Dose-response curve of EBT, EBT2, and EBT3 radiochromic films to synchrotron-produced monochromatic x-ray beams

Purpose: This work investigates the dose-response curves of GAFCHROMIC® EBT, EBT2, and EBT3 radiochromic films using synchrotron-produced monochromatic x-ray beams. EBT2 film is being utilized for dose verification in photoactivated Auger electron therapy at the Louisiana State University Center for...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2012-12, Vol.39 (12), p.7412-7417
Hauptverfasser: Brown, Thomas A. D., Hogstrom, Kenneth R., Alvarez, Diane, Matthews, Kenneth L., Ham, Kyungmin, Dugas, Joseph P.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 7417
container_issue 12
container_start_page 7412
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 39
creator Brown, Thomas A. D.
Hogstrom, Kenneth R.
Alvarez, Diane
Matthews, Kenneth L.
Ham, Kyungmin
Dugas, Joseph P.
description Purpose: This work investigates the dose-response curves of GAFCHROMIC® EBT, EBT2, and EBT3 radiochromic films using synchrotron-produced monochromatic x-ray beams. EBT2 film is being utilized for dose verification in photoactivated Auger electron therapy at the Louisiana State University Center for Advanced Microstructures and Devices (CAMD) synchrotron facility. Methods: Monochromatic beams of 25, 30, and 35 keV were generated on the tomography beamline at CAMD. Ion chamber depth-dose measurements were used to determine the dose delivered to films irradiated at depths from 0.7 to 8.5 cm in a 10 × 10 × 10-cm3 polymethylmethacrylate phantom. AAPM TG-61 protocol was applied to convert measured ionization into dose. Films were digitized using an Epson 1680 Professional flatbed scanner and analyzed using the net optical density (NOD) derived from the red channel. A dose-response curve was obtained at 35 keV for EBT film, and at 25, 30, and 35 keV for EBT2 and EBT3 films. Calibrations of films for 4 MV x-rays were obtained for comparison using a radiotherapy accelerator at Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center. Results: The sensitivity (NOD per unit dose) of EBT film at 35 keV relative to that for 4-MV x-rays was 0.73 and 0.76 for doses 50 and 100 cGy, respectively. The sensitivity of EBT2 film at 25, 30, and 35 keV relative to that for 4-MV x-rays varied from 1.09–1.07, 1.23–1.17, and 1.27–1.19 for doses 50–200 cGy, respectively. For EBT3 film the relative sensitivity was within 3% of unity for all three monochromatic x-ray beams. Conclusions: EBT and EBT2 film sensitivity showed strong energy dependence over an energy range of 25 keV–4 MV, although this dependence becomes weaker for larger doses. EBT3 film shows weak energy dependence, indicating that it would be a better dosimeter for kV x-ray beams where beam hardening effects can result in large changes in the effective energy.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.4767770
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22097001</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>1238118053</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5220-d970890f37b07c7f322d9f7c3ca5b065165c415c565a80c44e484b48ae668ec83</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp90ctu1TAQBmALgeihsOAFkCU2gOoyvsXJEkq5SEWwKGvLmThqUGIf7KRw3h5HOSA2ZWNb1qd_7BlCnnI455zXr_m5MpUxBu6RnVBGMiWguU92AI1iQoE-IY9y_g4AldTwkJwIKSQXDd-R-C5mz5LP-xiyp7ikW09jTy_fXp-tizijLnTrSdLkuiHiTYrTgLQfxinTOdJ8COvdnGJg-xS7BX1Hpxg26eZif7HkDrT1bsqPyYPejdk_Oe6n5Nv7y-uLj-zqy4dPF2-uGGohgHWNgbqBXpoWDJpeCtE1vUGJTrdQaV5pVFyjrrSrAZXyqlatqp2vqtpjLU_J8y035nmwGYfZ4w3GEDzOtlQo-cCLerGp8vAfi8-znYaMfhxd8HHJlgtZlwaDloW-3CimmHPyvd2nYXLpYDnYdQqW2-MUin12jF3ayXd_5Z-2F8A28HMY_eHuJPv56zHw1ebXj5SWxvDf6nfi25j-Cd93vfwNabupSg</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>1238118053</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Dose-response curve of EBT, EBT2, and EBT3 radiochromic films to synchrotron-produced monochromatic x-ray beams</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Brown, Thomas A. D. ; Hogstrom, Kenneth R. ; Alvarez, Diane ; Matthews, Kenneth L. ; Ham, Kyungmin ; Dugas, Joseph P.</creator><creatorcontrib>Brown, Thomas A. D. ; Hogstrom, Kenneth R. ; Alvarez, Diane ; Matthews, Kenneth L. ; Ham, Kyungmin ; Dugas, Joseph P.