Variations in dose distribution and optical properties of Gafchromic(TM) EBT2 film according to scanning mode

The authors aim was to investigate the effects of using transmission and reflection scanning modes, the film orientation during scanning, and ambient room light on a dosimetry system based on the Gafchromic(TM) EBT2 film model. For calibration, the films were cut to 3 × 3 cm(2) and irradiated from 2...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2012-05, Vol.39 (5), p.2524-2535
Hauptverfasser: Park, Soah, Kang, Sei-Kwon, Cheong, Kwang-Ho, Hwang, Taejin, Kim, Haeyoung, Han, Taejin, Lee, Me-Yeon, Kim, Kyoungju, Bae, Hoonsik, Su Kim, Hyeong, Han Kim, Jung, Jae Oh, Seung, Suh, Jin-Suck
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 2535
container_issue 5
container_start_page 2524
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 39
creator Park, Soah
Kang, Sei-Kwon
Cheong, Kwang-Ho
Hwang, Taejin
Kim, Haeyoung
Han, Taejin
Lee, Me-Yeon
Kim, Kyoungju
Bae, Hoonsik
Su Kim, Hyeong
Han Kim, Jung
Jae Oh, Seung
Suh, Jin-Suck
description The authors aim was to investigate the effects of using transmission and reflection scanning modes, the film orientation during scanning, and ambient room light on a dosimetry system based on the Gafchromic(TM) EBT2 film model. For calibration, the films were cut to 3 × 3 cm(2) and irradiated from 20 to 700 cGy at the depth of maximum dose using 6 and 10 MV photon beams in a 10 × 10 cm(2) field size. Absolute dose calibration of the linear accelerator was done according to the TRS398 protocol. An FG65-G ionization chamber was used to monitor the dose while irradiating the films in solid water. The film pieces were scanned with an EPSON Expression 1680 Pro flatbed scanner in transmission and reflection modes. Authors investigated the effect of orientation on films and examined the optical properties of EBT2 film using an ellipsometer and an ultraviolet (UV)/visible spectrometer to explain the dosimetric dependence of the film on orientation during the scanning process. To investigate the effect of ambient room light, films were preirradiated in 6 and 10 MV photon beams with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA) plans, and then exposed to room light, either directly for 2 days in a workroom or for 2 months in a film box. Gamma index pass criteria of (3%, 3 mm) were used. The dose response curves based on net optical density (NOD) indicated that the reflection scanning mode can provide a better dose sensitivity than the transmission scanning mode, whereas the standard deviation of the dose is greater in reflection mode than in transmission mode. When the film was rotated 90° from the portrait orientation, the average dose of the EBT2 film decreased by 11.5-19.6% in transmission mode and by 1.5-2.3% in reflection mode. Using an ellipsometer, variation of the refractive index of EBT2 film-the birefringence property-was found to be the largest between 45° (1.72 and 1.71) and 135° (1.8 and 1.77) for 300 and 800 cGy. Absorption spectra of EBT2 films measured with spectrometer were the function of film orientation. The readings in reflection scanning mode were more stable against room light than those in transmission scanning mode, although dose readings increased in both modes after the films were exposed to room light. The transmission scanning mode exhibited a strong dependence on film orientation during scanning and a change in optical density resulting from room light exposure, so a constant scanning orientation and minimal exposure to
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.3700731
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22098844</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1011541662</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-o239t-68694086b8afd8b4aca5c9606c5544aded0dc3c03349920376d4df6ae8b270363</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNo1kD1PwzAURS0EoqUw8AeQJZYypDx_xIlHqEpBKmIprJFjO9QosUvsDPx7glqmd_V0dKV7ELomsCCElPdkwQqAgpETNKW8YBmnIE_RFEDyjHLIJ-gixi8AECyHczShNM-loGyKug_VO5Vc8BE7j02IFhsXU-_q4e-LlTc47JPTqsX7Puxtn5yNODR4rRq960Pn9Hz7eodXj1uKG9d2WGkdeuP8J04BR628_8tdMPYSnTWqjfbqeGfo_Wm1XT5nm7f1y_JhkwXKZMpEKSSHUtSlakxZc6VVrqUAofOcc2WsAaOZBsa4lBRYIQw3jVC2rGkBTLAZuj30hphcFbVLVu908N7qVNFRTllyPlLzAzXu-h5sTFXnorZtq7wNQ6wIEJJzIkZRM3RzRIe6s6ba965T_U_1L5L9AnB8csw</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1011541662</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Variations in dose distribution and optical properties of Gafchromic(TM) EBT2 film according to scanning mode</title><source>Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals</source><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Park, Soah ; Kang, Sei-Kwon ; Cheong, Kwang-Ho ; Hwang, Taejin ; Kim, Haeyoung ; Han, Taejin ; Lee, Me-Yeon ; Kim, Kyoungju ; Bae, Hoonsik ; Su Kim, Hyeong ; Han Kim, Jung ; Jae Oh, Seung ; Suh, Jin-Suck</creator><creatorcontrib>Park, Soah ; Kang, Sei-Kwon ; Cheong, Kwang-Ho ; Hwang, Taejin ; Kim, Haeyoung ; Han, Taejin ; Lee, Me-Yeon ; Kim, Kyoungju ; Bae, Hoonsik ; Su Kim, Hyeong ; Han Kim, Jung ; Jae Oh, Seung ; Suh, Jin-Suck</creatorcontrib><description>The authors aim was to investigate the effects of using transmission and reflection scanning modes, the film orientation during scanning, and ambient room light on a dosimetry system based on the Gafchromic(TM) EBT2 film model. For calibration, the films were cut to 3 × 3 cm(2) and irradiated from 20 to 700 cGy at the depth of maximum dose using 6 and 10 MV photon beams in a 10 × 10 cm(2) field size. Absolute dose calibration of the linear accelerator was done according to the TRS398 protocol. An FG65-G ionization chamber was used to monitor the dose while irradiating the films in solid water. The film pieces were scanned with an EPSON Expression 1680 Pro flatbed scanner in transmission and reflection modes. Authors investigated the effect of orientation on films and examined the optical properties of EBT2 film using an ellipsometer and an ultraviolet (UV)/visible spectrometer to explain the dosimetric dependence of the film on orientation during the scanning process. To investigate the effect of ambient room light, films were preirradiated in 6 and 10 MV photon beams with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA) plans, and then exposed to room light, either directly for 2 days in a workroom or for 2 months in a film box. Gamma index pass criteria of (3%, 3 mm) were used. The dose response curves based on net optical density (NOD) indicated that the reflection scanning mode can provide a better dose sensitivity than the transmission scanning mode, whereas the standard deviation of the dose is greater in reflection mode than in transmission mode. When the film was rotated 90° from the portrait orientation, the average dose of the EBT2 film decreased by 11.5-19.6% in transmission mode and by 1.5-2.3% in reflection mode. Using an ellipsometer, variation of the refractive index of EBT2 film-the birefringence property-was found to be the largest between 45° (1.72 and 1.71) and 135° (1.8 and 1.77) for 300 and 800 cGy. Absorption spectra of EBT2 films measured with spectrometer were the function of film orientation. The readings in reflection scanning mode were more stable against room light than those in transmission scanning mode, although dose readings increased in both modes after the films were exposed to room light. The transmission scanning mode exhibited a strong dependence on film orientation during scanning and a change in optical density resulting from room light exposure, so a constant scanning orientation and minimal exposure to light can reduce uncertainty in the measured dose (23 ± 3%). The angular dependence was analyzed using Jones matrices and optical properties of EBT2 film were obtained using an ellipsometer and an UV/visible spectrometer. The reflection scanning mode has relatively good stability with respect to room light and film orientation on a scanner, although the large standard deviation of dose is a disadvantage in measurements of absolute dose. Reflection scanning mode can offer a potential advantage for film dosimetry in radiotherapy, although transmission scanning mode is still recommended for dosimetry as it provides better uncertainty results.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.3700731</identifier><identifier>PMID: 22559623</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States</publisher><subject>ABSORPTION SPECTRA ; BIREFRINGENCE ; CALIBRATION ; DOSEMETERS ; ELLIPSOMETERS ; FILM DOSIMETRY ; Film Dosimetry - instrumentation ; Film Dosimetry - methods ; INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ; IONIZATION CHAMBERS ; Light ; LINEAR ACCELERATORS ; MODULATION ; OPACITY ; Optical Phenomena ; PHOTON BEAMS ; Radiation Dosage ; RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS ; RADIATION DOSES ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; RADIOTHERAPY ; REFLECTION ; REFRACTIVE INDEX ; SENSITIVITY ; TRANSMISSION ; ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION ; ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROMETERS</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2012-05, Vol.39 (5), p.2524-2535</ispartof><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><link.rule.ids>230,314,780,784,885,27924,27925</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22559623$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22098844$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Park, Soah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Sei-Kwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheong, Kwang-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Taejin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Haeyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Taejin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Me-Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kyoungju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bae, Hoonsik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su Kim, Hyeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han Kim, Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jae Oh, Seung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suh, Jin-Suck</creatorcontrib><title>Variations in dose distribution and optical properties of Gafchromic(TM) EBT2 film according to scanning mode</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>The authors aim was to investigate the effects of using transmission and reflection scanning modes, the film orientation during scanning, and ambient room light on a dosimetry system based on the Gafchromic(TM) EBT2 film model. For calibration, the films were cut to 3 × 3 cm(2) and irradiated from 20 to 700 cGy at the depth of maximum dose using 6 and 10 MV photon beams in a 10 × 10 cm(2) field size. Absolute dose calibration of the linear accelerator was done according to the TRS398 protocol. An FG65-G ionization chamber was used to monitor the dose while irradiating the films in solid water. The film pieces were scanned with an EPSON Expression 1680 Pro flatbed scanner in transmission and reflection modes. Authors investigated the effect of orientation on films and examined the optical properties of EBT2 film using an ellipsometer and an ultraviolet (UV)/visible spectrometer to explain the dosimetric dependence of the film on orientation during the scanning process. To investigate the effect of ambient room light, films were preirradiated in 6 and 10 MV photon beams with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA) plans, and then exposed to room light, either directly for 2 days in a workroom or for 2 months in a film box. Gamma index pass criteria of (3%, 3 mm) were used. The dose response curves based on net optical density (NOD) indicated that the reflection scanning mode can provide a better dose sensitivity than the transmission scanning mode, whereas the standard deviation of the dose is greater in reflection mode than in transmission mode. When the film was rotated 90° from the portrait orientation, the average dose of the EBT2 film decreased by 11.5-19.6% in transmission mode and by 1.5-2.3% in reflection mode. Using an ellipsometer, variation of the refractive index of EBT2 film-the birefringence property-was found to be the largest between 45° (1.72 and 1.71) and 135° (1.8 and 1.77) for 300 and 800 cGy. Absorption spectra of EBT2 films measured with spectrometer were the function of film orientation. The readings in reflection scanning mode were more stable against room light than those in transmission scanning mode, although dose readings increased in both modes after the films were exposed to room light. The transmission scanning mode exhibited a strong dependence on film orientation during scanning and a change in optical density resulting from room light exposure, so a constant scanning orientation and minimal exposure to light can reduce uncertainty in the measured dose (23 ± 3%). The angular dependence was analyzed using Jones matrices and optical properties of EBT2 film were obtained using an ellipsometer and an UV/visible spectrometer. The reflection scanning mode has relatively good stability with respect to room light and film orientation on a scanner, although the large standard deviation of dose is a disadvantage in measurements of absolute dose. Reflection scanning mode can offer a potential advantage for film dosimetry in radiotherapy, although transmission scanning mode is still recommended for dosimetry as it provides better uncertainty results.