Evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction algorithms using synchrotron radiation in standard geometry

Purpose: In this article, the image quality of reconstructed volumes by four algorithms for digital tomosynthesis, applied in the case of breast, is investigated using synchrotron radiation. Methods: An angular data set of 21 images of a complex phantom with heterogeneous tissue-mimicking background...

Ausführliche Beschreibung

Gespeichert in:
Bibliographische Detailangaben
Veröffentlicht in:Medical physics (Lancaster) 2010-04, Vol.37 (4), p.1893-1903
Hauptverfasser: Bliznakova, K., Kolitsi, Z., Speller, R. D., Horrocks, J. A., Tromba, G., Pallikarakis, N.
Format: Artikel
Sprache:eng
Schlagworte:
Online-Zugang:Volltext
Tags: Tag hinzufügen
Keine Tags, Fügen Sie den ersten Tag hinzu!
container_end_page 1903
container_issue 4
container_start_page 1893
container_title Medical physics (Lancaster)
container_volume 37
creator Bliznakova, K.
Kolitsi, Z.
Speller, R. D.
Horrocks, J. A.
Tromba, G.
Pallikarakis, N.
description Purpose: In this article, the image quality of reconstructed volumes by four algorithms for digital tomosynthesis, applied in the case of breast, is investigated using synchrotron radiation. Methods: An angular data set of 21 images of a complex phantom with heterogeneous tissue-mimicking background was obtained using the SYRMEP beamline at ELETTRA Synchrotron Light Laboratory, Trieste, Italy. The irradiated part was reconstructed using the multiple projection algorithm (MPA) and the filtered backprojection with ramp followed by hamming windows (FBR-RH) and filtered backprojection with ramp (FBP-R). Additionally, an algorithm for reducing the noise in reconstructed planes based on noise mask subtraction from the planes of the originally reconstructed volume using MPA (MPA-NM) has been further developed. The reconstruction techniques were evaluated in terms of calculations and comparison of the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and artifact spread function. Results: It was found that the MPA-NM resulted in higher CNR, comparable with the CNR of FBP-RH for high contrast details. Low contrast objects are well visualized and characterized by high CNR using the simple MPA and the MPA-NM. In addition, the image quality of the reconstructed features in terms of CNR and visual appearance as a function of the initial number of projection images and the reconstruction arc was carried out. Slices reconstructed with more input projection images result in less reconstruction artifacts and higher detail CNR, while those reconstructed from projection images acquired in reduced angular range causes pronounced streak artifacts. Conclusions: Of the reconstruction algorithms implemented, the MPA-NM and MPA are a good choice for detecting low contrast objects, while the FBP-RH, FBP-R, and MPA-NM provide high CNR and well outlined edges in case of microcalcifications.
doi_str_mv 10.1118/1.3371693
format Article
fullrecord <record><control><sourceid>proquest_osti_</sourceid><recordid>TN_cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22096677</recordid><sourceformat>XML</sourceformat><sourcesystem>PC</sourcesystem><sourcerecordid>733122949</sourcerecordid><originalsourceid>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3863-1e81586aac4f7504e91a3a5b0f7ddefd56d66ddeb4ce302daeb7d1ddfcc4ce693</originalsourceid><addsrcrecordid>eNp9kU1LxDAQhoMoun4c_AMS8CAI1aRJ0-1RxC9Q9KDnkCbT3UjbrEmq7L83a1fxoqcZZp55mXkHoUNKziil03N6xlhJRcU20CTnJct4TqpNNCGk4lnOSbGDdkN4JYQIVpBttJMTzllB6QQNV--qHVS0rseuwcbObFQtrj2oEHF0nQvLPs4h2IA9aNeH6Af9hat25ryN8y7gIdh-hhOp595Fn5peGTuq2h6HqHqjvMEzcB1Ev9xHW41qAxys4x56ub56vrzN7h9v7i4v7jPNpoJlFKa0mAqlNG_KgnCoqGKqqElTGgONKYQRImU118BIbhTUpaHGNFqnSvJjDx2Pui5EK4O2EfQ8HdGDjjJPJglRlok6GamFd28DhCg7GzS0rerBDUGWjNE8r_hK72hNDnUHRi687ZRfym8_E5CNwIdtYfnTp0SuHiWpXD9KPjytQuJPR36125dff8_8B787_0t8YRr2CVYHpGo</addsrcrecordid><sourcetype>Open Access Repository</sourcetype><iscdi>true</iscdi><recordtype>article</recordtype><pqid>733122949</pqid></control><display><type>article</type><title>Evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction algorithms using synchrotron radiation in standard geometry</title><source>MEDLINE</source><source>Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete</source><source>Alma/SFX Local Collection</source><creator>Bliznakova, K. ; Kolitsi, Z. ; Speller, R. D. ; Horrocks, J. A. ; Tromba, G. ; Pallikarakis, N.