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: This work investigates the dose-response curves of GAFCHROMIC® EBT, EBT2, and EBT3 radiochromic films using synchrotron-produced monochromatic x-ray beams. EBT2 film is being utilized for dose verification in photoactivated Auger electron therapy at the Louisiana State University Center for Advanced Microstructures and Devices (CAMD) synchrotron facility. Methods: Monochromatic beams of 25, 30, and 35 keV were generated on the tomography beamline at CAMD. Ion chamber depth-dose measurements were used to determine the dose delivered to films irradiated at depths from 0.7 to 8.5 cm in a 10 × 10 × 10-cm3 polymethylmethacrylate phantom. AAPM TG-61 protocol was applied to convert measured ionization into dose. Films were digitized using an Epson 1680 Professional flatbed scanner and analyzed using the net optical density (NOD) derived from the red channel. A dose-response curve was obtained at 35 keV for EBT film, and at 25, 30, and 35 keV for EBT2 and EBT3 films. Calibrations of films for 4 MV x-rays were obtained for comparison using a radiotherapy accelerator at Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center. Results: The sensitivity (NOD per unit dose) of EBT film at 35 keV relative to that for 4-MV x-rays was 0.73 and 0.76 for doses 50 and 100 cGy, respectively. The sensitivity of EBT2 film at 25, 30, and 35 keV relative to that for 4-MV x-rays varied from 1.09–1.07, 1.23–1.17, and 1.27–1.19 for doses 50–200 cGy, respectively. For EBT3 film the relative sensitivity was within 3% of unity for all three monochromatic x-ray beams. Conclusions: EBT and EBT2 film sensitivity showed strong energy dependence over an energy range of 25 keV–4 MV, although this dependence becomes weaker for larger doses. EBT3 film shows weak energy dependence, indicating that it would be a better dosimeter for kV x-ray beams where beam hardening effects can result in large changes in the effective energy.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.4767770</identifier><identifier>PMID: 23231291</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES ; Auger electron spectra ; AUGER ELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY ; BRACHYTHERAPY ; CALIBRATION ; Computed tomography ; Computerised tomographs ; computerised tomography ; COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY ; DEPTH DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS ; Devices sensitive to very short wavelength, e.g. x‐rays, gamma‐rays or corpuscular radiation ; diagnostic radiography ; Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation ; DOSEMETERS ; Dose‐volume analysis ; dosimeters ; DOSIMETRY ; EBT2 ; EBT3 ; ENERGY DEPENDENCE ; Equipment Design ; Equipment Failure Analysis ; Film Dosimetry - instrumentation ; Image scanners ; INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY ; Ionization ; IONIZATION CHAMBERS ; KEV RANGE 10-100 ; MONOCHROMATIC RADIATION ; monochromatic x‐rays ; NEOPLASMS ; PHANTOMS ; Photons ; Radiation Dosage ; RADIATION DOSES ; Radiation therapy ; radiochromic film ; Radiography ; Reproducibility of Results ; Ring currents ; SENSITIVITY ; Sensitivity and Specificity ; SYNCHROTRON RADIATION ; Synchrotrons ; Thin film structure ; Transforming x‐rays ; X RADIATION ; X-Rays ; X‐ and γ‐ray instruments ; X‐ray monochromators ; X‐ray optics ; X‐ray technique</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2012-12, Vol.39 (12), p.7412-7417</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2012 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><oa>free_for_read</oa><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5220-d970890f37b07c7f322d9f7c3ca5b065165c415c565a80c44e484b48ae668ec83</citedby><cites>FETCH-LOGICAL-c5220-d970890f37b07c7f322d9f7c3ca5b065165c415c565a80c44e484b48ae668ec83</cites></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.4767770$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.4767770$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23231291$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22097001$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Brown, Thomas A. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogstrom, Kenneth R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarez, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Kenneth L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ham, Kyungmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dugas, Joseph P.