphysical term and why it vanishes according to the previous prescription. We will see that perturbation theory is formally not valid in the large time limit since the effect of the noise accumulates continuously in time. Therefore either one performs an exact calculation (or at least in some way includes higher order terms) as we do here, or one finds a way to make a perturbative calculation meaningful, e.g., by confining the system as in Adler (2013).
•We compute the electromagnetic radiation emission in collapse models.•Under only the dipole approximation, the equations of motion are solved exactly.•The electromagnetic interaction must be treated exactly.•In order to obtain the correct emission rate the particle must be bounded. |
doi_str_mv | 10.1016/j.aop.2013.10.009 |
format | Article |
fullrecord | <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22224280</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><els_id>S0003491613002443</els_id><sourcerecordid>3166468561</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-5c05399e1cfcf9f72ff6b4ec394e97a8226711720650d69dc01bbf7a24461cad3</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kc2KHCEUhSVkIJ1JHiC7gmyyqZ57La0qySo0-RlomEUyMDuxrWvGplo7agfm7WNRIbOLG1G_cznHw9g7hC0C9jfHrYnnLQfs6nkLoF6wDYLqW-jkw0u2AYCuFQr7V-x1zkcARCHHDbu9C015pCafYygmULzkhk4-Zx9DE11DM9mS4sn8DFS8bZKZvCnLo1-Fu-_75hQnmt-wK2fmTG__7tfs_svnH7tv7f7u6-3u0761gqvSSguyU4rQOuuUG7hz_UGQ7ZQgNZiR835AHDj0EqZeTRbwcHCD4UL0aM3UXbP369yYi9fZ-kL20cYQqlHN6xJ8hEp9WKlzir8ulIuuoSzN85pRo-xAjXLsxueB_9BjvKRQM2gUAyhAKWSlcKVsijkncvqc_MmkJ42glwr0UdcK9FLBclUrqJqPq4bqf_z2lBa7FCxNPi1up-j_o_4DF3GMvw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1470901545</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>On the spontaneous emission of electromagnetic radiation in the CSL model</title><source>Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals</source><creator>Donadi, Sandro ; Deckert, Dirk-André ; Bassi, Angelo</creator><creatorcontrib>Donadi, Sandro ; Deckert, Dirk-André ; Bassi, Angelo</creatorcontrib><description>Spontaneous photon emission in the Continuous Spontaneous Localization (CSL) model is studied one more time. In the CSL model each particle interacts with a noise field that induces the collapse of its wave function. As a consequence of this interaction, when the particle is electrically charged, it radiates. As discussed in Adler (2013) the formula for the emission rate, to first perturbative order, contains two terms: one is proportional to the Fourier component of the noise field at the same frequency as that of the emitted photon and one is proportional to the zero Fourier component of the noise field. As discussed in previous works, this second term seems unphysical. In Adler (2013) it was shown that the unphysical term disappears when the noise is confined to a bounded region and the final particle’s state is a wave packet. Here we investigate the origin of this unphysical term and why it vanishes according to the previous prescription. We will see that perturbation theory is formally not valid in the large time limit since the effect of the noise accumulates continuously in time. Therefore either one performs an exact calculation (or at least in some way includes higher order terms) as we do here, or one finds a way to make a perturbative calculation meaningful, e.g., by confining the system as in Adler (2013).