</creator><creatorcontrib>Bliznakova, K. ; Kolitsi, Z. ; Speller, R. D. ; Horrocks, J. A. ; Tromba, G. ; Pallikarakis, N.</creatorcontrib><description>Purpose: In this article, the image quality of reconstructed volumes by four algorithms for digital tomosynthesis, applied in the case of breast, is investigated using synchrotron radiation. Methods: An angular data set of 21 images of a complex phantom with heterogeneous tissue-mimicking background was obtained using the SYRMEP beamline at ELETTRA Synchrotron Light Laboratory, Trieste, Italy. The irradiated part was reconstructed using the multiple projection algorithm (MPA) and the filtered backprojection with ramp followed by hamming windows (FBR-RH) and filtered backprojection with ramp (FBP-R). Additionally, an algorithm for reducing the noise in reconstructed planes based on noise mask subtraction from the planes of the originally reconstructed volume using MPA (MPA-NM) has been further developed. The reconstruction techniques were evaluated in terms of calculations and comparison of the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and artifact spread function. Results: It was found that the MPA-NM resulted in higher CNR, comparable with the CNR of FBP-RH for high contrast details. Low contrast objects are well visualized and characterized by high CNR using the simple MPA and the MPA-NM. In addition, the image quality of the reconstructed features in terms of CNR and visual appearance as a function of the initial number of projection images and the reconstruction arc was carried out. Slices reconstructed with more input projection images result in less reconstruction artifacts and higher detail CNR, while those reconstructed from projection images acquired in reduced angular range causes pronounced streak artifacts. Conclusions: Of the reconstruction algorithms implemented, the MPA-NM and MPA are a good choice for detecting low contrast objects, while the FBP-RH, FBP-R, and MPA-NM provide high CNR and well outlined edges in case of microcalcifications.</description><identifier>ISSN: 0094-2405</identifier><identifier>EISSN: 2473-4209</identifier><identifier>DOI: 10.1118/1.3371693</identifier><identifier>PMID: 20443511</identifier><identifier>CODEN: MPHYA6</identifier><language>eng</language><publisher>United States: American Association of Physicists in Medicine</publisher><subject>ALGORITHMS ; BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY ; Breast - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - pathology ; Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy ; breast tomosynthesis ; Contrast Media - pharmacology ; diagnostic radiography ; Digital tomosynthesis mammography ; FBP reconstruction ; Female ; Film mammography ; Humans ; IMAGE PROCESSING ; Image Processing, Computer-Assisted ; image reconstruction ; Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods ; MAMMARY GLANDS ; Mammography ; Medical image artifacts ; Medical image contrast ; Medical image noise ; medical image processing ; Medical image quality ; Medical image reconstruction ; Medical imaging ; MPA ; NOISE ; noise reduction technique ; parallel beam ; PHANTOMS ; Phantoms, Imaging ; Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods ; Radiography ; RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE ; Reconstruction ; Software ; SYNCHROTRON RADIATION ; Synchrotrons ; Time Factors ; Tomography - methods</subject><ispartof>Medical physics (Lancaster), 2010-04, Vol.37 (4), p.1893-1903</ispartof><rights>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><rights>2010 American Association of Physicists in Medicine</rights><lds50>peer_reviewed</lds50><woscitedreferencessubscribed>false</woscitedreferencessubscribed><citedby>FETCH-LOGICAL-c3863-1e81586aac4f7504e91a3a5b0f7ddefd56d66ddeb4ce302daeb7d1ddfcc4ce693</citedby></display><links><openurl>$$Topenurl_article</openurl><openurlfulltext>$$Topenurlfull_article</openurlfulltext><thumbnail>$$Tsyndetics_thumb_exl</thumbnail><linktopdf>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1118%2F1.3371693$$EPDF$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktopdf><linktohtml>$$Uhttps://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/full/10.1118%2F1.3371693$$EHTML$$P50$$Gwiley$$H</linktohtml><link.rule.ids>230,314,776,780,881,1411,27901,27902,45550,45551</link.rule.ids><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20443511$$D View this record in MEDLINE/PubMed$$Hfree_for_read</backlink><backlink>$$Uhttps://www.osti.gov/biblio/22096677$$D View this record in Osti.gov$$Hfree_for_read</backlink></links><search><creatorcontrib>Bliznakova, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolitsi, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speller, R. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horrocks, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tromba, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pallikarakis, N.</creatorcontrib><title>Evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction algorithms using synchrotron radiation in standard geometry</title><title>Medical physics (Lancaster)</title><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><description>Purpose: In this article, the image quality of reconstructed volumes by four algorithms for digital tomosynthesis, applied in the case of breast, is investigated using synchrotron radiation. Methods: An angular data set of 21 images of a complex phantom with heterogeneous tissue-mimicking background was obtained using the SYRMEP beamline at ELETTRA Synchrotron Light Laboratory, Trieste, Italy. The irradiated part was reconstructed using the multiple projection algorithm (MPA) and the filtered backprojection with ramp followed by hamming windows (FBR-RH) and filtered backprojection with ramp (FBP-R). Additionally, an algorithm for reducing the noise in reconstructed planes based on noise mask subtraction from the planes of the originally reconstructed volume using MPA (MPA-NM) has been further developed. The reconstruction techniques were evaluated in terms of calculations and comparison of the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and artifact spread function. Results: It was found that the MPA-NM resulted in higher CNR, comparable with the CNR of FBP-RH for high contrast details. Low contrast objects are well visualized and characterized by high CNR using the simple MPA and the MPA-NM. In addition, the image quality of the reconstructed features in terms of CNR and visual appearance as a function of the initial number of projection images and the reconstruction arc was carried out. Slices reconstructed with more input projection images result in less reconstruction artifacts and higher detail CNR, while those reconstructed from projection images acquired in reduced angular range causes pronounced streak artifacts. Conclusions: Of the reconstruction algorithms implemented, the MPA-NM and MPA are a good choice for detecting low contrast objects, while the FBP-RH, FBP-R, and MPA-NM provide high CNR and well outlined edges in case of microcalcifications.</description><subject>ALGORITHMS</subject><subject>BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY</subject><subject>Breast - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</subject><subject>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</subject><subject>breast tomosynthesis</subject><subject>Contrast Media - pharmacology</subject><subject>diagnostic radiography</subject><subject>Digital tomosynthesis mammography</subject><subject>FBP reconstruction</subject><subject>Female</subject><subject>Film mammography</subject><subject>Humans</subject><subject>IMAGE PROCESSING</subject><subject>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</subject><subject>image reconstruction</subject><subject>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</subject><subject>MAMMARY GLANDS</subject><subject>Mammography</subject><subject>Medical image artifacts</subject><subject>Medical image contrast</subject><subject>Medical image noise</subject><subject>medical image processing</subject><subject>Medical image quality</subject><subject>Medical image reconstruction</subject><subject>Medical imaging</subject><subject>MPA</subject><subject>NOISE</subject><subject>noise reduction technique</subject><subject>parallel beam</subject><subject>PHANTOMS</subject><subject>Phantoms, Imaging</subject><subject>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</subject><subject>Radiography</subject><subject>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</subject><subject>Reconstruction</subject><subject>Software</subject><subject>SYNCHROTRON RADIATION</subject><subject>Synchrotrons</subject><subject>Time Factors</subject><subject>Tomography - methods</subject><issn>0094-2405</issn><issn>2473-4209</issn><fulltext>true</fulltext><rsrctype>article</rsrctype><creationdate>2010</creationdate><recordtype>article</recordtype><sourceid>EIF</sourceid><recordid>eNp9kU1LxDAQhoMoun4c_AMS8CAI1aRJ0-1RxC9Q9KDnkCbT3UjbrEmq7L83a1fxoqcZZp55mXkHoUNKziil03N6xlhJRcU20CTnJct4TqpNNCGk4lnOSbGDdkN4JYQIVpBttJMTzllB6QQNV--qHVS0rseuwcbObFQtrj2oEHF0nQvLPs4h2IA9aNeH6Af9hat25ryN8y7gIdh-hhOp595Fn5peGTuq2h6HqHqjvMEzcB1Ev9xHW41qAxys4x56ub56vrzN7h9v7i4v7jPNpoJlFKa0mAqlNG_KgnCoqGKqqElTGgONKYQRImU118BIbhTUpaHGNFqnSvJjDx2Pui5EK4O2EfQ8HdGDjjJPJglRlok6GamFd28DhCg7GzS0rerBDUGWjNE8r_hK72hNDnUHRi687ZRfym8_E5CNwIdtYfnTp0SuHiWpXD9KPjytQuJPR36125dff8_8B787_0t8YRr2CVYHpGo</recordid><startdate>201004</startdate><enddate>201004</enddate><creator>Bliznakova, K.