</creatorcontrib><title>Dose-response curve of EBT, EBT2, and EBT3 radiochromic films to synchrotron-produced monochromatic x-ray beams</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose: This work investigates the dose-response curves of GAFCHROMIC® EBT, EBT2, and EBT3 radiochromic films using synchrotron-produced monochromatic x-ray beams. EBT2 film is being utilized for dose verification in photoactivated Auger electron therapy at the Louisiana State University Center for Advanced Microstructures and Devices (CAMD) synchrotron facility. Methods: Monochromatic beams of 25, 30, and 35 keV were generated on the tomography beamline at CAMD. Ion chamber depth-dose measurements were used to determine the dose delivered to films irradiated at depths from 0.7 to 8.5 cm in a 10 × 10 × 10-cm3 polymethylmethacrylate phantom. AAPM TG-61 protocol was applied to convert measured ionization into dose. Films were digitized using an Epson 1680 Professional flatbed scanner and analyzed using the net optical density (NOD) derived from the red channel. A dose-response curve was obtained at 35 keV for EBT film, and at 25, 30, and 35 keV for EBT2 and EBT3 films. Calibrations of films for 4 MV x-rays were obtained for comparison using a radiotherapy accelerator at Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center. Results: The sensitivity (NOD per unit dose) of EBT film at 35 keV relative to that for 4-MV x-rays was 0.73 and 0.76 for doses 50 and 100 cGy, respectively. The sensitivity of EBT2 film at 25, 30, and 35 keV relative to that for 4-MV x-rays varied from 1.09–1.07, 1.23–1.17, and 1.27–1.19 for doses 50–200 cGy, respectively. For EBT3 film the relative sensitivity was within 3% of unity for all three monochromatic x-ray beams. Conclusions: EBT and EBT2 film sensitivity showed strong energy dependence over an energy range of 25 keV–4 MV, although this dependence becomes weaker for larger doses. EBT3 film shows weak energy dependence, indicating that it would be a better dosimeter for kV x-ray beams where beam hardening effects can result in large changes in the effective energy.</description><subject>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</subject><subject>Auger electron spectra</subject><subject>AUGER ELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY</subject><subject>BRACHYTHERAPY</subject><subject>CALIBRATION</subject><subject>Computed tomography</subject><subject>Computerised tomographs</subject><subject>computerised tomography</subject><subject>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</subject><subject>DEPTH DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS</subject><subject>Devices sensitive to very short wavelength, e.g. x‐rays, gamma‐rays or corpuscular radiation</subject><subject>diagnostic radiography</subject><subject>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</subject><subject>DOSEMETERS</subject><subject>Dose‐volume analysis</subject><subject>dosimeters</subject><subject>DOSIMETRY</subject><subject>EBT2</subject><subject>EBT3</subject><subject>ENERGY DEPENDENCE</subject><subject>Equipment Design</subject><subject>Equipment Failure Analysis</subject><subject>Film Dosimetry - instrumentation</subject><subject>Image scanners</subject><subject>INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY</subject><subject>Ionization</subject><subject>IONIZATION CHAMBERS</subject><subject>KEV RANGE 10-100</subject><subject>MONOCHROMATIC RADIATION</subject><subject>monochromatic x‐rays</subject><subject>NEOPLASMS</subject><subject>PHANTOMS</subject><subject>Photons</subject><subject>Radiation Dosage</subject><subject>RADIATION DOSES</subject><subject>Radiation therapy</subject><subject>radiochromic film</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>Reproducibility of Results</subject><subject>Ring currents</subject><subject>SENSITIVITY</subject><subject>Sensitivity and Specificity</subject><subject>SYNCHROTRON RADIATION</subject><subject>Synchrotrons</subject><subject>Thin film structure</subject><subject>Transforming x‐rays</subject><subject>X RADIATION</subject><subject>X-Rays</subject><subject>X‐ and γ‐ray instruments</subject><subject>X‐ray monochromators</subject><subject>X‐ray optics</subject><subject>X‐ray