</description><subject>ABSORPTION SPECTRA</subject><subject>BIREFRINGENCE</subject><subject>CALIBRATION</subject><subject>DOSEMETERS</subject><subject>ELLIPSOMETERS</subject><subject>FILM DOSIMETRY</subject><subject>Film Dosimetry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Film Dosimetry - methods</subject><subject>INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY</subject><subject>IONIZATION CHAMBERS</subject><subject>Light</subject><subject>LINEAR ACCELERATORS</subject><subject>MODULATION</subject><subject>OPACITY</subject><subject>Optical Phenomena</subject><subject>PHOTON BEAMS</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS</subject><subject>RADIATION DOSES</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>RADIOTHERAPY</subject><subject>REFLECTION</subject><subject>REFRACTIVE INDEX</subject><subject>SENSITIVITY</subject><subject>TRANSMISSION</subject><subject>ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION</subject><subject>ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROMETERS</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNo1kD1PwzAURS0EoqUw8AeQJZYypDx_xIlHqEpBKmIprJFjO9QosUvsDPx7glqmd_V0dKV7ELomsCCElPdkwQqAgpETNKW8YBmnIE_RFEDyjHLIJ-gixi8AECyHczShNM-loGyKug_VO5Vc8BE7j02IFhsXU-_q4e-LlTc47JPTqsX7Puxtn5yNODR4rRq960Pn9Hz7eodXj1uKG9d2WGkdeuP8J04BR628_8tdMPYSnTWqjfbqeGfo_Wm1XT5nm7f1y_JhkwXKZMpEKSSHUtSlakxZc6VVrqUAofOcc2WsAaOZBsa4lBRYIQw3jVC2rGkBTLAZuj30hphcFbVLVu908N7qVNFRTllyPlLzAzXu-h5sTFXnorZtq7wNQ6wIEJJzIkZRM3RzRIe6s6ba965T_U_1L5L9AnB8csw</recordid><startdate>20120501</startdate><enddate>20120501</enddate><creator>Park, Soah</creator><creator>Kang, Sei-Kwon</creator><creator>Cheong, Kwang-Ho</creator><creator>Hwang, Taejin</creator><creator>Kim, Haeyoung</creator><creator>Han, Taejin</creator><creator>Lee, Me-Yeon</creator><creator>Kim, Kyoungju</creator><creator>Bae, Hoonsik</creator><creator>Su Kim, Hyeong</creator><creator>Han Kim, Jung</creator><creator>Jae Oh, Seung</creator><creator>Suh, Jin-Suck</creator><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>20120501</creationdate><title>Variations in dose distribution and optical properties of Gafchromic(TM) EBT2 film according to scanning mode</title><author>Park, Soah ; Kang, Sei-Kwon ; Cheong, Kwang-Ho ; Hwang, Taejin ; Kim, Haeyoung ; Han, Taejin ; Lee, Me-Yeon ; Kim, Kyoungju ; Bae, Hoonsik ; Su Kim, Hyeong ; Han Kim, Jung ; Jae Oh, Seung ; Suh, Jin-Suck</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-o239t-68694086b8afd8b4aca5c9606c5544aded0dc3c03349920376d4df6ae8b270363</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>ABSORPTION SPECTRA</topic><topic>BIREFRINGENCE</topic><topic>CALIBRATION</topic><topic>DOSEMETERS</topic><topic>ELLIPSOMETERS</topic><topic>FILM DOSIMETRY</topic><topic>Film Dosimetry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Film Dosimetry - methods</topic><topic>INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY</topic><topic>IONIZATION CHAMBERS</topic><topic>Light</topic><topic>LINEAR ACCELERATORS</topic><topic>MODULATION</topic><topic>OPACITY</topic><topic>Optical Phenomena</topic><topic>PHOTON BEAMS</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS</topic><topic>RADIATION DOSES</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>RADIOTHERAPY</topic><topic>REFLECTION</topic><topic>REFRACTIVE INDEX</topic><topic>SENSITIVITY</topic><topic>TRANSMISSION</topic><topic>ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION</topic><topic>ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROMETERS</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Park, Soah</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kang, Sei-Kwon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Cheong, Kwang-Ho</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hwang, Taejin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Haeyoung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han, Taejin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Lee, Me-Yeon</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kim, Kyoungju</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Bae, Hoonsik</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Su Kim, Hyeong</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Han Kim, Jung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Jae Oh, Seung</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Suh, Jin-Suck</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Park, Soah</au><au>Kang, Sei-Kwon</au><au>Cheong, Kwang-Ho</au><au>Hwang, Taejin</au><au>Kim, Haeyoung</au><au>Han, Taejin</au><au>Lee, Me-Yeon</au><au>Kim, Kyoungju</au><au>Bae, Hoonsik</au><au>Su Kim, Hyeong</au><au>Han Kim, Jung</au><au>Jae Oh, Seung</au><au>Suh, Jin-Suck</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Variations in dose distribution and optical properties of Gafchromic(TM) EBT2 film according to scanning mode</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2012-05-01</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>5</issue><spage>2524</spage><epage>2535</epage><pages>2524-2535</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><abstract>The authors aim was to investigate the effects of using transmission and reflection scanning modes, the film orientation during scanning, and ambient room light on a dosimetry system based on the Gafchromic(TM) EBT2 