</creator><creator>Kolitsi, Z.</creator><creator>Speller, R. D.</creator><creator>Horrocks, J. A.</creator><creator>Tromba, G.</creator><creator>Pallikarakis, N.</creator><general>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</general><scope>CGR</scope><scope>CUY</scope><scope>CVF</scope><scope>ECM</scope><scope>EIF</scope><scope>NPM</scope><scope>7X8</scope><scope>OTOTI</scope></search><sort><creationdate>201004</creationdate><title>Evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction algorithms using synchrotron radiation in standard geometry</title><author>Bliznakova, K. ; Kolitsi, Z. ; Speller, R. D. ; Horrocks, J. A. ; Tromba, G. ; Pallikarakis, N.</author></sort><facets><frbrtype>5</frbrtype><frbrgroupid>cdi_FETCH-LOGICAL-c3863-1e81586aac4f7504e91a3a5b0f7ddefd56d66ddeb4ce302daeb7d1ddfcc4ce693</frbrgroupid><rsrctype>articles</rsrctype><prefilter>articles</prefilter><language>eng</language><creationdate>2010</creationdate><topic>ALGORITHMS</topic><topic>BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY</topic><topic>Breast - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - pathology</topic><topic>Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy</topic><topic>breast tomosynthesis</topic><topic>Contrast Media - pharmacology</topic><topic>diagnostic radiography</topic><topic>Digital tomosynthesis mammography</topic><topic>FBP reconstruction</topic><topic>Female</topic><topic>Film mammography</topic><topic>Humans</topic><topic>IMAGE PROCESSING</topic><topic>Image Processing, Computer-Assisted</topic><topic>image reconstruction</topic><topic>Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods</topic><topic>MAMMARY GLANDS</topic><topic>Mammography</topic><topic>Medical image artifacts</topic><topic>Medical image contrast</topic><topic>Medical image noise</topic><topic>medical image processing</topic><topic>Medical image quality</topic><topic>Medical image reconstruction</topic><topic>Medical imaging</topic><topic>MPA</topic><topic>NOISE</topic><topic>noise reduction technique</topic><topic>parallel beam</topic><topic>PHANTOMS</topic><topic>Phantoms, Imaging</topic><topic>Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods</topic><topic>Radiography</topic><topic>RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE</topic><topic>Reconstruction</topic><topic>Software</topic><topic>SYNCHROTRON RADIATION</topic><topic>Synchrotrons</topic><topic>Time Factors</topic><topic>Tomography - methods</topic><toplevel>peer_reviewed</toplevel><toplevel>online_resources</toplevel><creatorcontrib>Bliznakova, K.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Kolitsi, Z.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Speller, R. D.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Horrocks, J. A.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Tromba, G.</creatorcontrib><creatorcontrib>Pallikarakis, N.</creatorcontrib><collection>Medline</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE (Ovid)</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>MEDLINE</collection><collection>PubMed</collection><collection>MEDLINE - Academic</collection><collection>OSTI.GOV</collection><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle></facets><delivery><delcategory>Remote Search Resource</delcategory><fulltext>fulltext</fulltext></delivery><addata><au>Bliznakova, K.</au><au>Kolitsi, Z.</au><au>Speller, R. D.</au><au>Horrocks, J. A.</au><au>Tromba, G.</au><au>Pallikarakis, N.