technique</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2012</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp90ctu1TAQBmALgeihsOAFkCU2gOoyvsXJEkq5SEWwKGvLmThqUGIf7KRw3h5HOSA2ZWNb1qd_7BlCnnI455zXr_m5MpUxBu6RnVBGMiWguU92AI1iQoE-IY9y_g4AldTwkJwIKSQXDd-R-C5mz5LP-xiyp7ikW09jTy_fXp-tizijLnTrSdLkuiHiTYrTgLQfxinTOdJ8COvdnGJg-xS7BX1Hpxg26eZif7HkDrT1bsqPyYPejdk_Oe6n5Nv7y-uLj-zqy4dPF2-uGGohgHWNgbqBXpoWDJpeCtE1vUGJTrdQaV5pVFyjrrSrAZXyqlatqp2vqtpjLU_J8y035nmwGYfZ4w3GEDzOtlQo-cCLerGp8vAfi8-znYaMfhxd8HHJlgtZlwaDloW-3CimmHPyvd2nYXLpYDnYdQqW2-MUin12jF3ayXd_5Z-2F8A28HMY_eHuJPv56zHw1ebXj5SWxvDf6nfi25j-Cd93vfwNabupSg</recordid><startdate>201212</startdate><enddate>201212</enddate><creator>Brown, Thomas A. D.</creator><creator>Hogstrom, Kenneth R.</creator><creator>Alvarez, Diane</creator><creator>Matthews, Kenneth L.</creator><creator>Ham, Kyungmin</creator><creator>Dugas, Joseph P.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>AAYXX</scope><scope>CITATION</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201212</creationdate><title>Dose-response curve of EBT, EBT2, and EBT3 radiochromic films to synchrotron-produced monochromatic x-ray beams</title><author>Brown, Thomas A. D. ; Hogstrom, Kenneth R. ; Alvarez, Diane ; Matthews, Kenneth L. ; Ham, Kyungmin ; Dugas, Joseph P.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c5220-d970890f37b07c7f322d9f7c3ca5b065165c415c565a80c44e484b48ae668ec83</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2012</creationdate><topic>60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES</topic><topic>Auger electron spectra</topic><topic>AUGER ELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY</topic><topic>BRACHYTHERAPY</topic><topic>CALIBRATION</topic><topic>Computed tomography</topic><topic>Computerised tomographs</topic><topic>computerised tomography</topic><topic>COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY</topic><topic>DEPTH DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS</topic><topic>Devices sensitive to very short wavelength, e.g. x‐rays, gamma‐rays or corpuscular radiation</topic><topic>diagnostic radiography</topic><topic>Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation</topic><topic>DOSEMETERS</topic><topic>Dose‐volume analysis</topic><topic>dosimeters</topic><topic>DOSIMETRY</topic><topic>EBT2</topic><topic>EBT3</topic><topic>ENERGY DEPENDENCE</topic><topic>Equipment Design</topic><topic>Equipment Failure Analysis</topic><topic>Film Dosimetry - instrumentation</topic><topic>Image scanners</topic><topic>INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY</topic><topic>Ionization</topic><topic>IONIZATION CHAMBERS</topic><topic>KEV RANGE 10-100</topic><topic>MONOCHROMATIC RADIATION</topic><topic>monochromatic x‐rays</topic><topic>NEOPLASMS</topic><topic>PHANTOMS</topic><topic>Photons</topic><topic>Radiation Dosage</topic><topic>RADIATION DOSES</topic><topic>Radiation therapy</topic><topic>radiochromic film</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>Reproducibility of Results</topic><topic>Ring currents</topic><topic>SENSITIVITY</topic><topic>Sensitivity and Specificity</topic><topic>SYNCHROTRON RADIATION</topic><topic>Synchrotrons</topic><topic>Thin film structure</topic><topic>Transforming x‐rays</topic><topic>X RADIATION</topic><topic>X-Rays</topic><topic>X‐ and γ‐ray instruments</topic><topic>X‐ray monochromators</topic><topic>X‐ray optics</topic><topic>X‐ray technique</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Brown, Thomas A. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Hogstrom, Kenneth R.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Alvarez, Diane</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Matthews, Kenneth L.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Ham, Kyungmin</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Dugas, Joseph P.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>CrossRef</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Brown, Thomas A. D.</au><au>Hogstrom, Kenneth R.</au><au>Alvarez, Diane</au><au>Matthews, Kenneth L.</au><au>Ham, Kyungmin</au><au>Dugas, Joseph P.