film model. For calibration, the films were cut to 3 × 3 cm(2) and irradiated from 20 to 700 cGy at the depth of maximum dose using 6 and 10 MV photon beams in a 10 × 10 cm(2) field size. Absolute dose calibration of the linear accelerator was done according to the TRS398 protocol. An FG65-G ionization chamber was used to monitor the dose while irradiating the films in solid water. The film pieces were scanned with an EPSON Expression 1680 Pro flatbed scanner in transmission and reflection modes. Authors investigated the effect of orientation on films and examined the optical properties of EBT2 film using an ellipsometer and an ultraviolet (UV)/visible spectrometer to explain the dosimetric dependence of the film on orientation during the scanning process. To investigate the effect of ambient room light, films were preirradiated in 6 and 10 MV photon beams with intensity-modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) quality assurance (QA) plans, and then exposed to room light, either directly for 2 days in a workroom or for 2 months in a film box. Gamma index pass criteria of (3%, 3 mm) were used. The dose response curves based on net optical density (NOD) indicated that the reflection scanning mode can provide a better dose sensitivity than the transmission scanning mode, whereas the standard deviation of the dose is greater in reflection mode than in transmission mode. When the film was rotated 90° from the portrait orientation, the average dose of the EBT2 film decreased by 11.5-19.6% in transmission mode and by 1.5-2.3% in reflection mode. Using an ellipsometer, variation of the refractive index of EBT2 film-the birefringence property-was found to be the largest between 45° (1.72 and 1.71) and 135° (1.8 and 1.77) for 300 and 800 cGy. Absorption spectra of EBT2 films measured with spectrometer were the function of film orientation. The readings in reflection scanning mode were more stable against room light than those in transmission scanning mode, although dose readings increased in both modes after the films were exposed to room light. The transmission scanning mode exhibited a strong dependence on film orientation during scanning and a change in optical density resulting from room light exposure, so a constant scanning orientation and minimal exposure to light can reduce uncertainty in the measured dose (23 ± 3%). The angular dependence was analyzed using Jones matrices and optical properties of EBT2 film were obtained using an ellipsometer and an UV/visible spectrometer. The reflection scanning mode has relatively good stability with respect to room light and film orientation on a scanner, although the large standard deviation of dose is a disadvantage in measurements of absolute dose. Reflection scanning mode can offer a potential advantage for film dosimetry in radiotherapy, although transmission scanning mode is still recommended for dosimetry as it provides better uncertainty results.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pmid>22559623</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.3700731</doi><tpages>12</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2012-05, Vol.39 (5), p.2524-2535
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22098844
source Wiley Online Library - AutoHoldings Journals; MEDLINE; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects ABSORPTION SPECTRA
BIREFRINGENCE
CALIBRATION
DOSEMETERS
ELLIPSOMETERS
FILM DOSIMETRY
Film Dosimetry - instrumentation
Film Dosimetry - methods
INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
IONIZATION CHAMBERS
Light
LINEAR ACCELERATORS
MODULATION
OPACITY
Optical Phenomena
PHOTON BEAMS
Radiation Dosage
RADIATION DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS
RADIATION DOSES
RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE
RADIOTHERAPY
REFLECTION
REFRACTIVE INDEX
SENSITIVITY
TRANSMISSION
ULTRAVIOLET RADIATION
ULTRAVIOLET SPECTROMETERS
title Variations in dose distribution and optical properties of Gafchromic(TM) EBT2 film according to scanning mode
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-01T01%3A04%3A05IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Variations%20in%20dose%20distribution%20and%20optical%20properties%20of%20Gafchromic(TM)%20EBT2%20film%20according%20to%20scanning%20mode&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Park,%20Soah&rft.date=2012-05-01&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=5&rft.spage=2524&rft.epage=2535&rft.pages=2524-2535&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.3700731&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1011541662%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1011541662&rft_id=info:pmid/22559623&rfr_iscdi=true