</au><format>journal</format><genre>article</genre><ristype>JOUR</ristype><atitle>Evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction algorithms using synchrotron radiation in standard geometry</atitle><jtitle>Medical physics (Lancaster)</jtitle><addtitle>Med Phys</addtitle><date>2010-04</date><risdate>2010</risdate><volume>37</volume><issue>4</issue><spage>1893</spage><epage>1903</epage><pages>1893-1903</pages><issn>0094-2405</issn><eissn>2473-4209</eissn><coden>MPHYA6</coden><abstract>Purpose: In this article, the image quality of reconstructed volumes by four algorithms for digital tomosynthesis, applied in the case of breast, is investigated using synchrotron radiation. Methods: An angular data set of 21 images of a complex phantom with heterogeneous tissue-mimicking background was obtained using the SYRMEP beamline at ELETTRA Synchrotron Light Laboratory, Trieste, Italy. The irradiated part was reconstructed using the multiple projection algorithm (MPA) and the filtered backprojection with ramp followed by hamming windows (FBR-RH) and filtered backprojection with ramp (FBP-R). Additionally, an algorithm for reducing the noise in reconstructed planes based on noise mask subtraction from the planes of the originally reconstructed volume using MPA (MPA-NM) has been further developed. The reconstruction techniques were evaluated in terms of calculations and comparison of the contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) and artifact spread function. Results: It was found that the MPA-NM resulted in higher CNR, comparable with the CNR of FBP-RH for high contrast details. Low contrast objects are well visualized and characterized by high CNR using the simple MPA and the MPA-NM. In addition, the image quality of the reconstructed features in terms of CNR and visual appearance as a function of the initial number of projection images and the reconstruction arc was carried out. Slices reconstructed with more input projection images result in less reconstruction artifacts and higher detail CNR, while those reconstructed from projection images acquired in reduced angular range causes pronounced streak artifacts. Conclusions: Of the reconstruction algorithms implemented, the MPA-NM and MPA are a good choice for detecting low contrast objects, while the FBP-RH, FBP-R, and MPA-NM provide high CNR and well outlined edges in case of microcalcifications.</abstract><cop>United States</cop><pub>American Association of Physicists in Medicine</pub><pmid>20443511</pmid><doi>10.1118/1.3371693</doi><tpages>11</tpages></addata></record>
fulltext fulltext
identifier ISSN: 0094-2405
ispartof Medical physics (Lancaster), 2010-04, Vol.37 (4), p.1893-1903
issn 0094-2405
2473-4209
language eng
recordid cdi_osti_scitechconnect_22096677
source MEDLINE; Wiley Online Library Journals Frontfile Complete; Alma/SFX Local Collection
subjects ALGORITHMS
BIOMEDICAL RADIOGRAPHY
Breast - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - pathology
Breast Neoplasms - radiotherapy
breast tomosynthesis
Contrast Media - pharmacology
diagnostic radiography
Digital tomosynthesis mammography
FBP reconstruction
Female
Film mammography
Humans
IMAGE PROCESSING
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
image reconstruction
Imaging, Three-Dimensional - methods
MAMMARY GLANDS
Mammography
Medical image artifacts
Medical image contrast
Medical image noise
medical image processing
Medical image quality
Medical image reconstruction
Medical imaging
MPA
NOISE
noise reduction technique
parallel beam
PHANTOMS
Phantoms, Imaging
Radiographic Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted - methods
Radiography
RADIOLOGY AND NUCLEAR MEDICINE
Reconstruction
Software
SYNCHROTRON RADIATION
Synchrotrons
Time Factors
Tomography - methods
title Evaluation of digital breast tomosynthesis reconstruction algorithms using synchrotron radiation in standard geometry
url https://sfx.bib-bvb.de/sfx_tum?ctx_ver=Z39.88-2004&ctx_enc=info:ofi/enc:UTF-8&ctx_tim=2025-02-07T23%3A40%3A07IST&url_ver=Z39.88-2004&url_ctx_fmt=infofi/fmt:kev:mtx:ctx&rfr_id=info:sid/primo.exlibrisgroup.com:primo3-Article-proquest_osti_&rft_val_fmt=info:ofi/fmt:kev:mtx:journal&rft.genre=article&rft.atitle=Evaluation%20of%20digital%20breast%20tomosynthesis%20reconstruction%20algorithms%20using%20synchrotron%20radiation%20in%20standard%20geometry&rft.jtitle=Medical%20physics%20(Lancaster)&rft.au=Bliznakova,%20K.&rft.date=2010-04&rft.volume=37&rft.issue=4&rft.spage=1893&rft.epage=1903&rft.pages=1893-1903&rft.issn=0094-2405&rft.eissn=2473-4209&rft.coden=MPHYA6&rft_id=info:doi/10.1118/1.3371693&rft_dat=%3Cproquest_osti_%3E733122949%3C/proquest_osti_%3E%3Curl%3E%3C/url%3E&disable_directlink=true&sfx.directlink=off&sfx.report_link=0&rft_id=info:oai/&rft_pqid=733122949&rft_id=info:pmid/20443511&rfr_iscdi=true