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Dose-response curve of EBT, EBT2, and EBT3 radiochromic films to synchrotron-produced monochromatic x-ray beams</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2012-12</date><risdate>2012</risdate><volume>39</volume><issue>12</issue><spage>7412</spage><epage>7417</epage><pages>7412-7417</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose: This work investigates the dose-response curves of GAFCHROMIC® EBT, EBT2, and EBT3 radiochromic films using synchrotron-produced monochromatic x-ray beams. EBT2 film is being utilized for dose verification in photoactivated Auger electron therapy at the Louisiana State University Center for Advanced Microstructures and Devices (CAMD) synchrotron facility. Methods: Monochromatic beams of 25, 30, and 35 keV were generated on the tomography beamline at CAMD. Ion chamber depth-dose measurements were used to determine the dose delivered to films irradiated at depths from 0.7 to 8.5 cm in a 10 × 10 × 10-cm3 polymethylmethacrylate phantom. AAPM TG-61 protocol was applied to convert measured ionization into dose. Films were digitized using an Epson 1680 Professional flatbed scanner and analyzed using the net optical density (NOD) derived from the red channel. A dose-response curve was obtained at 35 keV for EBT film, and at 25, 30, and 35 keV for EBT2 and EBT3 films. Calibrations of films for 4 MV x-rays were obtained for comparison using a radiotherapy accelerator at Mary Bird Perkins Cancer Center. Results: The sensitivity (NOD per unit dose) of EBT film at 35 keV relative to that for 4-MV x-rays was 0.73 and 0.76 for doses 50 and 100 cGy, respectively. The sensitivity of EBT2 film at 25, 30, and 35 keV relative to that for 4-MV x-rays varied from 1.09–1.07, 1.23–1.17, and 1.27–1.19 for doses 50–200 cGy, respectively. For EBT3 film the relative sensitivity was within 3% of unity for all three monochromatic x-ray beams. Conclusions: EBT and EBT2 film sensitivity showed strong energy dependence over an energy range of 25 keV–4 MV, although this dependence becomes weaker for larger doses. EBT3 film shows weak energy dependence, indicating that it would be a better dosimeter for kV x-ray beams where beam hardening effects can result in large changes in the effective energy.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>23231291</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.4767770</doi><tpages>6</tpages><oa>free_for_read</oa></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2012-12, Vol.39 (12), p.7412-7417
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22097001
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects 60 APPLIED LIFE SCIENCES
Auger electron spectra
AUGER ELECTRON SPECTROSCOPY
BRACHYTHERAPY
CALIBRATION
Computed tomography
Computerised tomographs
computerised tomography
COMPUTERIZED TOMOGRAPHY
DEPTH DOSE DISTRIBUTIONS
Devices sensitive to very short wavelength, e.g. x‐rays, gamma‐rays or corpuscular radiation
diagnostic radiography
Dose-Response Relationship, Radiation
DOSEMETERS
Dose‐volume analysis
dosimeters
DOSIMETRY
EBT2
EBT3
ENERGY DEPENDENCE
Equipment Design
Equipment Failure Analysis
Film Dosimetry - instrumentation
Image scanners
INSTRUMENTATION RELATED TO NUCLEAR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Ionization
IONIZATION CHAMBERS
KEV RANGE 10-100
MONOCHROMATIC RADIATION
monochromatic x‐rays
NEOPLASMS
PHANTOMS
Photons
Radiation Dosage
RADIATION DOSES
Radiation therapy
radiochromic film
Radiography
Reproducibility of Results
Ring currents
SENSITIVITY
Sensitivity and Specificity
SYNCHROTRON RADIATION
Synchrotrons
Thin film structure
Transforming x‐rays
X RADIATION
X-Rays
X‐ and γ‐ray instruments
X‐ray monochromators
X‐ray optics
X‐ray technique
title Dose-response curve of EBT, EBT2, and EBT3 radiochromic films to synchrotron-produced monochromatic x-ray beams
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-01-29T01%3A39%3A33IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Dose-response%20curve%20of%20EBT,%20EBT2,%20and%20EBT3%20radiochromic%20films%20to%20synchrotron-produced%20monochromatic%20x-ray%20beams&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Brown,%20Thomas%20A.%20D.&rft.date=2012-12&rft.volume=39&rft.issue=12&rft.spage=7412&rft.epage=7417&rft.pages=7412-7417&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.4767770&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E1238118053%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=1238118053&rft_id=info:pmid/23231291&rfr_iscdi=true