•We compute the electromagnetic radiation emission in collapse models.•Under only the dipole approximation, the equations of motion are solved exactly.•The electromagnetic interaction must be treated exactly.•In order to obtain the correct emission rate the particle must be bounded.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0003-4916</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 1096-035X</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1016/j.aop.2013.10.009</identifier><identifier>CODEN: APNYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>New York: Elsevier Inc</publisher><subject>APPROXIMATIONS ; Charged particles ; CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS ; Collapse model ; Confining ; DIPOLES ; ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERACTIONS ; ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION ; Electromagnetism ; EQUATIONS OF MOTION ; Fourier analysis ; Mathematical models ; Measurement problem ; NOISE ; Particles (of physics) ; PERTURBATION THEORY ; PHOTON EMISSION ; Physics ; QUANTUM MECHANICS ; Radiation ; Radiation emission ; Spontaneous ; Spontaneous emission ; WAVE PACKETS</subject><ispartof>Annals of physics, 2014-01, Vol.340 (1), p.70-86</ispartof><rights>2013 Elsevier Inc.</rights><rights>Copyright © 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-5c05399e1cfcf9f72ff6b4ec394e97a8226711720650d69dc01bbf7a24461cad3</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-5c05399e1cfcf9f72ff6b4ec394e97a8226711720650d69dc01bbf7a24461cad3</cites><orcidid>0000-0002-9140-8962</orcidid></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.aop.2013.10.009$$EHTML$$P50$$Gelsevier$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,3536,27903,27904,45974</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22224280$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Donadi, Sandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deckert, Dirk-André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bassi, Angelo</creatorcontrib><title>On the spontaneous emission of electromagnetic radiation in the CSL model</title><title>Annals of physics</title><description>Spontaneous photon emission in the Continuous Spontaneous Localization (CSL) model is studied one more time. In the CSL model each particle interacts with a noise field that induces the collapse of its wave function. As a consequence of this interaction, when the particle is electrically charged, it radiates. As discussed in Adler (2013) the formula for the emission rate, to first perturbative order, contains two terms: one is proportional to the Fourier component of the noise field at the same frequency as that of the emitted photon and one is proportional to the zero Fourier component of the noise field. As discussed in previous works, this second term seems unphysical. In Adler (2013) it was shown that the unphysical term disappears when the noise is confined to a bounded region and the final particle’s state is a wave packet. Here we investigate the origin of this unphysical term and why it vanishes according to the previous prescription. We will see that perturbation theory is formally not valid in the large time limit since the effect of the noise accumulates continuously in time. Therefore either one performs an exact calculation (or at least in some way includes higher order terms) as we do here, or one finds a way to make a perturbative calculation meaningful, e.g., by confining the system as in Adler (2013).
•We compute the electromagnetic radiation emission in collapse models.•Under only the dipole approximation, the equations of motion are solved exactly.•The electromagnetic interaction must be treated exactly.•In order to obtain the correct emission rate the particle must be bounded.</description><subject>APPROXIMATIONS</subject><subject>Charged particles</subject><subject>CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS</subject><subject>Collapse model</subject><subject>Confining</subject><subject>DIPOLES</subject><subject>ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERACTIONS</subject><subject>ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION</subject><subject>Electromagnetism</subject><subject>EQUATIONS OF MOTION</subject><subject>Fourier analysis</subject><subject>Mathematical models</subject><subject>Measurement problem</subject><subject>NOISE</subject><subject>Particles (of physics)</subject><subject>PERTURBATION THEORY</subject><subject>PHOTON EMISSION</subject><subject>Physics</subject><subject>QUANTUM MECHANICS</subject><subject>Radiation</subject><subject>Radiation emission</subject><subject>Spontaneous</subject><subject>Spontaneous emission</subject><subject>WAVE PACKETS</subject><issn>0003-4916</issn><issn>1096-035X</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2014</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><recordid>eNp9kc2KHCEUhSVkIJ1JHiC7gmyyqZ57La0qySo0-RlomEUyMDuxrWvGplo7agfm7WNRIbOLG1G_cznHw9g7hC0C9jfHrYnnLQfs6nkLoF6wDYLqW-jkw0u2AYCuFQr7V-x1zkcARCHHDbu9C015pCafYygmULzkhk4-Zx9DE11DM9mS4sn8DFS8bZKZvCnLo1-Fu-_75hQnmt-wK2fmTG__7tfs_svnH7tv7f7u6-3u0761gqvSSguyU4rQOuuUG7hz_UGQ7ZQgNZiR835AHDj0EqZeTRbwcHCD4UL0aM3UXbP369yYi9fZ-kL20cYQqlHN6xJ8hEp9WKlzir8ulIuuoSzN85pRo-xAjXLsxueB_9BjvKRQM2gUAyhAKWSlcKVsijkncvqc_MmkJ42glwr0UdcK9FLBclUrqJqPq4bqf_z2lBa7FCxNPi1up-j_o_4DF3GMvw</recordid><startdate>20140101</startdate><enddate>20140101</enddate><creator>Donadi, Sandro</creator><creator>Deckert, Dirk-André</creator><creator>Bassi, Angelo</creator><general>Elsevier Inc</general><general>Elsevier BV</general><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7U5</scope><scope>8FD</scope><scope>L7M</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9140-8962</orcidid></search><sort><creationdate>20140101</creationdate><title>On the spontaneous emission of electromagnetic radiation in the CSL model</title><author>Donadi, Sandro ; Deckert, Dirk-André ; Bassi, Angelo</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c429t-5c05399e1cfcf9f72ff6b4ec394e97a8226711720650d69dc01bbf7a24461cad3</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2014</creationdate><topic>APPROXIMATIONS</topic><topic>Charged particles</topic><topic>CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS</topic><topic>Collapse model</topic><topic>Confining</topic><topic>DIPOLES</topic><topic>ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERACTIONS</topic><topic>ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION</topic><topic>Electromagnetism</topic><topic>EQUATIONS OF MOTION</topic><topic>Fourier analysis</topic><topic>Mathematical models</topic><topic>Measurement problem</topic><topic>NOISE</topic><topic>Particles (of physics)</topic><topic>PERTURBATION THEORY</topic><topic>PHOTON EMISSION</topic><topic>Physics</topic><topic>QUANTUM MECHANICS</topic><topic>Radiation</topic><topic>Radiation emission</topic><topic>Spontaneous</topic><topic>Spontaneous emission</topic><topic>WAVE PACKETS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Donadi, Sandro</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Deckert, Dirk-André</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bassi, Angelo</creatorcontrib><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>Solid State and Superconductivity Abstracts</collection><collection>Technology Research Database</collection><collection>Advanced Technologies Database with Aerospace</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Annals of physics</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Donadi, Sandro</au><au>Deckert, Dirk-André</au><au>Bassi, Angelo</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>On the spontaneous emission of electromagnetic radiation in the CSL model</atitle><jtitle>Annals of physics</jtitle><date>2014-01-01</date><risdate>2014</risdate><volume>340</volume><issue>1</issue><spage>70</spage><epage>86</epage><pages>70-86</pages><issn>0003-4916</issn><eissn>1096-035X</eissn><coden>APNYA6</coden><abstract>Spontaneous photon emission in the Continuous Spontaneous Localization (CSL) model is studied one more time. In the CSL model each particle interacts with a noise field that induces the collapse of its wave function. As a consequence of this interaction, when the particle is electrically charged, it radiates. As discussed in Adler (2013) the formula for the emission rate, to first perturbative order, contains two terms: one is proportional to the Fourier component of the noise field at the same frequency as that of the emitted photon and one is proportional to the zero Fourier component of the noise field. As discussed in previous works, this second term seems unphysical. In Adler (2013) it was shown that the unphysical term disappears when the noise is confined to a bounded region and the final particle’s state is a wave packet. Here we investigate the origin of this unphysical term and why it vanishes according to the previous prescription. We will see that perturbation theory is formally not valid in the large time limit since the effect of the noise accumulates continuously in time. Therefore either one performs an exact calculation (or at least in some way includes higher order terms) as we do here, or one finds a way to make a perturbative calculation meaningful, e.g., by confining the system as in Adler (2013).
•We compute the electromagnetic radiation emission in collapse models.•Under only the dipole approximation, the equations of motion are solved exactly.•The electromagnetic interaction must be treated exactly.•In order to obtain the correct emission rate the particle must be bounded.</abstract><cop>New York</cop><pub>Elsevier Inc</pub><doi>10.1016/j.aop.2013.10.009</doi><tpages>17</tpages><orcidid>https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9140-8962</orcidid><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record> |
fulltext | fulltext |
identifier | ISSN: 0003-4916 |
ispartof | Annals of physics, 2014-01, Vol.340 (1), p.70-86 |
issn | 0003-4916 1096-035X |
language | eng |
recordid | cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22224280 |
source | Elsevier ScienceDirect Journals |
subjects | APPROXIMATIONS Charged particles CLASSICAL AND QUANTUM MECHANICS, GENERAL PHYSICS Collapse model Confining DIPOLES ELECTROMAGNETIC INTERACTIONS ELECTROMAGNETIC RADIATION Electromagnetism EQUATIONS OF MOTION Fourier analysis Mathematical models Measurement problem NOISE Particles (of physics) PERTURBATION THEORY PHOTON EMISSION Physics QUANTUM MECHANICS Radiation Radiation emission Spontaneous Spontaneous emission WAVE PACKETS |
title | On the spontaneous emission of electromagnetic radiation in the CSL model |
url | https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-22T14%3A40%3A54IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=On%20the%20spontaneous%20emission%20of%20electromagnetic%20radiation%20in%20the%20CSL%20model&rft.jtitle=Annals%20of%20physics&rft.au=Donadi,%20Sandro&rft.date=2014-01-01&rft.volume=340&rft.issue=1&rft.spage=70&rft.epage=86&rft.pages=70-86&rft.issn=0003-4916&rft.eissn=1096-035X&rft.coden=APNYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1016/j.aop.2013.10.009&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E3166468561%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1470901545&rft_id=info:pmid/&rft_els_id=S0003491613002443&rfr_iscdi=true |